Rated T for Tolerance: Christian teen raps about evils of homosexuality

Options
Young_Chitlin
Young_Chitlin Members Posts: 23,852 ✭✭✭✭✭
edited March 2013 in R & R (Religion and Race)
«1

Comments

  • Matt-
    Matt- Members Posts: 21,585 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Options
    horrible thread title
  • Drew_Ali
    Drew_Ali Members Posts: 1,403 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Options

    Powerful lyrics..............

  • Bodhi
    Bodhi Members Posts: 7,932 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited March 2013
    Options
    No ? but there is a neurobiological basis for homosexuality
  • Drew_Ali
    Drew_Ali Members Posts: 1,403 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Options

    LOL......

    @ ? for accepting biological variation regarding sexuality........

    And refuting them when it comes to race............

    No ? @ your incessant fixation on homosexuality................


  • Bodhi
    Bodhi Members Posts: 7,932 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited March 2013
    Options
    Drew_Ali wrote: »
    @ ? for accepting biological variation regarding sexuality........

    And refuting them when it comes to race............


    This is because race is a social construct and has no grounding in genetics. More specifically because
    While different genes for physical traits such as skin and hair color can be identified between individuals, no consistent patterns of genes across the human genome exist to distinguish one race from another. There also is no genetic basis for divisions of human ethnicity. People who have lived in the same geographic region for many generations may have some alleles in common, but no allele will be found in all members of one population and in no members of any other.
    http://www.ornl.gov/sci/techresources/Human_Genome/elsi/minorities.shtml

    We've went over this before. We don't need to go any further.
    Drew_Ali wrote: »
    No ? @ your incessant fixation on homosexuality................

    Yet you posted here before I did. lol..

    No ? @ your incessant fixation with me.
  • Drew_Ali
    Drew_Ali Members Posts: 1,403 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited March 2013
    Options
    Oceanic wrote: »
    We've went over this before. We don't need to go any further.



    No ? @ your incessant fixation with me.

    We have been over it before........

    Funny how you think that a preference is biological......

    Yet fail to see that race is biological............
    Oceanic wrote: »
    Yet you posted here before I did. lol..

    Yeah....

    But I didn't come in here talking ? about homosexuality being biological with no evidence though.............

  • Bodhi
    Bodhi Members Posts: 7,932 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited March 2013
    Options
    Drew_Ali wrote: »

    Funny how you think that a preference is biological......

    Yet fail to see that race is biological............

    "Race" is an attempt to group people into categories based on phenotypic traits, which themselves are genetic, but the problem with the "race" concept is that for race to exist, the genes have to be consistent across the population in order for one race to be distinguishable from another. This is not the case, so "race" has no basis in genetics. That's the difference.

    Oceanic wrote: »
    Yet you posted here before I did. lol..
    Drew_Ali wrote: »
    Yeah....

    Alright then.

    Drew_Ali wrote: »
    I didn't come in here talking about homosexuality being biological with no evidence though.............

    "Potatoes come from the ground"

    ^^^ A statement that I wont back up with evidence and don't feel like backing up with evidence. That statement is true regardless of whether or not I provide you with evidence. Also, my making that statement does not prove whether or not I enjoy eating potatoes or even if I plant them.




    Again, no ? @ your incessant fixation with @Oceanic
  • Drew_Ali
    Drew_Ali Members Posts: 1,403 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Options

    For the record......

    @Oceanic is a ? ? ..............

    Stop crying after you lose a debate ? .........

    Jankow sonned your ass and you cannot admit it......

    I ethered your ass and you begged for me to get banned.............


    Oceanic wrote: »
    ^^^ A statement that I wont back up with evidence and don't feel like backing up with evidence. That statement is true regardless of whether or not I provide you with evidence.


    LOL......

    Translation;

    You cannot provide any evidence for your ? claims.......................


  • Bodhi
    Bodhi Members Posts: 7,932 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Options
    Drew_Ali wrote: »

    LOL......

    Translation;

    You cannot provide any evidence for your ? claims.......................



    I could. I just didn't in that first post.
  • Drew_Ali
    Drew_Ali Members Posts: 1,403 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited March 2013
    Options
    Sure thing pal..........

