LMS Debate: BOSSExcellence vs Young_Chitlin, Will the virtual life take over the reality ?
Options
Comments
-
thats alot of words..
ill read in a sec. lol -
Oh, say, can you see, by the dawn's early light,
What so proudly we hail'd at the twilight's last gleaming?
Whose broad stripes and bright stars, thro' the perilous fight,
O'er the ramparts we watch'd, were so gallantly streaming?
And the rockets' red glare, the bombs bursting in air,
Gave proof thro' the night that our flag was still there.
O say, does that star-spangled banner yet wave
O'er the land of the free and the home of the brave?
On the shore dimly seen thro' the mists of the deep,
Where the foe's haughty host in dread silence reposes,
What is that which the breeze, o'er the towering steep,
As it fitfully blows, half conceals, half discloses?
Now it catches the gleam of the morning's first beam,
In full glory reflected, now shines on the stream:
'Tis the star-spangled banner: O, long may it wave
O'er the land of the free and the home of the brave!
And where is that band who so vauntingly swore
That the havoc of war and the battle's confusion
A home and a country should leave us no more?
Their blood has wash'd out their foul footsteps' pollution.
No refuge could save the hireling and slave
From the terror of flight or the gloom of the grave:
And the star-spangled banner in triumph doth wave
O'er the land of the free and the home of the brave.
O, thus be it ever when freemen shall stand,
Between their lov'd homes and the war's desolation;
Blest with vict'ry and peace, may the heav'n-rescued land
Praise the Pow'r that hath made and preserv'd us a nation!
Then conquer we must, when our cause is just,
And this be our motto: "In ? is our trust"
And the star-spangled banner in triumph shall wave
O'er the land of the free and the home of the brave! -
Boss you gotta go full Karl Rove. Turn his strengths into a weakness.
#FireandICE -
Boss you gotta go full Karl Rove. Turn his strengths into a weakness.
#FireandICE
hey hey....careful there -
Is it me...or do all these 'world' ? type like foreign people talk lol
I read all they ? in my 'Coming to America' accent -
yellowtapesport wrote: »Is it me...or do all these 'world' ? type like foreign people talk lol
I read all they ? in my 'Coming to America' accent
We type eloquently compa -
takin my daughter to school and ill be back to read this toroshit so i can give the appropriate response. lol
-
BOSSExcellence wrote: »takin my daughter to school and ill be back to read this toroshit so i can give the appropriate response. lol
how you start a movement called respond on site
then be like ...ill be right back -
Young_Chitlin wrote: »When my opponent gives you a post equating to the others receiving votes on an honorable mention list, clearly the concise manner in which I laid my points out was effective. I will now delve further- once again, I remind everyone of what it is that we are debating.
The Topic: Will the virtual life take over the reality ?
Merriam-Webster defines virtual as "being such in essence or effect though not formally recognized or admitted." My opponent brings out the example of chew toys and dogs. He ended the question with several question marks because even he didn't know where he was going with the question. For about two decades Pokemon has been in power with our youth the posters on this website. Why go through all the trouble of getting accessories for your pet when you can make your Pokemon hold and item feed them calcium or protein or zinc, and be content with it. It is not real to Outsiders but it's real to me dammit, they may say. The people that play the game are not wrong because while players are in the same region, they create their own world within that region- you can start with a grass type fire type or water type.
While it is stated that humans are social creatures, it would be unwise for my opponent to believe that every single human is pre deposed to act the same way. I could spend the whole debate talking about the news stories that we've heard from the Asian part of the world Eastern world much of that side of the world. I agree that we go out to consume I work in an office and that statement is very true Thursday night Wednesday night Friday night but if you're as worried as I am and as virtually invested as I am, statement my opponent made in that little blob of text is merely a hasty generalization of humans on this planet. I admit that we turn up as humans we like to engage in carnal desires with the opposite sex however, my opponent fails to realize that not all of humans have the same social capital as he believes that we do. Some Humans like my opponent charge their social capital on their credit cards, while the others live like no one else. The last eight words I'm not trying to argue are humans getting out of debt, but rather entertain yourselves in different ways that doesn't necessarily mean going out tonight clubs expensive restaurants that they can or cannot afford, etcetera. Virtual life is quite popular in Japan with anime being a major part of the culture. Virtual life in Japan involves going to the certain clubs and having a holographic girlfriend or several holographic escorts and Men and women are very entertained by that. Virtual life involves having dinner with Holograms or perhaps building robot with the personality of somebody close that you lost and being happy that way.
