No Homos In My Comics Please
Options
Maximus Rex
Members Posts: 6,354 ✭✭✭✭✭
It may have started before then but before me, it started innocently enough in with Superman #15. Then Captain Maggie Sawyer of Metropolis Special Crimes Unit. Captain Sawyer's daughter had came up missing and she had enlisted the help of Supes to find her kid. Later in the story we learn that Maggie lost custody of her daughter because she was a ? .
The beauty of this story is that Bryne never uses the word "lesbian," in the story. It's all insinuated. He leaves hints and hope your smart enough to figure it out. Later, in Superman Annual # 2 Inspector Dan Turpin admits to his feelings to himself about Captain Sawyer. He pops up unannounced at her apartment with flowers in hand. Captain Sawyer not realizing Turpin is there refers to her lover as "babe." These are all the instances of homosexuality I have in the about 200 issues of Superman I have. Captain Sawyer is usually shown in her capacity as head of the S.C.U.
Unfortunately this is changing. Slowly but surely Both Marvel and DC are introducing more and more ? and ? characters. Eventually there will be a ? or ? in every title the companies put out. Just like it's mandatory on a MTV reality series there's at least on ? in the cast.
I've been a fanboy since I was 13. Comics are a very big part of my life. Due to budgetary constraints I forced to leave the hobby I loved for many years. Now that I'm back I'm not liking what I'm seeing. A major change in direction for Superman and DC for that matter, and the use of "death," gimmicks to sale books among others.
But the ? thing is ? because there's clearly an agenda being put forth. Like most of the media it's clear that the writers are left leaning and have ? or ? relatives or friends, or are themselves ? suckers and butt wranglers. They see sucking ? and ? licking as normal behavior.
I find homosexuality repulsive and disgusting as I do lesbianism. Of course I have that typical hypocritical view of female bisexuality buts another issue. Why are the writers and editors arrogant enough to believe that just because they my like sucking ? , that me the reader wants to read how Batwoman wants to have a threeway with Power Girl and Wonder Woman or how in Ultimate X-Men The Beast wants Logan to give him a prostate exam. ? and ? aren't apart of life and I definitely don't want them to be a part of my comics.
Why should this sexual behavior be on display as opposed to a character that has a penchant for exhibitionism, masochism, or ? . Why are writers trying to normalize homosexuality?
And this is the really ? up part about it. It's cool to have ? and ? characters running around but where's the conservative right wing Christian, Libertarian or traditional values character? These characters are noticeably absent. To add insult to injury Joe Quesada, Marvel's editor-in-chief banned smoking but allows ? ass characters in his books. Why is one lifestyle choice acceptable, but the other isn't?
Edit/Delete Message
The beauty of this story is that Bryne never uses the word "lesbian," in the story. It's all insinuated. He leaves hints and hope your smart enough to figure it out. Later, in Superman Annual # 2 Inspector Dan Turpin admits to his feelings to himself about Captain Sawyer. He pops up unannounced at her apartment with flowers in hand. Captain Sawyer not realizing Turpin is there refers to her lover as "babe." These are all the instances of homosexuality I have in the about 200 issues of Superman I have. Captain Sawyer is usually shown in her capacity as head of the S.C.U.
Unfortunately this is changing. Slowly but surely Both Marvel and DC are introducing more and more ? and ? characters. Eventually there will be a ? or ? in every title the companies put out. Just like it's mandatory on a MTV reality series there's at least on ? in the cast.
I've been a fanboy since I was 13. Comics are a very big part of my life. Due to budgetary constraints I forced to leave the hobby I loved for many years. Now that I'm back I'm not liking what I'm seeing. A major change in direction for Superman and DC for that matter, and the use of "death," gimmicks to sale books among others.
But the ? thing is ? because there's clearly an agenda being put forth. Like most of the media it's clear that the writers are left leaning and have ? or ? relatives or friends, or are themselves ? suckers and butt wranglers. They see sucking ? and ? licking as normal behavior.
I find homosexuality repulsive and disgusting as I do lesbianism. Of course I have that typical hypocritical view of female bisexuality buts another issue. Why are the writers and editors arrogant enough to believe that just because they my like sucking ? , that me the reader wants to read how Batwoman wants to have a threeway with Power Girl and Wonder Woman or how in Ultimate X-Men The Beast wants Logan to give him a prostate exam. ? and ? aren't apart of life and I definitely don't want them to be a part of my comics.
Why should this sexual behavior be on display as opposed to a character that has a penchant for exhibitionism, masochism, or ? . Why are writers trying to normalize homosexuality?
