Anonymous Threatens to Take the Hoods Off of 1,000 KKK Members
Options
Comments
-
konceptjones wrote: »Ghostdenithegawd wrote: »Melanin_Enriched wrote: »I hope y'all ? don't really have faith in anons.
? couldn't even shut down FB but they gonna take out the kkk.... Yaaaaaaa nope
I have more faith in the people on the dark web than anons
Exposing people in the kkk is alot easier than shutting down fb servers if you gona have an opinion about somethingatleast have some bit of knowledge about itGhostdenithegawd wrote: »Thereal_ba wrote: »Ghostdenithegawd wrote: »Melanin_Enriched wrote: »I hope y'all ? don't really have faith in anons.
? couldn't even shut down FB but they gonna take out the kkk.... Yaaaaaaa nope
I have more faith in the people on the dark web than anons
Exposing people in the kkk is alot easier than shutting down fb servers if you gona have an opinion about somethingatleast have some bit of knowledge about it
And im pretty sure if the hackers got caught by the fbi, they would be charged as terrorists.
Hackers are not getting this info from a database protected by anybody important
There getting it from hacking sites like stormfront
Catching a hacker is not something that's really possible hackers that get caught are,idiots who do it from there moms basement on an every day computer
If i pay cash for an portable pc about 30$ (rasberry pie) and use somebody else's internet hack your ? then destroy the evidence how would you know it was me?
People get hacked everyday and dont know it
Take your own advice, if you're gonna attempt to speak on it at least have some knowledge.
The rest of the IC already knows I'm what's referred to as a White Hat. I've been on and led red teams. I've worked to secure global networks for large clients, including the military. My specialties being wireless security, ? testing, and incident forensics.
http://community.allhiphop.com/discussion/comment/6651488#Comment_6651488
Anyways... Outside of what you said about exposing the KKK being easier than taking down FB (which is true), the ? you wrote is quite laughable.
1. In 2015, how the hell are you getting on someone else's wireless network? Unless you're going to Starbucks or the Library, your choices are slim as ? . The only wifi encryption that's easy as ? to break is WEP, and almost no one uses it anymore. Very few people still have their ? set to "open" so there's effctively no one in any give area with a wireless you can compromise. WPA/WPA2 are unreasonably breakable via brute force, but the cost involved to set up a CUDA or OpenCL cluster capable of brute forcing an 8 character WPA/WPA2 key in under a week would break the average person. To brute force an 9 character key usually takes months with a with a well stacked CUDA or OCL cluster... you can bring that time down with word lists but if the person is using a 10 char+ key and is including special characters and it's completely random, you ain't brute forcing that ? without a few dozen of the fastest GPU's available and a whole lotta luck (I authored a white paper on IKE cracking for a client that insisted on using aggressive mode on their VPN endpoints with short, weak keys. It's easier to break IKE than WPA/WPA2 and I could compromise their network in a few days with a two card crossfire enabled Radeon setup). Even if you had some fairly long wordlists, it's only speeds things up if your target is using regular words in their keys, if they're not it's useless.
2. A lot of people that do it from their home PC ain't technically doing it from their home PC. You pay for a VPS hosted in a non-extradition treaty country, remote into that and do everything from there. If you want to be cheap about it you run a VM from your desktop (which should have full drive encryption in place in case you're compromised), and pipe it's connection out via VPN.
3. It's Raspberry Pi... And you'd do a whole lot better just buying an older throwaway laptop than buying a Pi for this kind of thing.
4. As for getting the info from Stormfront... Maybe... But since it's just a forum like this one all you're really going to get is a bunch of IP addresses and throwaway email accounts. Correlating the people behind the ip addresses is going to be pretty difficult unless they're stupid as ? and use their email addresses elsewhere (like FB). For those idiots getting their identities might be easy.
Good ? . What's your opinion on the deep web?
Why not just go on the deep web and form ya own aGhostdenithegawd wrote: »Melanin_Enriched wrote: »I hope y'all ? don't really have faith in anons.