Virtual life will take over the reality because people have more control over how they feel how they live and how they operate because THEY set the rules and not the government nor an authoritative figure.
@BOSSExcellence
Thank you.
maybe due to my compadre's homeland.. iunno perhaps they have a low elevation or something and my "chew toy" analogy went over his head.. funny tho seeing as it fits right into the narrative that he's tryin to steer the conversation..
for see a chew toy to a dog is what virtual reality is to a human being.. ENTERTAINMENT!! evident in all of what Young Chipotle is talking about. Human life is more complex then jus entertainment.. HELL.. even a dog will prefer a REAL bone to a nylon one.. and please Young Empada.. don't confuse my grammar with ME being confused.. the punctuation marks is jus how i type.. nothin more.. nothin less..
moving on..
u next brought up Pokémon.. ANOTHER FORM OF ENTERTAINMENT as an example of people's preference over pets.. feeding them.. training them and so on.. and if I'm not mistaken a phone app came out a lil over 5months ago.. it was the rave of the world... everybody was downloading to catch them all.. even i got caught up in the hype i must admit.. but once i caught my charzar i pretty much lost interest fast.. AS DID THE REST OF THE WORLD..
see i have this article id like to present to the audience.. https://gamerant.com/pokemon-go-paying-player-drop/ ...for those who don't like to click links.. here's a brief synopsis.. basically at the time of the article.. which was 3 months ago.. its highlighting how the product is still profitable for the company.. HOWEVER they experienced a 80% drop off of players... VIRTUALLY.. i say virtually cause the TRUE number is 79%... but eh! i was almost correct right??!
see how that works?? lol
it don't take a rocket scientist.. and I'm sure it won't take a food specialist *cough* @Young_Chitlin *cough* to understand what this article is saying.. virtual reality can entertain.. but it can't sustain!!! can i get a Amen! this ties back into my original argument that we as humans are more complex then what a virtual world can provide us which is why it will never take over reality..
he thens goes on about humans unknowingly supporting my first argument.. he even brought up the Asians..
"While it is stated that humans are social creatures, it would be unwise for my opponent to believe that every single human is pre deposed to act the same way."
this is where I KNEW my analogy went over his head wit the chew toy and dogs.. the chew toy being virtual reality.. and the dogs being humans.. iv already assessed that dogs (humans) differ.. which is why i used bite force.. (attention span).. a person who hates their life.. has no friends.. wants an escape will love the idea of a virtual world.. but a person who loves their life.. enjoys their family.. has friends.. likes to travel and touch and taste and experience things which is a VERY large part of the human populace will not go for a "nylon bone".. cause we know in that real bone is the marrow and thats the tastiest part! thats that kiss from the woman u love.. that "daddy i love u" from ur daughter.. "I'm so glad to see u son" from ur mother.. granny's sweet potato pie on thanksgiving.. NEVER IN A BILLION YEARS will virtual reality be the preference.. and THATS what this debate is about.
-
2stepz_ahead wrote: »BOSSExcellence wrote: »takin my daughter to school and ill be back to read this toroshit so i can give the appropriate response. lol
how you start a movement called respond on site
then be like ...ill be right back
oh.. its RESPOND ON SITE!!
jus cause i came in the thread doesn't mean i read his post..
cause i assure u i didn't..
i had to jus literally force myself to read that ? . hahaha
y'all think i be playing when i say i didn't read.. I'm not. i pass over posts all the time.. read a line or two and say "nah.. never mind" lol -
I believe the meme that Queen Gabi posted symbolizes my opponent's obesely-inflated sense of debate self, just wanted to state that. I won't into the chew toy analogy my opponent brought up again in his rebuttal because I understood clearly what my opponent was trying to get at- he seems to enjoy Chipotle and empanadas so much that F7 was yanked in a e-fit of gluttony. I'm six foot three, so very few things go over my head. But I will address the aspect of entertainment.
