Spinoff: Why are dudes so threatened / disgusted by females with "high" body counts?

1567810

Comments

  • deadeye
    deadeye Members Posts: 22,884 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Westie wrote: »
    YunnSanco wrote: »
    Westie wrote: »
    DNB1 wrote: »
    LMAO ? want that good head but don't wanna know how she learn to do that ? ....

    Wake up wake up.....it's the first of the month!!!

    There was always a ? better than you....not because he better, but because he was her first love....
    And because he was better.

    You've told men the truth haven't you

    About body counts yes. ? game I've lied like a mfer.

    @Westie‌


    Your body count must be low then.


    Excellent.


    I'll be updating my database with this new information.


    stringgg.gif
  • deadeye
    deadeye Members Posts: 22,884 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Westie wrote: »
    i dont know about these other ? but personally i dont be tryna smash no scalawags simply due to the fact that i know one of them old ? is probably still stalking her ass still reading old text messages and is liable to hop out the bushes on me when im walking her into the liqour store to get that pack of nag champa's and courvoisier .... and thats just a risk that increases with each ? she has let run up in her ... i seen it too many times .... wild ass dudes comin up to ? jobs confronting them at the check stands and ? ...

    2602126-1183250606-no-aw.gif

    I Done seen too much!
    I had a stalker I didn't sleep with...

    *no deadeye*



    Then again, I never slept with Manda either so......



    Shrug3.gif
  • nujerz84
    nujerz84 Members Posts: 15,418 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Anyone regardless of gender who has self worth/Respect/class and decency is not going to be in a serious relationship with a person with very high bodycount any way.. Dating/? yeah serious relationship nah
  • BEAM
    BEAM Members Posts: 2,560 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Trashboat wrote: »
    Psychology and biology hold testosterone to be the primary factor in determining desire for sex, of which men still have much more than women, generally speaking. However it goes deeper than this as there have been efforts to find men who have never consumed Pornography to participate in studies and they cannot find them, as they don't seem to exist. The female counterpart does.

    Add in a higher propensity for infidelity, a higher rate of sex crime conviction, and even higher rates of sex and porn addiction, and there is an obvious trend.

    Women that rival men in sexual desire are not that uncommon, but are much more the exception than the rule.

    Not that any of that negates their sexual freedom, but the comparison does not look quite the way you portray it

    Men watch porn, women read erotica. Both crave sex, just in different ways via different outlets. Erotica addition and the subsequent effects on marriage is also becoming much more prevalent.

    The higher rate of infidelity in men is due to the structure of relationships themselves; More recent studies have begun to take note of this fact. Men have always been more able to cheat because they leave the house for work. Now that women are competing in the workforce, their infidelity rates have skyrocketed. Higher rates of sex crime conviction are a combination of our being stronger physically, and women not needing to try so hard to get sex societally.

    Women that are openly and discoverable as desirous of sex as men are becoming more and more common with each study, because times are changing. They've been an exception because our society has always looked down on that kind of behavior from women.

    See, what you're not realizing is that the studies you're depending on to make your case are antiquated, lack comprehension, and are essentially obsolete. Studies expire, and so do the societies they're based on.


    zombie wrote: »
    The negative effects on society don't just come as a result of male pride being hurt, if you have a bunch of women running around ? then the problem becomes how this effects the children of these women. because ultimately she is the one who will get pregnant sooner or later and even if she takes the pill. knowing that your mom has a football team of lovers will be damaging to children

    number one she will have a bunch of different men she nor her child really know around. which opens up a lot of problems. number two sooner or later she will ? someone husband which often leads to some sort of violence
    number three she increases the chance that she will catch an std and women are more susceptible to get those than men and the affects is more damaging for them.

    change is not always a good thing and our disrespect for women who sleep around is not changing ? lovers are rare thank ? .

    and obviously i am talking about women with children who ? around too much

    Everything you just said, besides the bolded, is a result of perceptions forged by society, not nature. I can't keep spelling this out for you.

    As harsh as it may be, your feelings and what you're comfortable with don't stand as justification for why things should stay the way they are. You ? really think how you look at ? right now, however collective, is how things actually are, not realizing that the world we live in has been shaped by feelings ( society ), which are about as malleable a construct as they come. ? just don't want to change.

