I would just like to take the time out to say Eric Cantor is a world class ? .
Options
Idi Amin Dada
Members Posts: 3,192 ✭✭
Dude is in a class all himself. Just a ? ' ? in the truest meaning of the word.
Comments
-
Ok
*Forrest Gump Voice* -
House Republicans have struck a tone of cooperation with the White House on the issue of job creation in recent days. But Cantor, during his roughly 15-minute address, listed several components of the administration’s jobs plan that Republicans object to.
Cantor balked at the “stimulus spending” in the bill, asking the crowd, “Why would we want to go do something like that again?” He also criticized Obama’s plan to pay for the $447 billion package, which includes raising taxes on the high-income earners.
“Looking at the impact of his policies … what you see is a tax on the very people you expect and want to create jobs,” Cantor said.
Read more: http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0911/63398.html#ixzz1XvD3lFFI
Imo This President just doesn't get it -- them cats that create jobs have spoken, can you say NO new jobs were created last month.
I was speaking more on a personal level. This bitchmade ? ass ? saw me running for an elevator and let the ? door close.
Hoecake ass ? . ? him. -
C/s this thread
Cantor is so smug that it sickens me -
lol how many times must we discredit this "job creator platform" the repubs run behind
eh....either way, I love seeing these muhfuckas quiet as ? when we talk about job creations, cause their only job creating solution is to cut taxes
thats its. thats all. that's the entire plan. -
The blame game is over - this administrative and its failed policies are front and center. They continue to DO the same damn thing over and over again and again....THE BLAME game IS OVER....a real leader with REAL experience would know how to put Americans back to work...NO former community leader has that kind of experience....the private sector has spoken and this President REFUESES TO HEAR THEM. (waits for the cries of racism) & hate for this black man......playing the race card is getting OLD AND TIRESOME.
Cutting taxes solely doesn't work. Obama's plan isn't perfect, and no public policy is, but it is good. You can't discredit it as shortsighted. ? what the private sector says, since when is what's good for the private sector good for America? Alright, since forever, but the fact remains that his plan is better than the alternatives I've seen. The American people have spoken, and they support Obama's plan.
where the ? was the private sector republicans when everyone with sense was screaming for a tort reform amendment to the healthcare bill, huh? Where them ? was at then? -
they truly have no souls. thats the only way they say the ? that they do and do the ? that they do
-
the private sector was highly unregulated before 1930 howd that work out...hold on bush makes tax then voila another depression...corporations dont want to be held responsible yet they want and need the public to buy from them...they say that the environmental problems that they create should be paid for by taxes yet guess what they want to cut taxes...the rich arent hiring anybody with their money they are hoarding it
-
Here's another one for you Mister know it all......this man aka POTUS is totally incompetent.
http://www.debtfreebankruptcyattorney.com/2011/09/solyndra-filing-for-bankruptcy-has-left-egg-on-obama%E2%80%99s-face/
what does this prove? what are these regulatory laws which have been passed? should private sector not be concerned with keeping water and air clean or should the folks who live near coal and other factors just suffer the consequence of being poor? the rich have the least in taxes since they have paid since the 1950s its at about 30% in the bush sr clinton and regan eras it was around 35% we had a surplus then bush sr and regan both raised taxes but if obama does it he is incompetent gtfoh. GE and other corporations have hired tax attorney's to use loopholes in the law to paying least possible or no taxes at all. first operation of a company is to make profit yes but it must take in to consideration socioeconomic impact as well as environmental impact of its operation...money has been funneling from the bottom to the top trickle down economics sure hasn't worked 8 years of tax cuts and deregulation ended in recession, deregulation resulted in BP oil spill in the south...in order for the country to rise we need fair business practices which take environment and health of the citizens first otherwise in 50 years there will be no workforce and we will be a third world country free market left alone with no regulation won't work the country needs a balance of capitalism and socialist policies
its called a mixed economy with out labor unions there would be no minimum wage...some on the right believe that minimum wage is "unconstitutional"
We the People of the United States, in Order to form a more perfect Union, establish Justice, insure domestic Tranquility, provide for the common defence, promote the general Welfare, and secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity, do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America.
did they use the ? w word in the first sentence of the constitution general welfare of the citizens is unconstitutional damn it lol -
True, butbarney frank is a ? as well, taking the "sheval ready" money and giving it to his construction buddies for nothing in return (barney frank is suspect, and has construction buddies can you say village people?)
no tax raising. Lower the rates, broaden the base, and close the loop holes. That how you get the revenue. The dems just don't get it -
redhandedbandit wrote: »
did they use the ? w word in the first sentence of the constitution general welfare of the citizens is unconstitutional damn it lol
do you get your talking points from michale moore? Yawns -
heyslick, ur full of ? . U forgot the fact that the republicans and tea party are doing everything they can to make sure the first black president fails to get re-elected. Even if it destroys the economy they wont let him get ? done. If they took the stick out there ass, they could have created jobs
-
poindexter2 wrote: »True, butbarney frank is a ? as well, taking the "sheval ready" money and giving it to his construction buddies for nothing in return (barney frank is suspect, and has construction buddies can you say village people?)
