Hard On Hoes: The Ludacris Edition
Options
Comments
-
A Talented One wrote: »Ludacris is doing what women more often do: deny the non-custodial parent time with the child.
And I can't support this.I don't know the history of their relationship, but based on what I see here Luda should go on and let the mother of his child talk to her over the phone.
Again I dont know the history of their relationship but it's kinda of a hoe move on his part to deny the "other" parent a part in their child's life.
I say the same thing when women pull this hoe ? to by not letting the man see their child because they're not seeing eye to eye with him; let that woman talk to her kid over the phone if her intentions are sincere.
i knew this thread was coming...
his time is his time....we dont know what the reason is behind this.
this chick could be trying to get info to use against him...an thats why the court doesnt even allow it.
dont look at him as being the ass ...wonder why the court wont support her.
and please dont say because he has money -
Im respectfully laughing at their over use of the word respectfully...
-
2stepz_ahead wrote: »A Talented One wrote: »Ludacris is doing what women more often do: deny the non-custodial parent time with the child.
And I can't support this.I don't know the history of their relationship, but based on what I see here Luda should go on and let the mother of his child talk to her over the phone.
Again I dont know the history of their relationship but it's kinda of a hoe move on his part to deny the "other" parent a part in their child's life.
I say the same thing when women pull this hoe ? to by not letting the man see their child because they're not seeing eye to eye with him; let that woman talk to her kid over the phone if her intentions are sincere.
i knew this thread was coming...
his time is his time....we dont know what the reason is behind this.
this chick could be trying to get info to use against him...an thats why the court doesnt even allow it.
dont look at him as being the ass ...wonder why the court wont support her.
and please dont say because he has money
If he schedules a time she can FaceTime her mother he can be there as well. So that's a excuse why and she tryingt to get info. Nothing to get if he's there.
Luda just acting like a women would. -
Respectfully™
-
If she wasn't trying to milk him this wouldn't be a problem.she thought she'd have the kid and a spot would come open for her on vh1 and it all back fired.
More power to him,rare that the father gets sole custody kind of feel like if you got millions of dollar as a guy you should try and get sole custody. It just might change the way courts side with in the future -
Im respectfully laughing at their over use of the word respectfully...
I'm respectfully doing the same -
2stepz_ahead wrote: »A Talented One wrote: »Ludacris is doing what women more often do: deny the non-custodial parent time with the child.
And I can't support this.I don't know the history of their relationship, but based on what I see here Luda should go on and let the mother of his child talk to her over the phone.
Again I dont know the history of their relationship but it's kinda of a hoe move on his part to deny the "other" parent a part in their child's life.
I say the same thing when women pull this hoe ? to by not letting the man see their child because they're not seeing eye to eye with him; let that woman talk to her kid over the phone if her intentions are sincere.
i knew this thread was coming...
his time is his time....we dont know what the reason is behind this.
this chick could be trying to get info to use against him...an thats why the court doesnt even allow it.
dont look at him as being the ass ...wonder why the court wont support her.
and please dont say because he has money
This woman probably really ain't ? you will get no argument from me there, but if she isn't a threat to harm the well being of the child and is reasonably mentally stable set up a time for her to talk to the kid.
Seems like she pulled some foul ? like this on him now he's giving her a heavy dose of her own medicine.
I understand why he's doing it, but you got to put the "needs" of your child over beef with your baby mama.
This is the type of ? that might end up backfiring down the road on him as that little girl becomes a woman if this situation isn't quickly resolved. -
is this in the best interest of the child? if so, cool. if not, foul.
-
Shizlansky wrote: »2stepz_ahead wrote: »A Talented One wrote: »Ludacris is doing what women more often do: deny the non-custodial parent time with the child.
And I can't support this.I don't know the history of their relationship, but based on what I see here Luda should go on and let the mother of his child talk to her over the phone.
Again I dont know the history of their relationship but it's kinda of a hoe move on his part to deny the "other" parent a part in their child's life.
I say the same thing when women pull this hoe ? to by not letting the man see their child because they're not seeing eye to eye with him; let that woman talk to her kid over the phone if her intentions are sincere.
i knew this thread was coming...
his time is his time....we dont know what the reason is behind this.
this chick could be trying to get info to use against him...an thats why the court doesnt even allow it.
dont look at him as being the ass ...wonder why the court wont support her.
and please dont say because he has money
If he schedules a time she can FaceTime her mother he can be there as well. So that's a excuse why and she tryingt to get info. Nothing to get if he's there.
Luda just acting like a women would.
i think alot of you dudes aint been put in a situation where you may think you would get outta character until you are already outta character.
you dont know when you have to do ? to protect yourself....sometimes you need to self preserve before you can care for your child, otherwise you setting yourself up for longterm heartache and your child still aint getting cared for properly. -
Luda better than me....
-
Btfu. That passive aggresive ? really do be killing these hoes.
-
pissedoffnobody wrote: »The thing is, if the court order is in place on the conditions of communication, if Luda violates them the order can be dismissed and he'll have to spend more money getting a new one in place for allowing himself to be coerced into being party to directly violating a judge's decree and court order.
