NBAs best young core
Options
Comments
-
Milwaukee BucksBlackAX410 wrote: »The audacity of a nets fan talkin down on us lol. We're so much better then yall for the present and future. You trynna focus on star players but team wise we were one of the most efficient offenses in the league. Plus Isaiah Thomas is better then almost anyone on that unadulterated filth in Brooklyn. Team wit no point guard,no assets, no bench and no wing play outside of a declining joe Johnson talkin down cuz we fleeced your GM.
Y'all very well could win the division. The Atlantic is ass, but you and John are all up in here woofing like its summer '07. What makes y'all that much better than us? -
Milwaukee Bucks5th Letter wrote: »BlackAX410 wrote: »The audacity of a nets fan talkin down on us lol. We're so much better then yall for the present and future. You trynna focus on star players but team wise we were one of the most efficient offenses in the league. Plus Isaiah Thomas is better then almost anyone on that unadulterated filth in Brooklyn. Team wit no point guard,no assets, no bench and no wing play outside of a declining joe Johnson talkin down cuz we fleeced your GM.
Y'all very well could win the division. The Atlantic is ass, but you and John are all up in here woofing like its summer '07. What makes y'all that much better than us?
Coaching and depth. If tall lose Lopez your season is over and the chances of that happening are like 50/50. You have all of your eggs in 1 basket. They have a way better Roster/HC/Front office then yall but I will give you this.. Lopez is the best player on both teams but the next 3 or 4 play for the Celtics..then yall get 1 more... Then Boston 3 or 4 more.. Then ya.. we'll you get it. -
Milwaukee BucksFor one I picked the Bucks I didn't even pick the Celtics and two all I said was I think we can win the division, it's not out of the realms of reality considering the teams that play in the division, none of them are overly impressive and have the division on lock I predict a tight race, at no point was I gassing up the Celtics
-
Milwaukee Bucksaf.r.i.c.a. wrote: »5th Letter wrote: »BlackAX410 wrote: »The audacity of a nets fan talkin down on us lol. We're so much better then yall for the present and future. You trynna focus on star players but team wise we were one of the most efficient offenses in the league. Plus Isaiah Thomas is better then almost anyone on that unadulterated filth in Brooklyn. Team wit no point guard,no assets, no bench and no wing play outside of a declining joe Johnson talkin down cuz we fleeced your GM.
Y'all very well could win the division. The Atlantic is ass, but you and John are all up in here woofing like its summer '07. What makes y'all that much better than us?
Coaching and depth. If tall lose Lopez your season is over and the chances of that happening are like 50/50. You have all of your eggs in 1 basket. They have a way better Roster/HC/Front office then yall but I will give you this.. Lopez is the best player on both teams but the next 3 or 4 play for the Celtics..then yall get 1 more... Then Boston 3 or 4 more.. Then ya.. we'll you get it.
You can make the case that if any team loses _____ then their season is over, but the rest of your post I don't see how they are better coached or have a better coach. They have solid depth but no go too guy to create a shot in close games. -
Milwaukee Bucksits....JOHN B wrote: »For one I picked the Bucks I didn't even pick the Celtics and two all I said was I think we can win the division, it's not out of the realms of reality considering the teams that play in the division, none of them are overly impressive and have the division on lock I predict a tight race, at no point was I gassing up the Celtics
If this was all you said then this thread would've died by now...... -
Minnesota T WolvesBlackAX410 wrote: »
Lol FOH based off the info i put in here earlier thats obviously false, its at least 10 rosters thats worse, a lot of yall gonna be lookin foolish when we make the playoffs againCelts got Nets pick next year? Ouch.
Worst 2 rosters in the league imo.
Celts fans stop being biased, that roster is TRASH.
Name 3. Not,worse TEAMS, but worst meaning bad teams AND no rising youth,,assets, or stars
Even the Knicks got Melo, and Porzingas
Minny got young guns
Lakers got young guns
Celts and Nets the only 2 teams i can think of just bare cupboard
-
Boston CelticsBlackAX410 wrote: »
Lol FOH based off the info i put in here earlier thats obviously false, its at least 10 rosters thats worse, a lot of yall gonna be lookin foolish when we make the playoffs againCelts got Nets pick next year? Ouch.