    Your pride / emotions ≠ Universal truth.
  • zombie
    zombie Members Posts: 13,450 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited October 2014
    BEAM wrote: »
    Trashboat wrote: »
    Psychology and biology hold testosterone to be the primary factor in determining desire for sex, of which men still have much more than women, generally speaking. However it goes deeper than this as there have been efforts to find men who have never consumed Pornography to participate in studies and they cannot find them, as they don't seem to exist. The female counterpart does.

    Add in a higher propensity for infidelity, a higher rate of sex crime conviction, and even higher rates of sex and porn addiction, and there is an obvious trend.

    Women that rival men in sexual desire are not that uncommon, but are much more the exception than the rule.

    Not that any of that negates their sexual freedom, but the comparison does not look quite the way you portray it

    Men watch porn, women read erotica. Both crave sex, just in different ways via different outlets. Erotica addition and the subsequent effects on marriage is also becoming much more prevalent.

    The higher rate of infidelity in men is due to the structure of relationships themselves; More recent studies have begun to take note of this fact. Men have always been more able to cheat because they leave the house for work. Now that women are competing in the workforce, their infidelity rates have skyrocketed. Higher rates of sex crime conviction are a combination of our being stronger physically, and women not needing to try so hard to get sex societally.

    Women that are openly and discoverable as desirous of sex as men are becoming more and more common with each study, because times are changing. They've been an exception because our society has always looked down on that kind of behavior from women.

    See, what you're not realizing is that the studies you're depending on to make your case are antiquated, lack comprehension, and are essentially obsolete. Studies expire, and so do the societies they're based on.


    zombie wrote: »
    The negative effects on society don't just come as a result of male pride being hurt, if you have a bunch of women running around ? then the problem becomes how this effects the children of these women. because ultimately she is the one who will get pregnant sooner or later and even if she takes the pill. knowing that your mom has a football team of lovers will be damaging to children

    number one she will have a bunch of different men she nor her child really know around. which opens up a lot of problems. number two sooner or later she will ? someone husband which often leads to some sort of violence
    number three she increases the chance that she will catch an std and women are more susceptible to get those than men and the affects is more damaging for them.

    change is not always a good thing and our disrespect for women who sleep around is not changing ? lovers are rare thank ? .

    and obviously i am talking about women with children who ? around too much

    Everything you just said, besides the bolded, is a result of perceptions forged by society, not nature. I can't keep spelling this out for you.

    As harsh as it may be, your feelings and what you're comfortable with don't stand as justification for why things should stay the way they are. You ? really think how you look at ? right now, however collective, is how things actually are, not realizing that the world we live in has been shaped by feelings ( society ), which are about as malleable a construct as they come. ? just don't want to change.

    Your pride / emotions ≠ Universal truth.

    what does a woman who endangers her children by bringing around a bunch of men have to do with my feelings or any male feelings. if moma is a ? sooner or later one of her boyfriends is going to be a lowlife we see these stories on the news all the time.

    what parents do and how they live their lives has an effect on their offspring that was my argument and that has nothing to do with my feelings, seems that you don't have a proper rebuttal.
  • deadeye
    deadeye Members Posts: 22,884 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited October 2014
    deadeye wrote: »
    h

    And as far as the car analogy, IM not gon play stupid, I see where you coming from. but me personally having had my last 2 cars be used I could give a ? less who the owners were or how many, I bought them ? off the strength of their current condition and an ideal of how reliable they would be from then on.


    Would you pay for them what you would expect to pay for a new car?


    That was the main point.


    No man in his right mind wants to wife a chick with a high body count.


    Smash maybe, but not wife.
    Look man when you in my situation 30 and still in the field looking for a piece of strange you gon take what you can get not to mention that in your 30s the mileage gon add up for everybody whether she ? the same dude or one here and one there.
    To each his own you want you a grown ass ? by all means wait on it with my blessings

    A "piece of strange" is understandable.....but not for relationship material.


    And I am currently focusing on a grown ass ? .


    She's in nursing school and her studies occupy most of her time.


