How much longer until NFL is no longer watchable?
KINGOFDAARCADE
Members Posts: 4,379 ✭✭✭✭✭
I give that ? another 5 years before it's a bunch of ballerina WR's deaking out safeties and corners all game long.
? been pussified.
Forseeable Rule Changes:
QB's can no longer be hit (Two Hand Touch)
Tackles below the knees outlawed
No more shoulder-to-helmet hits allowed
Sack dances illegal
Stiff Arms taken out of the game
Defenders hug ball carrier to down him
Kick Offs taken out of the game (very close to happening)
? been pussified.
Forseeable Rule Changes:
QB's can no longer be hit (Two Hand Touch)
Tackles below the knees outlawed
No more shoulder-to-helmet hits allowed
Sack dances illegal
Stiff Arms taken out of the game
Defenders hug ball carrier to down him
Kick Offs taken out of the game (very close to happening)
Comments
-
No Stiff arm to the helmet is the next rule to be placed.
-
Vince McMahon should give up on WWE and bring back XFL!
-
Add on wearing pink from head to toe.
This thread should be renamed The Inevitable Feminization of Pro Football... -
But NFL ain't going nowhere. Nobody is checking out for Soccer, Tennis, Golf, WNBA.
-
Shizlansky wrote: »No Stiff arm to the helmet is the next rule to be placed.
With the way goddell changing ? up I wouldn't be surprised. -
Vince McMahon should give up on WWE and bring back XFL!
Hell no id rather watch lingerie football. -
It's not even plausible for the NFL to be "unwatchable" anytime in the near future.
It will having the highest ratings of any sport in the US for at least the next couple of decades. -
And Roger Goodell still has a job?
-
But NFL ain't going nowhere. Nobody is checking out for Soccer, Tennis, Golf, WNBA.
With all the rule changes, and upcoming rule changes..... NFL will be just like Soccer.
A bunch of nancies taking dives and faking injuries to get yellow flags.
-
These rule changes are woat, but I ain't even gon' front like I'll stop watching. Like people that smoke cigarettes.
The price gets higher, the places you can smoke become fewer and fewer, more and more bad news about the ? they put in cigs keeps coming out, but at the end of the day...
...Y'all keep coppin' 'ports. -
^ Terrible analogy.
People still smoke because their chemically addicted. Physically addicted. They've developed a habit they can't (or don't want to) stop.
Watching football isn't an addiction by any means. People will stop watching when the product suffers. Look at how popular Boxing was 20 years ago. These days nobody is checking for that ? . -
KINGOFDAARCADE wrote: »^ Terrible analogy.
People still smoke because their chemically addicted. Physically addicted. They've developed a habit they can't (or don't want to) stop.
Watching football isn't an addiction by any means. People will stop watching when the product suffers. Look at how popular Boxing was 20 years ago. These days nobody is checking for that ? .
Speak for yourself. Some ? watch football like females, some watch it like men.
-
Football will always be the superior sport. unless it goes away.
-
The better question is when will T/S thread making privileges be revoked.
-
greenwood1921 wrote: »KINGOFDAARCADE wrote: »^ Terrible analogy.
People still smoke because their chemically addicted. Physically addicted. They've developed a habit they can't (or don't want to) stop.
Watching football isn't an addiction by any means. People will stop watching when the product suffers. Look at how popular Boxing was 20 years ago. These days nobody is checking for that ? .
Speak for yourself. Some ? watch football like females, some watch it like men.
You must be a ? .
Regardless of "how" you watch football. The fact is that it's not an addiction like smoking is.
That was a terrible analogy. Now move on.... -
MikeydaGawd wrote: »Football will always be the superior sport. unless it goes away.
Seeing your signature reminded me..... It's only a matter of time before they take Kick Offs out of the game! -
KINGOFDAARCADE wrote: »greenwood1921 wrote: »KINGOFDAARCADE wrote: »^ Terrible analogy.
People still smoke because their chemically addicted. Physically addicted. They've developed a habit they can't (or don't want to) stop.
Watching football isn't an addiction by any means. People will stop watching when the product suffers. Look at how popular Boxing was 20 years ago. These days nobody is checking for that ? .
Speak for yourself. Some ? watch football like females, some watch it like men.
You must be a ? .
Regardless of "how" you watch football. The fact is that it's not an addiction like smoking is.
That was a terrible analogy. Now move on....
And 99.9% of your threads are terrible. Now move on... -
greenwood1921 wrote: »KINGOFDAARCADE wrote: »greenwood1921 wrote: »KINGOFDAARCADE wrote: »^ Terrible analogy.
People still smoke because their chemically addicted. Physically addicted. They've developed a habit they can't (or don't want to) stop.
