*Spinoff* Greatest NBA teams to never win a title
Options
Comments
-
? Word @silverfoxx
-
5th Letter wrote: »They matched up poorly against the Warriors. Because otherwise they would've beaten the Jazz and then beat the Spurs (who they used to give work to in those years) and they definitely beat the Cavs in the Finals.
Bad matchup...but if they deserve to be mentioned in this thread they would of handled business in a tough series, now the team that lost to the Heat in what most would call the worst officiated series of all time that team could be mentioned, up 2-0 in the series then just ? -
its....JOHN B wrote: »5th Letter wrote: »They matched up poorly against the Warriors. Because otherwise they would've beaten the Jazz and then beat the Spurs (who they used to give work to in those years) and they definitely beat the Cavs in the Finals.
Bad matchup...but if they deserve to be mentioned in this thread they would of handled business in a tough series, now the team that lost to the Heat in what most would call the worst officiated series of all time that team could be mentioned, up 2-0 in the series then just ?
The thread is best teams to not win a championship. The OP never specified that the team had to lose in a specific round. The 2007 Mavs won 67 games. -
5th Letter wrote: »its....JOHN B wrote: »5th Letter wrote: »They matched up poorly against the Warriors. Because otherwise they would've beaten the Jazz and then beat the Spurs (who they used to give work to in those years) and they definitely beat the Cavs in the Finals.
Bad matchup...but if they deserve to be mentioned in this thread they would of handled business in a tough series, now the team that lost to the Heat in what most would call the worst officiated series of all time that team could be mentioned, up 2-0 in the series then just ?
The thread is best teams to not win a championship. The OP never specified that the team had to lose in a specific round. The 2007 Mavs won 67 games.
I know there's no specifics but they lost in the first round to an 8th seed, I don't care if it was a bad matchup, they shouldn't be mentioned -
silverfoxx wrote: »2007 Hornets
Prime MVP CP3
Young David West
Peja
Mo Pete
Tyson Chandler Prime
? the Spurs and ? Kobe from robbing chris paul that MVP
ENOUGH! -
Because they lost in the first round? That doesn't disqualify them.its....JOHN B wrote: »5th Letter wrote: »its....JOHN B wrote: »5th Letter wrote: »They matched up poorly against the Warriors. Because otherwise they would've beaten the Jazz and then beat the Spurs (who they used to give work to in those years) and they definitely beat the Cavs in the Finals.
Bad matchup...but if they deserve to be mentioned in this thread they would of handled business in a tough series, now the team that lost to the Heat in what most would call the worst officiated series of all time that team could be mentioned, up 2-0 in the series then just ?
The thread is best teams to not win a championship. The OP never specified that the team had to lose in a specific round. The 2007 Mavs won 67 games.
I know there's no specifics but they lost in the first round to an 8th seed, I don't care if it was a bad matchup, they shouldn't be mentioned
-
5th Letter wrote: »
Because they lost in the first round? That doesn't disqualify them.its....JOHN B wrote: »5th Letter wrote: »its....JOHN B wrote: »5th Letter wrote: »They matched up poorly against the Warriors. Because otherwise they would've beaten the Jazz and then beat the Spurs (who they used to give work to in those years) and they definitely beat the Cavs in the Finals.
Bad matchup...but if they deserve to be mentioned in this thread they would of handled business in a tough series, now the team that lost to the Heat in what most would call the worst officiated series of all time that team could be mentioned, up 2-0 in the series then just ?
The thread is best teams to not win a championship. The OP never specified that the team had to lose in a specific round. The 2007 Mavs won 67 games.
I know there's no specifics but they lost in the first round to an 8th seed, I don't care if it was a bad matchup, they shouldn't be mentioned
I didn't mention run TMC because they were never really a legitimate threat to win the title, but a great regular season team, there is no specifics but I think when you're remembered for getting upset in the first round you shouldn't be mentioned -
Ooook , lot of revisionist history history goin on here.
Other than Portland and Sac, all these teams are just favorites and really good teams, they werent nearly as close as yall gassin
Pippen should have shared mvp with Hakeem? Lol You high! Pip led them in all categories, but he still 'only' came with 22, 6, and 5. Good numbers but cmon. Hakeem was on some 27,10, 4, and 4. Stop itEdit: scottiie that year 22, 8rpg, and 5apg, 3spg. Great year but Hakeem avg 27, 12, 4blks, 4apg[/quote
Ur also forgetting the fact the Bulls won 55 games that year, only two more games than they won the previous year with MJ. That along with the fact that they were a horrible call against Pip from goin to the Eastern conference finals. Plus Pip was the all star game mvp, and led the Bulls in all categories. I stand by what I say, that man should have gotten a piece of that mvp. -
Why is it about 80% of mvps, once 5, 10 years pass, 'should have went to ____'???