? couldn't even shut down FB but they gonna take out the kkk.... Yaaaaaaa nope
I have more faith in the people on the dark web than anons
Exposing people in the kkk is alot easier than shutting down fb servers if you gona have an opinion about somethingatleast have some bit of knowledge about it
An u missed the point of my post anonymous comes on actin like they ? level type hackers but can't even shut down FB
Meanwhile I've seen ? on the dark web not the deep web (for those who dk the difference) post secret Russian and American documents hell the FBI still ain't been able to catch or shut them down
Dark Web Hackers >>>>>> Anonymous Hackers -
An u missed the point of my post anonymous comes on actin like they ? level type hackers but can't even shut down FB
Meanwhile I've seen ? on the dark web not the deep web (for those who dk the difference) post secret Russian and American documents hell the FBI still ain't been able to catch or shut them down
Dark Web Hackers >>>>>> Anonymous Hackers
My ? , I don't really think you understand what you're talking about. First, having secret documents doesn't mean you hacked anything. It just means you somehow gained access to those documents. Wikileaks wasn't a product of hacking, it was an insider job. And of course it's much harder to catch people who do ? on the Dark Web. That's the whole point. The infrastructure of the Dark Web is set up specifically so it's damn near impossible to figure out who is doing what. Again, that has nothing at all to do with hacking ability.
-
The Lonious Monk wrote: »An u missed the point of my post anonymous comes on actin like they ? level type hackers but can't even shut down FB
Meanwhile I've seen ? on the dark web not the deep web (for those who dk the difference) post secret Russian and American documents hell the FBI still ain't been able to catch or shut them down
Dark Web Hackers >>>>>> Anonymous Hackers
My ? , I don't really think you understand what you're talking about. First, having secret documents doesn't mean you hacked anything. It just means you somehow gained access to those documents. Wikileaks wasn't a product of hacking, it was an insider job. And of course it's much harder to catch people who do ? on the Dark Web. That's the whole point. The infrastructure of the Dark Web is set up specifically so it's damn near impossible to figure out who is doing what. Again, that has nothing at all to do with hacking ability.
I know that but u can't say they didn't hack it either its all a matter of opinion and what u choose to believe. I just know what I've seen on the dark web, 4chan, 8chan and other sites that hackers are known to frequent. I've never really heard of anonymous doing ? worth a damn other than hacking kanyes account -
The Lonious Monk wrote: »An u missed the point of my post anonymous comes on actin like they ? level type hackers but can't even shut down FB
Meanwhile I've seen ? on the dark web not the deep web (for those who dk the difference) post secret Russian and American documents hell the FBI still ain't been able to catch or shut them down
Dark Web Hackers >>>>>> Anonymous Hackers
My ? , I don't really think you understand what you're talking about. First, having secret documents doesn't mean you hacked anything. It just means you somehow gained access to those documents. Wikileaks wasn't a product of hacking, it was an insider job. And of course it's much harder to catch people who do ? on the Dark Web. That's the whole point. The infrastructure of the Dark Web is set up specifically so it's damn near impossible to figure out who is doing what. Again, that has nothing at all to do with hacking ability.
I know that but u can't say they didn't hack it either its all a matter of opinion and what u choose to believe. I just know what I've seen on the dark web, 4chan, 8chan and other sites that hackers are known to frequent. I've never really heard of anonymous doing ? worth a damn other than hacking kanyes account
lol Yes, I can. I know how Classified ? works. Most of it isn't in a position to be gained through hacking, and what little of it is would take a huge effort. -
The Lonious Monk wrote: »The Lonious Monk wrote: »An u missed the point of my post anonymous comes on actin like they ? level type hackers but can't even shut down FB
Meanwhile I've seen ? on the dark web not the deep web (for those who dk the difference) post secret Russian and American documents hell the FBI still ain't been able to catch or shut them down
Dark Web Hackers >>>>>> Anonymous Hackers
My ? , I don't really think you understand what you're talking about. First, having secret documents doesn't mean you hacked anything. It just means you somehow gained access to those documents. Wikileaks wasn't a product of hacking, it was an insider job. And of course it's much harder to catch people who do ? on the Dark Web. That's the whole point. The infrastructure of the Dark Web is set up specifically so it's damn near impossible to figure out who is doing what. Again, that has nothing at all to do with hacking ability.
I know that but u can't say they didn't hack it either its all a matter of opinion and what u choose to believe. I just know what I've seen on the dark web, 4chan, 8chan and other sites that hackers are known to frequent. I've never really heard of anonymous doing ? worth a damn other than hacking kanyes account
lol Yes, I can. I know how Classified ? works. Most of it isn't in a position to be gained through hacking, and what little of it is would take a huge effort.