    Her chastity is very important to her as well so,....as a compromise....I'm content as long as she gives me a ? every once in a while until she's ready to lose her virginity.
  • deadeye
    deadeye Members Posts: 22,884 ✭✭✭✭✭
    ? I look like loving up on a broad that sucked 7 or 8 ? before me talking about "mama I might be found the one"


    2bcjkj.jpg
  • Westie
    Westie Members Posts: 12,479 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Ew at erotica tho...
  • deadeye
    deadeye Members Posts: 22,884 ✭✭✭✭✭
    BEAM wrote: »
    BEAM wrote: »
    "A key that can open any lock is a master key, a lock that can be opened by any key is just a ? lock"

    Both sides take note of that fact and act accordingly, philosophy is nice but reality is reality.

    I'm sorry, but that bullshyt analogy is tired. Only idiots subscribe to such elementary, ABC logic.

    All of these social and religious constructs encouraged by the masses' abysmal inability to think critically, blindly following the example of civilizations developed thousands of ago years by Men, almost exclusively, is not "reality." It's what you're comfortable with, nothing more..

    What a lot of you ? don't realize, is that you sound EXACTLY how White Supremacists sound. They too cling to the past talmbout, "This is just the way things are." Cultural revolutions, sexual revolutions, these things are necessary. Otherwise ? like the ones in this very thread will continue to think they get to decide how other people live their lives based on small-mindedness and society's shortcomings.

    Why won't you people just admit that you enjoy the double standard?
    Unfortunately tho, the fact that you like something, or that things've been this way in every lesser civilization to date doesn't mean it's best.
    Candles worked just fine before the lightbulb..

    you typed all that but didn't prove what he says was wrong?

    You subscribe to this sexist dogma, you believe it, mainly because you're on the benefitting end of the double standard.

    You do realize that you're subscribing to feminist dogma as well right?


    How exactly is that benefitting you?
  • zombie
    zombie Members Posts: 13,450 ✭✭✭✭✭
    could you imagine being the son/daughter of a known ? in a small town the mental damage that knowledge will do to you is inescapable.
  • BEAM
    BEAM Members Posts: 2,560 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited October 2014
    zombie wrote: »
    what does a woman who endangers her children by bringing around a bunch of men have to do with my feelings or any male feelings. if moma is a ? sooner or later one of her boyfriends is going to be a lowlife we see these stories on the news all the time.

    what parents do and how they live their lives has an effect on their offspring that was my argument and that has nothing to do with my feelings, seems that you don't have a proper rebuttal.

    The exact same is true of new women in the picture; But you haven't paid close attention to those stories, have you? Your bias deems you under-qualified for this discussion, honestly. You're more concerned with your ideas being challenged than with the facts being presented to challenge them. Pride, arrogance, comfortability, all things that've contributed to how slowly our civilization has progressed morally.

    You have no point, only hurt feelings and threatened ideologies.

    deadeye wrote: »
    You do realize that you're subscribing to feminist dogma as well right?


    How exactly is that benefitting you?

    SO WHAT? Feminism at it's core, was founded on striving for equality of the sexes; THAT is what I support, because we now live in a society that makes the few biological differences between men and women moot, and sheds light on the societal differences that were created by all of our past male-dominated ideologies. Poor execution of a mission doesn't downplay it's purpose, and yet that's what most men see when they encounter feminism, unfortunately.

    While "feminism" may not necessarily benefit me as a man, that's no reason to deny it to those fighting for it, because it poses no real threat to me. If taking away your ability to selfishly engage in reckless promiscuity is a threat to you, then you're an issue.
  • goldenja
    goldenja Members Posts: 6,351 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited October 2014
    BEAM wrote: »
    Tell me why that analogy is wrong tho


    Men want ? , women want ? ; It's biology.

    I mean seriously, did you need me to spell it out like that?[/b]

    hahahahahahah!!!

    yo, it don't get no triller than this right here.
  • Westie
    Westie Members Posts: 12,479 ✭✭✭✭✭
    deadeye wrote: »
    deadeye wrote: »
    h

    And as far as the car analogy, IM not gon play stupid, I see where you coming from. but me personally having had my last 2 cars be used I could give a ? less who the owners were or how many, I bought them ? off the strength of their current condition and an ideal of how reliable they would be from then on.


    Would you pay for them what you would expect to pay for a new car?


    That was the main point.


    No man in his right mind wants to wife a chick with a high body count.


