17yr old black kid charged with child pornography after sending nude to 16 yr old white female teen

MasterJayN100
MasterJayN100 Members Posts: 11,845 ✭✭✭✭✭
edited February 2017 in For The Grown & Sexy
levar.jpg?w=400\

giphy.gif

https://youtu.be/EFI102Xu-nQ


Levar Allen is a 17-year-old standout three-sport student athlete at Parkway High School in south Bossier City, La.

An award-winning wrestler, football and basketball player, Levar is beloved at school and in the community. He’s never been in trouble with the law a day in his life — until now.

Levar did what millions of kids in America are doing — he exchanged naked text messages with a 16-year-old classmate.

First, she sent Levar a nude video and then he sent her one in return. Call it gross, but a recent study found that 54% of kids under the age of 18 have done so before.

Parents may hate it, but when it’s consensual, it’s definitely safer than in-person intercourse.

But Levar lives in the deep South. He’s black. And it appears his biggest mistake wasn’t doing what the majority of American teens have done. His biggest mistake was doing so with a white girl.

Her parents called the police when they discovered what was happening. Of course, they arrested Levar and he was charged with contributing to the delinquency of a juvenile and possession of child pornography for the video he still had of her on his phone.

Yes, she’s 16 and he’s 17.

Yes, she sent him a video first.

Yes, this was consensual.

Yes they attend the same high school together.

Yes, this is a bogus symptom of the mass criminalization of black folk in the New Jim Crow.

When pressed on whether or not race played a role, Lt. Bill Davis, who is also white, seemed offended and told KSLA-TV, “I have nothing to say about that. It doesn’t matter what your race, what your religion, what your ethnicity, don’t do child pornography! Plain and simple.”

Except a 16-year-old and 17-year-old in the same school consensually sending each other sexual videos of themselves isn’t child pornography.

In Louisiana, the law states that anyone under the age of 17 found to be sexting any person of any age can be charged with a misdemeanor. It’s not widely prosecuted. If a 17 year old, even if they are in high school together, does the very same thing, with a 16 year old, they can be charged with with child pornography. The law lacks the nuance it deserves and ultimately criminalizes common youth misbehavior between peers.

Now, this young man faces the prospect of having a criminal record and his mother is having to scrape together every single dime she can find, $4,000 already, just to defend him from these outrageous charges.

f course race has everything to do with Levar Allen being charged with these trumped-up crimes. Millions upon millions of teenagers are doing this very thing and he was selectively targeted among them, and made an example of, because he crossed a line that clearly irritated not only her white parents but white law enforcement officers as well.

Charges should be dropped against this young man and his mother, a single mom of three, should be reimbursed for all of the needless expenses of this charade.

Beyond that, these laws must be adjusted to have nuance for normal sexual behaviors between two consenting 16 and 17-year-old kids.


http://earhustle411.com/16-year-old-white-girl-text-nude-picture-of-herself-to-17-year-old-black-boy-he-sends-one-back-now-hes-being-charged-with-child-pornography/

Comments

  • 7figz
    7figz Members Posts: 15,294 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Man WTF, the "state" needs to be beat for even thinking of bringing charges.

    Does dude have a gofundme ? This ? is ridiculous.
  • LUClEN
    LUClEN Members Posts: 20,559 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Kids are dumb.
  • Valentinez A. Kaiser
    Valentinez A. Kaiser Members Posts: 9,028 ✭✭✭✭✭
    These kids gon' learn today!

    Did the girl get charged with distribution of child pornography if he's charged with possession?
  • Trillfate
    Trillfate Members Posts: 24,008 ✭✭✭✭✭
    LUClEN wrote: »
    Kids are dumb.

    Racism is dumber
  • LUClEN
    LUClEN Members Posts: 20,559 ✭✭✭✭✭
    These kids gon' learn today!

    Did the girl get charged with distribution of child pornography if he's charged with possession?

    Probably not. She's got white girl legal armour. You can ? your own baby and get away with it if you have that ? . It's like the golden gun of the criminal justice system.

    I wanna know how the ? her parents found out. She must have set him up. No teen with half a brain is stupid enough to leave nudes out in the open for parents to see.
  • Will Munny
    Will Munny Members Posts: 30,199 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited February 2017
    It is a perfect storm of technology and hormones.

    Neither should be charged, but how can only one be charged for literally of the exact same crime?

    Just take their ? phones.
  • huey
    huey Members Posts: 11,743 ✭✭✭✭✭
    how the ? is she not charged as well?
  • MasterJayN100
    MasterJayN100 Members Posts: 11,845 ✭✭✭✭✭
    LUClEN wrote: »
    These kids gon' learn today!

    Did the girl get charged with distribution of child pornography if he's charged with possession?

    Probably not. She's got white girl legal armour. You can ? your own baby and get away with it if you have that ? . It's like the golden gun of the criminal justice system.

    I wanna know how the ? her parents found out. She must have set him up. No teen with half a brain is stupid enough to leave nudes out in the open for parents to see.

    White Parents Keep Tabs on their Kids
  • LUClEN
    LUClEN Members Posts: 20,559 ✭✭✭✭✭
    LUClEN wrote: »
    These kids gon' learn today!

    Did the girl get charged with distribution of child pornography if he's charged with possession?

    Probably not. She's got white girl legal armour. You can ? your own baby and get away with it if you have that ? . It's like the golden gun of the criminal justice system.

    I wanna know how the ? her parents found out. She must have set him up. No teen with half a brain is stupid enough to leave nudes out in the open for parents to see.