Worst 2 rosters in the league imo.
Celts fans stop being biased, that roster is TRASH.
Name 3. Not,worse TEAMS, but worst meaning bad teams AND no rising youth,,assets, or stars
Even the Knicks got Melo, and Porzingas
Minny got young guns
Lakers got young guns
Celts and Nets the only 2 teams i can think of just bare cupboard
Lakers aint got anybody worth a damn for the future
Knicks are definitely worst
Sixers are definitely worst then us
Blazers are in worst shape then us
-
Boston Celtics5th Letter wrote: »af.r.i.c.a. wrote: »5th Letter wrote: »BlackAX410 wrote: »The audacity of a nets fan talkin down on us lol. We're so much better then yall for the present and future. You trynna focus on star players but team wise we were one of the most efficient offenses in the league. Plus Isaiah Thomas is better then almost anyone on that unadulterated filth in Brooklyn. Team wit no point guard,no assets, no bench and no wing play outside of a declining joe Johnson talkin down cuz we fleeced your GM.
Y'all very well could win the division. The Atlantic is ass, but you and John are all up in here woofing like its summer '07. What makes y'all that much better than us?
Coaching and depth. If tall lose Lopez your season is over and the chances of that happening are like 50/50. You have all of your eggs in 1 basket. They have a way better Roster/HC/Front office then yall but I will give you this.. Lopez is the best player on both teams but the next 3 or 4 play for the Celtics..then yall get 1 more... Then Boston 3 or 4 more.. Then ya.. we'll you get it.
You can make the case that if any team loses _____ then their season is over, but the rest of your post I don't see how they are better coached or have a better coach. They have solid depth but no go too guy to create a shot in close games.
We dont have a guy who can create a shot yet Isaiah Thomas was one of the league leaders in 4th quarter points and evan Turner, marcus smart, and jared sullinger didnt hit multiple game winners to end last year. Swear yall ? don't kno anything about my squad lls -
Milwaukee Bucks
Like I said the Celtics have nobody that can create a shot in the clutch. That weakness was exposed in the playoffs.BlackAX410 wrote: »5th Letter wrote: »af.r.i.c.a. wrote: »5th Letter wrote: »BlackAX410 wrote: »The audacity of a nets fan talkin down on us lol. We're so much better then yall for the present and future. You trynna focus on star players but team wise we were one of the most efficient offenses in the league. Plus Isaiah Thomas is better then almost anyone on that unadulterated filth in Brooklyn. Team wit no point guard,no assets, no bench and no wing play outside of a declining joe Johnson talkin down cuz we fleeced your GM.
Y'all very well could win the division. The Atlantic is ass, but you and John are all up in here woofing like its summer '07. What makes y'all that much better than us?
Coaching and depth. If tall lose Lopez your season is over and the chances of that happening are like 50/50. You have all of your eggs in 1 basket. They have a way better Roster/HC/Front office then yall but I will give you this.. Lopez is the best player on both teams but the next 3 or 4 play for the Celtics..then yall get 1 more... Then Boston 3 or 4 more.. Then ya.. we'll you get it.
You can make the case that if any team loses _____ then their season is over, but the rest of your post I don't see how they are better coached or have a better coach. They have solid depth but no go too guy to create a shot in close games.
We dont have a guy who can create a shot yet Isaiah Thomas was one of the league leaders in 4th quarter points and evan Turner, marcus smart, and jared sullinger didnt hit multiple game winners to end last year. Swear yall ? don't kno anything about my squad lls
-
Milwaukee Bucks5th Letter wrote: »af.r.i.c.a. wrote: »5th Letter wrote: »BlackAX410 wrote: »The audacity of a nets fan talkin down on us lol. We're so much better then yall for the present and future. You trynna focus on star players but team wise we were one of the most efficient offenses in the league. Plus Isaiah Thomas is better then almost anyone on that unadulterated filth in Brooklyn. Team wit no point guard,no assets, no bench and no wing play outside of a declining joe Johnson talkin down cuz we fleeced your GM.
Y'all very well could win the division. The Atlantic is ass, but you and John are all up in here woofing like its summer '07. What makes y'all that much better than us?
