PC game called Hatred might be the bloodiest game ever made

2

Comments

  • LUClEN
    LUClEN Members Posts: 20,559 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Trashboat wrote: »
    Whoever buys this game needs to be on a watch list

    Put yourself on a watch list then because damn near everyone who has played GTA has went on mass murdering sprees. The only difference here is that killing is part of the objective and on GTA it's optional.

    exactly, how the ? is GTA morally acceptable but this aint?

    Because it is being marketed as a genocide simulator

    why because he said he was gonna have his own personal genocide? foh.

    the game is the same ? as GTA, ? people, cause chaos, commit crime. real simple

    There is no evidence of any other point to the game
    No indication of missions or alternative objectives

    The protagonist looks like he's auditioning to be in the trench coat mafia
    and his soliloquy there sets up a plot where his goal is to ? as many people as possible, with little regard for himself dying
  • Smokey Tha Bandit
    Smokey Tha Bandit Members Posts: 3,779 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited October 2014
    Trashboat wrote: »
    Trashboat wrote: »
    Whoever buys this game needs to be on a watch list

    Put yourself on a watch list then because damn near everyone who has played GTA has went on mass murdering sprees. The only difference here is that killing is part of the objective and on GTA it's optional.

    exactly, how the ? is GTA morally acceptable but this aint?

    Because it is being marketed as a genocide simulator

    why because he said he was gonna have his own personal genocide? foh.

    the game is the same ? as GTA, ? people, cause chaos, commit crime. real simple

    There is no evidence of any other point to the game
    No indication of missions or alternative objectives

    The protagonist looks like he's auditioning to be in the trench coat mafia
    and his soliloquy there sets up a plot where his goal is to ? as many people as possible, with little regard for himself dying

    KD6oN.jpg

    about 80 percent of the people who play GTA, dont play it for the ? missions or objectives. all that ? you talking about means absolutely ? .
  • Jabu_Rule
    Jabu_Rule Members Posts: 5,993 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Whoever buys this game needs to be on a watch list

    Put yourself on a watch list then because damn near everyone who has played GTA has went on mass murdering sprees. The only difference here is that killing is part of the objective and on GTA it's optional.

    exactly, how the ? is GTA morally acceptable but this aint?

    Sound like you trying to get your Neo ? fix. GTA isn't focused on massacring everyone in a square mile radius unless you want to play like that. Manhunt would be a more appropriate comparison and that was controversial too, but they focused mainly on offing criminals. GTA is more of an equal opportunity crime spree encompassing a multitude of criminal acts. It also isn't morally acceptable by most standards which is why it has garnered a lot of negative attention.
  • Shizlansky
    Shizlansky Members Posts: 35,095 ✭✭✭✭✭
    The ? is too real.

    Gta is kiddie as ? .
  • LUClEN
    LUClEN Members Posts: 20,559 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Trashboat wrote: »
    Trashboat wrote: »
    Whoever buys this game needs to be on a watch list

    Put yourself on a watch list then because damn near everyone who has played GTA has went on mass murdering sprees. The only difference here is that killing is part of the objective and on GTA it's optional.

    exactly, how the ? is GTA morally acceptable but this aint?

    Because it is being marketed as a genocide simulator

    why because he said he was gonna have his own personal genocide? foh.

    the game is the same ? as GTA, ? people, cause chaos, commit crime. real simple

    There is no evidence of any other point to the game
    No indication of missions or alternative objectives

    The protagonist looks like he's auditioning to be in the trench coat mafia
    and his soliloquy there sets up a plot where his goal is to ? as many people as possible, with little regard for himself dying

    KD6oN.jpg

    about 80 percent of the people who play GTA, dont play it for the ? missions or objectives. all that ? you talking about means absolutely ? .

    That's irrelevant. You asked about the difference between them, and from a marketing standpoint this product conflicts with social values regarding genocide and mass murder much more than gta does.

    They appear to be similar in game play but without a full copy you are just speculating until its release permits a full review.

