Will Roman Reigns become a better version of Batista?
Options
DOPEdweebz
Members, Moderators, Writer Posts: 29,364 Regulator
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AbjBhdxZUhMWill Roman Reigns become a better version of Batista? 13 votes
Yes
30%
4 votes
No
0%
Maybe So
7%
1 vote
He will be a completely different product from Batista altogether
61%
8 votes
Comments
-
YesOnly thing about Batista that impressed me was him ? Melina and Morrison having to accept it.
-
Yesherbalism101 wrote: »Only thing about Batista that impressed me was him ? Melina and Morrison having to accept it.
Val Venis straight ethered that ? Morrison about that too
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HF7m1bnKsEM
And Reigns is already better then Batista, imo -
He will be a completely different product from Batista altogetherReigns carries the shield, I been saying that. I don't even like the other 2 dudes.
I see him being a better version of Edge and Rhino with no mic skills over Batista though. -
Nah man. Reigns reminds people of Batista because of the spear and power bomb that's it.
Reigns has no track record as a solo act. Can he talk? Can he wrestle full matches alone? He been on TV for over a year and I can't remember a single solo match hes had.
He looks good because hes so heavily protected. He never takes falls, all he does is really two movies and brings some intensity.
I'm worried that everybody that is on the bandwagon now will be greatly disappointed when he finally goes it alone. I personally haven't seen anything special yet. -
herbalism101 wrote: »Only thing about Batista that impressed me was him ? Melina and Morrison having to accept it.
Val Venis straight ethered that ? Morrison about that toohttp://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HF7m1bnKsEM
And Reigns is already better then Batista, imo
FATALITY! -
too soon to tell, we know what dean and seth can produce solo, roman, im not so sure, he has potential just like the other two tho
-
herbalism101 wrote: »Only thing about Batista that impressed me was him ? Melina and Morrison having to accept it.
Val Venis straight ethered that ? Morrison about that toohttp://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HF7m1bnKsEM
And Reigns is already better then Batista, imo
I knew Batista was smashing but Mike Knox as well gawwwd damn. -
-
Daniel Bryan.
Roman Reigns needs a push in singles first before he should win any kind of rumble or title.
Batista has no business winning the rumble or a title. -
YesJus seeing if yall being hyporcrites.
-
Reigns has no business in the conversation.
-
The user and all related content has been deleted.
-
No part timer should win the royal rumble. It's too soon to throw Roman into the main title picture.
Daniel Bryan is the most likely choice, him or CM Punk. I'd like to see Punk vs Bryan at Wrestlemania. -
He will be a completely different product from Batista altogetherThey two different people. Reigns is a suped up, Samoan Rhino. Batista is just Batista...
-
He will be a completely different product from Batista altogetherI don't care who wins.
-
Batista aint been around in years, dude don't deserve no main event at Wrestlemania. Just like the Rock didn't deserve it.
Roman Reigns only had 1 or 2 singles matches, he's not ready to headline the biggest ppv -
I can't call it yet. He's going down the path that Batista went. They protected Batista when he first started by putting him in tag and group matches. Then the fans got behind him when the seeds of a split was forming in Evolution just like what's been happening in the Shield
-
Chi-Town Bully wrote: »Batista aint been around in years, dude don't deserve no main event at Wrestlemania. Just like the Rock didn't deserve it.
Roman Reigns only had 1 or 2 singles matches, he's not ready to headline the biggest ppv
Uh bruh, its the Rock. That's like sayin Taker doesn't deserve it. -
darkone360 wrote: »Chi-Town Bully wrote: »Batista aint been around in years, dude don't deserve no main event at Wrestlemania. Just like the Rock didn't deserve it.
Roman Reigns only had 1 or 2 singles matches, he's not ready to headline the biggest ppv
Uh bruh, its the Rock. That's like sayin Taker doesn't deserve it.
That dude don't either, I know y'all like the nostalgia of seeing these guys you grew up watching but that don't mean they should keep coming back and leaving somebody off the card that deserve it. And plus it makes the regular roster look weak if people can take all that time off but first match back beat an established person -
Batista getting the strap even for a short reign (unless it's to put over a younger guy like Punk or Bryan) would be disgusting.
I respect Batista's position as a main event star but he has moved to being an "attraction" same as Undertaker and Lesnar, he shouldn't be winning titles and bumping guys from top spots.
And yes i felt the same about Rock being champion. Having a superfight is one thing but being champion is something else totally. -
Chi-Town Bully wrote: »darkone360 wrote: »Chi-Town Bully wrote: »Batista aint been around in years, dude don't deserve no main event at Wrestlemania. Just like the Rock didn't deserve it.
Roman Reigns only had 1 or 2 singles matches, he's not ready to headline the biggest ppv
Uh bruh, its the Rock. That's like sayin Taker doesn't deserve it.
That dude don't either, I know y'all like the nostalgia of seeing these guys you grew up watching but that don't mean they should keep coming back and leaving somebody off the card that deserve it. And plus it makes the regular roster look weak if people can take all that time off but first match back beat an established person
Well maybe if the talent pool was better, then you wouldn't have to worry about them coming back to breathe life. Seriously, if you gotta keep bringing folks like that, what does that say about their confidence wit the current roster they got? -
He will be a completely different product from Batista altogetherBruh, I damn sure ain't want the Rock (a black man) coming back to get his ass whooped by Cena (a ? ) and leaving like a ? . Cena of all people.
-
He will be a completely different product from Batista altogetherYou know what, Batista was a pretty decent wrestler and he had an in-ring personality. Roman is just boring.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bPtI9j3Y8Ps
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8SHHh8jhxXo -
YesGrandMasterSour wrote: »You know what, Batista was a pretty decent wrestler and he had an in-ring personality. Roman is just boring.http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bPtI9j3Y8Pshttp://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8SHHh8jhxXo
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vVaQned2_NQ
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IQKX5X7zBBI
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_C0PcNNEKeQ
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dTFynv9TOE4
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=slpDUOZWHlE
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JegzQqoWddk -
Samoan Rhino, that's a good one. I'm gonna tweet that ? 50x a day to WWE, Steph and Trips.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6j9tGrSZU6M&list=UUpo_r3_HXHnjvMy93MYCRPg
![[Deleted User]](https://w1.vanillicon.com/v2/15efd8efe08bb34aae25f1808aaf5018.svg)