no tax raising. Lower the rates, broaden the base, and close the loop holes. That how you get the revenue. The dems just don't get it
sounds easy run for president -
obamas jobs bill would cut payroll tax and give incentives for small business to hire...but its bad to repubs
-
calicing420 wrote: »heyslick, ur full of ? . U forgot the fact that the republicans and tea party are doing everything they can to make sure the first black president fails to get re-elected. Even if it destroys the economy they wont let him get ? done. If they took the stick out there ass, they could have created jobs
more talking points. What about tim scott, a black man, who passed legislation to block another one of this administrations regulations, so that his state south carolina can create 1000 jobs with boeing? If they blocked that then i would see your point -
redhandedbandit wrote: »obamas jobs bill would cut payroll tax and give incentives for small business to hire...but its bad to repubs
and to pay for it raise taxes, instead of cutting waste, and putting out a plan for social security reform, and entitlement reform -
redhandedbandit wrote: »sounds easy run for president
your sarcasm shows tht you have no alternatives to bring up for debate. You want to raise taxes -
Idi Amin Dada wrote: »Cutting taxes solely doesn't work. Obama's plan isn't perfect, and no public policy is, but it is good. You can't discredit it as shortsighted. ? what the private sector says, since when is what's good for the private sector good for America? Alright, since forever, but the fact remains that his plan is better than the alternatives I've seen. The American people have spoken, and they support Obama's plan.
where the ? was the private sector republicans when everyone with sense was screaming for a tort reform amendment to the healthcare bill, huh? Where them ? was at then?
I cosign this. I'm no fan of Obama but his plan is way better than anything Republicans have offered. Raising taxes on the rich will give us much needed revenue to not only pay off the debt but help create new jobs, as what happened during the Clinton administration. Republicans make me sick to my stomach. -
poindexter2 wrote: »and to pay for it raise taxes, instead of cutting waste, and putting out a plan for social security reform, and entitlement reform
Taxes were raised during the Clinton days and guess what? 21 million jobs were created. When will Republicans have the ? to admit they're wrong? Again, Obama spends too much money and I agree with that but when are we going to see a Republican job bill?? They've yet to send any job legislation forward since taking the House, I wonder why. -
if you knew anything about the government of DC, you would know that "exposing dishonesty" is NOT what they are in the business of doing.its over: 2012! wrote: »THE CITY of Washington D.C. has a Black population, which this week, decided to expose dishonesty-
i'm not going to say taxes on the rich shouldn't be raised. however:kingblaze84 wrote: »Raising taxes on the rich will give us much needed revenue to not only pay off the debt but help create new jobs, as what happened during the Clinton administration.
--it's not going help pay the debt off much if you pair it with more spending;
--Clinton also benefited from an excellent economy that was powered by a tech boom, not by raising taxes on the rich
which, again, is not to say you SHOULDN'T raise taxes on the rich (or let tax cuts expire or whatever) -
its funny to sit back and watch how u ? take this political ? more serious than actually politicians .....
-
did you even READ the article you posted? for starters, you've got a picture of DC's mayor, who's clearly part of DC's government. then we have:its over: 2012! wrote: »Here I wasn't really concerned about the govt of DC, so you might be right, as....
the citizens aka community leaders of DC, getting proactive regarding Obama's jobs plan, is what enticed me to link up that article.
--"District of Columbia officials" (sounds like the government)
--"D.C. Chamber of Commerce" (known for endorsing DC's current government)
--and again, "Mayor Vincent Gray"
look, i hope whatever they're cooking up works out, but the fact remains that i would not rely on the government of DC to do anything in line with "exposing dishonesty" -
i am pretty sure my post said "the government of DC." as in, not the federal government. also as in "the people being discussed in the article you posted."its over: 2012! wrote: »I thought you were taking a dig, at Capitol Hill...
okay, so you're really just responding to me after not reading what i posted, right?its over: 2012! wrote: »I also hope you find a way to lose some of the doubt you have for WashDC's nigg citizens, having success with this effort
my doubt is for the government of DC, which includes its mayor and its government officials, and probably extends to any businessmen with whom they have cozy relationships. you may not be aware of this, but Gray's administration is not looking squeaky clean currently. this doubt has nothing to do with the average citizens of DC, which is PROBABLY why i posted "if you knew anything about the government of DC, you would know that "exposing dishonesty" is NOT what they are in the business of doing": a statement that clearly refers to DC's government. -
kingblaze84 wrote: »Taxes were raised during the Clinton days and guess what? 21 million jobs were created. When will Republicans have the ? to admit they're wrong? Again, Obama spends too much money and I agree with that but when are we going to see a Republican job bill?? They've yet to send any job legislation forward since taking the House, I wonder why.
the government cant create jobs but create the conditions to get the private sector to invest in the economy. they have passed "jobs" bills. moratoriums on regulations, cut cap and balance. tim scott proposed a bill to stop the union association from blocking boeing from creating a factory in south carolina. eric holder is blocking at&t from repatriating money back to the us. why wont obama go look into the health care bill and get rid of the regulations that are causing the uncertainty in the economy. those bills are floating around in the senate. harry reid isn't doing anything, not even adding amendments to at least get some compromise
![[Deleted User]](https://w4.vanillicon.com/v2/4d5f18e60a0c14866b074c72ec2ab49d.svg)