    Grand theft auto elicited a huge wave of criticism and moral opposition upon release as well. This idea that one is fine but the other is not has no grounding in fact. Grand theft auto was banned in Australia, demonized by various media and prompted protests from parents and politicians alike. This isn't a matter of GTA seeing no backlash and this game being hit with unprecedented resistance. This is more of the same people who advocated against Rockstar vocalizing similar concerns about Hatred and their developers.
  • Karl.
    Karl. Members Posts: 8,015 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Trashboat wrote: »
    Trashboat wrote: »
    Whoever buys this game needs to be on a watch list

    Put yourself on a watch list then because damn near everyone who has played GTA has went on mass murdering sprees. The only difference here is that killing is part of the objective and on GTA it's optional.

    exactly, how the ? is GTA morally acceptable but this aint?

    Because it is being marketed as a genocide simulator

    why because he said he was gonna have his own personal genocide? foh.

    the game is the same ? as GTA, ? people, cause chaos, commit crime. real simple

    There is no evidence of any other point to the game
    No indication of missions or alternative objectives

    The protagonist looks like he's auditioning to be in the trench coat mafia
    and his soliloquy there sets up a plot where his goal is to ? as many people as possible, with little regard for himself dying


    about 80 percent of the people who play GTA, dont play it for the ? missions or objectives. all that ? you talking about means absolutely ? .

    Where did you get this stat?
  • Smokey Tha Bandit
    Smokey Tha Bandit Members Posts: 3,779 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited October 2014
    FuriousOne wrote: »
    Whoever buys this game needs to be on a watch list

    Put yourself on a watch list then because damn near everyone who has played GTA has went on mass murdering sprees. The only difference here is that killing is part of the objective and on GTA it's optional.

    exactly, how the ? is GTA morally acceptable but this aint?

    Sound like you trying to get your Neo ? fix. GTA isn't focused on massacring everyone in a square mile radius unless you want to play like that. Manhunt would be a more appropriate comparison and that was controversial too, but they focused mainly on offing criminals. GTA is more of an equal opportunity crime spree encompassing a multitude of criminal acts. It also isn't morally acceptable by most standards which is why it has garnered a lot of negative attention.

    neo ? fix? ? you sound dumb as hell. what is ? about this game? he didnt say he wanted to ? everyone that wasnt white, he just said he wanted to ? everyone. I dont see what the ? problem is.

    like I said, GTA is about killing people and commiting crimes. you can do other little ? on the side but that is what most people play the game for.
  • Smokey Tha Bandit
    Smokey Tha Bandit Members Posts: 3,779 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited October 2014
    Karl. wrote: »
    Trashboat wrote: »
    Trashboat wrote: »
    Whoever buys this game needs to be on a watch list

    Put yourself on a watch list then because damn near everyone who has played GTA has went on mass murdering sprees. The only difference here is that killing is part of the objective and on GTA it's optional.

    exactly, how the ? is GTA morally acceptable but this aint?

    Because it is being marketed as a genocide simulator

    why because he said he was gonna have his own personal genocide? foh.

    the game is the same ? as GTA, ? people, cause chaos, commit crime. real simple

    There is no evidence of any other point to the game
    No indication of missions or alternative objectives

    The protagonist looks like he's auditioning to be in the trench coat mafia
    and his soliloquy there sets up a plot where his goal is to ? as many people as possible, with little regard for himself dying


    about 80 percent of the people who play GTA, dont play it for the ? missions or objectives. all that ? you talking about means absolutely ? .

    Where did you get this stat?

    have you ever played GTA online? have you ever played GTA with friends? MOST people who play the game do it to ? people and cause random acts of chaos. period.

    I play the game for the missions and all the extra ? but most do not.
  • Smokey Tha Bandit
    Smokey Tha Bandit Members Posts: 3,779 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Trashboat wrote: »
    Trashboat wrote: »
    Trashboat wrote: »
    Whoever buys this game needs to be on a watch list

    Put yourself on a watch list then because damn near everyone who has played GTA has went on mass murdering sprees. The only difference here is that killing is part of the objective and on GTA it's optional.

    exactly, how the ? is GTA morally acceptable but this aint?