And this is the really ? up part about it. It's cool to have ? and ? characters running around but where's the conservative right wing Christian, Libertarian or traditional values character? These characters are noticeably absent. To add insult to injury Joe Quesada, Marvel's editor-in-chief banned smoking but allows ? ass characters in his books. Why is one lifestyle choice acceptable, but the other isn't?
Edit/Delete Message
Comments
-
the comics are only being realistic
-
ItzGravitation wrote: »the comics are only being realistic
shaddup ? mary. -
earth two superman wrote: »shaddup ? mary.
thats rude and hurtful dude. -
So there shouldn't be any homosexuals in the comics why exactly? I'm sure it's not showin' ? ? in the comic, so why are you upset that comics are beginning to better reflect the society we live in? If you had it your way there wouldn't be any blacks in the comics because that's too "risqué" for your tastes. Smh.
-
Yes they are. There was an issue of X-Force were Rictor was tonguing down Shatterstar. I don't need to see that ? . As far a "better reflection of society," that's ? . Again showing people in comics with a particular sexual proclivity isn't a reflection of society. Some people like to ? young boys. Some people like to ? three and four people at the same time. Some folks like to get ? on. According to you, these people should be included in comics because it's a reflection of our society.
Also where's the balance? It's cool to have all of these ? a nd ? in comicdom, but where's the traditional or conservative character? Where's the character that's down with the Tea Party. And answer me this, why Joe Quesada think it's cool to have ? ass characters, but smoking is banned in all Marvel books. Why is one life style choice cool, but the other isn't. As far as Blacks, you can't compare race to people's sexual practices. -
Maximus Rex wrote: »Yes they are. There was an issue of X-Force were Rictor was tonguing down Shatterstar. I don't need to see that ? . As far a "better reflection of society," that's ? . Again showing people in comics with a particular sexual proclivity isn't a reflection of society. Some people like to ? young boys. Some people like to ? three and four people at the same time. Some folks like to get ? on. According to you, these people should be included in comics because it's a reflection of our society.
Also where's the balance? It's cool to have all of these ? a nd ? in comicdom, but where's the traditional or conservative character? Where's the character that's down with the Tea Party. And answer me this, why Joe Quesada think it's cool to have ? ass characters, but smoking is banned in all Marvel books. Why is one life style choice cool, but the other isn't. As far as Blacks, you can't compare race to people's sexual practices.
I can guarantee you you look hard enough, youll find characters like that in SOME comic out there.
And like I said b4 thatdamngay deleted my post
Hawkman
Iron Man
Superman
Lois Lane
Wildcat
Wolverine
and many more have shown conservative values at some point. Even Lex Luthor becoming president was modeled after Bush's 2000 election. Down with the tea party? who the hell is gonna wanna be down with a group that isnt even sure what theyre rallying against? Nothing about them screams out heroic, so why would any hero be modeled after them? Besides theyre a very young movement. They showed up in a captain america comic but they were portrayed as angry, confused and boderline racist which isnt much of a strecth really.
If you honestly are looking for republican values in your entertainment, I suggest you try something different than comics and graphic novels. 95% of the time, its gonna be a very liberal medium. hell the biggest comic book character of all time is himself an immigrant. -
Tha Killer wrote: »So there shouldn't be any homosexuals in the comics why exactly? I'm sure it's not showin' ? ? in the comic, so why are you upset that comics are beginning to better reflect the society we live in? If you had it your way there wouldn't be any blacks in the comics because that's too "risqué" for your tastes. Smh.
So now you're comparing being black to being a ? ? -
guess threadstarter isn't a Alpha Flight fan
-
So now you're comparing being black to being a ? ?
minority group? check
hated by the majority? check
yeah i'd say its about the same ? as far as representation -
[IMG]http://www.myconfinedspace.com/wp-content/uploads/2006/11/? -blackmen.jpg[/IMG]
...................... -
smh@every male in here defending the ?
-
By homos you mean ? ? That's just a feeling.
-
Smh at wolverine's son being a ? out of all ? they had to make his son the ?
-
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/05/21/dc-comics-? -superhero-i_n_1533105.html
The ? subtext of comic book superheroes has been a hot topic in the ? community for some time. Now comics fans and the lesbian, ? , bisexual and transgender (LGBT) blogosphere is abuzz with news that a major DC Comics character will "come out" in a future issue.
Details of the character and his specific story arc are relatively scarce thus far, but as Bleeding Cool is reporting, DC Comics co-publisher Dan DiDio told attendees at the Kapow Comic Convention in London that the superhero -- an established player in one of the series, and was originally introduced as straight -- will become "one of our most prominent ? characters."