I mentioned in my previous round about the Holograms where people in Japan take that to an extreme level, per certain views. My opponent did something right in typing a sentence about human life that a lot of people on this website would agree with. Keeping my debate goggles on and the topic of our debate in mind, reality is indeed complex. We are fed I mean conditioned into believing that we have to be hard on hoes, flashy and engage in financial debauchery. I went to college and took a few economic classes and did some reading Forbes Bloomberg and the online website for the aforementioned. What I'm trying to get at with my example for this particular round on entertainment is that the internet is growing by the second. I've been tasked to argue why the virtual life will take over the reality and with that I want to make the following point- Technology is over-saturated. Now hold on a minute, Young_Chipotleempanada is about to destroy his own argument. Not so fast my friend, this is a good thing in terms of virtual life. With the saturation of technology, that makes entertainment have more options to entertain people.. virtually. I'll bring up another anime example again because men and women can have tea time and coffee time with their Waifus and husbandos, any notable character they like. They have at certain arcades Tekken where you can put on that stuff and actually "fight" Eddy, Law, etc. They have VR, where you can drive that Ferrari, Bugatti, fly a plane, etc. That's definitely cheaper than going to the Ferrari test track Bugatti test track or sign up to become a pilot. VR is very economical and people can personalize it to their liking.
I read the article that my opponent posted in his previous round for Pokemon Go. Sure the numbers are alarming; however, that is just a blip in the Pokemon Universe. If you read comments on websites and on YouTube videos of Pokemon, it's still one of the most popular forms of entertainment. My opponent is trying to use statistics and numbers via a short article to discredit the Pokemon analogy I made. I implore you to see the numbers for what they truly are. If you are able to press the A Button like you did in Pokemon yellow with Pikachu on each of the Pokemon fans, they're going to jump up like Pikachu and a have a heart, due to how personal their virtual reality is in each region.
I remind my opponent that his analogy did not go over my head in the slightest. Judges, please read the second and third lines multiple times when it comes time to make a decision on who won the debate when it's all said and done. I hope the generalizations that he's made do not deter you from your decision on who won the debate. Yet again I need to remind my opponent that not everybody's the same. It would appear to me that my opponent is using highlights from his life to vicariously debate his points. The fifth line of his final paragraph can definitely be agreed upon. I have to disagree with the last sentence of the last paragraph though. While we do real things in this reality of ours and will always do- go to work, pay bills, swiping your credit card, the preference will always be for a more convenient life, and what better type of life than one you have more control over? What better type of life than one is more personal to you? What better type of life than one that allow you to more creative in that you set the parameters over? The reality tells you how to live your life, while virtual reality tells you how to love your life and not theirs. Thank you.
@BOSSExcellence
-
Apple pie.
-
Bald eagle.
-
Obesity.
-
-
mryounggun wrote: »Obesity.
really -
-
-
winners in bold
yellowtapesport vs SimptimusLEMZUS
atribecalledgabi vs CeLLaR-DooR
mryounggun vs Preach2Teach
BOSSExcellence vs Young_Chitlin
Lou_Cypher vs zzombie
Stiff vs Figo
SolemnSauce vs Kai
obnoxiouslyfresh vs Sion
b'mer vs MistyKnight
SuperSoaker vs Paprika
NeighborhoodNomad. vs AggyAF
tied 2-2 -
Young_Chitlin wrote: »I believe the meme that Queen Gabi posted symbolizes my opponent's obesely-inflated sense of debate self, just wanted to state that. I won't into the chew toy analogy my opponent brought up again in his rebuttal because I understood clearly what my opponent was trying to get at- he seems to enjoy Chipotle and empanadas so much that F7 was yanked in a e-fit of gluttony. I'm six foot three, so very few things go over my head. But I will address the aspect of entertainment.
I mentioned in my previous round about the Holograms where people in Japan take that to an extreme level, per certain views. My opponent did something right in typing a sentence about human life that a lot of people on this website would agree with. Keeping my debate goggles on and the topic of our debate in mind, reality is indeed complex. We are fed I mean conditioned into believing that we have to be hard on hoes, flashy and engage in financial debauchery. I went to college and took a few economic classes and did some reading Forbes Bloomberg and the online website for the aforementioned. What I'm trying to get at with my example for this particular round on entertainment is that the internet is growing by the second. I've been tasked to argue why the virtual life will take over the reality and with that I want to make the following point- Technology is over-saturated. Now hold on a minute, Young_Chipotleempanada is about to destroy his own argument. Not so fast my friend, this is a good thing in terms of virtual life. With the saturation of technology, that makes entertainment have more options to entertain people.. virtually. I'll bring up another anime example again because men and women can have tea time and coffee time with their Waifus and husbandos, any notable character they like. They have at certain arcades Tekken where you can put on that stuff and actually "fight" Eddy, Law, etc. They have VR, where you can drive that Ferrari, Bugatti, fly a plane, etc. That's definitely cheaper than going to the Ferrari test track Bugatti test track or sign up to become a pilot. VR is very economical and people can personalize it to their liking.