    LOL.....@ no gene for race and you finding the elusive ? gene.....

    n/h....

    don-t-worry-i-ll-wait-o.gif
  • Bodhi
    Bodhi Members Posts: 7,932 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited March 2013
    Options
    You'll be waiting then. I don't feel like getting into any more pointless debates with you; they always end when you refuse to accept what's being presented to you. Exhibit A: your Darwin thread.
  • zombie
    zombie Members Posts: 13,450 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Options
    Oceanic wrote: »
    No ? but there is a neurobiological basis for homosexuality

    you could say there is neurobiological basis for wrong behavior but that does not excuse it or make it right.
  • View From The Left
    View From The Left Members Posts: 1
    Options
    I watched this video and had an itch
    To call this person "just another dumb _______."
    But I'll let others decide what to call her, I'll punt
    But I'm sure most will agree, she's an ignorant ________."
    She's a harlot, a ? and a skank, to be sure,
    but she's also a ? and a no-talent ________.
    So recognize her for what she is, to wit,
    just an ugly, ignorant woman with a brain full of ________!!
  • Bodhi
    Bodhi Members Posts: 7,932 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Options
    zombie wrote: »
    Oceanic wrote: »
    No ? but there is a neurobiological basis for homosexuality

    you could say there is neurobiological basis for wrong behavior but that does not excuse it or make it right.


    My statement has nothing to do with whether or not homosexuality is right or wrong.
  • Drew_Ali
    Drew_Ali Members Posts: 1,403 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited March 2013
    Options
    LOL......

    Quit lying ? .........

    You have no evidence of a ? gene, n/h..................

    And my darwin thread is full of people not accepting evidence..........

    However.....

    I am not one of those individuals..................

    You don't want to debate with me anymore because you will lose..........

    I am in the process of illustrating my debate skills in the SLDC.................

    A challenge that you also ? out of............


  • zombie
    zombie Members Posts: 13,450 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Options
    Oceanic wrote: »
    zombie wrote: »
    Oceanic wrote: »
    No ? but there is a neurobiological basis for homosexuality

    you could say there is neurobiological basis for wrong behavior but that does not excuse it or make it right.


    My statement has nothing to do with whether or not homosexuality is right or wrong.

    YES BUT THE VIDEO DOES.
  • Bodhi
    Bodhi Members Posts: 7,932 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited March 2013
    Options
    zombie wrote: »
    YES BUT THE VIDEO DOES.

    I'm addressing the part of the video where she states that homosexuality is not innate. Did you watch the video?

  • Bodhi
    Bodhi Members Posts: 7,932 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited March 2013
    Options
    Drew_Ali wrote: »
    You don't want to debate with me anymore because you will lose..........

    I am in the process of illustrating my debate skills in the SLDC.................

    A challenge that you also ? out of............

    I told you to talk to Scion and set up the debate between you and I since you initiated the challenge. You never set it up with him so I assumed you were scared and I left it alone. You're still free to do what I told you to do.

  • zombie
    zombie Members Posts: 13,450 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Options
    Oceanic wrote: »
    zombie wrote: »
    YES BUT THE VIDEO DOES.

    I'm addressing the part of the video where she states that homosexuality is not innate. Did you watch the video?

    yes i did but homosexuality not being innate is not her main objection to homosexuality so your statement does not really debunk the main focus of her video.
  • Bodhi
    Bodhi Members Posts: 7,932 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Options
    zombie wrote: »
    your statement does not really debunk the main focus of her video.

    That was not the purpose. I simply addressed an incorrect statement within her poem.
  • Drew_Ali
    Drew_Ali Members Posts: 1,403 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Options
    Oceanic wrote: »
    zombie wrote: »
    your statement does not really debunk the main focus of her video.


    That was not the purpose. I simply addressed an incorrect statement within her poem.

    With no evidence?.?.?.?.?

    disappointed_gif_44556.gif
  • zombie
    zombie Members Posts: 13,450 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited March 2013
    Options
    Oceanic wrote: »
    zombie wrote: »
    your statement does not really debunk the main focus of her video.

    That was not the purpose. I simply addressed an incorrect statement within her poem.

    her statement was not really incorrect there is no conclusive proof that a ? gene exist or that homosexality has a singular basis in the brain. religiously it would not matter even if there was.
  • Bodhi
    Bodhi Members Posts: 7,932 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited March 2013
    Options
    zombie wrote: »
    there is no conclusive proof that a ? gene exist

    That's because research is now leading in the direction of explaining its existence through epigenetics.
  • Drew_Ali
    Drew_Ali Members Posts: 1,403 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Options
    Oceanic wrote: »
    zombie wrote: »
    there is no conclusive proof that a ? gene exist

    That's because research is now leading in the direction of explaining its existence through epigenetics.

    charlie-murphy-laugh-o.gif

    Again you forgot your evidence....................
  • Drew_Ali
    Drew_Ali Members Posts: 1,403 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited March 2013
    Options
    Oceanic wrote: »
    zombie wrote: »
    there is no conclusive proof that a ? gene exist

    That's because research is now leading in the direction of explaining its existence through epigenetics.


    bertstare-eccbc87e4b5ce2fe28308fd9f2a7baf3-344.gif