(Kanye West Shrug) not gonna argue with u. I still think anonymous ain't hittin on ? -
-
konceptjones wrote: »Ghostdenithegawd wrote: »Melanin_Enriched wrote: »I hope y'all ? don't really have faith in anons.
? couldn't even shut down FB but they gonna take out the kkk.... Yaaaaaaa nope
I have more faith in the people on the dark web than anons
Exposing people in the kkk is alot easier than shutting down fb servers if you gona have an opinion about somethingatleast have some bit of knowledge about itGhostdenithegawd wrote: »Thereal_ba wrote: »Ghostdenithegawd wrote: »Melanin_Enriched wrote: »I hope y'all ? don't really have faith in anons.
? couldn't even shut down FB but they gonna take out the kkk.... Yaaaaaaa nope
I have more faith in the people on the dark web than anons
Exposing people in the kkk is alot easier than shutting down fb servers if you gona have an opinion about somethingatleast have some bit of knowledge about it
And im pretty sure if the hackers got caught by the fbi, they would be charged as terrorists.
Hackers are not getting this info from a database protected by anybody important
There getting it from hacking sites like stormfront
Catching a hacker is not something that's really possible hackers that get caught are,idiots who do it from there moms basement on an every day computer
If i pay cash for an portable pc about 30$ (rasberry pie) and use somebody else's internet hack your ? then destroy the evidence how would you know it was me?
People get hacked everyday and dont know it
Take your own advice, if you're gonna attempt to speak on it at least have some knowledge.
The rest of the IC already knows I'm what's referred to as a White Hat. I've been on and led red teams. I've worked to secure global networks for large clients, including the military. My specialties being wireless security, ? testing, and incident forensics.
http://community.allhiphop.com/discussion/comment/6651488#Comment_6651488
Anyways... Outside of what you said about exposing the KKK being easier than taking down FB (which is true), the ? you wrote is quite laughable.
1. In 2015, how the hell are you getting on someone else's wireless network? Unless you're going to Starbucks or the Library, your choices are slim as ? . The only wifi encryption that's easy as ? to break is WEP, and almost no one uses it anymore. Very few people still have their ? set to "open" so there's effctively no one in any give area with a wireless you can compromise. WPA/WPA2 are unreasonably breakable via brute force, but the cost involved to set up a CUDA or OpenCL cluster capable of brute forcing an 8 character WPA/WPA2 key in under a week would break the average person. To brute force an 9 character key usually takes months with a with a well stacked CUDA or OCL cluster... you can bring that time down with word lists but if the person is using a 10 char+ key and is including special characters and it's completely random, you ain't brute forcing that ? without a few dozen of the fastest GPU's available and a whole lotta luck (I authored a white paper on IKE cracking for a client that insisted on using aggressive mode on their VPN endpoints with short, weak keys. It's easier to break IKE than WPA/WPA2 and I could compromise their network in a few days with a two card crossfire enabled Radeon setup). Even if you had some fairly long wordlists, it's only speeds things up if your target is using regular words in their keys, if they're not it's useless.
2. A lot of people that do it from their home PC ain't technically doing it from their home PC. You pay for a VPS hosted in a non-extradition treaty country, remote into that and do everything from there. If you want to be cheap about it you run a VM from your desktop (which should have full drive encryption in place in case you're compromised), and pipe it's connection out via VPN.
3. It's Raspberry Pi... And you'd do a whole lot better just buying an older throwaway laptop than buying a Pi for this kind of thing.
4. As for getting the info from Stormfront... Maybe... But since it's just a forum like this one all you're really going to get is a bunch of IP addresses and throwaway email accounts. Correlating the people behind the ip addresses is going to be pretty difficult unless they're stupid as ? and use their email addresses elsewhere (like FB). For those idiots getting their identities might be easy.