I read the article that my opponent posted in his previous round for Pokemon Go. Sure the numbers are alarming; however, that is just a blip in the Pokemon Universe. If you read comments on websites and on YouTube videos of Pokemon, it's still one of the most popular forms of entertainment. My opponent is trying to use statistics and numbers via a short article to discredit the Pokemon analogy I made. I implore you to see the numbers for what they truly are. If you are able to press the A Button like you did in Pokemon yellow with Pikachu on each of the Pokemon fans, they're going to jump up like Pikachu and a have a heart, due to how personal their virtual reality is in each region.
I remind my opponent that his analogy did not go over my head in the slightest. Judges, please read the second and third lines multiple times when it comes time to make a decision on who won the debate when it's all said and done. I hope the generalizations that he's made do not deter you from your decision on who won the debate. Yet again I need to remind my opponent that not everybody's the same. It would appear to me that my opponent is using highlights from his life to vicariously debate his points. The fifth line of his final paragraph can definitely be agreed upon. I have to disagree with the last sentence of the last paragraph though. While we do real things in this reality of ours and will always do- go to work, pay bills, swiping your credit card, the preference will always be for a more convenient life, and what better type of life than one you have more control over? What better type of life than one is more personal to you? What better type of life than one that allow you to more creative in that you set the parameters over? The reality tells you how to live your life, while virtual reality tells you how to love your life and not theirs. Thank you.
@BOSSExcellence
smh.. here we go.. talking in circles now..
is that uv ran out of ? to say @Young_Pupusa??
u say on one hand "that not everybody's the same" but then wanna use China.. Entertainment.. Pokémon.. and Tekken as the basis for ur argument.. so basically u would impose the will of the chinese people on the rest of the world??
how can u tell me and the audience everyone is not the same but then argue that everyone will be like the chinese?? u can't have it both ways..
True when it comes to technology China leads the world..
but when it comes to LIFEstyle who do they follow??
MERICA!!!!
now lets talk about lifestyle.. for u see China is a communist.. everybody is being oppressed there and they are miserable so the only thing they CAN DO is imagine.. ITS NO WONDER virtual reality has taken off over there.. but that aint the rest of the world and it damn sure aint MERICA! we are CAPITALIST! the world is for our taking!! i said it before.. life is a ? so we grab it by the ? ! u ever felt ? before?? NOTHING a virtual simulator can duplicate in a million years!!!
u make it sound so easy.. "oh jus log on and BAM ur in a Lamborghini" nah.. thats not gonna do it for us.. thats jus a nylon bone.. where's the marrow?? the appreciation of finally having something u worked EXTREMELY hard for?? that rush when u first turn on the ignition and the car vibrations rumble through ur body?? that first drive and when u pull up to valet and ALL THE REAL PEOPLE stop to stare?? that i REALLY did it feeling??
in China they'll never do it cause they're not allowed to.. I'm not sure they can even rent one.. so the next best thing is put on some goggles to see what its like to be in the cockpit.. so yeh.. there will always be a place for VR but it will never TAKE the place of reality for the MAJORITY because our lives our jus fine.. and if its not we have the opportunity to make it so..
Nothing beats the thrill of the chase.
*looks over to team world*
hey guys.. y'all only have one advantage over us..
y'all can kiss our ? and we can't! hahahaha
-
BOSSExcellence wrote: »Young_Chitlin wrote: »I believe the meme that Queen Gabi posted symbolizes my opponent's obesely-inflated sense of debate self, just wanted to state that. I won't into the chew toy analogy my opponent brought up again in his rebuttal because I understood clearly what my opponent was trying to get at- he seems to enjoy Chipotle and empanadas so much that F7 was yanked in a e-fit of gluttony. I'm six foot three, so very few things go over my head. But I will address the aspect of entertainment.