Watching football isn't an addiction by any means. People will stop watching when the product suffers. Look at how popular Boxing was 20 years ago. These days nobody is checking for that ? .
Speak for yourself. Some ? watch football like females, some watch it like men.
You must be a ? .
Regardless of "how" you watch football. The fact is that it's not an addiction like smoking is.
That was a terrible analogy. Now move on....
And 99.9% of your threads are terrible. Now move on...
But you still enter them and reply.... trying to compare watching football to smoking cigarettes... LMFAO.... you actually thought you were onto something there too. Stupid azz ? . -
Leon Sandcastle wrote: »The better question is when will T/S thread making privileges be revoked.
Word. Goodell need to holla at thatdamnJay and get this ? done.
Then I'll forgive the rule changes and be like...
-
numbaz...80's baby wrote: »Idk because everyone cried about the helmet to helmet tackles by the defense but everyone still watched. The NFL still has the highest ratings. The defenders just had to adjust just like the RBs will have to. A true RB shouldnt have to lead with his helmet anyway.
its funny how they so worried about concussions but that running back can get injured if he dont lower his head so he can truck thru a defender... -
KINGOFDAARCADE wrote: »greenwood1921 wrote: »KINGOFDAARCADE wrote: »greenwood1921 wrote: »KINGOFDAARCADE wrote: »^ Terrible analogy.
People still smoke because their chemically addicted. Physically addicted. They've developed a habit they can't (or don't want to) stop.
Watching football isn't an addiction by any means. People will stop watching when the product suffers. Look at how popular Boxing was 20 years ago. These days nobody is checking for that ? .
Speak for yourself. Some ? watch football like females, some watch it like men.
You must be a ? .
Regardless of "how" you watch football. The fact is that it's not an addiction like smoking is.
That was a terrible analogy. Now move on....
And 99.9% of your threads are terrible. Now move on...
But you still enter them and reply.... trying to compare watching football to smoking cigarettes... LMFAO.... you actually thought you were onto something there too. Stupid azz ? .
Like every wack thread you've made that just ends up getting sonned by multiple posters before the first page is done?
Yeah. You would know. -
greenwood1921 wrote: »KINGOFDAARCADE wrote: »greenwood1921 wrote: »KINGOFDAARCADE wrote: »greenwood1921 wrote: »KINGOFDAARCADE wrote: »^ Terrible analogy.
People still smoke because their chemically addicted. Physically addicted. They've developed a habit they can't (or don't want to) stop.
Watching football isn't an addiction by any means. People will stop watching when the product suffers. Look at how popular Boxing was 20 years ago. These days nobody is checking for that ? .
Speak for yourself. Some ? watch football like females, some watch it like men.
You must be a ? .
Regardless of "how" you watch football. The fact is that it's not an addiction like smoking is.
That was a terrible analogy. Now move on....
And 99.9% of your threads are terrible. Now move on...
But you still enter them and reply.... trying to compare watching football to smoking cigarettes... LMFAO.... you actually thought you were onto something there too. Stupid azz ? .
Like every wack thread you've made that just ends up getting sonned by multiple posters before the first page is done?
Yeah. You would know.
Except that never happens..... All you did was son yourself with that grade 2 analogy.
It's funny how offended you got when I shot your analogy down. You mustve thought you were onto some genius ? there. LOL!
-
jus make it 2 hand touch and be done. ? it. smh.
-
KINGOFDAARCADE wrote: »greenwood1921 wrote: »KINGOFDAARCADE wrote: »greenwood1921 wrote: »KINGOFDAARCADE wrote: »greenwood1921 wrote: »KINGOFDAARCADE wrote: »^ Terrible analogy.
People still smoke because their chemically addicted. Physically addicted. They've developed a habit they can't (or don't want to) stop.
Watching football isn't an addiction by any means. People will stop watching when the product suffers. Look at how popular Boxing was 20 years ago. These days nobody is checking for that ? .
Speak for yourself. Some ? watch football like females, some watch it like men.
You must be a ? .
Regardless of "how" you watch football. The fact is that it's not an addiction like smoking is.
That was a terrible analogy. Now move on....
And 99.9% of your threads are terrible. Now move on...
But you still enter them and reply.... trying to compare watching football to smoking cigarettes... LMFAO.... you actually thought you were onto something there too. Stupid azz ? .
Like every wack thread you've made that just ends up getting sonned by multiple posters before the first page is done?
Yeah. You would know.
Except that never happens.....
-
@greenwood1921 A played out gif. Good one.
@marc123 we're not far off from two hand touch. I think Running backs will always be tackled, but two hand touch on WR's and QB's isnt unfathomable.