Religious End Time prophecy is actually Reptilian End Game blueprint
Comments
-
Lost Scriptures: Books that Did Not Make It into the New Testament [Hardcover]
http://www.amazon.com/Lost-Scriptures-Books-that-Testament/dp/0195141822/ref=sr_1_1?s=books&ie=UTF8&qid=1323999950&sr=1-1
Book Description
Publication Date: October 2, 2003
We may think of the twenty-seven books of the New Testament as the only sacred writings of the early Christians, but this is not at all the case. Lost Scriptures offers an anthology of up-to-date and readable translations of many non-canonical writings from the first centuries after Christ--texts that have been for the most part lost or neglected for almost two millennia.
Here is an array of remarkably varied writings from early Christian groups whose visions of Jesus differ dramatically from our contemporary understanding. Readers will find Gospels supposedly authored by the apostle Philip, James the brother of Jesus, Mary Magdalen, and others. There are Acts originally ascribed to John and to Thecla, Paul's female companion; there are Epistles allegedly written by Paul to the Roman philosopher Seneca. And there is an apocalypse by Simon Peter that offers a guided tour of the afterlife, both the glorious ecstasies of the saints and the horrendous torments of the damned, and an Epistle by Titus, a companion of Paul, which argues page after page against sexual love, even within marriage, on the grounds that physical intimacy leads to damnation. In all, the anthology includes fifteen Gospels, five non-canonical Acts of the Apostles, thirteen Epistles, a number of Apocalypes and Secret Books, and several Canon lists. Ehrman has included a general introduction, plus brief introductions to each piece.
Lost Scriptures gives readers a vivid picture of the range of beliefs that battled each other in the first centuries of the Christian era. It is an essential resource for anyone interested in the Bible or the early Church.
About the Author
Bart D. Ehrman chairs the Department of Religious Studies at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill. An authority on the early Church and the life of Jesus, he has appeared on A&E, the History Channel, CNN, and other television and radio shows. He has taped several highly popular lecture series for the "Teaching Company" and is the author of The New Testament: A Historical Introduction to the Early Christian Writings (Third Edition, OUP, 2003) and Jesus, Apocalyptic Prophet of the New Millennium (OUP, 1999). -
btw according to the Nag Hammadi gospels Jesus/Yeshua came to earth as a messenger to reveal a Supreme Creator ? . In the Nag Hammadi scriptures they refer to the ? of the Old Testament as a Demiurge ? of this material world. There are many scholars that teach this and many books on this subject where u can research if u want but those scriptures are the MAIN source. Some even say the reason Jesus never even mentions the name "Yah" in the New Testament is because he was revealing the Supreme Creator to humanity... But don't take my word for it u can look all this stuff up for yourself. I'm just speaking on what those scriptures teach.
peace
The Gnostic Gospels of Jesus: The Definitive Collection of Mystical Gospels and Secret Books about Jesus of Nazareth [Hardcover]
http://www.amazon.com/Gnostic-Gospels-Jesus-Definitive-Collection/dp/006076208X/ref=pd_sim_b_6
Marvin Meyer is one of the foremost scholars on early Christianity and texts about Jesus outside the New Testament. He is Griset Professor of Bible and Christian Studies at Chapman University in Orange, California. Among his recent books are The Gospel of Judas, The Gnostic Gospels of Jesus, The Gospels of Mary, The Gospel of Thomas, and The Nag Hammadi Scriptures.
Assuming the arrogant pose of a solar deity, Yaldabaoth {demiurge} falsely believes himself to be the only ? in the entire cosmos. Thus, for Gnostics, the identification of Yaldabaoth with Jehovah of the Old Testament, a deity who suffers from this very complex of cosmic egotism, is a foregone conclusion, prefigured in the Sophianic origin myth.
Being blind, he cannot perceive the Pleroma (galactic core), nor does he recognize Sophia, the cosmic current that surged from the core and produced him in the first place.
"She cast him away from her radiance, so that no one among the immortal ones might see him... She joined a luminous cloud with him, and placed a throne in the middle of the cloud."
(Apoc John BG 38, 1-10)
The Apocryphon of John [found in the Gnostic Gospels] (II, 10, 24-25) describes how the Lord Archon "produced for himself cyclic worlds (orbiting bodies) from the luminous spark that still shines in the sky." Thus, he draws upon the vortex power of the central star, the newborn Sun, to organize the matter swirling in the proto-planetary disk.
Yaldabaoth originates nothing, however. He can only copy the model of the Pleroma, without even knowing that he does so:
And he was amazed by his own arrogance, for he seemed to beget material powers (exousiai, "authorities") out of his own solitary power, but after the patterns of the imperishable Aeons... And so there came to be a stereoma ("firmament") corresponding to the cyclic formations of the Pleroma. (II, 10, 26-28, and 12, 25)
Gnostic teachings constantly emphasize that the Archons are imitators who cannot produce anything original, yet they arrogantly claim they can.
The Lord Archon is called antimimon pneuma, "counterfeit spirit." (Apoc John III, 36:17. The term occurs several times in different texts.) The cosmos he produces is described by the Coptic term hal, "simulation." The vast planetary system of the Archons is a stereoma, a virtual reality projection in simulation of a higher dimensional pattern.
THIS ? IS TO EASY NOW, in the words of E-40 " which way should I steer ah"
How about i start with this JUDAH7 why dont you tell us about your post you deleted? Is is because your rabid ass mind is confused? In the post you deleted did you stated something like this "you have some concern about the greek influence of the Nag Hammadi" now you back again with this ? . Damn get a grip of yourself.
Now here is the Reason why Yah and Yahushua name was blotted out it's because they dont want us to remember our Fathers name, they tried to erase our father name out of our minds and soul because they know how powerful and mighty our father is, and they know when we call on our father as a people he will answer us.
Why you think that those sit in Moses seat told us that our father name is to holy to mention and dont say his name, those same very people was the ones that killed the messiyah and from the serpent seed maybe if you study your lessons you would of knew that.
And the same reason why Yah name was taking out the bible, and the Hebrews always had the name of YAH. -
waterproof wrote: »THIS ? IS TO EASY NOW, in the words of E-40 " which way should I steer ah"
How about i start with this JUDAH7 why dont you tell us about your post you deleted? Is is because your rabid ass mind is confused? In the post you deleted did you stated something like this "you have some concern about the greek influence of the Nag Hammadi" now you back again with this ? . Damn get a grip of yourself.
Now here is the Reason why Yah and Yahushua name was blotted out it's because they dont want us to remember our Fathers name, they tried to erase our father name out of our minds and soul because they know how powerful and mighty our father is, and they know when we call on our father as a people he will answer us.
Why you think that those sit in Moses seat told us that our father name is to holy to mention and dont say his name, those same very people was the ones that killed the messiyah and from the serpent seed maybe if you study your lessons you would of knew that.
And the same reason why Yah name was taking out the bible, and the Hebrews always had the name of YAH.
but then the new testament also was written in greek like these scriptures and research shows most of these scriptures were left out the new testament. at the council of nicea the romans SELECTED certain scriptures to include in the CANON and left others out.