I mentioned in my previous round about the Holograms where people in Japan take that to an extreme level, per certain views. My opponent did something right in typing a sentence about human life that a lot of people on this website would agree with. Keeping my debate goggles on and the topic of our debate in mind, reality is indeed complex. We are fed I mean conditioned into believing that we have to be hard on hoes, flashy and engage in financial debauchery. I went to college and took a few economic classes and did some reading Forbes Bloomberg and the online website for the aforementioned. What I'm trying to get at with my example for this particular round on entertainment is that the internet is growing by the second. I've been tasked to argue why the virtual life will take over the reality and with that I want to make the following point- Technology is over-saturated. Now hold on a minute, Young_Chipotleempanada is about to destroy his own argument. Not so fast my friend, this is a good thing in terms of virtual life. With the saturation of technology, that makes entertainment have more options to entertain people.. virtually. I'll bring up another anime example again because men and women can have tea time and coffee time with their Waifus and husbandos, any notable character they like. They have at certain arcades Tekken where you can put on that stuff and actually "fight" Eddy, Law, etc. They have VR, where you can drive that Ferrari, Bugatti, fly a plane, etc. That's definitely cheaper than going to the Ferrari test track Bugatti test track or sign up to become a pilot. VR is very economical and people can personalize it to their liking.
I read the article that my opponent posted in his previous round for Pokemon Go. Sure the numbers are alarming; however, that is just a blip in the Pokemon Universe. If you read comments on websites and on YouTube videos of Pokemon, it's still one of the most popular forms of entertainment. My opponent is trying to use statistics and numbers via a short article to discredit the Pokemon analogy I made. I implore you to see the numbers for what they truly are. If you are able to press the A Button like you did in Pokemon yellow with Pikachu on each of the Pokemon fans, they're going to jump up like Pikachu and a have a heart, due to how personal their virtual reality is in each region.
I remind my opponent that his analogy did not go over my head in the slightest. Judges, please read the second and third lines multiple times when it comes time to make a decision on who won the debate when it's all said and done. I hope the generalizations that he's made do not deter you from your decision on who won the debate. Yet again I need to remind my opponent that not everybody's the same. It would appear to me that my opponent is using highlights from his life to vicariously debate his points. The fifth line of his final paragraph can definitely be agreed upon. I have to disagree with the last sentence of the last paragraph though. While we do real things in this reality of ours and will always do- go to work, pay bills, swiping your credit card, the preference will always be for a more convenient life, and what better type of life than one you have more control over? What better type of life than one is more personal to you? What better type of life than one that allow you to more creative in that you set the parameters over? The reality tells you how to live your life, while virtual reality tells you how to love your life and not theirs. Thank you.
@BOSSExcellence
smh.. here we go.. talking in circles now..
is that uv ran out of ? to say @Young_Pupusa??
u say on one hand "that not everybody's the same" but then wanna use China.. Entertainment.. Pokémon.. and Tekken as the basis for ur argument.. so basically u would impose the will of the chinese people on the rest of the world??
how can u tell me and the audience everyone is not the same but then argue that everyone will be like the chinese?? u can't have it both ways..
True when it comes to technology China leads the world..
but when it comes to LIFEstyle who do they follow??
MERICA!!!!
now lets talk about lifestyle.. for u see China is a communist.. everybody is being oppressed there and they are miserable so the only thing they CAN DO is imagine.. ITS NO WONDER virtual reality has taken off over there.. but that aint the rest of the world and it damn sure aint MERICA! we are CAPITALIST! the world is for our taking!! i said it before.. life is a ? so we grab it by the ? ! u ever felt ? before?? NOTHING a virtual simulator can duplicate in a million years!!!
u make it sound so easy.. "oh jus log on and BAM ur in a Lamborghini" nah.. thats not gonna do it for us.. thats jus a nylon bone.. where's the marrow?? the appreciation of finally having something u worked EXTREMELY hard for?? that rush when u first turn on the ignition and the car vibrations rumble through ur body?? that first drive and when u pull up to valet and ALL THE REAL PEOPLE stop to stare?? that i REALLY did it feeling??
in China they'll never do it cause they're not allowed to.. I'm not sure they can even rent one.. so the next best thing is put on some goggles to see what its like to be in the cockpit.. so yeh.. there will always be a place for VR but it will never TAKE the place of reality for the MAJORITY because our lives our jus fine.. and if its not we have the opportunity to make it so..
Nothing beats the thrill of the chase.
*looks over to team world*
hey guys.. y'all only have one advantage over us..
y'all can kiss our ? and we can't! hahahaha
Pfff
-
Leave system of a down outa this hundred eyes!!!!
