ESPN's NBA Pre-Season Power Rankings
Options
Cigarello Slim
Members Posts: 2,642 ✭✭✭✭✭
Provided by Marc Stein.. Let the B.S. commence..
espn.go.com/nba/powerrankings
2012-13 Power Rankings: Training Camp
1 Miami
2 Los Angeles (Lakers)
3 Oklahoma City
4 San Antonio
5 Los Angeles (Clippers)
6 Boston
7 Philadelphia
8 Indiana
9 Denver
10 Dallas
11 Memphis
12 Brooklyn
13 New York
14 Minnesota
15 Chicago
16 Utah
17 Golden State
18 Atlanta
19 Milwaukee
20 New Orleans
21 Portland
22 Washington
23 Toronto
24 Phoenix
25 Detroit
26 Houston
27 Orlando
28 Cleveland
29 Sacramento
30 Charlotte
espn.go.com/nba/powerrankings
2012-13 Power Rankings: Training Camp
1 Miami
2 Los Angeles (Lakers)
3 Oklahoma City
4 San Antonio
5 Los Angeles (Clippers)
6 Boston
7 Philadelphia
8 Indiana
9 Denver
10 Dallas
11 Memphis
12 Brooklyn
13 New York
14 Minnesota
15 Chicago
16 Utah
17 Golden State
18 Atlanta
19 Milwaukee
20 New Orleans
21 Portland
22 Washington
23 Toronto
24 Phoenix
25 Detroit
26 Houston
27 Orlando
28 Cleveland
29 Sacramento
30 Charlotte
Comments
-
WOW at Chicago's drop...
-
Bulls was expected to drop since Rose wont be playing. Im surprised that Portland is that low
-
Minnesota is on the come up but I wish they would've kept Beasley. At the same time he wasn't much of a SF, Love is definitely the 4 there and you don't want to move Love to center the way Pekovic has improved. They probably want to give Derrick Williams more minutes as well.
-
Indiana pacers is too high
-
my squad at number 14, #T-Wolf Gang
-
I think Cleveland will be higher,Kyrie Irving got a couple more pieces around him
-
brooklyn>>>>
-
In b4
*OKC should be number 2* -
Bobcats are to low
-
Lakers will win the ship so rankings dont matter
-
List is wack, this list is based purely on paper and past success. With that said Knicks>>>>>Brooklyn, Memphis, Dallas, Indy, Philly. The bucks will be a sleeper team prob take the 7th or 8th slot if Jennings doesn't catch Larry Holmes. Sacramento will have a better record than the 6 teams ahead of them
-
i hope dis aint serious lol them ? won 7 games last year nd barely made moves to improve. MKG aint a miracle worker after dat putrid season last year they're lucky to be considered a NBA teamBobcats are to low
-
dixinormus wrote: »List is wack, this list is based purely on paper and past success. With that said Knicks>>>>>Brooklyn, Memphis, Dallas, Indy, Philly. The bucks will be a sleeper team prob take the 7th or 8th slot if Jennings doesn't catch Larry Holmes. Sacramento will have a better record than the 6 teams ahead of them
Lol @ Brandon Jennings catching LHD
C/S Sacromento should be much higher.
-
I laugh. Philly's at #7.
Got damn. Bynum THAT good? -
Philly too high an lol @ where houston is.
Thats what happens when you spend big money on lin and omer asik -
Only reason Milwaukee will make the playoffs is because there are so many weak teams in the east, Washington, Orlando, Charlotte, Atlanta, Detroit, Toronto and probably Cleveland are all garbage, I can only see Cleveland surprising some people and before injuries Washington looked like they might be able to make a run, but Ellis and Jennings will be worse than Curry and Ellis, its not going to work
-
Boston should be 4th right now
-
Bobcats too high on the list.
-
My Rockets should be #29, b.
Not gonna lie.
Only team we're better than right now is Charlotte. -
Go lakers...of course bk n ny are 12 and 13
-
-
^I wouldn't say the most easiest trolled but top 5
-
Alpha Outlaw wrote: »Philly too high an lol @ where houston is.
Thats what happens when you spend big money on lin and omer asik
Lol @ 8 million dollars a year being big money. If you have enough to sign two max free agents you didn't spend big money.... The bulls and knicks would've matched if we didn't drop that poison pill ? yet we still only paying 8 mil a year. Would they have been bad signings then? -
? those Rankings.
-
lol @ the bulls
and knicks should be higher than the nets, thats disrespect
