DO YOU "ACCEPT" PEOPLE COMING OUT? WHAT ARE YOUR THOUGHTS ON THAT LIFE?
Options
Comments
-
John_Blazini wrote: »John_Blazini wrote: »[IMG]http://i568.photobucket.com/albums/ss129/blazini81/dolphin-? -caves-500x387.jpg[/IMG]
Scumbags of the sea...if dolphins were Spanish they would be Mexican
LMAO this can't be real
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HLEb-iCQqec&feature=youtube_gdata_player
? damn ? you not funny yo ? is horrible -
Tebow was never bashed for being a Christian he was bashed for always throwing that useless religion around. The ? player is not talking about ? and praising reach arounds NO ? ...so this is not at all comparable, plus Christians are excepted anyway. As far as I am concerned Christians are worst than ? NO ? .
-
-
You're still poor and Mexican
-
I understand "freewill" to be "the human will" - "the human will is the faculty of the human mind by which we decide or conceive of ourselves as deciding upon and initiating action"
I guess you could think of "free will" like that. -
Raging Raven wrote: »Tebow was never bashed for being a Christian he was bashed for always throwing that useless religion around. The ? player is not talking about ? and praising reach arounds NO ? ...so this is not at all comparable, plus Christians are excepted anyway. As far as I am concerned Christians are worst than ? NO ? .
That's pretty much the essential reason for being bashed as a Christian. -
Don't bother trying to make a legit point to that simple jack ? ....
-
It seems to be the only functioning possibility.
-
-
John_Blazini wrote: »John_Blazini wrote: »[IMG]http://i568.photobucket.com/albums/ss129/blazini81/dolphin-? -caves-500x387.jpg[/IMG]
Scumbags of the sea...if dolphins were Spanish they would be Mexican
LMAO this can't be realhttp://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HLEb-iCQqec&feature=youtube_gdata_player
GOTDAYUM dolphin was all up in that ? ...and then dude tried to protect her and dolphin was like "you can get this work too ? !" -
How the ? was this thread allowed to reach 21 pages?
-
Law Trafalgar wrote: »How the ? was this thread allowed to reach 21 pages?
CAUSE IM DRO ? .. YEEN KNOW -
PLATINUM PUSH...
-
-
Three fail proof conversation topics; sex, money, religion.
-
DoUwant2go2Heaven? wrote: »? _i_look_like wrote: »I'm beyond flabbergasted that Obama, the PRESIDENT OF THE U.S.A felt the need to express how "Proud" he is of this Collins character. It's ridiculous how so many ppl are treating this basketball player as a hero. I'm done yo...
link please....
thegrio.com/2013/04/30/obama-says-couldnt-be-prouder-of-jason-collins/
-
-
-
WHAT MOVIE IS THIS?
-
WHAT MOVIE IS THIS?
GOAT war movie........
A Soldiers Story........
It was P-P-Peterson Sir........
http://youtu.be/CG9iYXLYkGM
-
using religion as your logical backup is pretty niggerish of you.
Actual facts >>>>>>> the bible because your argument is already biased -
using religion as your logical backup is pretty niggerish of you.
Actual facts >>>>>>> the bible because your argument is already biased
Whooooo ? ......
It's only natural, actual facts are thrown at you.........
The impact'll blow trees back and ? statues............
-
GeminiRose wrote: »GeminiRose wrote: »RodrigueZz wrote: »Also it is perfectly normal to be ? . Most animal species exhibit homosexual tendencies. And Kinsey proved that people are rarely ever 100% straight or 100% ? , they fall somewhere in between the two. Sword
i was just going to speak on kinsey's degrees of sexuality. thanks for touching on it.
Sexuality is not black and white, it is a complex grey area that only a person can define for themselves.
Hypothetically speaking, on surface level, I am straight but I can be into women's bodies only. I could be extremely attracted to the shape of a woman but completely identify with being a heterosexual woman.
Or, I could be a heterosexual woman, who is interested in men who are ? females. On the surface, I may seem like I am a lesbian. But because the ? I am dating is biologically a male with their ? & testicles attached and who identifies himself to be a male but psychically sees himself as a woman. That would make me a heterosexual woman because the man believes he is a male biologically and attracted to women. ( Note: Not all transsexuals are homosexuals).
Now, if I am dating a man who believes deep down inside he is a woman. He may look like a man, and act like a man but identifies as a woman ( which is considered transgender). I could be considered lesbian based on how my partner identifies himself as a person by gender.
See there are degrees of sexuality, and for simple-minded people who rely heavily on a religious book that does not deal with modern time complexities, is silly for an adult to use as a logical response in a "rebuttal".
On topic: I have no issue with people coming out of the closet. They should be able to be out and proud in this country.
That sounds like a bunch of mess!
-______- Obviously you havent taking a sexual psychology course. Because if you did, then you would understand everything I had spoken about.
No I haven't and I don't want to listen to some sexual scale or theory someone made up.
science is not made up. Kinsey did this study on thousand of people based on his sample population that he had. Then,Masters and Johnson modernized Kinsey degrees of sexuality to what we go by today.
facts >>>>> ignorance -
GeminiRose wrote: »GeminiRose wrote: »RodrigueZz wrote: »Also it is perfectly normal to be ? . Most animal species exhibit homosexual tendencies. And Kinsey proved that people are rarely ever 100% straight or 100% ? , they fall somewhere in between the two. Sword
i was just going to speak on kinsey's degrees of sexuality. thanks for touching on it.
Sexuality is not black and white, it is a complex grey area that only a person can define for themselves.
Hypothetically speaking, on surface level, I am straight but I can be into women's bodies only. I could be extremely attracted to the shape of a woman but completely identify with being a heterosexual woman.
Or, I could be a heterosexual woman, who is interested in men who are ? females. On the surface, I may seem like I am a lesbian. But because the ? I am dating is biologically a male with their ? & testicles attached and who identifies himself to be a male but psychically sees himself as a woman. That would make me a heterosexual woman because the man believes he is a male biologically and attracted to women. ( Note: Not all transsexuals are homosexuals).
Now, if I am dating a man who believes deep down inside he is a woman. He may look like a man, and act like a man but identifies as a woman ( which is considered transgender). I could be considered lesbian based on how my partner identifies himself as a person by gender.
See there are degrees of sexuality, and for simple-minded people who rely heavily on a religious book that does not deal with modern time complexities, is silly for an adult to use as a logical response in a "rebuttal".
On topic: I have no issue with people coming out of the closet. They should be able to be out and proud in this country.
That sounds like a bunch of mess!
-______- Obviously you havent taking a sexual psychology course. Because if you did, then you would understand everything I had spoken about.
No I haven't and I don't want to listen to some sexual scale or theory someone made up.
science is not made up. Kinsey did this study on thousand of people based on his sample population that he had. Then,Masters and Johnson modernized Kinsey degrees of sexuality to what we go by today.
facts >>>>> ignorance
Those are your facts not mine! A thousand of people isn't everyone. A lot of those people were probably ? anyway.
-
Everybody praising these ? gonna learn. Especially the women who keep taking up for them. Why would you want to stand up for a dude that's trying to be like you?
http://youtu.be/umIp81ZrKsQ
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=R2LNHkbTExw