Well damn! -
Ghostdenithegawd wrote: »regardless of all that ? they do to mask there ip's they still eventually get tracked to there moms basement
Nah b. Check the history of Anon, the cats that got tracked did absolutely nothing to conceal themselves. A lot of the cats that got hemmed up after Chanology didn't even know to conceal their addresses. They were just using LOIC like any other application, oblivious to what it could do or what the legal ramifications were for DDoS'ing a website would be.you don't have to ? a wap there are open access points all over my city
This may be true, but unless you know how to hit that AP from a distance as opposed to being inside or directly outside the building you still run a risk of being compromised. Doesn't take that much of an investment, but you gotta be smart about it.And people are dumb they don't think to use a bs email and these people are old arrogant ignorant white people who think they cant be touched
Look at how many people got exposed on this site because they used all there real ? , look at all these people getting fired from that jobs for posting stuppidity because you can easily link all there ? to there real fb
They're a lot smarter than you think, but not too smart.
FB is a completely different animal. Technically you're supposed to be "you" on FB so, yes, anything you post there can be tracked. The thing that gets folks caught up is doing ? under their real names. This is why those kids that posted all that racist ? on Twitter right after Obama got re-elected will have that ? to answer to later in life; the did it all under their real names.people are dumb there are nowhere as technological as us the reason i mention rasberry pi( i admit i dont know much about it) is because its way cheaper than a laptop,your thinking from a place for somebody with resources
In order to use a RasPi, you need extra ? to go with it. Keyboard, mouse, monitor, SD card, and you'll need to get an OS installed on it along with a wireless network dongle... and you need to power it. It makes far more sense to cop a used netbook for $50 on Ebay and a USB wireless adapter that's fully supported under Aircrack-NG to use.
Before you get to typing, I have an old netbook that I currently use for pen testing and whatnot. Copped it on Ebay a few years ago for $75 mainly because it had built-in bluetooth and I can use that with bluediving (among other tools). The onboard wifi is fully supported by Aircrack, but I also use an external usb joint with it.I remember interning for a senior citizen homes and the girl who gave them there checks computer was infested with over 4000 thousand male-ware and she worked on that ? for years im like dam there giving out international spy retirement packages in this ?
A lot of that old malware is annoying as ? , but the servers they phone home to are no longer online, so a lot of that data is going nowhere.
A lot of those hits were likely for components of the various pieces of malware installed, not 4000 individual malware apps.you probably like me you think all the ? you know is common knowledge but it aint people are dumb
True, but not as dumb as you might think.you know they could of gathered there bs emails sent them an email that looked like it came from what ever bigoted site they post from and got inside there pcs from that
Maybe. A lot of malware is being flagged and stopped on mail servers these days. Gone are the days of sending a "cool new screensaver" in an email and expecting to compromise a target.@konceptjones
i mean correct me if im wrong i am not a white hat im just coming into being a network engineer
Go out and buy this book:
http://www.amazon.com/Hacking-Ethical-Hackers-Handbook-Edition/dp/0071742557
I interviewed with the author of this book, Alan Harper, for contract security gig a couple of years ago (he owns a network security firm). Good dude, extremely knowledgeable. I was a little too green for what he wanted back then, but we still keep in touch.
Also grab this:
Take the CEH test at some point. -
The Lonious Monk wrote: »lol Yes, I can. I know how Classified ? works. Most of it isn't in a position to be gained through hacking, and what little of it is would take a huge effort.
It would take a state sponsored effort (i.e. China, Russia, etc backing the hackers or outright employing them) and it happens a lot more than you would think. -
Anon isn't accurate, and people can easily deny their involvement unless the proof is overwhelming.
-
Anon isn't accurate, and people can easily deny their involvement unless the proof is overwhelming.
which it why it was so easy to hit all the "foot soldiers", if you will, that were running LOIC during Project Chanology. They confiscated their computers, so it would be easy to check for some form of C&C malware. They had the ip addresses of all the machines participating in the DDoS and theirs were confirmed. A lot of them simply didn't know how it worked and didn't know to cover their tracks. -
konceptjones wrote: »The Lonious Monk wrote: »lol Yes, I can. I know how Classified ? works. Most of it isn't in a position to be gained through hacking, and what little of it is would take a huge effort.
It would take a state sponsored effort (i.e. China, Russia, etc backing the hackers or outright employing them) and it happens a lot more than you would think.
