Rewriting Evolution ~ Darwin was wrong
Comments
-
The law of creation is the law of cycles which says that the end point is the same as the beginning point. We came from '? ' not a single cell organism and the universe was not born from a chaotic mass that atheist describe as 'nothing'.
-
They're probably creationist scientist.
WHo cares about them??
They believe that the Grand Canyon was because of the Flood. -
This isn't a intelligent conversation.
It's ID-iots supporter trying to his/her hardest trying to disprove something that's a fact.
We all share a common ancestor which happened to be a Black Woman.
And Change over time does occur.
Darwin was wrong about a lot of things.
But about Natural selection he wasn't wrong.
everything about evolution is a theory... or did you forget that part.
you do know that gravity is "just a theory" right. why don't you jump off the empire state building since it's just a theory
this is supposed to be t/s compelling/intelligent argument?
evolution is a very simple and very real process of life. it also doesn't require your belief in order to exist, facts are kinda wonderful that way
@kai......
Please do not confuse my argument with that of anyone else.......
-
For example: Humans observe that hotter water sometimes freezes faster than colder water; then someone says that they think it happens due to convection. -
This isn't a intelligent conversation.
It's ID-iots supporter trying to his/her hardest trying to disprove something that's a fact.
We all share a common ancestor which happened to be a Black Woman.
And Change over time does occur.
Darwin was wrong about a lot of things.
But about Natural selection he wasn't wrong.
everything about evolution is a theory... or did you forget that part.
you do know that gravity is "just a theory" right. why don't you jump off the empire state building since it's just a theory
this is supposed to be t/s compelling/intelligent argument?
evolution is a very simple and very real process of life. it also doesn't require your belief in order to exist, facts are kinda wonderful that way
but this has nothing to do with gravity. its about mankind and where we came from.
slight difference.
-
They're probably creationist scientist.
WHo cares about them??
They believe that the Grand Canyon was because of the Flood.
Yeah these guys are all creationists.....
Please watch.... only 2 mins.....
http://youtu.be/-bMQkAqxNeE -
Demonstrate your Magical genie right now.
And inb4 Atheist believes in nothing when there is really no such thing as nothing in terms of science. -
Gold_Certificate wrote: »
For example: Humans observe that hotter water sometimes freezes faster than colder water; then someone says that they think it happens due to convection.
Typo, bruh, and I gave you ether. -
This isn't a intelligent conversation.
It's ID-iots supporter trying to his/her hardest trying to disprove something that's a fact.
We all share a common ancestor which happened to be a Black Woman.
And Change over time does occur.
Darwin was wrong about a lot of things.
But about Natural selection he wasn't wrong.
everything about evolution is a theory... or did you forget that part.
you do know that gravity is "just a theory" right. why don't you jump off the empire state building since it's just a theory
this is supposed to be t/s compelling/intelligent argument?
evolution is a very simple and very real process of life. it also doesn't require your belief in order to exist, facts are kinda wonderful that way
I'd say it's because mass warps space-time. -
They're probably creationist scientist.
WHo cares about them??
They believe that the Grand Canyon was because of the Flood.
Yeah these guys are all creationists.....
Please watch.... only 2 mins.....
http://youtu.be/-bMQkAqxNeE
If not, they're using an Argument from Personal Incredulity. -
you demonstrate how their ISNT a ? ..
ok, here-
how did the computer make itself.
quick. answer. -
Gold_Certificate wrote: »Gold_Certificate wrote: »So how does this involve the article in the first post of this thread?This thread was established for the sole purpose of "debunking" or "proving" that the theory of evolution is bogus......
And the engine of scientific racism................
I believe that this is a G&S topic........
But will move to the R&R in a few days.............
I will be compiling evidence here that sheds doubt on evolution and Darwinism......
So you are arguing against specific theories of how biological evolution rather than arguing against the fact the biological evolution occurs?
In the first instance, I am arguing that new research has shown that previous evolutionary theories were incorrect and have to be rewritten.......
http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/80beats/?p=42382&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=pulsenews#.USlPyWdnCSo
The second illustrates that the "Tree of Life" accepted by many scientists.........