    Smash maybe, but not wife.
    Look man when you in my situation 30 and still in the field looking for a piece of strange you gon take what you can get not to mention that in your 30s the mileage gon add up for everybody whether she ? the same dude or one here and one there.
    To each his own you want you a grown ass ? by all means wait on it with my blessings

    A "piece of strange" is understandable.....but not for relationship material.


    And I am currently focusing on a grown ass ? .


    She's in nursing school and her studies occupy most of her time.


    Her chastity is very important to her, so....as a compromise....I'm content as long as she gives me a ? every once in a while until she's ready to lose her virginity.
    So you're abstaining from ? right? What's your body count?
  • Westie
    Westie Members Posts: 12,479 ✭✭✭✭✭
    You ? with penises do not deserve chaste women. Deviants
  • deadeye
    deadeye Members Posts: 22,884 ✭✭✭✭✭
    BEAM wrote: »
    Tell me why that analogy is wrong tho

    Because a ? doesn't have the same purpose / function as a lock; ? is designed to take ? ( any ? shorty wants ). Femmes aren't faulty for ? .

    ? doesn't have the same purpose / function as a key; ? is designed to go up in ? ( any ? dude wants ). Dudes aren't unlocking anything by ? .

    Men want ? , women want ? ; It's biology.

    I mean seriously, did you need me to spell it out like that?


    Do you understand what an analogy is?


    It's basically a comparison in which you find common similarities between two different things.


    Somebody saying "Getting hit by a car feels just like getting hit by a car" is not an analogy.
  • The Lonious Monk
    The Lonious Monk Members Posts: 26,258 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Cars and people are a little bit different tho
    lol

    Not in this case. Whether your buying a car or settling in a relationship, you want to know you're getting quality for your investment. I'm not saying that a chick with a mileage can't be a quality. She might, just like a well maintained car with a lot of mileage may still be a good buy depending on the circumstances. It still something to be wary of.
  • Dupac
    Dupac Members, Writer Posts: 68,365 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Westie wrote: »
    You ? with penises do not deserve chaste women. Deviants

    lol, what do you deserve?
  • Westie
    Westie Members Posts: 12,479 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Cars and people are a little bit different tho
    lol

    Not in this case. Whether your buying a car or settling in a relationship, you want to know you're getting quality for your investment. I'm not saying that a chick with a mileage can't be a quality. She might, just like a well maintained car with a lot of mileage may still be a good buy depending on the circumstances. It still something to be wary of.

    Cars are PROPERTY. You pay money for them. They are machines you work until they're outdated. Their only purpose is to take you from one destination to the next. Yes, a lot of yall equate that to women but of you do you're a mysogynist.

    *waits*
  • zombie
    zombie Members Posts: 13,450 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited October 2014
    BEAM wrote: »
    zombie wrote: »
    what does a woman who endangers her children by bringing around a bunch of men have to do with my feelings or any male feelings. if moma is a ? sooner or later one of her boyfriends is going to be a lowlife we see these stories on the news all the time.

    what parents do and how they live their lives has an effect on their offspring that was my argument and that has nothing to do with my feelings, seems that you don't have a proper rebuttal.

    The exact same is true of new women in the picture; But you haven't paid close attention to those stories, have you? Your bias deems you under-qualified for this discussion, honestly. You're more concerned with your ideas being challenged than with the facts being presented to challenge them. Pride, arrogance, comfortability, all things that've contributed to how slowly our civilization has progressed morally.

    You have no point, only hurt feelings and threatened ideologies.

    What feelings are you talking about?? it's not the adult male or female i am concerned about in my argument it's the children and the effects that having ? for parents will have on them mother or father sleeping around is wrong and has bad effects for the children, my argument is that because of the way biology/psychology is set up that ? mothers do more damage to their children.

  • BEAM
    BEAM Members Posts: 2,560 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited October 2014
    deadeye wrote: »
    Do you understand what an analogy is?


    It's basically a comparison in which you find common similarities between two different things.


    Somebody saying "Getting hit by a car feels just like getting hit by a car" is not an analogy.

    The analogy does not work, plain and simple; Which I had to map out.

    Similar shapes ≠ Valid analogies.