Yeah, our government getting hacked into happens all the time. Sensitive info gets hacked a lot, but not so much Classified stuff. I've been working on Classified networks for like 8 years now and I don't think I've ever heard about them being hacked. I could be wrong though. -
The Lonious Monk wrote: »konceptjones wrote: »The Lonious Monk wrote: »lol Yes, I can. I know how Classified ? works. Most of it isn't in a position to be gained through hacking, and what little of it is would take a huge effort.
It would take a state sponsored effort (i.e. China, Russia, etc backing the hackers or outright employing them) and it happens a lot more than you would think.
Yeah, our government getting hacked into happens all the time. Sensitive info gets hacked a lot, but not so much Classified stuff. I've been working on Classified networks for like 8 years now and I don't think I've ever heard about them being hacked. I could be wrong though.
I wish I could screen shot and post some of the doc I've seen but ion want the FBI knocking on my door askin questions plus I kinda fear some folks on the dark web since some of the sites Ive visited on there I'm sure have had my IP address followed right bck to my house -
Ghostdenithegawd wrote: »Thereal_ba wrote: »Ghostdenithegawd wrote: »Melanin_Enriched wrote: »I hope y'all ? don't really have faith in anons.
? couldn't even shut down FB but they gonna take out the kkk.... Yaaaaaaa nope
I have more faith in the people on the dark web than anons
Exposing people in the kkk is alot easier than shutting down fb servers if you gona have an opinion about somethingatleast have some bit of knowledge about it
And im pretty sure if the hackers got caught by the fbi, they would be charged as terrorists.
Hackers are not getting this info from a database protected by anybody important
There getting it from hacking sites like stormfront
Catching a hacker is not something that's really possible hackers that get caught are,idiots who do it from there moms basement on an every day computer
If i pay cash for an portable pc about 30$ (rasberry pie) and use somebody else's internet hack your ? then destroy the evidence how would you know it was me?
People get hacked everyday and dont know it
I meant if they hacked the fbi Database -
The Lonious Monk wrote: »konceptjones wrote: »The Lonious Monk wrote: »lol Yes, I can. I know how Classified ? works. Most of it isn't in a position to be gained through hacking, and what little of it is would take a huge effort.
It would take a state sponsored effort (i.e. China, Russia, etc backing the hackers or outright employing them) and it happens a lot more than you would think.
Yeah, our government getting hacked into happens all the time. Sensitive info gets hacked a lot, but not so much Classified stuff. I've been working on Classified networks for like 8 years now and I don't think I've ever heard about them being hacked. I could be wrong though.
I wish I could screen shot and post some of the doc I've seen but ion want the FBI knocking on my door askin questions plus I kinda fear some folks on the dark web since some of the sites Ive visited on there I'm sure have had my IP address followed right bck to my house
I'm not disputing that they somehow gained access to Classified information and posted it. I'm saying that there is nothing that says that information was obtain via hacking and not other means. Again, there have been some heavy leaks of Classified documents in recent years, but they weren't obtained from hacking. They were leaked. -
Melanin_Enriched wrote: »I hope y'all ? don't really have faith in anons.
Right, all they seem to do is make threats. What have these anon ppl actually done?? -
So its not a good idea to use wireless access points of any random given establishment open to the general public, much less a random desktop PC therein, for the purpose of Internet spying without concern of being traced even when done from a throwaway device?
-
So its not a good idea to use wireless access points of any random given establishment open to the general public, much less a random desktop PC therein, for the purpose of Internet spying without concern of being traced even when done from a throwaway device?
Not unless you know how to do it while being a good distance away from that access point.
Here's the problem:
You're on an open wifi at your nearby Starbucks doin your thing, "hacking" or whatever. On the other end, you've tripped somebody's IPS and show ip in their logs. They keep an eye out for that IP address. If they go through historical logs and find you there more than once, they begin an incident response investigation. Part of this is figuring out who that IP address belongs to. Turns out the IP belongs to a block owned by Comcast, ? ,Century Link, etc because that's the ISP Starbucks is using for their open wifi.
The ISP is contacted, the IP address is tracked to a router owned by the ISP sitting at that particular Starbucks. Now we know where you're operating from and if it's comcast and you're using one of their wireless gateways, they have a list of every MAC address that has connected to that router. Doing enough filtering they can narrow it down to a handful of devices, including yours.
The logs shows that the activity is popping up at certain times of the day. This gives us a time frame to watch for your attempts.