    Because it is being marketed as a genocide simulator

    why because he said he was gonna have his own personal genocide? foh.

    the game is the same ? as GTA, ? people, cause chaos, commit crime. real simple

    There is no evidence of any other point to the game
    No indication of missions or alternative objectives

    The protagonist looks like he's auditioning to be in the trench coat mafia
    and his soliloquy there sets up a plot where his goal is to ? as many people as possible, with little regard for himself dying

    KD6oN.jpg

    about 80 percent of the people who play GTA, dont play it for the ? missions or objectives. all that ? you talking about means absolutely ? .

    That's irrelevant. You asked about the difference between them, and from a marketing standpoint this product conflicts with social values regarding genocide and mass murder much more than gta does.

    They appear to be similar in game play but without a full copy you are just speculating until its release permits a full review.

    Grand theft auto elicited a huge wave of criticism and moral opposition upon release as well. This idea that one is fine but the other is not has no grounding in fact. Grand theft auto was banned in Australia, demonized by various media and prompted protests from parents and politicians alike. This isn't a matter of GTA seeing no backlash and this game being hit with unprecedented resistance. This is more of the same people who advocated against Rockstar vocalizing similar concerns about Hatred and their developers.

    oh you mean its irrelevant because its not convenient for your argument. and so what? the game is marketed with murder, what ? game isnt? your strawman argument for "genocide marketing" is weak.

    all that other ? you talkin about is irrelevant. I dont care if GTA was banned in australia, its legal in america. the bolded is exactly what you are trying to do when they are similar type of games.

    bottom line, this is a GTA-esque game.
  • LUClEN
    LUClEN Members Posts: 20,559 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Trashboat wrote: »
    Trashboat wrote: »
    Trashboat wrote: »
    Whoever buys this game needs to be on a watch list

    Put yourself on a watch list then because damn near everyone who has played GTA has went on mass murdering sprees. The only difference here is that killing is part of the objective and on GTA it's optional.

    exactly, how the ? is GTA morally acceptable but this aint?

    Because it is being marketed as a genocide simulator

    why because he said he was gonna have his own personal genocide? foh.

    the game is the same ? as GTA, ? people, cause chaos, commit crime. real simple

    There is no evidence of any other point to the game
    No indication of missions or alternative objectives

    The protagonist looks like he's auditioning to be in the trench coat mafia
    and his soliloquy there sets up a plot where his goal is to ? as many people as possible, with little regard for himself dying

    KD6oN.jpg

    about 80 percent of the people who play GTA, dont play it for the ? missions or objectives. all that ? you talking about means absolutely ? .

    That's irrelevant. You asked about the difference between them, and from a marketing standpoint this product conflicts with social values regarding genocide and mass murder much more than gta does.

    They appear to be similar in game play but without a full copy you are just speculating until its release permits a full review.

    Grand theft auto elicited a huge wave of criticism and moral opposition upon release as well. This idea that one is fine but the other is not has no grounding in fact. Grand theft auto was banned in Australia, demonized by various media and prompted protests from parents and politicians alike. This isn't a matter of GTA seeing no backlash and this game being hit with unprecedented resistance. This is more of the same people who advocated against Rockstar vocalizing similar concerns about Hatred and their developers.

    oh you mean its irrelevant because its not convenient for your argument. and so what? the game is marketed with murder, what ? game isnt? your strawman argument for "genocide marketing" is weak.

    all that other ? you talkin about is irrelevant. I dont care if GTA was banned in australia, its legal in america. the bolded is exactly what you are trying to do when they are similar type of games.

    bottom line, this is a GTA-esque game.

    That's not a straw man.

    This is mass murder for the sake of murder. This is not an FPS where America's military rival at the time serves as the main villain. This is not a game where the enemies are nonhumans. This is killing civilians for the sake of killing civilians. Grand theft auto never advocates for that.