DC Comics has produced some of the comic book world's most iconic superheroes, including Superman, Wonder Woman and others. Senior Vice President Bob Wayne compared his company's policy on ? characters to that of President Obama in that it "has evolved."
DiDio previously hinted at the introduction of a ? character last year in an interview with The Advocate. "What we really wanted to do was show the diversity of our audience across the line of our books," he said at the time. "Right now we have such a wide fan base and we wanted to create characters and stories that really reflected [that] fan base."
As a fanboy this really saddens me that two entities that have provided me with so much joy andn entertainment for 27 years have to stoop to such a ? up level to sell books. ? disguesting. This obvious pandering to such a small segment to the fandom is beyond ? up and is another piece of evidence that homos are invading and spreading there pernicious influence like a cancer. Homos in comics need to be ? banned, NOW!
More than likely DC is going to make Diana a ? for obvious reasons. Even though it's logical and makes the most sense, Rex cannot and most importantly WILL NOT support this movement. It's ? up, because if it is Diana, I have to think long and hard on whether or not I'll buy her book. -
SMH why use a current character...why not just create a new character...
-
Then Again im not surprised DC is doing it... if you been up on the New 52 usually the last page has updates of whats been going on up in the DC offices...and they proudly touted a outright ? and Lesbian High School for ? , ? , Bi, Tran Students located in NYC recent visit to the DC offices.
-
t/s said "where's the comic book character that supports the Tea Party" lmfao ? outta here with that wack ?
this ? wanna see Captain Confederacy punch out Obama's lights and fight an abortion doctor supervillain.
whoever DC makes ? , I hope its Rex's favorite character (look I'll say it again, Wonder Woman is and always has been a corny ass superhero) -
if i buy a comic book and it has 2 ? kissing, thats the last time i'm buying that ? .
I cant do nothing about a character being ? , its whatever, but if they gonna ? up jimmy olsen and have him and perry making out, then i prolly wouldnt read superman or that writers ? again. -
A bunch of men running around in tights is already pretty ?
-
I guess you don't like Batwoman huh? if you don't like it, don't buy it. no writer stays on a book forever like they did back in the day, and most characters have two or three books that is written by a different writer that won't have the same stuff in it.
-
Swiffness! wrote: »t/s said "where's the comic book character that supports the Tea Party" lmfao ? outta here with that wack ?
this ? wanna see Captain Confederacy punch out Obama's lights and fight an abortion doctor supervillain.
whoever DC makes ? , I hope its Rex's favorite character (look I'll say it again, Wonder Woman is and always has been a corny ass superhero)
So you would rather see this ? ass fuckery, as opposed to a differing political opinion or religious view.
Rictor kissing Shatterstar
[img]http://images.? .com/media/apimages/ap-image-eff0c593-4fe4-4bfc-b610-dda276d9750c.jpg[/img]
Northstar's ? ass getting married.
Archie promoting butt wrangling
So you're telling me you would rather read books with this fuckery as opposed to reading something that has characters with a differing political point of view or religious philosophy. What kind of ? is this? I have a nephew and when I have kids, I hope they inheirt my love and passion of comics. I don't want to have to worry about them getting unneccessary exposure to fagdom via the medium I hold so dear. They and myself are already getting bombarded with ? and ? and every other facet of life.
Also it's equally disturbing that Archie is co-signing this ? . We all know who the target demo of Archie books is and the publishers of Archie comics are trying to indoctrinate your kids into thinking ? sucking and ? eating is okay. What's next? ? , ? , ? , and sadomasochis, pederasty, pedhophilia? It's a slippery slope people.
-
So going back to your original ? point. I would gladly read this book:
Before I read some ? ass ? .
I can't believe that ? are on here promoting male dicking sucking and female ? licking superheros.
And Diana is a cool character. It depends on who's writing her. That post- Crisis ? George Perez did in the 80's was the ? . -
maximus rex is the black rick ? . he thinks more about ? sex than actual ?
lmao this guy said ? disgust him too
trollolololol -
^ now thats what im talking bout ^
-
earth two superman wrote: »lmao this guy said ? disgust him too
trollolololol
If dykin' only involved chicks that like this:
Dkyin would be a cool movement; however, I still wouldn't want it in my comics. What purpose would it serve.
This is the reality of dykin:
New York City Council Speaker Christine Quinn
[img]http://1.bp.blogspot.com/-B3jOayU4vmY/TZo5aQU2NYI/AAAAAAAAAA0/s8H_zpAvQ_M/s1600/3371_law_support_? _and_lesbian_couples-300x201.jpg[/img]
[img][/img]
If y'all are aroused at the thought of any these chicks licking ? , sleeping in the bed naked, and ? each other with a ? , it's you with the problem and not me.
