Does the 'Hard on Hoes' movement prove black women to be right about black men?
Options
Comments
-
Yung_Souf_Money wrote: »we're not promoting the HOH movement for a negative cause ya dig,it's a way of life
And the truth shall make you free^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ -
Yung_Souf_Money wrote: »we're not promoting the HOH movement for a negative cause ya dig,it's a way of life
The main problem is ? like the T/S isn't hard enough on these hoes, and he got the game ? up!
Hard on Hoes™ 2010....It's a Movement -
Myayoni is bored wrote: »i miss fonsworth
I talk to the dude on occasion he got an on-line magazine poppin
As for the thread...when women can prove what these ? are saying is wrong then they can talk. Until then they can keep falling back on the "you bitter and you dont get no ? " excuses. -
TX_Made713 wrote: »hard on HOES not good women...note the word HOES...? these ? i swear i care about everything but these ?
Problem is, most of these dudes are so ? up in the head...they think every woman is a ? regardless of how good she is. HOH is dumb. Why do I need to point out the obvious? If she's a ? or an ain't ? woman, I'm better off getting the ? out of dodge as opposed to clowning and going out of my way to ? on her. Even worse, most of these dudes claiming they HOH either lack getting it in general or still ? with the hoes and get mad when the ? dogs them out. -
thread backfire somethin serious
-
dr. zero_ahh wrote: »Problem is, most of these dudes are so ? up in the head...they think every woman is a ? regardless of how good she is. HOH is dumb. Why do I need to point out the obvious? If she's a ? or an ain't ? woman, I'm better off getting the ? out of dodge as opposed to clowning and going out of my way to ? on her. Even worse, most of these dudes claiming they HOH either lack getting it in general or still ? with the hoes and get mad when the ? dogs them out.
? what? This ain't 1654 doggy. All women are hoes. Matter fact they come from a long line of hoes. It's 2010, ? done took the hoe game to monumental levels! smh @ this ? thinking there's such a thing as good girls anymore, you done fell for the hype mayne. -
? what? This ain't 1654 doggy. All women are hoes. Matter fact they come from a long line of hoes. It's 2010, ? done took the hoe game to monumental levels! smh @ this ? thinking there's such a thing as good girls anymore, you done fell for the hype mayne.
Since when were you under the impression that I fell for any hype? Just because I believe that good women exist, don't mean I'm out saving hoes and believing I can turn a ? into a housewife like some of you ? here. -
simping is the new ? !
-
i could see thinking such a way if you're dealing with hoes, but not all women. a stand up broad you wouldn't need to think that way. you treat people like they treat you. so i wouldn't knock a ? for having the HOH mentality, the only way he's gonna survive messing with such ? is if he's 2 steps ahead of her and the ? .
-
thetruth391 wrote: »thread backfire somethin serious
lmao im not surprised -
i could see thinking such a way if you're dealing with hoes, but not all women. a stand up broad you wouldn't need to think that way. you treat people like they treat you. so i wouldn't knock a ? for having the HOH mentality, the only way he's gonna survive messing with such ? is if he's 2 steps ahead of her and the ? .
Thats the reality of the situation. -
dr. zero_ahh wrote: »Problem is, most of these dudes are so ? up in the head...they think every woman is a ? regardless of how good she is. HOH is dumb. Why do I need to point out the obvious? If she's a ? or an ain't ? woman, I'm better off getting the ? out of dodge as opposed to clowning and going out of my way to ? on her. Even worse, most of these dudes claiming they HOH either lack getting it in general or still ? with the hoes and get mad when the ? dogs them out.
ladies its captain save em to the rescue!!!!!!!!!!!
-
TX_Made713 wrote: »ladies its captain save em to the rescue!!!!!!!!!!!