    Even though the GTA games deal with different, arguably lighter taboos, they are still attacked

    This is Glenn Beck blaming immorality on GTA
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Zzr138ijmaQ

    This is GTA being blamed for shootings
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NSCQV1X1wOk

    Grand Theft Auto blamed for a kid shooting his care giver
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=d_TWqhJbWVY

    Prostitutes protested GTA in 2006
    http://www.nytimes.com/2006/02/20/technology/20link.html?_r=0

    Hatian Americans protested GTA in 2006
    uk.gamespot.com/pc/action/grandtheftautovicecity/news.html?sid=6084645

    Animal rights activists cry about GTA's animal cruelty
    http://www.tmz.com/2013/09/21/animal-rights-org-boycott-gta-v-for-shameless-animal-murder/

    Mothers Against ? Driving complain about GTA
    http://www.shacknews.com/article/52461/madd-protests-gta-4-over

    Parent group issues warning for Grand Theft Auto
    http://articles.latimes.com/2009/feb/21/business/fi-video-games21

    Christian activists decry GTA's use of torture
    http://www.christianpost.com/news/grand-theft-auto-v-under-fire-from-human-rights-activists-over-games-torture-scene-104995/



    Jack Thompson made a career of suing people over Rockstar games.
    There was a ton of backlash to the GTA games, as well as the other works by Rockstar.
  • zombie
    zombie Members Posts: 13,450 ✭✭✭✭✭
    why are people in here arguing with trashboat??? he wants to be a lawyer he's just practicing the art of ? logic for fun he never has a real point
  • LUClEN
    LUClEN Members Posts: 20,559 ✭✭✭✭✭
    zombie wrote: »
    why are people in here arguing with trashboat??? he wants to be a lawyer he's just practicing the art of ? logic for fun he never has a real point

    You must still be butt hurt because I didn't buy into your illogical ideology and feelings based claims
  • StoneColdMikey
    StoneColdMikey Members, Moderators Posts: 33,543 Regulator
    This ? smoke always catch feelings if you disagree with him
  • Smokey Tha Bandit
    Smokey Tha Bandit Members Posts: 3,779 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited October 2014
    Trashboat wrote: »
    Trashboat wrote: »
    Trashboat wrote: »
    Trashboat wrote: »
    Whoever buys this game needs to be on a watch list

    Put yourself on a watch list then because damn near everyone who has played GTA has went on mass murdering sprees. The only difference here is that killing is part of the objective and on GTA it's optional.

    exactly, how the ? is GTA morally acceptable but this aint?

    Because it is being marketed as a genocide simulator

    why because he said he was gonna have his own personal genocide? foh.

    the game is the same ? as GTA, ? people, cause chaos, commit crime. real simple

    There is no evidence of any other point to the game
    No indication of missions or alternative objectives

    The protagonist looks like he's auditioning to be in the trench coat mafia
    and his soliloquy there sets up a plot where his goal is to ? as many people as possible, with little regard for himself dying

    KD6oN.jpg

    about 80 percent of the people who play GTA, dont play it for the ? missions or objectives. all that ? you talking about means absolutely ? .

    That's irrelevant. You asked about the difference between them, and from a marketing standpoint this product conflicts with social values regarding genocide and mass murder much more than gta does.

    They appear to be similar in game play but without a full copy you are just speculating until its release permits a full review.

    Grand theft auto elicited a huge wave of criticism and moral opposition upon release as well. This idea that one is fine but the other is not has no grounding in fact. Grand theft auto was banned in Australia, demonized by various media and prompted protests from parents and politicians alike. This isn't a matter of GTA seeing no backlash and this game being hit with unprecedented resistance. This is more of the same people who advocated against Rockstar vocalizing similar concerns about Hatred and their developers.

    oh you mean its irrelevant because its not convenient for your argument. and so what? the game is marketed with murder, what ? game isnt? your strawman argument for "genocide marketing" is weak.

    all that other ? you talkin about is irrelevant. I dont care if GTA was banned in australia, its legal in america. the bolded is exactly what you are trying to do when they are similar type of games.

    bottom line, this is a GTA-esque game.

    That's not a straw man.

    This is mass murder for the sake of murder. This is not an FPS where America's military rival at the time serves as the main villain. This is not a game where the enemies are nonhumans. This is killing civilians for the sake of killing civilians. Grand theft auto never advocates for that.

