Remember when...
Options
kanggoodie
Members Posts: 3,354 ✭✭✭✭✭
GTA 3 was a PS2 exclusive? imagine if Sony woulda held on to that and made Grand Theft Auto a flagship Sony exclusive title? it would be no question then that Playstation would be the best system to have... i still think that PS2 > XBOX and 360 > PS3 tho....
Comments
-
? forget what Sony did for video games...
GTA3
MGS2
FFX
that was the golden years of the PS2 cycle...
then those ? wanted more money and went multiplat , 2/3companies lost their identities
I dont think Gears of War or Uncharted would have been as popular if they were multiplat
PS2> Xbox
PS3> Xbox 360... dont let sales fool you... Xbox is going the wii route and have one exclusive a year -
ps1 > ps3 > ps2 > xbox > 360
-
? forget what Sony did for video games...
GTA3
MGS2
FFX
that was the golden years of the PS2 cycle...
MGS2? ? you serious? If you said MGS3 then I could get behind that but MGS2?
smh. -
One Spliff wrote: »ps2> ps3 > ps1 > xbox < 360
fixed.... for you -
? forget what DMA Design (Rockstar North), Konami and Squaresoft did for video games...
GTA3
MGS2
FFX
fixed......... -
rofl PS3 is light years a head of the 360 and GTA had nothing to do with how great or how much the PS2 sold.GTA3 was also released on the Xbox.
It goes PS2>PS1>SNES>Genesis>NES>PS3>Dreamcast>N64>Atari 2600>GameCube>Saturn>>>Xbox>Xbox360>>>>>>>>>>>Wii
MS is the only company out of the major companies to NOT have a classic console. -
No playstation did mgs
Mgs2 was ? , doing cart wheels with a white sensitive ? while he's holding his genital with one hand I could do without in the franchise. -
while MGS3 is a better game, MGS2 had hype and impact... in 2001 those three games came out and thats when Sony "Dreamcast"ed Segavespesianus wrote: »MGS2? ? you serious? If you said MGS3 then I could get behind that but MGS2?
smh.fixed.........
no ? SONY... if it wasnt for PS1 we would still be playing Mario like games on consoles... Playstation brought gaming to mainstream with the help of Rockstar, Konami and Squaresoft....
GTA, MGS, and Final Fantasy would not be where they are today without Sony and vice versa -
rofl PS3 is light years a head of the 360 and GTA had nothing to do with how great or how much the PS2 sold.GTA3 was also released on the Xbox.
It goes PS2>PS1>SNES>Genesis>NES>PS3>Dreamcast>N64>Atari 2600>GameCube>Saturn>>>Xbox>Xbox360>>>>>>>>>>>Wii
MS is the only company out of the major companies to NOT have a classic console.
lmao @ dreamcast, atari, gamecube n saturn all being better than the xbox n 360...
how u figure ? -
It goes PS2>PS1>SNES>Genesis>NES>PS3>Dreamcast>N64>Atari 2600>GameCube>Saturn>>>Xbox>Xbox360>>>>>>>>>>>Wii.
lol @ thatno ? SONY... if it wasnt for PS1 we would still be playing Mario like games on consoles... Playstation brought gaming to mainstream with the help of Rockstar, Konami and Squaresoft....
GTA, MGS, and Final Fantasy would not be where they are today without Sony and vice versa
Um, it was Nintendo who TRULY brought gaming to the mainstream with NES and games like Mario in the 80s, home gaming at least. ? , they arguably saved the video game industry after the crash. And I dont give credit to Sony for MGS, GTA and Final Fantasy X ,which, by the way is great but isnt even ? with FFIIII(VI) on SNES. They just had gave them the platform to put these games on. If it wasnt them it wouldve been someone else eventually. I give credit to the developers who actually made the games, I guess thats just me though. -
One Spliff wrote: »lmao @ dreamcast, atari, gamecube n saturn all being better than the xbox n 360...
how u figure ?