Thats cute and all but thats .. basically what it is... ? need to man up..and stop puttin "HOES" on a pedestal.. you ? the game up not the hoes you choose to deal with.. be hard on ya self -
playmaker88 wrote: »Thats cute and all but thats .. basically what it is... ? need to man up..and stop puttin "HOES" on a pedestal.. you ? the game up not the hoes you choose to deal with.. be hard on ya self
naw, ? need not to ? with hoes period
you ? the game up by defending these ? like they worth defending -
TX_Made713 wrote: »naw, ? need not to ? with hoes period
you ? the game up by defending these ? like they worth defending
Since when were you under the impression I was saving anyone? All I said was HOH in theory don't work because you can't be hard on hoes if you don't get any and what's the point of pointing out a ? ? Wouldn't a smart man...just avoid the ? altogether? But I guess when a person is inadequate, he seeks out the first person he can ? with just to feel good. That is pathetic. -
TX_Made713 wrote: »naw, ? need not to ? with hoes period
you ? the game up by defending these ? like they worth defending
I think u missed the point.. -
playmaker88 wrote: »I think u missed the point..
Nah, it's cool. I know that's what happens when you can't read beyond a third grade level. I never saw a point to go out of my way to point out a ? . I keep it moving and pay her no mind. -
Captain Save A Hoe wrote: »Since when were you under the impression I was saving anyone? I defend nothing; but it's asinine to think all women are hoes...period, point blank. But I forget where I'm posting; land of the hypocritical and ridiculous.
if you go back and read my post, you'd realize i said HOES not WOMEN. I never said all women are hoes...im speaking on the hoes only -
dr. zero_ahh wrote: »Nah, it's cool. I know that's what happens when you can't read beyond a third grade level. I never saw a point to go out of my way to point out a ? . I keep it moving and pay her no mind.TX_Made713 wrote: »hard on HOES not good women...note the word HOES...? these ? i swear i care about everything but these ?
I completely agree...
continue your quest to save america one hoe at a time
-
TX_Made713 wrote: »[/B]
if you go back and read my post, you'd realize i said HOES not WOMEN. I never said all women are hoes...im speaking on the hoes only
And if you read my post, I was explaining why SOME of you ? got the game ? up with this hard on hoes ? , but you just wanted to call someone a captain because of some perception I don't agree with your circle ? club? ? please. Zero don't love the hoes, but y'all do or else y'all wouldn't be ? with them the way you do. (Oh and before you catch even more feelings, you was general not YOU which was my response to the first post, NOT YOU. I quoted b/c I was lazy. Sue me.) -
That savem ? is wack.. you lame for it and it doesnt even apply but carry on..
-
TX_Made713 wrote: »naw, ? need not to ? with hoes period
you ? the game up by defending these ? like they worth defending
hoes been gettin ? since the dawn of man. you might as well ask the sky to rain every sunday. hoes have they place here just like everything else. male/female some folks just like to ? and not deal with a relationship. and in 2010 the ? is almost common place. what's important is these folks having they ? tight so they don't get caught up in nothing if they chose to roll like that. -
dr. zero_ahh wrote: »And if you read my post, I was explaining why SOME of you ? got the game ? up with this hard on hoes ? , but you just wanted to call someone a captain because of some perception I don't agree with your circle ? club? ? please. Zero don't love the hoes, but y'all do or else y'all wouldn't be ? with them the way you do. (Oh and before you catch even more feelings, you was general not YOU which was my response to the first post, NOT YOU. I quoted b/c I was lazy. Sue me.)
.looks like your the one catching feelings. i say ? these hoes....read my post belowdr. zero_ahh wrote: »Since when were you under the impression I was saving anyone? All I said was HOH in theory don't work because you can't be hard on hoes if you don't get any and what's the point of pointing out a ? ? Wouldn't a smart man...just avoid the ? altogether? But I guess when a person is inadequate, he seeks out the first person he can ? with just to feel good. That is pathetic.
thanks for stating the obvious...hoes dont always appear to be hoes at first.....some females disguise themselves as ladies which suckers us in -
TX_Made713 wrote: ».looks like your the one catching feelings. i say ? these hoes....read my post below
thanks for stating the obvious...hoes dont always appear to be hoes at first.....some females disguise themselves as ladies which suckers us in
And whose fault is that if you dumb enough to be sucked in?
You can't get mad @ a ? for being a ? . That's like being mad at fire for being hot. So if you know a ? = ? like fire = hot, why ? with it at all? That's ALL I'm saying dude. You ? and your quest to appear macho on a messageboard is sickening -
.....................
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=X69if5C3i9o