DO YOU "ACCEPT" PEOPLE COMING OUT? WHAT ARE YOUR THOUGHTS ON THAT LIFE?
Comments
-
[IMG]http://i568.photobucket.com/albums/ss129/blazini81/dolphin-? -caves-500x387.jpg[/IMG]
Scumbags of the sea...if dolphins were Spanish they would be Mexican -
@mods move this ? to R&R, ? these bible bashing ? .
-
3.6 rebounds a game average and he 7ft tall? He must suck ? .
-
GeminiRose wrote: »RodrigueZz wrote: »Also it is perfectly normal to be ? . Most animal species exhibit homosexual tendencies. And Kinsey proved that people are rarely ever 100% straight or 100% ? , they fall somewhere in between the two. Sword
i was just going to speak on kinsey's degrees of sexuality. thanks for touching on it.
Sexuality is not black and white, it is a complex grey area that only a person can define for themselves.
Hypothetically speaking, on surface level, I am straight but I can be into women's bodies only. I could be extremely attracted to the shape of a woman but completely identify with being a heterosexual woman.
Or, I could be a heterosexual woman, who is interested in men who are ? females. On the surface, I may seem like I am a lesbian. But because the ? I am dating is biologically a male with their ? & testicles attached and who identifies himself to be a male but psychically sees himself as a woman. That would make me a heterosexual woman because the man believes he is a male biologically and attracted to women. ( Note: Not all transsexuals are homosexuals).
Now, if I am dating a man who believes deep down inside he is a woman. He may look like a man, and act like a man but identifies as a woman ( which is considered transgender). I could be considered lesbian based on how my partner identifies himself as a person by gender.
See there are degrees of sexuality, and for simple-minded people who rely heavily on a religious book that does not deal with modern time complexities, is silly for an adult to use as a logical response in a "rebuttal".
On topic: I have no issue with people coming out of the closet. They should be able to be out and proud in this country.
That sounds like a bunch of mess!
-______- Obviously you havent taking a sexual psychology course. Because if you did, then you would understand everything I had spoken about. -
englishdude wrote: »@mods move this ? to R&R, ? these bible bashing ? .
? DONT COME IN HERE TELLIN THEM WHAT TO DO WITH MY THREAD... TAKE YO ASS TO WALMART OR SOMETHING -
DoUwant2go2Heaven? wrote: »DoUwant2go2Heaven? wrote: »
Cosign that he created "Lucifer", but he had foreknowledge before ANYTHING had been created that his creation "Lucifer" would go on to become "Satan". Therefore, ? did created Satan, as "it's his plan".
? isn't free of anything, he is considered responsible.
? can't create 'everything' and only get credit for the good and not for the bad. LOL that's one hell of a way to pick and choose.
Before the foundations of the world ? knew that on April 30, 2013 you would be on the IC willfully denying His goodness, but yet He still gave you life. Go figure, huh?
Further proof he doesn't exist. I should be dead.
-
? people bombed the Boston Marathon
-
DoUwant2go2Heaven? wrote: »
No. ? didn't create sin. Sin is the result of the creatures that He created rebelling against His will.
Lets play.
Did ? create humans? Yes.
Did ? allow these humans to have "free will"? Yes.
Did ? knowingly create humans, who would use this "free will" to be evil? Yes.
Did ? give evil a platform, therefore introducing it to humans? Yes.
So we can conclude when ? created "everything", he also knowingly created and allowed sin to exist. -
GeminiRose wrote: »RodrigueZz wrote: »Also it is perfectly normal to be ? . Most animal species exhibit homosexual tendencies. And Kinsey proved that people are rarely ever 100% straight or 100% ? , they fall somewhere in between the two. Sword
i was just going to speak on kinsey's degrees of sexuality. thanks for touching on it.
Sexuality is not black and white, it is a complex grey area that only a person can define for themselves.
Hypothetically speaking, on surface level, I am straight but I can be into women's bodies only. I could be extremely attracted to the shape of a woman but completely identify with being a heterosexual woman.
Or, I could be a heterosexual woman, who is interested in men who are ? females. On the surface, I may seem like I am a lesbian. But because the ? I am dating is biologically a male with their ? & testicles attached and who identifies himself to be a male but psychically sees himself as a woman. That would make me a heterosexual woman because the man believes he is a male biologically and attracted to women. ( Note: Not all transsexuals are homosexuals).