So, ? her feelings, the law is the law and if she expects him to violate that for her sake now they ain't together, she's dead wrong for thinking he's dumb as ? and emotional enough to do that ? and ? up the arrangement for her sake. "a biological right to talk to her"... yeah, see, if it's not in court documents, it doesn't matter. No ? biology teacher is going to take the stand to defend her ? claim because she's talking ? . Luda keeps her caked up because he knocked her up, he takes cares of the child and the mother but he's not going to violate court orders for the ? of it. Can't blame him.
this is what people are missing. -
2stepz_ahead wrote: »A Talented One wrote: »Ludacris is doing what women more often do: deny the non-custodial parent time with the child.
And I can't support this.I don't know the history of their relationship, but based on what I see here Luda should go on and let the mother of his child talk to her over the phone.
Again I dont know the history of their relationship but it's kinda of a hoe move on his part to deny the "other" parent a part in their child's life.
I say the same thing when women pull this hoe ? to by not letting the man see their child because they're not seeing eye to eye with him; let that woman talk to her kid over the phone if her intentions are sincere.
i knew this thread was coming...
his time is his time....we dont know what the reason is behind this.
this chick could be trying to get info to use against him...an thats why the court doesnt even allow it.
dont look at him as being the ass ...wonder why the court wont support her.
and please dont say because he has money
This woman probably really ain't ? you will get no argument from me there, but if she isn't a threat to harm the well being of the child and is reasonably mentally stable set up a time for her to talk to the kid.
Seems like she pulled some foul ? like this on him now he's giving her a heavy dose of her own medicine.
I understand why he's doing it, but you got to put the "needs" of your child over beef with your baby mama.
This is the type of ? that might end up backfiring down the road on him as that little girl becomes a woman if this situation isn't quickly resolved.
as long as your honest with your child in the long run......hopefully they will understand.
never guaranteed when raising kids -
Turfaholic wrote: »Luda better than me....
Gotdamn lmao. -
Luda playin this ? the way it need to be played....
-
pissedoffnobody wrote: »Meta_Conscious wrote: »is this in the best interest of the child? if so, cool. if not, foul.
If it's not in the court ordered terms, it doesn't matter what she wants or thinks she is entitled to have. If Luda asked for an abortion and she ignored his request, then caked up off him until he petitioned for sole custody based on the fact she effectively used his unwanted child to extort him while using the kid as leverage, that ? is the last person to talk about respecting her wishes or the welfare/interests of her child when she treated it like chattel to bargain with, not like a real child with real needs, and wants to hold Luda to court orders while expecting him to violate them for her sake. She's a trifling gold digging ? who had a child for the wrong reasons and doesn't deserve ? , especially when her trifling ass is making the matter public to try defame Luda when all he is doing is abiding by the law while she's acting like an entitled ? who thinks the law need not apply when she wants something. FOH.
Luda, bruh... this had nothing to do with my post... -
so yall understand when women dont let the father see they kids, cause you all would do the same in they shoes ?this some twilight zone ?
-
? that ? , luda won.
-
Respectfully
-
Ludacris let that Fast and Furious fame get to his head. Pulling moves like this is hoe ass ? tendencies
-
Ludacris let that Fast and Furious fame get to his head. Pulling moves like this is hoe ass ? tendencies
Depends on the bm.
Mine aint ? . I ? with too many females who do more for my son than she do. ? nothing more than egg donor. -
Eeny meeny decisions, with precision I pick or
Make my selection on who I choose to be wit' girl
Don't touch my protection, I know you want it to slip
But slippin' is somethin' I don't do, tippin' for life
That's like makin' it rain every month on schedule
Let me tell you, get your parasol umbrella
Cause it's gonna get wetter
Better prepare ya for the C support
She supposed to spend it on that baby but we see she don't
"Ask-ask Paul McCartney, the lawyers couldn't stop it"
"Slaughter-slaughterin' of them pockets"
"Had to tie her to a rocket"
Send her in to outer space, I know he wish he could
Cause he payin' 20K a day, that ? is eating good
Like an infant on a double D ? , just getting plump
Cause you miscalculated the next to the-the last pump
"Dump-dump in the gut, raw from the giddy up"
"Better choose that right one or pick-pick the kiddies up"
"(? )"
-
Turfaholic wrote: »
I pray I dont end up saying this about my childs mother in the future -
Turfaholic wrote: »
I pray I dont end up saying this about my childs mother in the future
Yea I was young with my first in house. Pretty face and good ? . No kind of work ethic. -
pissedoffnobody wrote: »Ludacris let that Fast and Furious fame get to his head. Pulling moves like this is hoe ass ? tendencies
Treating a child like a ? pay cheque is an actual ? move. You know, using sex to make money from a john dumb enough to ? a ? and think the ? wouldn't act like a ? . This is a man taking care of his child as best he can and wanting to limit the involvement of a ? who birthed a child just to make bank off it while neglecting her previous child because it wasn't a moneymaker.
You think this is about fame? This is about protecting a growing child from the influence of their morally bankrupt mother who was only interested in the kid as a source of income and now expects Luda to put himself in content of court for her ? ass. It's nothing to do with fame, it's about being a parent and a guardian, not just a DNA supplier with a ? attituden in ignorance of the law trying to ? up his life even more.
whoa whoa my ? relax badass