for their respective generation.Atari was ground breaking.Dreamcast had better games and so did the Cube.The Saturn had some classic RPGs and better exclusives too.MS is ? in the video game industry and only gets by because of who they are.Face it if the Xbox was made by a no name or less popular company they would be out of the gaming industry.ROFL they can not even make decent version of Windows and the Zune and Windows phone are garbage. -
lol @ that
Um, it was Nintendo who TRULY brought gaming to the mainstream with NES and games like Mario in the 80s, home gaming at least. ? , they arguably saved the video game industry after the crash. And I dont give credit to Sony for MGS, GTA and Final Fantasy X ,which, by the way is great but isnt even ? with FFIIII(VI) on SNES. They just had gave them the platform to put these games on. If it wasnt them it wouldve been someone else eventually. I give credit to the developers who actually made the games, I guess thats just me though.
Nintendo saved gaming but Sony is the reason that it is what it is today. Microsoft is the reason that its merged it online with other media...This isnt a debate if one game is better than another because if FFVI is better than the PS1 games, why havent it done numbers like the PS1 games? Why is square only known for games after FFVII? If Sony wasnt here we would have kid games from Nintendo, and extra ? games from PC. Sega would have had Sony's spot but they cant market games like Sony so we wouldnt have had a GTA to be this popular. If it wasnt for Sony games like Heavy Rain would never had been developed... Its doesnt matter who the developers are, if you dont have a good marketing team behind you youre nothing. Think of it like Magic or Kobe with the Lakers... had they not have been on the Lakers they would have still put up the stats but they would not have been considered the GOATs if they were on a team like the Spurs... Put Tim Duncan on the Lakers he would be more popular than he is today... -
Halo changed changed FPS games tho
u cant deny that
Goldeneye changed FPS games for consoles... Halo brought it to mainstream and killed the RPG genre... -
Correction Microsoft brought PC games to mainstream... I would have never played Oblivion, Bioshock, and Fallout if it wasnt for PC going multiplat...
-
Halo changed changed FPS games tho
u cant deny that
Half-Life????
If anything Halo ruined the genre by turning into the generic repetitive multiplayer driven ? that it s today. I remember when FPS used to be great single player games that were actually creative before Halo.
FY to stoneface,Sony made MGS,GTA and FF house hold games.Nintendo could not even blow up FF or any third party franchise as evident today.Only there first party titles ever sold. Truth is no one has blew up more franchises than Sony.They blew up Resident Evil,Madden NBA2k,Rockband,DMC,Silent Hill,Tales and a list of other franchises.Sony created a market for the adult gamer.I would not even be playing games today if t was not for them.As for Ninty saving gaming,that is debatable because people wold have bought the Atari 5200 or Master System if there was no NES and Nintendo games would have just been third party or Atari would have bought them out.Mario was released on the Atari before the NES after all. -
for their respective generation.Atari was ground breaking.Dreamcast had better games and so did the Cube.The Saturn had some classic RPGs and better exclusives too.MS is ? in the video game industry and only gets by because of who they are.Face it if the Xbox was made by a no name or less popular company they would be out of the gaming industry.ROFL they can not even make decent version of Windows and the Zune and Windows phone are garbage.
i agree somewhat to an extent...
but if u rating consoles according to their respective generation...then how is the ps2 ahead of the ps1 ?...ps1 had more classics n groundbreaking titles. -
One Spliff wrote: »i agree somewhat to an extent...
but if u rating consoles according to their respective generation...then how is the ps2 ahead of the ps1 ?...ps1 had more classics n groundbreaking titles.
PS1 vs PS2 is debatable for me because my favorite game of all time is on the PS1 but PS2 has better games
PS1 more groundbreaking
PS2 more classics
PS2 started with Tekken Tag and ended with ? of War 2... you cant beat that -
64>>>>>PS1 tho
and Halo did change fps -
Nintendo saved gaming but Sony is the reason that it is what it is today. Microsoft is the reason that its merged it online with other media...This isnt a debate if one game is better than another because if FFVI is better than the PS1 games, why havent it done numbers like the PS1 games? Why is square only known for games after FFVII? If Sony wasnt here we would have kid games from Nintendo, and extra ? games from PC. Sega would have had Sony's spot but they cant market games like Sony so we wouldnt have had a GTA to be this popular. If it wasnt for Sony games like Heavy Rain would never had been developed... Its doesnt matter who the developers are, if you dont have a good marketing team behind you youre nothing. Think of it like Magic or Kobe with the Lakers... had they not have been on the Lakers they would have still put up the stats but they would not have been considered the GOATs if they were on a team like the Spurs... Put Tim Duncan on the Lakers he would be more popular than he is today...
