N Korea Declares War

Options
13

Comments

  • not_osirus_jenkins
    not_osirus_jenkins Members, Banned Users Posts: 3,670 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Options
    zzombie wrote: »
    there will be no war and north korea won't really do ? ... in 2016 china is not willing to go to war for north korea the north korean army is using weapons from the 1950's, they are not prepared for a modern war in any sense and don't have the tenacity for a guerrilla war, south korea does not want a war either nobody wants a war and everybody wants the status quo.

    china does not want the north to join the south because it would mean having a us ally directly on their border and they are already basically surrounded by us allies.
    south korea does not want war because they would have to provide tons of resources to the north also
    both japan and south korea don't want war because any civilian casualties suffered will mostly come from their side

    The north koreans are just full of bluster they might do little small ? from time to time just to provoke nations in the region but there will be no full scale war.

    This. N Korea is like a chihuahua. All bark
  • qawshun
    qawshun Members Posts: 9,138 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Options
    Lou_Cypher wrote: »
    Lmao. Korea. They're like 5 foot tall over there

    America has never won a war against an Asian country

    What bout dem bombs dropped in Japan in Hiroshima and Nagasaki doe?

    The US decided to drop the bombs because research showed that the traditional ground and naval and ir invasion of Japan would have disastrous [/quot


    if we have beef and fight and i know you don't have hands but you gonna go for a choke out why would i grapple with you ?? It's war lmao why fight to your enemies advantage??
  • Jabu_Rule
    Jabu_Rule Members Posts: 5,993 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited July 2016
    Options
    IgboNegro wrote: »
    Other than World War 2.....when we had the Soviet Union...Britain...France....China
    Backing us up and we dropped bombs on Japan....any other time the States got ? up

    US used to wreck in most wars before the Korean war. Spanish American war...Mexican American war...plus the gulf war

    America tied with Korea in the Korean War and we lost Vietnam

    How Sway? Korea had to call China. America was in their borders damn near ready to wipe them out. The goal of the War was never to conquer the North and there wasn't any authorization to go there anyhow. They were planning on dropping Nukes then too. America secured the south which was the goal. I call that a V. Vietnam lost the entire country. Definitely a L.
  • qawshun
    qawshun Members Posts: 9,138 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Options
    All that history ? don't matter, America isn't about to send ground troops in NK that would be dumb. it'll be drones and planes, we way to advanced to still be fighting using soldiers. Especially against them.
  • Idiopathic Joker
    Idiopathic Joker Members, Moderators Posts: 45,691 Regulator
    edited July 2016
    Options
    Other than World War 2.....when we had the Soviet Union...Britain...France....China
    Backing us up and we dropped bombs on Japan....any other time the States got ? up

    "Other than the war we won, we lost."
  • Splackavelli
    Splackavelli Members Posts: 18,806 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Options
    fortyacres wrote: »
    giphy.gif


    NK guns are hand me downs

    They get their munitions from acme and wile.e. coyote is their weaponeer
  • dallas' 4 eva
    dallas' 4 eva Members Posts: 11,216 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Options
    Jabu_Rule wrote: »
    IgboNegro wrote: »
    Other than World War 2.....when we had the Soviet Union...Britain...France....China
    Backing us up and we dropped bombs on Japan....any other time the States got ? up

    US used to wreck in most wars before the Korean war. Spanish American war...Mexican American war...plus the gulf war

    America tied with Korea in the Korean War and we lost Vietnam

    How Sway? Korea had to call China. America was in their borders damn near ready to wipe them out. The goal of the War was never to conquer the North and there wasn't any authorization to go there anyhow. They were planning on dropping Nukes then too. America secured the south which was the goal. I call that a V. Vietnam lost the entire country. Definitely a L.

    You do realize the US Military wasn't even allowed to send ground troops into north vietnam right? The war was unwinnable because of how they had to 'fight' it.
  • dalyricalbandit
    dalyricalbandit Members, Moderators Posts: 67,918 Regulator
    Options
    These ? getting a wall too now - Trump
  • D0wn
    D0wn Members Posts: 10,818 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Options
    Yall ? acting like, Korea aint had y'all shooked a few years ago.
  • 700
    700 Members Posts: 14,496 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Options
    Sion wrote: »
    Won't happen

    I can agree with you this time cracka
  • Swiffness!
    Swiffness! Members Posts: 10,128 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Options
    zzombie wrote: »
    there will be no war and north korea won't really do ? ... in 2016 china is not willing to go to war for north korea the north korean army is using weapons from the 1950's, they are not prepared for a modern war in any sense and don't have the tenacity for a guerrilla war, south korea does not want a war either nobody wants a war and everybody wants the status quo.

    china does not want the north to join the south because it would mean having a us ally directly on their border and they are already basically surrounded by us allies.
    south korea does not want war because they would have to provide tons of resources to the north also
    both japan and south korea don't want war because any civilian casualties suffered will mostly come from their side

    The north koreans are just full of bluster they might do little small ? from time to time just to provoke nations in the region but there will be no full scale war.

    Thanks for saving me all the typing about North Korea's starving army and their twitter finger leadership
    Lou_Cypher wrote: »
    Lmao. Korea. They're like 5 foot tall over there

    America has never won a war against an Asian country

    What bout dem bombs dropped in Japan in Hiroshima and Nagasaki doe?

    The US decided to drop the bombs because research showed that the traditional ground and naval and ir invasion of Japan would have disastrous

    It would have resulted in a lot more casualities true, doesn't change the fact we still would have continued to kick Japan's ass.