Now, if I am dating a man who believes deep down inside he is a woman. He may look like a man, and act like a man but identifies as a woman ( which is considered transgender). I could be considered lesbian based on how my partner identifies himself as a person by gender.
See there are degrees of sexuality, and for simple-minded people who rely heavily on a religious book that does not deal with modern time complexities, is silly for an adult to use as a logical response in a "rebuttal".
On topic: I have no issue with people coming out of the closet. They should be able to be out and proud in this country.
That sounds like a bunch of mess!
-______- Obviously you havent taking a sexual psychology course. Because if you did, then you would understand everything I had spoken about.
No I haven't and I don't want to listen to some sexual scale or theory someone made up. -
If ? didn't allow sin to exist, why would we need "freewill"?
-
If ? didn't allow sin to exist, why would we need "freewill"?
Why do we need it?
(I don't believe biblically it's possible to even have free will though, it talks about predestination, which renders free will obsolete) -
John_Blazini wrote: »[IMG]http://i568.photobucket.com/albums/ss129/blazini81/dolphin-? -caves-500x387.jpg[/IMG]
Scumbags of the sea...if dolphins were Spanish they would be Mexican
LMAO this can't be real -
If I created a robot, that was capable of human emotions, decisions and knowing morals; right from wrong, in which I gave "free will", and it went and killed thousands of people, who is to blame?
Am I to blame, knowing that this was a possibility? -
John_Blazini wrote: »[IMG]http://i568.photobucket.com/albums/ss129/blazini81/dolphin-? -caves-500x387.jpg[/IMG]
Scumbags of the sea...if dolphins were Spanish they would be Mexican
LMAO this can't be real
It's legit.
Dolphins are brutal as ? . They're the most intelligent animal after us. -
That dolphin thing is entirely fake btw.
-
In cause you gullible muthafuckas were still wondering.
-
Freewill or sin? or both?
I know you don't Vibe.
-
I understand "freewill" to be "the human will" - "the human will is the faculty of the human mind by which we decide or conceive of ourselves as deciding upon and initiating action"
-
[IMG]http://gifsforum.com/images/image/other/grand/dont-be-? -other-eccbc87e4b5ce2fe28308fd9f2a7baf3-1430.jpg[/IMG]
-
PLAIN AND SIMPLE
-
John_Blazini wrote: »[IMG]http://i568.photobucket.com/albums/ss129/blazini81/dolphin-? -caves-500x387.jpg[/IMG]
Scumbags of the sea...if dolphins were Spanish they would be Mexican
LMAO this can't be real
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HLEb-iCQqec&feature=youtube_gdata_player -
BRUH STOP TRYIN 2 MESS UP MY THREAD WITH THAT DOLPHIN MESS
-
DO YOU "ACCEPT" PEOPLE COMING OUT? WHAT ARE YOUR THOUGHTS ON THAT LIFE? Yes. Doesn't concern me at all.
African Americans are disproportionally affected by Aids so maybe the subject should be talked about more openly without bashing people because it's not working.
-->Diagnoses of ? Infection, by Race/Ethnicity
Race or Ethnicity Estimated Number of Diagnoses
of ? Infection, 2011
American Indian/Alaska Native 212
Asian 982
Black/African American 23,168
Hispanic/Latinoa 10,159
Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander 78
White 13,846
Multiple Races 827
http://www.cdc.gov/? /statistics/basics/index.html
-
How much control humans have over their own mind is difficult to determine. This puts the whole idea of freewill into a grey area imo
-
DoUwant2go2Heaven? wrote: »
No. ? didn't create sin. Sin is the result of the creatures that He created rebelling against His will.
Lets play.
Did ? create humans? Yes.
Did ? allow these humans to have "free will"? Yes.
Did ? knowingly create humans, who would use this "free will" to be evil? Yes.
Did ? give evil a platform, therefore introducing it to humans? Yes.
So we can conclude when ? created "everything", he also knowingly created and allowed sin to exist.
So those two who no signed and whatever other reaction, do you not agree with this? Why not?