    Even though the GTA games deal with different, arguably lighter taboos, they are still attacked

    This is Glenn Beck blaming immorality on GTA
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Zzr138ijmaQ

    This is GTA being blamed for shootings
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NSCQV1X1wOk

    Grand Theft Auto blamed for a kid shooting his care giver
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=d_TWqhJbWVY

    Prostitutes protested GTA in 2006
    http://www.nytimes.com/2006/02/20/technology/20link.html?_r=0

    Hatian Americans protested GTA in 2006
    uk.gamespot.com/pc/action/grandtheftautovicecity/news.html?sid=6084645

    Animal rights activists cry about GTA's animal cruelty
    http://www.tmz.com/2013/09/21/animal-rights-org-boycott-gta-v-for-shameless-animal-murder/

    Mothers Against ? Driving complain about GTA
    http://www.shacknews.com/article/52461/madd-protests-gta-4-over

    Parent group issues warning for Grand Theft Auto
    http://articles.latimes.com/2009/feb/21/business/fi-video-games21

    Christian activists decry GTA's use of torture
    http://www.christianpost.com/news/grand-theft-auto-v-under-fire-from-human-rights-activists-over-games-torture-scene-104995/



    Jack Thompson made a career of suing people over Rockstar games.
    There was a ton of backlash to the GTA games, as well as the other works by Rockstar.

    smh you're an idiot, posting Glenn Beck faux news videos and celebrity gossip sites like that ? is credible lol

    I know about all the uproar of GTA, all Im saying is ? .
  • Smokey Tha Bandit
    Smokey Tha Bandit Members Posts: 3,779 ✭✭✭✭✭
    This ? smoke always catch feelings if you disagree with him

    ? officer
  • Jabu_Rule
    Jabu_Rule Members Posts: 5,993 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited October 2014
    FuriousOne wrote: »
    Whoever buys this game needs to be on a watch list

    Put yourself on a watch list then because damn near everyone who has played GTA has went on mass murdering sprees. The only difference here is that killing is part of the objective and on GTA it's optional.

    exactly, how the ? is GTA morally acceptable but this aint?

    Sound like you trying to get your Neo ? fix. GTA isn't focused on massacring everyone in a square mile radius unless you want to play like that. Manhunt would be a more appropriate comparison and that was controversial too, but they focused mainly on offing criminals. GTA is more of an equal opportunity crime spree encompassing a multitude of criminal acts. It also isn't morally acceptable by most standards which is why it has garnered a lot of negative attention.

    neo ? fix? ? you sound dumb as hell. what is ? about this game? he didnt say he wanted to ? everyone that wasnt white, he just said he wanted to ? everyone. I dont see what the ? problem is.

    like I said, GTA is about killing people and commiting crimes. you can do other little ? on the side but that is what most people play the game for.

    I play it to drive cars. I even follow the road rules until it gets boring. Still, the point was that it isn't the only point, and it was controversial unlike your silly ass notions. A Neo ? made a Murder simulator. You don't have to dig deeper to see its intent. And black folks weren't the primary victims of the holocaust you ? feelings catcher, it was White Jews and Communist.
  • RiGGA
    RiGGA Members Posts: 3,219 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Lol @ morality for pixels on your ? TV. People are straight ? nowadays yo we used to be thrown into the wilderness by elders as teenagers to become men, but now we done let the white man put bitchassness in our collective heart to the point we outchea feeling some type of way about making pixels shoot pixels. ? all'at, I'm wit Smokey for once...



    First day cop, piratebay for the tall ?


    DrakeStrut2.gif



  • LUClEN
    LUClEN Members Posts: 20,559 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Trashboat wrote: »
    Trashboat wrote: »
    Trashboat wrote: »
    Trashboat wrote: »
    Whoever buys this game needs to be on a watch list

    Put yourself on a watch list then because damn near everyone who has played GTA has went on mass murdering sprees. The only difference here is that killing is part of the objective and on GTA it's optional.

    exactly, how the ? is GTA morally acceptable but this aint?

    Because it is being marketed as a genocide simulator

    why because he said he was gonna have his own personal genocide? foh.

    the game is the same ? as GTA, ? people, cause chaos, commit crime. real simple

    There is no evidence of any other point to the game
    No indication of missions or alternative objectives

    The protagonist looks like he's auditioning to be in the trench coat mafia
    and his soliloquy there sets up a plot where his goal is to ? as many people as possible, with little regard for himself dying

    KD6oN.jpg

    about 80 percent of the people who play GTA, dont play it for the ? missions or objectives. all that ? you talking about means absolutely ? .