    The estimate was s loss of around 500k plus American and Allied lives to invade the Japanese Island alone....put that in perspective

    To make matters worse, their invasion staging areas would've been slammed by typhoons:

    "The Divine Wind, or Kamikaze, of a powerful typhoon destroyed a foreign invasion force heading for Japan in 1281, and it was for this storm that Japanese suicide aircraft of World War II were named. On October 9, 1945, a similar typhoon packing 140-mile per hour winds struck the American staging area on Okinawa that would have been expanded to capacity by that time if the war had not ended in September, and was still crammed with aircraft and assault shipping- much of which was destroyed. US analysts at the scene matter-of-factly reported that the storm would have caused up to a 45-day delay in the invasion of Kyushu.

    If there had been no atom bombs and Tokyo had attempted to hold out for an extended time- a possibility that even bombing and blockade advocates granted- the Japanese would have immediately appreciated the impact of the storm in the waters around Okinawa. Moreover, they would know exactly what it meant for the follow-up invasion of Honshu, which they had predicted as accurately as the invasion of Kyushu. Even with the storm delay and friction of combat on Kyushu, the Coronet schedule would have led US engineers to perform virtual miracles to make up for lost time and implement Y-Day as early in April as possible.

    Unfortunately the Divine Winds packed a one-two punch.

    On 4 April 1946, another typhoon raged in the Pacific, this one striking the northernmost Philippine island of Luzon on the following day where it inflicted only moderate damage before moving toward Taiwan. Coming almost a year after the war, it was of no particular concern. The Los Angeles Times gave it about a paragraph on the bottom of page 2. But if Japan had held out, this storm would have had profound effects on the world we live in today. "

    " Of course, to some, all this discussion about the surprise 3,300 kamikaze aircraft, the delay of the Honshu landing until the rice paddies were flooded, etc., is all moot because the Japanese were supposedly just itching to surrender even before the dropping of the atom bombs and the Soviet Union's entry into the war. Well, we'll just have to save that one for another time. "

    https://www.mtholyoke.edu/acad/intrel/giangrec.htm
  • 5onblackhandside
    5onblackhandside Members Posts: 2,585 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited July 2016
    Options
    Lou_Cypher wrote: »
    Lmao. Korea. They're like 5 foot tall over there

    America has never won a war against an Asian country

    What bout dem bombs dropped in Japan in Hiroshima and Nagasaki doe?

    The US decided to drop the bombs because research showed that the traditional ground and naval and ir invasion of Japan would have disastrous

    That was smart on the US part, war is all about strategy and the US used the best strategy to secure a win with minimal casualties and destroy the psyche of a entire nation. ? that act shook the entire world. Japan hasn't been the same since and alot of dem ? hate Americans even though their an now ally.
  • farris2k1
    farris2k1 Members Posts: 1,937 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Options
    Aint seen a damn thing on the news bout this ? change your thread title
  • Stiff
    Stiff Members Posts: 7,723 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Options
    This happenned weeks ago
  • D0wn
    D0wn Members Posts: 10,818 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Options
    farris2k1 wrote: »
    Aint seen a damn thing on the news bout this ? change your thread title
    farris2k1 wrote: »
    Aint seen a damn thing on the news bout this ? change your thread title

    The news haven't been talkng about the content of Hillary's emails neither.
  • farris2k1
    farris2k1 Members Posts: 1,937 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Options
    D0wn wrote: »
    farris2k1 wrote: »
    Aint seen a damn thing on the news bout this ? change your thread title
    farris2k1 wrote: »
    Aint seen a damn thing on the news bout this ? change your thread title

    The news haven't been talkng about the content of Hillary's emails neither.

    What? ? shut up
  • The Lonious Monk
    The Lonious Monk Members Posts: 26,258 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Options
    Every conflict ain't WW3. Who exactly would support N. Korea in this ? ?
  • Jabu_Rule
    Jabu_Rule Members Posts: 5,993 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited July 2016
    Options
    You do realize the US Military wasn't even allowed to send ground troops into north vietnam right? The war was unwinnable because of how they had to 'fight' it.

    I actually didn't know that. But i can see why that was a foolish move. Still, America was no longer able to secure the original stated goal of securing the South either. It didn't help that SV was nowhere near as organized as SK and was corrupt. America cut and ran because of domestic pushback especially because of Nixon's scandal. The US still in SK.
  • Recaptimus_Prime360
    Recaptimus_Prime360 Members Posts: 64,801 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Options
    hra-obama-to-north-korea-pull-up-den-3169138.png


    I didn't even see Joe Biddy in the background wit the hat. Lol!!
  • StillFaggyAF
    StillFaggyAF Members Posts: 40,358 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Options
    IgboNegro wrote: »
    northside7 wrote: »
    IgboNegro wrote: »
    So...Korean war, Vietnam war...I guess the middle east conflict we're in now...would be considered L's...but that's about it for the US

    The war of 1812.

    That was a tie, the win was more on America's side than the british side

    Didn't we invade bitchc ass Canada then?
  • Jabu_Rule
    Jabu_Rule Members Posts: 5,993 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Options
    AggyAF wrote: »
    IgboNegro wrote: »
    northside7 wrote: »
    IgboNegro wrote: »
    So...Korean war, Vietnam war...I guess the middle east conflict we're in now...would be considered L's...but that's about it for the US

    The war of 1812.

    That was a tie, the win was more on America's side than the british side

    Didn't we invade bitchc ass Canada then?

    Then got pushed back and got the Presidential Mansion burned down.
  • StillFaggyAF
    StillFaggyAF Members Posts: 40,358 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited July 2016
    Options
    D0wn wrote: »
    Its funny how blk ppl are in here talking that we and us ? .
    Mexicans who are still in Mexico, are more of a U.S citizen, than blk ppl in the U.S.

    ? is disgusting.
    Its like janitors at a fortune 500 company saying "we did it", after the ceos of the company closed out on a new deal .

    Our @ button work fine bredrin