-
BOSSExcellence wrote: »
smh.. here we go.. talking in circles now..
is that uv ran out of ? to say @Young_Pupusa??
u say on one hand "that not everybody's the same" but then wanna use China.. Entertainment.. Pokémon.. and Tekken as the basis for ur argument.. so basically u would impose the will of the chinese people on the rest of the world??
how can u tell me and the audience everyone is not the same but then argue that everyone will be like the chinese?? u can't have it both ways..
True when it comes to technology China leads the world..
but when it comes to LIFEstyle who do they follow??
MERICA!!!!
now lets talk about lifestyle.. for u see China is a communist.. everybody is being oppressed there and they are miserable so the only thing they CAN DO is imagine.. ITS NO WONDER virtual reality has taken off over there.. but that aint the rest of the world and it damn sure aint MERICA! we are CAPITALIST! the world is for our taking!! i said it before.. life is a ? so we grab it by the ? ! u ever felt ? before?? NOTHING a virtual simulator can duplicate in a million years!!!
u make it sound so easy.. "oh jus log on and BAM ur in a Lamborghini" nah.. thats not gonna do it for us.. thats jus a nylon bone.. where's the marrow?? the appreciation of finally having something u worked EXTREMELY hard for?? that rush when u first turn on the ignition and the car vibrations rumble through ur body?? that first drive and when u pull up to valet and ALL THE REAL PEOPLE stop to stare?? that i REALLY did it feeling??
in China they'll never do it cause they're not allowed to.. I'm not sure they can even rent one.. so the next best thing is put on some goggles to see what its like to be in the cockpit.. so yeh.. there will always be a place for VR but it will never TAKE the place of reality for the MAJORITY because our lives our jus fine.. and if its not we have the opportunity to make it so..
Nothing beats the thrill of the chase.
*looks over to team world*
hey guys.. y'all only have one advantage over us..
y'all can kiss our ? and we can't! hahahaha
-
oh.. and @Sion
don't think i aint peep how u stole my gif from the debate where Gab lodged her heels in Cellar's ass!!!
i peeped ? ..
-
@Young_Chipotleempanadapupusachingatumadrecarajo has addressed each important point my opponent has attempted to make round after round, for the record.
What I was successfully debating using my Tekken point was that when I saw this form of virtual reality at GameWorks in Tempe, every other game on the floor was ghost because this virtual reality game version brought a new way to enter the popular world of Tekken, by you the user using VR to "fight." We now have VR in the GTA universe, furthering my point that VR is more economical and will get even more economical.
Now I read through my third round again and expect it to be in an almanac of how great third rounds in online debates be mind you... how can my opponent tell me and the audience that I made the most infinitesimal of arguments such as everyone will be like the Chinese when I never typed such an argument? When the judges go through my rounds and do not find that, I hope that the judges ding my opponent for making a sensationalist point to discredit my argument by saying that I made an argument that I never argued. Now I would have more things to type about if my opponent had mentioned Japan and I would dissect each point my opponent makes.. Alas, my opponent sees a synonym or analogy, and makes a juvenile opportunity to do a red herring and tu quoque fallacy. My opponent can make the argument that a virtual simulator cannot duplicate; however, I have proven word for word in this debate that my opponent is sterile in terms of making convincing debate arguments.
My opponent goes off like he was in a tank in Tiananmen Square, feeling himself and really believing that his final points in his previous round smash, ergo drive the debate in his direction. I hope the judges see a similar comparison as I'm seeing, that being the proverbial rock being lodged in. It would seem that I have to make this point round after round and although we only have 5 rounds in this debate, I could argue my position for 55 rounds or more. The point is not everybody is the same. Virtual life has the reality by the throat and it will not let go until it fully imitates a cheetah or lion. I know there are people (me included) that are trying to live like no one else, until later we can leave and give like no one else CARAJO.. again I make the statement that not everybody is the same and people appreciate things their own way at their own time. My opponent fails to see that the judges read his words and the word vicarious shines bright like the Vegas lights. Here we see VR Lamborghini driving
https://youtu.be/oTtdqvmJ2FM
and Flying a plane VR,
https://youtu.be/a0V8quv0rsc
I have one more thing to add before I make my final point for this round-
Team World are the real Stars of these debates. Team World are the true patriots of these debates.
My final point of this round..
Loving your life (and not theirs!) is key. If that entails a more virtual of a life, what right does society or my opponent have to say that is wrong? Virtual life, should it be your preferred life over the reality, should not have dissent from you if it matters more to you and you truly believe that it matters most to you over the reality.
@BOSSExcellence
Thank you.