    That's irrelevant. You asked about the difference between them, and from a marketing standpoint this product conflicts with social values regarding genocide and mass murder much more than gta does.

    They appear to be similar in game play but without a full copy you are just speculating until its release permits a full review.

    Grand theft auto elicited a huge wave of criticism and moral opposition upon release as well. This idea that one is fine but the other is not has no grounding in fact. Grand theft auto was banned in Australia, demonized by various media and prompted protests from parents and politicians alike. This isn't a matter of GTA seeing no backlash and this game being hit with unprecedented resistance. This is more of the same people who advocated against Rockstar vocalizing similar concerns about Hatred and their developers.

    oh you mean its irrelevant because its not convenient for your argument. and so what? the game is marketed with murder, what ? game isnt? your strawman argument for "genocide marketing" is weak.

    all that other ? you talkin about is irrelevant. I dont care if GTA was banned in australia, its legal in america. the bolded is exactly what you are trying to do when they are similar type of games.

    bottom line, this is a GTA-esque game.

    That's not a straw man.

    This is mass murder for the sake of murder. This is not an FPS where America's military rival at the time serves as the main villain. This is not a game where the enemies are nonhumans. This is killing civilians for the sake of killing civilians. Grand theft auto never advocates for that.

    Even though the GTA games deal with different, arguably lighter taboos, they are still attacked

    This is Glenn Beck blaming immorality on GTA
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Zzr138ijmaQ

    This is GTA being blamed for shootings
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NSCQV1X1wOk

    Grand Theft Auto blamed for a kid shooting his care giver
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=d_TWqhJbWVY

    Prostitutes protested GTA in 2006
    http://www.nytimes.com/2006/02/20/technology/20link.html?_r=0

    Hatian Americans protested GTA in 2006
    uk.gamespot.com/pc/action/grandtheftautovicecity/news.html?sid=6084645

    Animal rights activists cry about GTA's animal cruelty
    http://www.tmz.com/2013/09/21/animal-rights-org-boycott-gta-v-for-shameless-animal-murder/

    Mothers Against ? Driving complain about GTA
    http://www.shacknews.com/article/52461/madd-protests-gta-4-over

    Parent group issues warning for Grand Theft Auto
    http://articles.latimes.com/2009/feb/21/business/fi-video-games21

    Christian activists decry GTA's use of torture
    http://www.christianpost.com/news/grand-theft-auto-v-under-fire-from-human-rights-activists-over-games-torture-scene-104995/



    Jack Thompson made a career of suing people over Rockstar games.
    There was a ton of backlash to the GTA games, as well as the other works by Rockstar.

    smh you're an idiot, posting Glenn Beck faux news videos and celebrity gossip sites like that ? is credible lol

    I know about all the uproar of GTA, all Im saying is ? .

    So basically you have no good refutation

    Could have just said that from the jump
  • reapin505
    reapin505 Members Posts: 4,009 ✭✭✭✭✭
    FuriousOne wrote: »
    FuriousOne wrote: »
    Whoever buys this game needs to be on a watch list

    Put yourself on a watch list then because damn near everyone who has played GTA has went on mass murdering sprees. The only difference here is that killing is part of the objective and on GTA it's optional.

    exactly, how the ? is GTA morally acceptable but this aint?

    Sound like you trying to get your Neo ? fix. GTA isn't focused on massacring everyone in a square mile radius unless you want to play like that. Manhunt would be a more appropriate comparison and that was controversial too, but they focused mainly on offing criminals. GTA is more of an equal opportunity crime spree encompassing a multitude of criminal acts. It also isn't morally acceptable by most standards which is why it has garnered a lot of negative attention.

    neo ? fix? ? you sound dumb as hell. what is ? about this game? he didnt say he wanted to ? everyone that wasnt white, he just said he wanted to ? everyone. I dont see what the ? problem is.

    like I said, GTA is about killing people and commiting crimes. you can do other little ? on the side but that is what most people play the game for.