Coaching and depth. If tall lose Lopez your season is over and the chances of that happening are like 50/50. You have all of your eggs in 1 basket. They have a way better Roster/HC/Front office then yall but I will give you this.. Lopez is the best player on both teams but the next 3 or 4 play for the Celtics..then yall get 1 more... Then Boston 3 or 4 more.. Then ya.. we'll you get it.
You can make the case that if any team loses _____ then their season is over, but the rest of your post I don't see how they are better coached or have a better coach. They have solid depth but no go too guy to create a shot in close games.
Not true. If the Bulls lose Rose their fine.. The Cavs lost 2 of their best 3 players they were fine.. ect... You need multiple options and players who can step up incase of injury. If Smart or IT got hurt they have plenty of depth behind them to hold down the fort. To your point about coaching and a go to player they have both. Stevens is one of the best young coaches in the league and getting better rapidly. They might not have s star player just yet but they have plenty of guys who can get their own shot from IT to Smart and funny as it sounds Evan Turner has made his fair share of big buckets. -
Milwaukee BucksBlackAX410 wrote: »BlackAX410 wrote: »
Lol FOH based off the info i put in here earlier thats obviously false, its at least 10 rosters thats worse, a lot of yall gonna be lookin foolish when we make the playoffs againCelts got Nets pick next year? Ouch.
Worst 2 rosters in the league imo.
Celts fans stop being biased, that roster is TRASH.
Name 3. Not,worse TEAMS, but worst meaning bad teams AND no rising youth,,assets, or stars
Even the Knicks got Melo, and Porzingas
Minny got young guns
Lakers got young guns
Celts and Nets the only 2 teams i can think of just bare cupboard
Lakers aint got anybody worth a damn for the future
Knicks are definitely worst
Sixers are definitely worst then us
Blazers are in worst shape then us
The Lakers actually have a decent group of young talent.
The Knicks are worse but they do have a potential star player which the Cs lack
Sixers are a coin flip but if they hit on Saric and Okafor they should be contenders in no time. Still too early to tell tho.
Blazers are worse but they have some decent pieces. Lillard is under 25 and one of the best 10 PGs in the league.They replaced LA with some decent young bigs Plumlee/Vonleh/E.Davis
-
Milwaukee Bucksaf.r.i.c.a. wrote: »5th Letter wrote: »af.r.i.c.a. wrote: »5th Letter wrote: »BlackAX410 wrote: »The audacity of a nets fan talkin down on us lol. We're so much better then yall for the present and future. You trynna focus on star players but team wise we were one of the most efficient offenses in the league. Plus Isaiah Thomas is better then almost anyone on that unadulterated filth in Brooklyn. Team wit no point guard,no assets, no bench and no wing play outside of a declining joe Johnson talkin down cuz we fleeced your GM.
Y'all very well could win the division. The Atlantic is ass, but you and John are all up in here woofing like its summer '07. What makes y'all that much better than us?
Coaching and depth. If tall lose Lopez your season is over and the chances of that happening are like 50/50. You have all of your eggs in 1 basket. They have a way better Roster/HC/Front office then yall but I will give you this.. Lopez is the best player on both teams but the next 3 or 4 play for the Celtics..then yall get 1 more... Then Boston 3 or 4 more.. Then ya.. we'll you get it.
You can make the case that if any team loses _____ then their season is over, but the rest of your post I don't see how they are better coached or have a better coach. They have solid depth but no go too guy to create a shot in close games.
Not true. If the Bulls lose Rose their fine.. The Cavs lost 2 of their best 3 players they were fine.. ect... You need multiple options and players who can step up incase of injury. If Smart or IT got hurt they have plenty of depth behind them to hold down the fort. To your point about coaching and a go to player they have both. Stevens is one of the best young coaches in the league and getting better rapidly. They might not have s star player just yet but they have plenty of guys who can get their own shot from IT to Smart and funny as it sounds Evan Turner has made his fair share of big buckets.