The FBI is then contacted. All data is turned over to them. Based on the data they have, they can place an agent at the establishment to run a Man In The Middle attack if they want to be incognito, or they can simply contact the establishment and let them know what they're going to do and run a tap on their connection.
The next day, you show up and do your usual, buy coffee and a piece of carrot cake and sit down at a table in the corner. You start your "activities". Because the FBI has inserted themselves into the network between everyone and the router, they can observe all traffic. If they're grabbing a capture and are watching something like Wireshark in realtime, they can create a filter to watch for any traffic going to a specific IP address (i.e. your target). You start your attack and you show up. Your MAC address is clearly visible to them. All they would need to do is find you using the very same tool I use that I posted before (WiSpy dbx+ device finder). You end up with two dudes at your table asking you questions, then cuffing you.
The key to avoiding all of this is knowing how to access an open wifi from a distance, and masking your network card's MAC address (which is incredibly simple). -
So its not a good idea to use wireless access points of any random given establishment open to the general public, much less a random desktop PC therein, for the purpose of Internet spying without concern of being traced even when done from a throwaway device?
This was intricately written -
Focal Point wrote: »So its not a good idea to use wireless access points of any random given establishment open to the general public, much less a random desktop PC therein, for the purpose of Internet spying without concern of being traced even when done from a throwaway device?
This was intricately written
Lol I swear I tried to compose that question as plainly as I could. Hope it wasn't confusing. -
konceptjones wrote: »Ghostdenithegawd wrote: »Melanin_Enriched wrote: »I hope y'all ? don't really have faith in anons.
? couldn't even shut down FB but they gonna take out the kkk.... Yaaaaaaa nope
I have more faith in the people on the dark web than anons
Exposing people in the kkk is alot easier than shutting down fb servers if you gona have an opinion about somethingatleast have some bit of knowledge about itGhostdenithegawd wrote: »Thereal_ba wrote: »Ghostdenithegawd wrote: »Melanin_Enriched wrote: »I hope y'all ? don't really have faith in anons.
? couldn't even shut down FB but they gonna take out the kkk.... Yaaaaaaa nope
I have more faith in the people on the dark web than anons
Exposing people in the kkk is alot easier than shutting down fb servers if you gona have an opinion about somethingatleast have some bit of knowledge about it
And im pretty sure if the hackers got caught by the fbi, they would be charged as terrorists.
Hackers are not getting this info from a database protected by anybody important
There getting it from hacking sites like stormfront
Catching a hacker is not something that's really possible hackers that get caught are,idiots who do it from there moms basement on an every day computer
If i pay cash for an portable pc about 30$ (rasberry pie) and use somebody else's internet hack your ? then destroy the evidence how would you know it was me?
People get hacked everyday and dont know it
Take your own advice, if you're gonna attempt to speak on it at least have some knowledge.
The rest of the IC already knows I'm what's referred to as a White Hat. I've been on and led red teams. I've worked to secure global networks for large clients, including the military. My specialties being wireless security, ? testing, and incident forensics.
http://community.allhiphop.com/discussion/comment/6651488#Comment_6651488
Anyways... Outside of what you said about exposing the KKK being easier than taking down FB (which is true), the ? you wrote is quite laughable.
1. In 2015, how the hell are you getting on someone else's wireless network? Unless you're going to Starbucks or the Library, your choices are slim as ? . The only wifi encryption that's easy as ? to break is WEP, and almost no one uses it anymore. Very few people still have their ? set to "open" so there's effctively no one in any give area with a wireless you can compromise. WPA/WPA2 are unreasonably breakable via brute force, but the cost involved to set up a CUDA or OpenCL cluster capable of brute forcing an 8 character WPA/WPA2 key in under a week would break the average person. To brute force an 9 character key usually takes months with a with a well stacked CUDA or OCL cluster... you can bring that time down with word lists but if the person is using a 10 char+ key and is including special characters and it's completely random, you ain't brute forcing that ? without a few dozen of the fastest GPU's available and a whole lotta luck (I authored a white paper on IKE cracking for a client that insisted on using aggressive mode on their VPN endpoints with short, weak keys. It's easier to break IKE than WPA/WPA2 and I could compromise their network in a few days with a two card crossfire enabled Radeon setup). Even if you had some fairly long wordlists, it's only speeds things up if your target is using regular words in their keys, if they're not it's useless.