    White Parents Keep Tabs on their Kids

    Nah white people just too ? nosy
  • Plutarch
    Plutarch Members Posts: 3,239 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Deja Vu? This story was posted before, right? Or does this kind of thing happen frequently?
  • Will Munny
    Will Munny Members Posts: 30,199 ✭✭✭✭✭
    I think all this ? pic ? going on is basically a feminist agenda playing a long game to basically ensure any man born before 1985 never runs for public office.
  • Will Munny
    Will Munny Members Posts: 30,199 ✭✭✭✭✭
    LUClEN wrote: »
    These kids gon' learn today!

    Did the girl get charged with distribution of child pornography if he's charged with possession?

    Probably not. She's got white girl legal armour. You can ? your own baby and get away with it if you have that ? . It's like the golden gun of the criminal justice system.

    I wanna know how the ? her parents found out. She must have set him up. No teen with half a brain is stupid enough to leave nudes out in the open for parents to see.

    White Parents Keep Tabs on their Kids

    My dad got a report anytime I did anthing naughty on AOL growing up. ? was the worst. I was a young freak tho tryna see ? in them chatrooms. Judging off the ? I send girls on the IC, ? ain't really changed.
  • BiblicalAtheist
    BiblicalAtheist Members Posts: 15,668 ✭✭✭✭✭
    LUClEN wrote: »
    These kids gon' learn today!

    Did the girl get charged with distribution of child pornography if he's charged with possession?

    Probably not. She's got white girl legal armour. You can ? your own baby and get away with it if you have that ? . It's like the golden gun of the criminal justice system.

    I wanna know how the ? her parents found out. She must have set him up. No teen with half a brain is stupid enough to leave nudes out in the open for parents to see.

    This happened in Canada a few years ago:
    The conviction of a 17-year-old girl in a Victoria “sexting” case should serve as a warning to youths who use text messages and other forms of online communication, said Crown prosecutor Chandra Fisher.

    She said the case shows that youth should be wary of what they transmit via text, especially pictures.

    “They need to be careful what they send, what they send to each other and where it might end up.”

    The convicted girl, who cannot be named under terms of the Youth Criminal Justice Act, has been found guilty of possessing and distributing child pornography, as well as uttering threats, in the unique case heard in Victoria Youth Justice Court.

  • King$osa
    King$osa Members Posts: 319 ✭✭✭✭
    I would be still under a jail in the middle of West Texas if half of the ? I knew in high school parents caught some of the messages I sent
  • CapitalB
    CapitalB Members Posts: 24,556 ✭✭✭✭✭
    not surprised..

    i brought this ? up in my debate wit @Paprika about curfews..
    kids sendin nudes even if its to other kids is considered child porn..

    ? is ? stupid..

    and in this case the ? sent the ? first..
    either they both get charged or they need to drop his ? ..
  • deadeye
    deadeye Members Posts: 22,884 ✭✭✭✭✭
    huey wrote: »
    how the ? is she not charged as well?


    Maybe because she's 16 and is considered a minor in the state she lives in.



    Granted, he's 17 too.......but he could be at the age of consent and she might not legally be old enough to give consent.



    Reminds me of a 60 minutes story in which this 17yr old football player in GA got sentenced for 10 years for having sex a 15yr old girl.



    It was eventually overturned after about 2 or 3 years, but he only got charged because the 15yr old girl wasn't legally old enough to give consent.



    This case doesn't mention actual intercourse, but I'm assuming the same premise applies.
  • konceptjones
    konceptjones Guests, Members, Writer, Content Producer Posts: 13,139 ✭✭✭✭✭
    so why is ole boy's moms not pressing charges against the girl seeing as how she initiated it?
  • 7figz
    7figz Members Posts: 15,294 ✭✭✭✭✭
    so why is ole boy's moms not pressing charges against the girl seeing as how she initiated it?

    Exactly - the smart thing to do, ? the ? .
  • konceptjones
    konceptjones Guests, Members, Writer, Content Producer Posts: 13,139 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited February 2017
    huey wrote: »
    how the ? is she not charged as well?

    she's white and Louisiana is a racist ass state. Clearly she's guilty of producing child pornography as defined under LRS 14:81.1


    http://legis.la.gov/Legis/law.aspx?d=78675

    " It shall be unlawful for a person to produce, promote, advertise, distribute, possess, or possess with the intent to distribute pornography involving juveniles."

    "(8) "Pornography involving juveniles" is any photograph, videotape, film, or other reproduction, whether electronic or otherwise, of any sexual performance involving a child under the age of seventeen.

    (9) "Produce" means to photograph, videotape, film, or otherwise reproduce pornography involving juveniles, or to solicit, promote, or coerce any child for the purpose of pornography involving juveniles.

    (10) "Sexual performance" means any performance or part thereof that includes actual or simulated sexual intercourse, deviate sexual intercourse, sexual ? , ? , sadomasochistic abuse, or lewd exhibition of the ? or ? .

  • 5onblackhandside
    5onblackhandside Members Posts: 2,585 ✭✭✭✭✭
    if da parents saw that is a white boy who sent the ? nude pics dey would invite his ass over fo dinner
  • blackrain
    blackrain Members, Moderators Posts: 27,269 Regulator
    Plutarch wrote: »
    Deja Vu? This story was posted before, right? Or does this kind of thing happen frequently?

    same story as before
  • Kwan Dai
    Kwan Dai Members Posts: 6,929 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Moral of the story. Stop ? with these pink toes.