Who are the most overrated NFL players?
Options
Comments
-
its....JOHN B wrote: »http://bleacherreport.com/articles/560760-defense-wins-championsipshow-the-packers-defense-has-been-so-successful-in-2010
I'm done I knew once this bozo said intangibles are made up it wasn't a debate worth having, "well Patriots have better ownership and front office" LOLOL yea because Brady makes that ? possible
Exactly what I mean by made up.
Intangibles = any narrative you want it to fit. Tom Brady never gets consulted on personnel matters. Patriots were winning when he was mediocre
https://www.pro-football-reference.com/players/B/BradTo00.htm
He had career avg rating around 87 before Moss got there
I guess those 3 championships got won with intangibles. Best coach, defenses and front office had nothing to do with that -
I figured out what Brady intangible is
Belchick -
Inglewood_B wrote: »People rave about Jameis Winston work ethic and leadership too. What that mean?
There are a lot of great leaders and locker room guys in the league not winning a damn thing.
And Aaron being self centered didn't hinder his ability to win MVP or a Super Bowl with bad receivers and no defense
AY ? DAMMIT! Stay on topic, haha. -
this thread is crazy. tom brady overrated. we get it yall hate the pats yall hate brady. i would he fine with both them as my qbs.
all he did was throw another game winning td.
now jameis winston and cam newton are overrated qbs -
this thread is crazy. tom brady overrated. we get it yall hate the pats yall hate brady. i would he fine with both them as my qbs.
all he did was throw another game winning td.
now jameis winston and cam newton are overrated qbs -
this thread is crazy. tom brady overrated. we get it yall hate the pats yall hate brady. i would he fine with both them as my qbs.
all he did was throw another game winning td.
now jameis winston and cam newton are overrated qbs -
this thread is crazy. tom brady overrated. we get it yall hate the pats yall hate brady. i would he fine with both them as my qbs.
all he did was throw another game winning td.
now jameis winston and cam newton are overrated qbs -
this thread is crazy. tom brady overrated. we get it yall hate the pats yall hate brady. i would he fine with both them as my qbs.
all he did was throw another game winning td.
now jameis winston and cam newton are overrated qbs -
Man ? Tom Brady!!!
-
Man ? Tom Brady!!!
-
detcatinva wrote: »this thread is crazy. tom brady overrated. we get it yall hate the pats yall hate brady. i would he fine with both them as my qbs.
all he did was throw another game winning td.
now jameis winston and cam newton are overrated qbs
What's crazy is that I said Tom Brady was NOT overrated. I said he was the GOAT.
I'm saying he earned his GOAT status on merit and performance, and The Brady Stan sittin up here trying to tell us it's magic -
Some elite number 1 receiver has 114 yards in 3 games
-
BlackAX410 wrote: »Some elite number 1 receiver has 114 yards in 3 games
Washed.
Jenkings
Talib/Harris
Peterson
All locked that boy the ? up -
BlackAX410 wrote: »Some elite number 1 receiver has 114 yards in 3 games
I think I saw a article questioning of he's even a 1 anymore -
bow to royalty wrote: »BlackAX410 wrote: »Some elite number 1 receiver has 114 yards in 3 games
I think I saw a article questioning of he's even a 1 anymore
Is he even a number 2 at this point -
Shizlansky wrote: »bow to royalty wrote: »BlackAX410 wrote: »Some elite number 1 receiver has 114 yards in 3 games
I think I saw a article questioning of he's even a 1 anymore
Is he even a number 2 at this point
Haha damn. I'll give the man a 2. -
bow to royalty wrote: »BlackAX410 wrote: »Some elite number 1 receiver has 114 yards in 3 games
I think I saw a article questioning of he's even a 1 anymore
Yeah he definitely lost explosion lls -
Inglewood_B wrote: »That's because you're (understandably) on some homer ? .
He literally can do everything Brady does, a lot of things better. He put up similar numbers with skill position players worse than what NE has.
And then there's that Belichek guy. I'm not gonna call Brady a system QB, but he had a development curve to being GOAT. Those first few championships were about the Defense and Belichek while Brady managed games.
There was a definitive turning point in his career trajectory. Brady wasn't "Brady" until you know who got there.
Except win in January and February.
-
Shizlansky wrote: »The last chip was about defense.
They gave up only 21 points and shut Atlanta out the second half.
They was like top 3 in points given up last year and ALWAYS have a top defense
Absolutely.
Cause we all know they got 6 points for every 3 and out they got against ATL and Brady ain't have nothing to do w/ it. -
Inglewood_B wrote: »its....JOHN B wrote: »I'm really not being a homer I just think there's intangibles that Brady possesses and Rodgers doesn't, it's more to it to me than pointing out how Rodgers throws a better deep ball and throws on the run better, there's things that make Belichick and Brady a perfect match that wouldn't happen with ARod, I'm not saying they wouldn't have success I'm just saying I don't think if you take Brady out and plug in Rodgers and you will get the same results maybe better, you say it like it's a fact and it's really not
"Intangibles" is a made up attribute to prop up less athletic white guys
Both guys are proven winners. One has better ownership, front office, coaching and overall team talent. That's the difference. Those are facts.
