let's make fun of Hillary Clinton's E-MAIL DRAMA
Options
Comments
-
THE NEXT PRESIDENT WILL BE REPUBLICAN .... which will be good for me because i could use a tax cut
-
kingblaze84 wrote: »Hilary's approval ratings are dropping according to the news.....she better make a speech about women now or something
-
kingblaze84 wrote: »Hilary's approval ratings are dropping according to the news.....she better make a speech about women now or something
True, not sure how Hilary is gonna come back from this though. Deleting 30,000 plus emails is mind boggling -
kingblaze84 wrote: »True, not sure how Hilary is gonna come back from this though. Deleting 30,000 plus emails is mind boggling
-
kingblaze84 wrote: »True, not sure how Hilary is gonna come back from this though. Deleting 30,000 plus emails is mind boggling
If Hilary survives this episode with independents overall not giving a damn, she probably will win the presidency.
If independents overall do care, she's gonna be screwed. Her best hope now will be Republicans doing or saying something so dumb, people willl forget about the emails. Considering Republicans have a long history of saying and doing dumb stuff, Hilary still has a good chance to recover from this. But I think she needs to eventually let a 3rd party search that computer drive.
-
kingblaze84 wrote: »But I think she needs to eventually let a 3rd party search that computer drive.
-
kingblaze84 wrote: »kingblaze84 wrote: »True, not sure how Hilary is gonna come back from this though. Deleting 30,000 plus emails is mind boggling
-
Soloman_The_Wise wrote: »kingblaze84 wrote: »kingblaze84 wrote: »True, not sure how Hilary is gonna come back from this though. Deleting 30,000 plus emails is mind boggling
I agree, but what other hope is there for Hilary to get past this? Even without the email drama, she has baggage from the Libya disaster and those deleted emails are going to be a problem. -
Given the Fact America has such a Love Hate relationship With Black Culture if we as A collective were to vote for a 3rd party the trendy will follow. That is why I do not get why so many of our "community leaders" support the Dems knowing they say one thing and live another in regards to us and have done since the civil war, the propaganda dumb down society game is strong so socially stunted slaves want to keep their shackles because master has made them fear being self determining.
Their is an aristocracy in place that is what both parties Represent they each just take different approaches towards maintaining it. Truth be told a third Party would actually just be a 2nd choice in stead of the same ruling class. That is what I do not get how people can actively subvert themselves to ? like that because it is "cool" to do so. Mtv Talking points and ? most you kats give and its sad the idiocy in it... -
@Fazeem_Blackall instead of just giving me negative reactions, if you care to refute what I said please do so.
-
-
I think Hilary is finished....her lawyer told Republicans and Democrats yesterday Hilary bleached her hard drive, so those 30,000 emails are gone forever. If she runs her campaign will become embarrassing. Another Dem needs to step up to the plate
-
kingblaze84 wrote: »I think Hilary is finished....her lawyer told Republicans and Democrats yesterday Hilary bleached her hard drive, so those 30,000 emails are gone forever. If she runs her campaign will become embarrassing. Another Dem needs to step up to the plate
-
Soloman_The_Wise wrote: »kingblaze84 wrote: »I think Hilary is finished....her lawyer told Republicans and Democrats yesterday Hilary bleached her hard drive, so those 30,000 emails are gone forever. If she runs her campaign will become embarrassing. Another Dem needs to step up to the plate
Yeah lots of truth to that, she'll have a lot of the Dems who will vote for her no matter what because she's Hilary and a Democrat. But if she's actually serious about running, plenty of Democrats are gonna see her spin on this and be kind of embarrassed for her since her excuses are so weak. But with Ted Cruz running for president now, Hilary supporters are probably a little happy now. Someone entered the race who looks worse then even she does. -
I'm hoping Warren and Sanders will run, but that's a pipe-dream. Robert ? has discussed getting his feet wet, but it's unlikely. People are comfortable with the same old ? , so that's likely what we'll get. I don't like Hillary, but not for her emails, I could really give a ? less about that. She's too cozy with the banksters and ? -- she loves to police the world and is essentially a neo-con in Democrats clothing. The majority of her base--as well as the republican base--has no idea what they are voting for, so chances are whoever gets elected to the executive office will be ? . There is no decent candidates seeking nominations on either side, so there is little need for Hillary or whomever to use their primaries to shape policy that reflects the will of the people, because the outcome is albeit predetermined. For instance, climate change is an issue that generally speaking the left--whether far left or centrist--stand united on, but any necessary change is overwrought with red tape, and if you cut that red tape-- you risk alienating your parties financial support. That means you can vote with the best of intentions and likely your representative won't deliver, because the money is not behind your vote. Hillary doesn't have the backbone to be a catalyst for change, she's a bootlicker and will always be a bootlicker. However, if I have to choose between her and Ted Cruz, I'm taking her every time.