Has now been shown to be an "antiquated" system of describing life-systems.......
http://postbiota.org/pipermail/tt/2009-February/004416.html -
Gold_Certificate wrote: »Gold_Certificate wrote: »Gold_Certificate wrote: »So how does this involve the article in the first post of this thread?This thread was established for the sole purpose of "debunking" or "proving" that the theory of evolution is bogus......
And the engine of scientific racism................
I believe that this is a G&S topic........
But will move to the R&R in a few days.............
I will be compiling evidence here that sheds doubt on evolution and Darwinism......
So you are arguing against specific theories of how biological evolution rather than arguing against the fact the biological evolution occurs?
In the first instance, I am arguing that new research has shown that previous evolutionary theories were incorrect and have to be rewritten.......
http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/80beats/?p=42382&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=pulsenews#.USlPyWdnCSo
The second illustrates that the "Tree of Life" accepted by many scientists.........
Has now been shown to be an "antiquated" system of describing life-systems.......
http://postbiota.org/pipermail/tt/2009-February/004416.html
I am.....
You know what's going on here..............
-
you demonstrate how their ISNT a ? ..
ok, here-
how did the computer make itself.
quick. answer.
You're shifting the burden of proof you can't do that.
Positive claims require extraordinary evidence.
That's like someone who tells me they have an invisible dragon in my garage.
I tell them I don't believe them
And he tells me to disprove it
It's not my job to disprove it, it's your job to prove it to me. -
Gold_Certificate wrote: »Gold_Certificate wrote: »Gold_Certificate wrote: »So how does this involve the article in the first post of this thread?This thread was established for the sole purpose of "debunking" or "proving" that the theory of evolution is bogus......
And the engine of scientific racism................
I believe that this is a G&S topic........
But will move to the R&R in a few days.............
I will be compiling evidence here that sheds doubt on evolution and Darwinism......
So you are arguing against specific theories of how biological evolution rather than arguing against the fact the biological evolution occurs?
In the first instance, I am arguing that new research has shown that previous evolutionary theories were incorrect and have to be rewritten.......
http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/80beats/?p=42382&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=pulsenews#.USlPyWdnCSo
The second illustrates that the "Tree of Life" accepted by many scientists.........
Has now been shown to be an "antiquated" system of describing life-systems.......
http://postbiota.org/pipermail/tt/2009-February/004416.html
I am.....
You know what's going on here..............
You're not arguing that biological evolution does not occur, right? -
This isn't a intelligent conversation.
It's ID-iots supporter trying to his/her hardest trying to disprove something that's a fact.
We all share a common ancestor which happened to be a Black Woman.
And Change over time does occur.
Darwin was wrong about a lot of things.
But about Natural selection he wasn't wrong.
everything about evolution is a theory... or did you forget that part.
you do know that gravity is "just a theory" right. why don't you jump off the empire state building since it's just a theory
this is supposed to be t/s compelling/intelligent argument?
evolution is a very simple and very real process of life. it also doesn't require your belief in order to exist, facts are kinda wonderful that way
but this has nothing to do with gravity. its about mankind and where we came from.
slight difference.
that's totally the opposite of science actually
also evolution says nothing about the origin of life, it only comes into play once life already exists
there is no slight difference, you attempt to discredit evolution by calling it a theory, when gravity is "just a theory" as well. you mistakenly believe theory in science means the same thing that theory does in the colloquial sense, probably due to the fact that you are scientifically illiterate like many adults in this country.
shuddup. this isnt your conversation. aint you muslim? then you should know your roll. i thought muslim women were well trained. -
you demonstrate how their ISNT a ? ..
ok, here-
how did the computer make itself.
quick. answer.
Computers are not natural.
Humans, plants, other animals are.
It took time for us to evolve.
Computers are intelligently designed we are not far from it.
It's not even funny. -
you demonstrate how their ISNT a ? ..
ok, here-
how did the computer make itself.
quick. answer.
You're shifting the burden of proof you can't do that.
Positive claims require extraordinary evidence.
That's like someone who tells me they have an invisible dragon in my garage.
I tell them I don't believe them
And he tells me to disprove it
It's not my job to disprove it, it's your job to prove it to me.
im reading a bunch of gibberish ^^
answer the question-
how did the computer make itself. -
I can see there is little abstract thinking in this thread. Evolution is no where near proven to be true and the theory and gravity is suspect also. I would explain, but it would go over many head.