Now the Packers organization ain't ? . lol That's a first.
The cirque du soleil contortions you ? go thru to ? on Brady is hilarious.
-
Inglewood_B wrote: »People rave about Jameis Winston work ethic and leadership too. What that mean?
There are a lot of great leaders and locker room guys in the league not winning a damn thing.
And Aaron being self centered didn't hinder his ability to win MVP or a Super Bowl with bad receivers and no defense
And A-Aron is one of em
-
Revolver Ocelot wrote: »Inglewood_B wrote: »People rave about Jameis Winston work ethic and leadership too. What that mean?
There are a lot of great leaders and locker room guys in the league not winning a damn thing.
And Aaron being self centered didn't hinder his ability to win MVP or a Super Bowl with bad receivers and no defense
And A-Aron is one of emRevolver Ocelot wrote: »Inglewood_B wrote: »That's because you're (understandably) on some homer ? .
He literally can do everything Brady does, a lot of things better. He put up similar numbers with skill position players worse than what NE has.
And then there's that Belichek guy. I'm not gonna call Brady a system QB, but he had a development curve to being GOAT. Those first few championships were about the Defense and Belichek while Brady managed games.
There was a definitive turning point in his career trajectory. Brady wasn't "Brady" until you know who got there.
Except win in January and February.
Oh word? January/February 2011 didn't happen? -
Revolver Ocelot wrote: »Inglewood_B wrote: »its....JOHN B wrote: »I'm really not being a homer I just think there's intangibles that Brady possesses and Rodgers doesn't, it's more to it to me than pointing out how Rodgers throws a better deep ball and throws on the run better, there's things that make Belichick and Brady a perfect match that wouldn't happen with ARod, I'm not saying they wouldn't have success I'm just saying I don't think if you take Brady out and plug in Rodgers and you will get the same results maybe better, you say it like it's a fact and it's really not
"Intangibles" is a made up attribute to prop up less athletic white guys
Both guys are proven winners. One has better ownership, front office, coaching and overall team talent. That's the difference. Those are facts.
Now the Packers organization ain't ? . lol That's a first.
The cirque du soleil contortions you ? go thru to ? on Brady is hilarious.
Where did I say the organization wasn't ? ? Quote me, I'll wait.
Better yet... just sit this one out, before you embarrass yourself like the other guy did. -
Inglewood_B wrote: »Revolver Ocelot wrote: »Inglewood_B wrote: »its....JOHN B wrote: »I'm really not being a homer I just think there's intangibles that Brady possesses and Rodgers doesn't, it's more to it to me than pointing out how Rodgers throws a better deep ball and throws on the run better, there's things that make Belichick and Brady a perfect match that wouldn't happen with ARod, I'm not saying they wouldn't have success I'm just saying I don't think if you take Brady out and plug in Rodgers and you will get the same results maybe better, you say it like it's a fact and it's really not
"Intangibles" is a made up attribute to prop up less athletic white guys
Both guys are proven winners. One has better ownership, front office, coaching and overall team talent. That's the difference. Those are facts.
Now the Packers organization ain't ? . lol That's a first.
The cirque du soleil contortions you ? go thru to ? on Brady is hilarious.
Where did I say the organization wasn't ? ? Quote me, I'll wait.
Better yet... just sit this one out, before you embarrass yourself like the other guy did.
lol at other guy bruh you got bodied, deal with it -
its....JOHN B wrote: »Inglewood_B wrote: »Revolver Ocelot wrote: »Inglewood_B wrote: »its....JOHN B wrote: »I'm really not being a homer I just think there's intangibles that Brady possesses and Rodgers doesn't, it's more to it to me than pointing out how Rodgers throws a better deep ball and throws on the run better, there's things that make Belichick and Brady a perfect match that wouldn't happen with ARod, I'm not saying they wouldn't have success I'm just saying I don't think if you take Brady out and plug in Rodgers and you will get the same results maybe better, you say it like it's a fact and it's really not
"Intangibles" is a made up attribute to prop up less athletic white guys
Both guys are proven winners. One has better ownership, front office, coaching and overall team talent. That's the difference. Those are facts.
Now the Packers organization ain't ? . lol That's a first.
The cirque du soleil contortions you ? go thru to ? on Brady is hilarious.
Where did I say the organization wasn't ? ? Quote me, I'll wait.
Better yet... just sit this one out, before you embarrass yourself like the other guy did.
lol at other guy bruh you got bodied, deal with it
Not surprised you'd be delusional about this. You believe in "intangibles".