    Cars and people are a little bit different tho
    lol

    Not in this case. Whether your buying a car or settling in a relationship, you want to know you're getting quality for your investment. I'm not saying that a chick with a mileage can't be a quality. She might, just like a well maintained car with a lot of mileage may still be a good buy depending on the circumstances. It still something to be wary of.

    The same consideration should be taken with men, is the point. That's why the analogy does not work, because it attempts to villainize one sex for doing what the other does casually.
  • Westie
    Westie Members Posts: 12,479 ✭✭✭✭✭
    DWO wrote: »
    Westie wrote: »
    You ? with penises do not deserve chaste women. Deviants

    lol, what do you deserve?

    I'm not chaste, so I don't expect the same.
  • BEAM
    BEAM Members Posts: 2,560 ✭✭✭✭✭
    zombie wrote: »
    What feelings are you talking about?? it's not the adult male or female i am concerned about in my argument it's the children and the effects that having ? for parents will have on them mother or father sleeping around is wrong and has bad effects for the children, my argument is that because of the way biology/psychology is set up that ? mothers do more damage to their children.

    The bolded is false.
    These are the feelings I'm talking about.
  • deadeye
    deadeye Members Posts: 22,884 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Westie wrote: »
    deadeye wrote: »
    deadeye wrote: »
    h

    And as far as the car analogy, IM not gon play stupid, I see where you coming from. but me personally having had my last 2 cars be used I could give a ? less who the owners were or how many, I bought them ? off the strength of their current condition and an ideal of how reliable they would be from then on.


    Would you pay for them what you would expect to pay for a new car?


    That was the main point.


    No man in his right mind wants to wife a chick with a high body count.


    Smash maybe, but not wife.
    Look man when you in my situation 30 and still in the field looking for a piece of strange you gon take what you can get not to mention that in your 30s the mileage gon add up for everybody whether she ? the same dude or one here and one there.
    To each his own you want you a grown ass ? by all means wait on it with my blessings

    A "piece of strange" is understandable.....but not for relationship material.


    And I am currently focusing on a grown ass ? .


    She's in nursing school and her studies occupy most of her time.


    Her chastity is very important to her, so....as a compromise....I'm content as long as she gives me a ? every once in a while until she's ready to lose her virginity.
    So you're abstaining from ? right? What's your body count?



    I'm satisfied as long as she jerks me off whenever I get too backed up.
  • zombie
    zombie Members Posts: 13,450 ✭✭✭✭✭
    if mom is a ? chances are you are going to end up with a whole bunch of half brothers and sisters who will live in the same house as you do. chances are you are going to be exposed to a whole bunch of different men and for a growing child looking for father figures this is a recipe for trouble. men who sleep with ? typically don't care about them or their children because he is just there for ? and might hurt her children

    if dad is a ? his outside children won't be living with you , so the child does not have that stress and the women dad brings around typical do care about him and won't hurt his child. often these women don't know the man is a ? because promiscuous men often hide this fact. men who are ? present themselves as not being one or at least it's harder to identify a man as a ? .

    but when a girl is a ? often there are clear cut signs
  • Westie
    Westie Members Posts: 12,479 ✭✭✭✭✭
    deadeye wrote: »
    Westie wrote: »
    deadeye wrote: »
    deadeye wrote: »
    h

    And as far as the car analogy, IM not gon play stupid, I see where you coming from. but me personally having had my last 2 cars be used I could give a ? less who the owners were or how many, I bought them ? off the strength of their current condition and an ideal of how reliable they would be from then on.


    Would you pay for them what you would expect to pay for a new car?


    That was the main point.


    No man in his right mind wants to wife a chick with a high body count.


    Smash maybe, but not wife.
    Look man when you in my situation 30 and still in the field looking for a piece of strange you gon take what you can get not to mention that in your 30s the mileage gon add up for everybody whether she ? the same dude or one here and one there.
    To each his own you want you a grown ass ? by all means wait on it with my blessings

    A "piece of strange" is understandable.....but not for relationship material.


    And I am currently focusing on a grown ass ? .


    She's in nursing school and her studies occupy most of her time.


    Her chastity is very important to her, so....as a compromise....I'm content as long as she gives me a ? every once in a while until she's ready to lose her virginity.
    So you're abstaining from ? right? What's your body count?



    I'm satisfied as long as she jerks me off whenever I get too backed up.

    Why do I ever ask you anything...