Here is a small article on it, not the best, but there are many more. For every paper supporting a theory there is one to go against it. Nothing is set in stone in science. For example Genetics......that theory was found to be flawed and incorrect which lead to the discovery of epigenetics. Science is constantly changing and the puzzle is no where near close to being solved -
-
you demonstrate how their ISNT a ? ..
ok, here-
how did the computer make itself.
quick. answer.
You're shifting the burden of proof you can't do that.
Positive claims require extraordinary evidence.
That's like someone who tells me they have an invisible dragon in my garage.
I tell them I don't believe them
And he tells me to disprove it
It's not my job to disprove it, it's your job to prove it to me.
im reading a bunch of gibberish ^^
answer the question-
how did the computer make itself.
A computer was made by a Human being.
You're using the "The Watchmaker argument" we've put this to rest years ago.
Humans and Computer are completely different.
Humans are natural while computers are intelligently designed. -
Gold_Certificate wrote: »This isn't a intelligent conversation.
It's ID-iots supporter trying to his/her hardest trying to disprove something that's a fact.
We all share a common ancestor which happened to be a Black Woman.
And Change over time does occur.
Darwin was wrong about a lot of things.
But about Natural selection he wasn't wrong.
everything about evolution is a theory... or did you forget that part.
you do know that gravity is "just a theory" right. why don't you jump off the empire state building since it's just a theory
this is supposed to be t/s compelling/intelligent argument?
evolution is a very simple and very real process of life. it also doesn't require your belief in order to exist, facts are kinda wonderful that way
I'd say it's because mass warps space-time.
evolution is an observable phenomena as well. i guess the explanation of how it works is the theory of evolution
are theory/laws interchangeable in physics?
word... i watched a frog grow wings and start flying because somebody launched it in the sky.. and the change of habitat forced it to grow wings and land safely.
evolution is amazing.
errrr.. fantasy. -
Gold_Certificate wrote: »This isn't a intelligent conversation.
It's ID-iots supporter trying to his/her hardest trying to disprove something that's a fact.
We all share a common ancestor which happened to be a Black Woman.
And Change over time does occur.
Darwin was wrong about a lot of things.
But about Natural selection he wasn't wrong.
everything about evolution is a theory... or did you forget that part.
you do know that gravity is "just a theory" right. why don't you jump off the empire state building since it's just a theory
this is supposed to be t/s compelling/intelligent argument?
evolution is a very simple and very real process of life. it also doesn't require your belief in order to exist, facts are kinda wonderful that way
I'd say it's because mass warps space-time.
evolution is an observable phenomena as well. i guess the explanation of how it works is the theory of evolution
are theory/laws interchangeable in physics?
word... i watched a frog grow wings and start flying because somebody launched it in the sky.. and the change of habitat forced it to grow wings and land safely.
evolution is amazing.
errrr.. fantasy.
Word, I saw a chicken being created of out thin air.
Wow, creationism is amazing.
-
Gold_Certificate wrote: »Gold_Certificate wrote: »Gold_Certificate wrote: »Gold_Certificate wrote: »So how does this involve the article in the first post of this thread?This thread was established for the sole purpose of "debunking" or "proving" that the theory of evolution is bogus......
And the engine of scientific racism................
I believe that this is a G&S topic........
But will move to the R&R in a few days.............
I will be compiling evidence here that sheds doubt on evolution and Darwinism......
So you are arguing against specific theories of how biological evolution rather than arguing against the fact the biological evolution occurs?
In the first instance, I am arguing that new research has shown that previous evolutionary theories were incorrect and have to be rewritten.......
http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/80beats/?p=42382&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=pulsenews#.USlPyWdnCSo
The second illustrates that the "Tree of Life" accepted by many scientists.........
Has now been shown to be an "antiquated" system of describing life-systems.......
http://postbiota.org/pipermail/tt/2009-February/004416.html
I am.....
You know what's going on here..............
You're not arguing that biological evolution does not occur, right?
This is where we get into semantics............
Biological evolution as it describes change over time exists and cannot be debunked........
However......
Biological evolution as describing how one species can evolve into many is horseshit.........
And will be debunked in this thread.........
-
U.S. educational system failed us.
Sad, we're in the information age
And we still believe in Noah's ark, Adam and Eve, and the Earth being 6,000 years old.
Thank goodness, I ain't going to have kids.