LOL. Wow. Where does one begin?
- Sony had nothing to do with the development or the marketing of GTA IV. That's the publishers and game developers job, not the console manufactures.
- So, none of the Final Fantasy's before 7 mattered? LOL
- Sony is good at marketing now? LMAO
- "It doesnt matter who the developers are." SMH -
PS1 vs PS2 is debatable for me because my favorite game of all time is on the PS1 but PS2 has better games
PS1 more groundbreaking
PS2 more classics
PS2 started with Tekken Tag and ended with ? of War 2... you cant beat that
final fantasy 7
gran turismo
resident evil
metal gear solid
grand theft auto
these 5 games alone make ps1 goat console.
ps2 had the sequels for these respective titles, and many other very good games...but not on the same level. -
LOL. Wow. Where does one begin?
- Sony had nothing to do with the development or the marketing of GTA IV. That's the publishers and game developers job, not the console manufactures.
- So, none of the Final Fantasy's before 7 mattered? LOL
- Sony is good at marketing now? LMAO
- "It doesnt matter who the developers are." SMH
So GTA III would have been popular on the Dreamcast, Nintendo, or PC?
Youre telling me ? in the hood was playing final fantasy before 7?
If Virtual Fighter 5 was exclusive to PS and Tekken was to Sega ? would be playing VF5 ( i like tekken btw)
? is begging for a FFVII remake not VI... and Konami wont let Kojima make another game cept MGS... MGS was not he first Metal Gear...lol -
So GTA III would have been popular on the Dreamcast, Nintendo, or PC?
Youre telling me ? in the hood was playing final fantasy before 7?
If Virtual Fighter 5 was exclusive to PS and Tekken was to Sega ? would be playing VF5 ( i like tekken btw)
? is begging for a FFVII remake not VI... and Konami wont let Kojima make another game cept MGS... MGS was not he first Metal Gear...lol
its the first good Metal Gear Game tho -
One Spliff wrote: »final fantasy 7
gran turismo
resident evil
metal gear solid
grand theft auto
these 5 games alone make ps1 goat console.
ps2 had the sequels for these respective titles, and many other very good games...but not on the same level.
? of War
Ico/SotC
GTA III series ( even though i played GTA 2... it wasnt as popular as 3)
MGS3>MGS (but MGS had more impact)
Madden (espically when Vick was on the Cover)
Jak and Dexter
PS1 had quality but PS2 had quantity... PS1 had a lot of duds too if you remember... ? didnt start going up till the games you mentioned toke off -
ItzGravitation wrote: »its the first good Metal Gear Game tho
cant disagree with that... but MGS is Konamis cash cow... and thats off the success of the PS1 MGS
not the PC and Nintendo original Metal Gear -
? of War
Ico/SotC
GTA III series ( even though i played GTA 2... it wasnt as popular as 3)
MGS3>MGS (but MGS had more impact)
Madden (espically when Vick was on the Cover)
Jak and Dexter
PS1 had qualtiy but PS2 had quantity... PS1 had a lot of duds too if you remember... ? didnt start going up till FFVII toke off
true...
but ps1 had so many great games, i jus cant remember them all...cases wud ? , discs wud scratch, manuals wud tear, controllers wud smash and walls wud be punched...but it was goat console to me for all the memories.
n then u had the 'hacking' era...were u cud chip ya ps1 n cop games for 5er a pop...easily the best generation of gaming.
also games were HARD back then, cudnt jus beat a game in 4-5 hours...
most games for ps3 n 360 are made for beginners...with on screen direction at every turn.
*press X to jump*, then then *press square* to open door...
smh.