Got damn. 10 years from now, if Curry win MVP, Harden was robbed!!
Same ngga if Harden win, Curry was ROBBED!
The nature of nggas never ceases to amaze me -
BamBamMr7Gram wrote: »'94 Knicks
Gahdamn
Greg Anthony
Pat Ewing
John Starks
Charles Oakley
Anthony Mason
-
Why is it about 80% of mvps, once 5, 10 years pass, 'should have went to ____'???
Got damn. 10 years from now, if Curry win MVP, Harden was robbed!!
Same ngga if Harden win, Curry was ROBBED!
The nature of nggas never ceases to amaze me
Hush. -
Those teams aren't comparable.its....JOHN B wrote: »5th Letter wrote: »
Because they lost in the first round? That doesn't disqualify them.its....JOHN B wrote: »5th Letter wrote: »its....JOHN B wrote: »5th Letter wrote: »They matched up poorly against the Warriors. Because otherwise they would've beaten the Jazz and then beat the Spurs (who they used to give work to in those years) and they definitely beat the Cavs in the Finals.
Bad matchup...but if they deserve to be mentioned in this thread they would of handled business in a tough series, now the team that lost to the Heat in what most would call the worst officiated series of all time that team could be mentioned, up 2-0 in the series then just ?
The thread is best teams to not win a championship. The OP never specified that the team had to lose in a specific round. The 2007 Mavs won 67 games.
I know there's no specifics but they lost in the first round to an 8th seed, I don't care if it was a bad matchup, they shouldn't be mentioned
I didn't mention run TMC because they were never really a legitimate threat to win the title, but a great regular season team, there is no specifics but I think when you're remembered for getting upset in the first round you shouldn't be mentioned
-
How could we forget 03-04 nets with J-Kidd Kenyon Martin Vince Carter Richard Jefferson
-
BamBamMr7Gram wrote: »How could we forget 03-04 nets with J-Kidd Kenyon Martin Vince Carter Richard Jefferson
That was 01-02 wasn't it? -
Can't forget about the 2007 Cavs that got upset by the Spurs in the Finals.
-
BamBamMr7Gram wrote: »How could we forget 03-04 nets with J-Kidd Kenyon Martin Vince Carter Richard Jefferson
None of those Nets teams warrant a mention imo. As fun as those teams were they were a product of a weak eastern conference. -
Might have been 01-02 thought Vince came a little later their bench might not have been deep but put someone else in Byron Scott shoes they might could have gave the Lakers a better series
-
The Eastern conference was weak as sugar water in the early 2000's. ? didn't even out til Detroit stunned the Lakers in '04 & Shaq left to play in Miami.!
-
BamBamMr7Gram wrote: »Might have been 01-02 thought Vince came a little later their bench might not have been deep but put someone else in Byron Scott shoes they might could have gave the Lakers a better series
Vince joined the Nets in the middle of 2004-05 season. -
BamBamMr7Gram wrote: »Might have been 01-02 thought Vince came a little later their bench might not have been deep but put someone else in Byron Scott shoes they might could have gave the Lakers a better series
The '02 Nets didn't stand a chance against the Lakers, but they held up well against the Spurs in '03. They could have stolen it if Timmy wouldn't have went off and Steve Kerr didn't get hot in game 6. -
-
93 Phoenix Suns...Barkley,KJ,Thunder Dan should have got that ring until that no name white boy hit that 3 smh
-
BamBamMr7Gram wrote: »Might have been 01-02 thought Vince came a little later their bench might not have been deep but put someone else in Byron Scott shoes they might could have gave the Lakers a better series
The '02 Nets didn't stand a chance against the Lakers, but they held up well against the Spurs in '03. They could have stolen it if Timmy wouldn't have went off and Steve Kerr didn't get hot in game 6.
Lol This is the worst fuking thread ever. -
The year Sacramento got cheated
-
silverfoxx wrote: »2007 Hornets
Prime MVP CP3
Young David West
Peja
Mo Pete
Tyson Chandler Prime
? the Spurs and ? Kobe from robbing chris paul that MVP
That was in 2008
So much for being so great when you don't even know what year they're from