-
The united states of America cannot afford another horrible weak liberal president while not a total nutcase liberal hillary will only serve to further continue the slow decay of American values with ? .
and enough with this semi-royal dynasty ? of Clintons and bushes. -
The united states of America cannot afford another horrible weak liberal president while not a total nutcase liberal hillary will only serve to further continue the slow decay of American values with ? .
and enough with this semi-royal dynasty ? of Clintons and bushes.
Our current system is not one that encourages working for the constituents but rather entice those to become the ruling class. Public office should be done as a service and not for profit and unfortunately while it was once that way it is now the bloated aristocratic nightmare it was designed to fight against.
Those in power play the divide and conquer through slight of hand game and choose their party not based on personal ideals and beliefs but almost solely on a few generations of propaganda traditions in their family. I see it in my family a refusal to ask critical questions and blind devotion to things in direct conflict with their stated beliefs... -
Soloman_The_Wise wrote: »Their is an aristocracy in place that is what both parties Represent they each just take different approaches towards maintaining it.kingblaze84 wrote: »If she runs her campaign will become embarrassing. Another Dem needs to step up to the platekingblaze84 wrote: »Yeah lots of truth to that, she'll have a lot of the Dems who will vote for her no matter what because she's Hilary and a Democrat.I'm hoping Warren and Sanders will run, but that's a pipe-dream. Robert ? has discussed getting his feet wet, but it's unlikely.
also, personally, i would vote Ted Cruz over Hillary (guns guns guns); however, i would ACTUALLY vote for Libertarian candidate in that hypothetical election scenario. -
Soloman_The_Wise wrote: »Their is an aristocracy in place that is what both parties Represent they each just take different approaches towards maintaining it.kingblaze84 wrote: »If she runs her campaign will become embarrassing. Another Dem needs to step up to the platekingblaze84 wrote: »Yeah lots of truth to that, she'll have a lot of the Dems who will vote for her no matter what because she's Hilary and a Democrat.I'm hoping Warren and Sanders will run, but that's a pipe-dream. Robert ? has discussed getting his feet wet, but it's unlikely.
also, personally, i would vote Ted Cruz over Hillary (guns guns guns); however, i would ACTUALLY vote for Libertarian candidate in that hypothetical election scenario.
Gotcha', there's no reason not to be a single issue voter when the bar is set so low.
-
Gotcha', there's no reason not to be a single issue voter when the bar is set so low.
-
Ha! You're not wrong. To whatever extent we elect the electors by voting for the presidential candidate of our choice, but if you vote red and live in a blue state, your vote is meaningless and vice versa. Not sure the president is a good example of representative democracy. That's like that Catholic ? , going through the Pope to speak to ? or something, ? 's pretty convoluted.
-
To whatever extent we elect the electors by voting for the presidential candidate of our choice, but if you vote red and live in a blue state, your vote is meaningless and vice versa.
but it lets you vote third party without having to debate the "lesser of two evils" thing, i guess