    I play it to drive cars. I even follow the road rules until it gets boring. Still, the point was that it isn't the only point, and it was controversial unlike your silly ass notions. A Neo ? made a Murder simulator. You don't have to dig deeper to see its intent. And black folks weren't the primary victims of the holocaust you ? feelings catcher, it was White Jews and Communist.

    I thought I was the only one to do that. I've been wishing that ? had a turning signal for the longest time lol
  • B_A
    B_A Members Posts: 2,405 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Just in time as i finish building my new pc
  • Smokey Tha Bandit
    Smokey Tha Bandit Members Posts: 3,779 ✭✭✭✭✭
    FuriousOne wrote: »
    FuriousOne wrote: »
    Whoever buys this game needs to be on a watch list

    Put yourself on a watch list then because damn near everyone who has played GTA has went on mass murdering sprees. The only difference here is that killing is part of the objective and on GTA it's optional.

    exactly, how the ? is GTA morally acceptable but this aint?

    Sound like you trying to get your Neo ? fix. GTA isn't focused on massacring everyone in a square mile radius unless you want to play like that. Manhunt would be a more appropriate comparison and that was controversial too, but they focused mainly on offing criminals. GTA is more of an equal opportunity crime spree encompassing a multitude of criminal acts. It also isn't morally acceptable by most standards which is why it has garnered a lot of negative attention.

    neo ? fix? ? you sound dumb as hell. what is ? about this game? he didnt say he wanted to ? everyone that wasnt white, he just said he wanted to ? everyone. I dont see what the ? problem is.

    like I said, GTA is about killing people and commiting crimes. you can do other little ? on the side but that is what most people play the game for.

    I play it to drive cars. I even follow the road rules until it gets boring. Still, the point was that it isn't the only point, and it was controversial unlike your silly ass notions. A Neo ? made a Murder simulator. You don't have to dig deeper to see its intent. And black folks weren't the primary victims of the holocaust you ? feelings catcher, it was White Jews and Communist.

    lol idiot where did I say that black folks were the primary victims of the holocaust? smh Im done with this ? ass argument.

    and LOL @ playing gta to drive cars and follow road rules until it gets boring. and then what do you do when you get bored? you ? murder everybody you say and blow ? up. you aint fooling me with this good samaritan ? .
  • Smokey Tha Bandit
    Smokey Tha Bandit Members Posts: 3,779 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited October 2014
    Trashboat wrote: »
    Trashboat wrote: »
    Trashboat wrote: »
    Trashboat wrote: »
    Trashboat wrote: »
    Whoever buys this game needs to be on a watch list

    Put yourself on a watch list then because damn near everyone who has played GTA has went on mass murdering sprees. The only difference here is that killing is part of the objective and on GTA it's optional.

    exactly, how the ? is GTA morally acceptable but this aint?

    Because it is being marketed as a genocide simulator

    why because he said he was gonna have his own personal genocide? foh.

    the game is the same ? as GTA, ? people, cause chaos, commit crime. real simple

    There is no evidence of any other point to the game
    No indication of missions or alternative objectives

    The protagonist looks like he's auditioning to be in the trench coat mafia
    and his soliloquy there sets up a plot where his goal is to ? as many people as possible, with little regard for himself dying

    KD6oN.jpg

    about 80 percent of the people who play GTA, dont play it for the ? missions or objectives. all that ? you talking about means absolutely ? .

    That's irrelevant. You asked about the difference between them, and from a marketing standpoint this product conflicts with social values regarding genocide and mass murder much more than gta does.

    They appear to be similar in game play but without a full copy you are just speculating until its release permits a full review.

    Grand theft auto elicited a huge wave of criticism and moral opposition upon release as well. This idea that one is fine but the other is not has no grounding in fact. Grand theft auto was banned in Australia, demonized by various media and prompted protests from parents and politicians alike. This isn't a matter of GTA seeing no backlash and this game being hit with unprecedented resistance. This is more of the same people who advocated against Rockstar vocalizing similar concerns about Hatred and their developers.

    oh you mean its irrelevant because its not convenient for your argument. and so what? the game is marketed with murder, what ? game isnt? your strawman argument for "genocide marketing" is weak.

    all that other ? you talkin about is irrelevant. I dont care if GTA was banned in australia, its legal in america. the bolded is exactly what you are trying to do when they are similar type of games.

    bottom line, this is a GTA-esque game.