2. A lot of people that do it from their home PC ain't technically doing it from their home PC. You pay for a VPS hosted in a non-extradition treaty country, remote into that and do everything from there. If you want to be cheap about it you run a VM from your desktop (which should have full drive encryption in place in case you're compromised), and pipe it's connection out via VPN.
3. It's Raspberry Pi... And you'd do a whole lot better just buying an older throwaway laptop than buying a Pi for this kind of thing.
4. As for getting the info from Stormfront... Maybe... But since it's just a forum like this one all you're really going to get is a bunch of IP addresses and throwaway email accounts. Correlating the people behind the ip addresses is going to be pretty difficult unless they're stupid as ? and use their email addresses elsewhere (like FB). For those idiots getting their identities might be easy.
isn't this used wireless cellcarriers an the software communicating with the hardware or some ? -
konceptjones wrote: »Ghostdenithegawd wrote: »regardless of all that ? they do to mask there ip's they still eventually get tracked to there moms basement
Nah b. Check the history of Anon, the cats that got tracked did absolutely nothing to conceal themselves. A lot of the cats that got hemmed up after Chanology didn't even know to conceal their addresses. They were just using LOIC like any other application, oblivious to what it could do or what the legal ramifications were for DDoS'ing a website would be.you don't have to ? a wap there are open access points all over my city
This may be true, but unless you know how to hit that AP from a distance as opposed to being inside or directly outside the building you still run a risk of being compromised. Doesn't take that much of an investment, but you gotta be smart about it.And people are dumb they don't think to use a bs email and these people are old arrogant ignorant white people who think they cant be touched
Look at how many people got exposed on this site because they used all there real ? , look at all these people getting fired from that jobs for posting stuppidity because you can easily link all there ? to there real fb
They're a lot smarter than you think, but not too smart.
FB is a completely different animal. Technically you're supposed to be "you" on FB so, yes, anything you post there can be tracked. The thing that gets folks caught up is doing ? under their real names. This is why those kids that posted all that racist ? on Twitter right after Obama got re-elected will have that ? to answer to later in life; the did it all under their real names.people are dumb there are nowhere as technological as us the reason i mention rasberry pi( i admit i dont know much about it) is because its way cheaper than a laptop,your thinking from a place for somebody with resources
In order to use a RasPi, you need extra ? to go with it. Keyboard, mouse, monitor, SD card, and you'll need to get an OS installed on it along with a wireless network dongle... and you need to power it. It makes far more sense to cop a used netbook for $50 on Ebay and a USB wireless adapter that's fully supported under Aircrack-NG to use.
Before you get to typing, I have an old netbook that I currently use for pen testing and whatnot. Copped it on Ebay a few years ago for $75 mainly because it had built-in bluetooth and I can use that with bluediving (among other tools). The onboard wifi is fully supported by Aircrack, but I also use an external usb joint with it.I remember interning for a senior citizen homes and the girl who gave them there checks computer was infested with over 4000 thousand male-ware and she worked on that ? for years im like dam there giving out international spy retirement packages in this ?
A lot of that old malware is annoying as ? , but the servers they phone home to are no longer online, so a lot of that data is going nowhere.
A lot of those hits were likely for components of the various pieces of malware installed, not 4000 individual malware apps.you probably like me you think all the ? you know is common knowledge but it aint people are dumb
True, but not as dumb as you might think.you know they could of gathered there bs emails sent them an email that looked like it came from what ever bigoted site they post from and got inside there pcs from that
Maybe. A lot of malware is being flagged and stopped on mail servers these days. Gone are the days of sending a "cool new screensaver" in an email and expecting to compromise a target.@konceptjones
i mean correct me if im wrong i am not a white hat im just coming into being a network engineer
Go out and buy this book:
http://www.amazon.com/Hacking-Ethical-Hackers-Handbook-Edition/dp/0071742557
I interviewed with the author of this book, Alan Harper, for contract security gig a couple of years ago (he owns a network security firm). Good dude, extremely knowledgeable. I was a little too green for what he wanted back then, but we still keep in touch.
Also grab this:
Take the CEH test at some point.
i guess im the only one here gonna ask this
do this ? get you noodz -
2stepz_ahead wrote: »i guess im the only one here gonna ask this
do this ? get you noodz
It's possible...