When LeBron got hurt the Cavs lost like they did after Bron went to Miami. When Durant and Westbrook got hurt the Thunder lost. You have some exceptions but for the most part if your main player goes down your season is ruined. What have Stevens done that makes you think he's better than Lionel Hollins? I'm not denying that IT or Smart can't get their own shot. I'm saying that they are not consistent go too guys, they are secondary players. It's a reason Thomas is on his 3rd team, there is a reason Turner the former number 2 pick is on his 3rd team. Bottom line them dudes don't scare anyone. The Celtics have lots of young players but no consistent go too guy, and nobody on their roster constitutes as one. -
OtherAx homer blinders.BlackAX410 wrote: »Russell the best player in this draft
Is it Black Girl Lost or Shawty owe you for ice? I BEEN REAL ALL MY LIFE -
Minnesota T WolvesCmon Axel you a grown ass man and you not even from Boston, no need for this level of fuckery
-
Boston CelticsCmon Axel you a grown ass man and you not even from Boston, no need for this level of fuckery
So me feeling my team will improve off a strong 2nd half of last year is fuckery? Lol ard bruh -
Boston CelticsAx homer blinders.BlackAX410 wrote: »Russell the best player in this draft
Is it Black Girl Lost or Shawty owe you for ice? I BEEN REAL ALL MY LIFE
I stand by that statement, that team is still abysmal and sub 30 wins tho so iont see the point of bringing this up lol -
OtherBlackAX410 wrote: »Ax homer blinders.BlackAX410 wrote: »Russell the best player in this draft
Is it Black Girl Lost or Shawty owe you for ice? I BEEN REAL ALL MY LIFE
I stand by that statement, that team is still abysmal and sub 30 wins tho so iont see the point of bringing this up lol
Not having anybody worth a damn for the future and Russell best player (your words) in a real solid draft class...
What type of 2+2 = 22 ? you on Blackman? -
Minnesota T WolvesBlackAX410 wrote: »Ax homer blinders.BlackAX410 wrote: »Russell the best player in this draft
Is it Black Girl Lost or Shawty owe you for ice? I BEEN REAL ALL MY LIFE
I stand by that statement, that team is still abysmal and sub 30 wins tho so iont see the point of bringing this up lol
What? You said the Lakers had nobody to build off of.....
Russell, randle, and maybe clarkson ain't that? -
Minnesota T WolvesThis is fuking pathetic.
I been a Redskins fan my whole life: we SUCK. Or atleast have sucked
What ? Boston roster are you looking at?!?
Too old for this man, too old lmao -
Boston CelticsBlackAX410 wrote: »Ax homer blinders.BlackAX410 wrote: »Russell the best player in this draft
Is it Black Girl Lost or Shawty owe you for ice? I BEEN REAL ALL MY LIFE
I stand by that statement, that team is still abysmal and sub 30 wins tho so iont see the point of bringing this up lol
What? You said the Lakers had nobody to build off of.....
Russell, randle, and maybe clarkson ain't that?
Man ? no that combo aint putting fear in nobody's heart lls. Clarkson is solid, not impressed with randle at all, looking at that trash roster they're nowhere near "the best NBA' s young core" under any circumstances -
Boston CelticsBlackAX410 wrote: »Ax homer blinders.BlackAX410 wrote: »Russell the best player in this draft
Is it Black Girl Lost or Shawty owe you for ice? I BEEN REAL ALL MY LIFE
I stand by that statement, that team is still abysmal and sub 30 wins tho so iont see the point of bringing this up lol
Not having anybody worth a damn for the future and Russell best player (your words) in a real solid draft class...
What type of 2+2 = 22 ? you on Blackman?
Russell is gonna be good but yall wont be above. 500 anytime soon so this imaginary good young core wont be impact players. Its a random contingent that thinks yall are gonna be good and idk why lol. Ill be the odd man out as usual tho -
Minnesota T WolvesOlynik-white
Sullinger-undersized
Turner-soft
Bradley-undersized
Smart-head case
Isaiah Thomas- undersized
Cmon, b -
Boston CelticsUndersized sullinger dropped 31/16 on boogie cousins
Soft evan Turner had one of the better years last year setting a career high in assist
Smart lead all rookies in 3 pointers made
IT averaged 19ppg for us and was top 5 in 4th quarter points
Lol its obvious yall ? dont watch my team cuz a lot of yall statements are baseless. None of the teams listed in the OP outside of the bucks will have a better record then us this year -
Milwaukee BucksAxel you're sounding like Shadyteam right now with these posts bruh.
-
Boston Celtics5th Letter wrote: »Axel you're sounding like Shadyteam right now with these posts bruh.
How? Lol
