Hard On Hoes: The Ludacris Edition
1CK1S
Members Posts: 27,471 ✭✭✭✭✭
Comments
-
Ludacris comes across as an intelligent cat. Situations like this reinforce that thought.
-
Ludacris is doing what women more often do: deny the non-custodial parent time with the child.
And I can't support this. -
I don't know the history of their relationship, but based on what I see here Luda should go on and let the mother of his child talk to her over the phone.
Again I dont know the history of their relationship but it's kinda of a hoe move on his part to deny the "other" parent a part in their child's life.
I say the same thing when women pull this hoe ? to by not letting the man see their child because they're not seeing eye to eye with him; let that woman talk to her kid over the phone if her intentions are sincere. -
i have no sympathy for her cuz there are men who deal with this EXACT samething everyday
but wrong is wrong
i still wanna know how she managed to lose custody of a child that young in a system that favors her
-
^^^why don't you two date
-
I don't know their situation or what has happened in the past to give an opinion on this matter
And neither do yall -
The way he's saying it itsike it's something a lawyer would say
He's ? for that though.
Yall say women do the same thing. But don't become a ? because ? does this to other men -
There's no reason for a child to not have contact with both parents unless one of the parents put the child in danger and is an overall bad influence on the child.
-
Not A Part Of Our Court Order = She ? up. Period. When the court steps in, it mean you can't handle your business as an adult, more often than not, they're going to rule in favor of the mother, but if based on some wild, and I mean, wild circumstances, they will rule in favor of the father. So in short, she's probably an unfit mother. The passive aggressiveness in this exchange is hilarious and sickening at the same time. I can tell she tried to take some of luda's texts to court because he was probably on some real ? ? about his daughter previously, so that ? keepin it real corporate for the sake of his case.
-
I'm so happy that I don't have kids and have to deal with ? like that. I hope that I never have to in the future because it seems so stressful on all sides.
-
I got to play this track from Luda
You's a hoehttp://youtu.be/MO9epU3GCeY
-
this ? been going on for years
luda wanted an abortion when she told him she was pregnant. she politely declined and put him on child support when the kid was born. the initial child support order was 2,000 a month. she made a petiton to increase her child support from 2,000 to 15,000. luda said i rather raise the child himself and made a petition for primary custody.
luda pulled out the stops, and successfully argued that he made 55,000 a year in 2013 or something. he also argued that she doesnt have custody of her first child either. anyway the judge made ludacris the primary custodial parent.
one of the highlights of the case was when ludacris wanted to take the baby to the grammys, or south africa for 2 weeks and she pulled the same thing you see ludacris pulling in those text. "its not in the court order" and the kid didnt go. -
-
I respectfully freepost
-
I'm so happy that I don't have kids and have to deal with ? like that. I hope that I never have to in the future because it seems so stressful on all sides.
You and me both bruh. This type of ? drives me crazy. -
Shizlansky wrote: »The way he's saying it itsike it's something a lawyer would say
He's ? for that though.
Yall say women do the same thing. But don't become a ? because ? does this to other men
they're both talking the way their lawyers have instructed....have to keep the respect, and be clear and informative.
i could screenshot damn near the exact convo in my phone right now
and before ya'll say he's wrong, please know that there is a reason the phone communication is not written in the court orders and the decision is his....he has been deemed to make better judgement than her when it comes to the well being of the child....period
-
After reading Bununs posts I can kinda see Luda's point if all that is true it's still wrong though and only hurts the child in the end though.
? need to be a little more mindful of who they skeet their baby making fluid in, because some women only view kids as a meal ticket to milk a man for dough and make his life miserable.
I'm not excusing Luda here at all either, but if a ? don't want to be a daddy why you trying to make him one. -
A Talented One wrote: »Ludacris is doing what women more often do: deny the non-custodial parent time with the child.
And I can't support this.
Word. This is female ? . Since when do real ? support one parent keeping a child away from the other parent? Hard on Hoes? More like Hard on Kids. Children need to be able to see and speak to both their mother and father. Unless there is some safety issue here that we're not seeing...Luda need to stop acting like a scorned woman. -
its unfortunate they have a child involved in this, my only question is, will luda's wife treat this break baby/trap baby from a jump off like her own child when she got a newborn on the way.
-
I can understand why he'd do this from personal experience. ? is mad cuz she lost control of the situation and all this is a a way for her to play the victim role.
-
You IC ? with unruly BMs could learn a thing or two from Ludacris
-
A Talented One wrote: »Ludacris is doing what women more often do: deny the non-custodial parent time with the child.
And I can't support this.
This -
that ? looks crazy
-
He's acting like a real bitter ? right now.
-
I'ma give him the benefit of the doubt on this one. Normally, I disagree with such acts, but when you dealing with a chick like this you gotta keep her on the other side of that line otherwise they'll keep crossin it.
Doin ? like callin at crazy hours or making crazy demands under the guise of trying to communicate with her child or, poisoning the child on some "look what your daddy did to me" type ? . So yeah, if he's keeping her at bay out of keeping his daughter safe from her ? , ain't nothing wrong with that.