-
konceptjones wrote: »Ghostdenithegawd wrote: »Melanin_Enriched wrote: »I hope y'all ? don't really have faith in anons.
? couldn't even shut down FB but they gonna take out the kkk.... Yaaaaaaa nope
I have more faith in the people on the dark web than anons
Exposing people in the kkk is alot easier than shutting down fb servers if you gona have an opinion about somethingatleast have some bit of knowledge about itGhostdenithegawd wrote: »Thereal_ba wrote: »Ghostdenithegawd wrote: »Melanin_Enriched wrote: »I hope y'all ? don't really have faith in anons.
? couldn't even shut down FB but they gonna take out the kkk.... Yaaaaaaa nope
I have more faith in the people on the dark web than anons
Exposing people in the kkk is alot easier than shutting down fb servers if you gona have an opinion about somethingatleast have some bit of knowledge about it
And im pretty sure if the hackers got caught by the fbi, they would be charged as terrorists.
Hackers are not getting this info from a database protected by anybody important
There getting it from hacking sites like stormfront
Catching a hacker is not something that's really possible hackers that get caught are,idiots who do it from there moms basement on an every day computer
If i pay cash for an portable pc about 30$ (rasberry pie) and use somebody else's internet hack your ? then destroy the evidence how would you know it was me?
People get hacked everyday and dont know it
Take your own advice, if you're gonna attempt to speak on it at least have some knowledge.
The rest of the IC already knows I'm what's referred to as a White Hat. I've been on and led red teams. I've worked to secure global networks for large clients, including the military. My specialties being wireless security, ? testing, and incident forensics.
http://community.allhiphop.com/discussion/comment/6651488#Comment_6651488
Anyways... Outside of what you said about exposing the KKK being easier than taking down FB (which is true), the ? you wrote is quite laughable.
1. In 2015, how the hell are you getting on someone else's wireless network? Unless you're going to Starbucks or the Library, your choices are slim as ? . The only wifi encryption that's easy as ? to break is WEP, and almost no one uses it anymore. Very few people still have their ? set to "open" so there's effctively no one in any give area with a wireless you can compromise. WPA/WPA2 are unreasonably breakable via brute force, but the cost involved to set up a CUDA or OpenCL cluster capable of brute forcing an 8 character WPA/WPA2 key in under a week would break the average person. To brute force an 9 character key usually takes months with a with a well stacked CUDA or OCL cluster... you can bring that time down with word lists but if the person is using a 10 char+ key and is including special characters and it's completely random, you ain't brute forcing that ? without a few dozen of the fastest GPU's available and a whole lotta luck (I authored a white paper on IKE cracking for a client that insisted on using aggressive mode on their VPN endpoints with short, weak keys. It's easier to break IKE than WPA/WPA2 and I could compromise their network in a few days with a two card crossfire enabled Radeon setup). Even if you had some fairly long wordlists, it's only speeds things up if your target is using regular words in their keys, if they're not it's useless.
2. A lot of people that do it from their home PC ain't technically doing it from their home PC. You pay for a VPS hosted in a non-extradition treaty country, remote into that and do everything from there. If you want to be cheap about it you run a VM from your desktop (which should have full drive encryption in place in case you're compromised), and pipe it's connection out via VPN.
3. It's Raspberry Pi... And you'd do a whole lot better just buying an older throwaway laptop than buying a Pi for this kind of thing.
4. As for getting the info from Stormfront... Maybe... But since it's just a forum like this one all you're really going to get is a bunch of IP addresses and throwaway email accounts. Correlating the people behind the ip addresses is going to be pretty difficult unless they're stupid as ? and use their email addresses elsewhere (like FB). For those idiots getting their identities might be easy.
Good ? . What's your opinion on the deep web?
Why not just go on the deep web and form ya own a
because, if i go on it, its for specific info, that i have yet to know that the deep web is good for. i dont care for anything the deep web is notorious for, so id rather not take risks just for the sake of being nosy. but i might one day. -
because, if i go on it, its for specific info, that i have yet to know that the deep web is good for. i dont care for anything the deep web is notorious for, so id rather not take risks just for the sake of being nosy. but i might one day.
I'm on enough watch lists already, I won't een ? around in the corner of the internet.