    That's not a straw man.

    This is mass murder for the sake of murder. This is not an FPS where America's military rival at the time serves as the main villain. This is not a game where the enemies are nonhumans. This is killing civilians for the sake of killing civilians. Grand theft auto never advocates for that.

    Even though the GTA games deal with different, arguably lighter taboos, they are still attacked

    This is Glenn Beck blaming immorality on GTA
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Zzr138ijmaQ

    This is GTA being blamed for shootings
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NSCQV1X1wOk

    Grand Theft Auto blamed for a kid shooting his care giver
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=d_TWqhJbWVY

    Prostitutes protested GTA in 2006
    http://www.nytimes.com/2006/02/20/technology/20link.html?_r=0

    Hatian Americans protested GTA in 2006
    uk.gamespot.com/pc/action/grandtheftautovicecity/news.html?sid=6084645

    Animal rights activists cry about GTA's animal cruelty
    http://www.tmz.com/2013/09/21/animal-rights-org-boycott-gta-v-for-shameless-animal-murder/

    Mothers Against ? Driving complain about GTA
    http://www.shacknews.com/article/52461/madd-protests-gta-4-over

    Parent group issues warning for Grand Theft Auto
    http://articles.latimes.com/2009/feb/21/business/fi-video-games21

    Christian activists decry GTA's use of torture
    http://www.christianpost.com/news/grand-theft-auto-v-under-fire-from-human-rights-activists-over-games-torture-scene-104995/



    Jack Thompson made a career of suing people over Rockstar games.
    There was a ton of backlash to the GTA games, as well as the other works by Rockstar.

    smh you're an idiot, posting Glenn Beck faux news videos and celebrity gossip sites like that ? is credible lol

    I know about all the uproar of GTA, all Im saying is ? .

    So basically you have no good refutation

    Could have just said that from the jump

    no basically you are a blithering idiot grasping at straws. why dont you just go buy 100,000 copies of this game and get your little mob of ? on here cosigning you to run them over and make little picket signs to voice your displeasure of the game.

    ?
  • Smokey Tha Bandit
    Smokey Tha Bandit Members Posts: 3,779 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited October 2014
    RiGGA wrote: »
    Lol @ morality for pixels on your ? TV. People are straight ? nowadays yo we used to be thrown into the wilderness by elders as teenagers to become men, but now we done let the white man put bitchassness in our collective heart to the point we outchea feeling some type of way about making pixels shoot pixels. ? all'at, I'm wit Smokey for once...



    First day cop, piratebay for the tall ?


    DrakeStrut2.gif



    lol sad day in hell when Rigga on the same page...

    yall need to pull ya skirts down tho, seriously. ? disgusting. yall on some Demolition Man/3 sea shells extra PC feminine ? .
  • Karl.
    Karl. Members Posts: 8,015 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Karl. wrote: »
    Trashboat wrote: »
    Trashboat wrote: »
    Whoever buys this game needs to be on a watch list

    Put yourself on a watch list then because damn near everyone who has played GTA has went on mass murdering sprees. The only difference here is that killing is part of the objective and on GTA it's optional.

    exactly, how the ? is GTA morally acceptable but this aint?

    Because it is being marketed as a genocide simulator

    why because he said he was gonna have his own personal genocide? foh.

    the game is the same ? as GTA, ? people, cause chaos, commit crime. real simple

    There is no evidence of any other point to the game
    No indication of missions or alternative objectives

    The protagonist looks like he's auditioning to be in the trench coat mafia
    and his soliloquy there sets up a plot where his goal is to ? as many people as possible, with little regard for himself dying


    about 80 percent of the people who play GTA, dont play it for the ? missions or objectives. all that ? you talking about means absolutely ? .

    Where did you get this stat?

    have you ever played GTA online? have you ever played GTA with friends? MOST people who play the game do it to ? people and cause random acts of chaos. period.

    I play the game for the missions and all the extra ? but most do not.

    So you made it up.
  • John_Blazini
    John_Blazini Members Posts: 14,837 ✭✭✭✭✭
    The game looks pretty lame to me ill prob pass