Forums

August FBI Memo Called ‘Black Identity Extremists’(BIEs) New Terror Threat…

245678

Replies

  • R0mpR0mp Keep Moving. Posts: 4,250 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited October 2017
    They need to approach white supremacist extremists terrorists, like former green beret Michael R Tubbs and KKK white knight David Wayne Hull, with the same intensity

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/David_Wayne_Hull

    https://sofrep.com/87813/disavowed-white-nationalist-and-ex-green-beret-a-part-of-the-violence-in-charlottesville/
  • R0mpR0mp Keep Moving. Posts: 4,250 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Also look into anti-black persons affiliated with supremacist and hate groups who have infiltrated law enforcement and the military with the same intensity...
  • stringer bellstringer bell Posts: 26,212 ✭✭✭✭✭
    https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2017/oct/06/fbi-black-identity-extremists-racial-profiling
    FBI terrorism unit says 'black identity extremists' pose a violent threat

    Leaked report, citing concerns of retaliation over ‘perceptions of police brutality against African Americans’, prompts fears of crackdown on activists

    The US government has declared “black identity extremists” a violent threat, according to a leaked report from the FBI’s counter-terrorism division.

    The assessment, obtained by Foreign Policy, has raised fears about federal authorities racially profiling activists and aggressively prosecuting civil rights protesters.

    The report, dated August 2017 and compiled by the Domestic Terrorism Analysis Unit, said: “The FBI assesses it is very likely Black Identity Extremist (BIE) perceptions of police brutality against African Americans spurred an increase in premeditated, retaliatory lethal violence against law enforcement and will very likely serve as justification for such violence.” Incidents of “alleged police abuse” have “continued to feed the resurgence in ideologically motivated, violent criminal activity within the BIE movement”.

    The FBI’s dedicated surveillance of black activists follows a long history of the US government aggressively monitoring protest movements and working to disrupt civil rights groups, but the scrutiny of African Americans by a domestic terrorism unit was particularly alarming to some free speech campaigners.


    “When we talk about enemies of the state and terrorists, with that comes an automatic stripping of those people’s rights to speak and protest,” said Mohammad Tajsar, staff attorney with the American Civil Liberties Union. “It marginalizes what are legitimate voices within the political debate that are calling for racial and economic justice.”

    The document has emerged at a time of growing concerns about Donald Trump’s links to the far right and white nationalists, and increasing anxieties about his administration’s efforts to further criminalize communities of color and shield police from scrutiny. Anti-Trump protesters and Black Lives Matter activists have continued to face harsh prosecutions and close federal monitoring.

    The FBI did not immediately respond to the Guardian’s request for comment on Friday, but defended its tracking of “black identity extremists” in a statement to Foreign Policy, claiming the “FBI cannot initiate an investigation based solely on an individual’s race, ethnicity, national origin, religion, or the exercise of First Amendment rights”.


    The FBI’s report noted specific cases of recent violence against police, most notably Micah Johnson, a 25-year-old shooter in Dallas who killed five officers and said he was targeting white people and law enforcement. Black Lives Matter – a movement protesting the disproportionate killings of black citizens by police in the US – had no ties to Johnson or other targeted killings of police and has condemned those shootings.

    The number of police officers killed on the job also remains a fraction of the number of citizens killed by officers each year, and statistics suggest that more white offenders than black offenders kill officers.

    The new FBI report said “BIE violence” peaked in the 1960s and 1970s “in response to changing socioeconomic attitudes and treatment of blacks”, adding that possible indicators today for “BIEs posing a violent threat to law enforcement” include “violent anti-white rhetoric” and “attempts to acquire illegal weapons or explosives”. BIE appears to be a very new term within law enforcement, Foreign Policy noted.

    Elsa Waithe, a comedian and activist with Black Lives Matter, said she feared the FBI’s classification could deter people from joining protests and further “criminalize anyone who is already in the movement”.


    She noted that she often wears a “black power” button and could easily see the FBI labeling her as a threat as a result: “The term ‘black identity extremist’ is so vague on purpose … If I wanted to do a picnic for black folks, is this now some sort of terrorist activity?”

    But law enforcement threats would not discourage her, she said. “This changes nothing. For some people, this means we fight harder.”

    Some reports have suggested that the Trump administration has also pushed to focus counter-terrorism efforts solely on Islamist extremism and no longer target white supremacist groups. The president further faced significant backlash in August for saying there were “very fine people” on both sides of a neo-Nazi rally where a civil rights activist was killed by an alleged white nationalist.

    The FBI document seemed to be aligned with far-right figures who have increasingly called Black Lives Matter a terrorist group, some comparing it to the Ku Klux Klan, noted Tajsar.


    DeRay Mckesson, a prominent Black Lives Matter activist, likened the “black identity extremist” monitoring to the FBI’s highly controversial domestic counterintelligence program known as Cointelpro, which was used to target political groups and activists like the NAACP, Martin Luther King Jr, socialist and communist groups and anti-war protesters.

    “We knew that we were likely being watched,” said Mckesson, who has spoken out about being monitored by the US government and FBI. “This is confirmation that the work of social justice continues to threaten those in power.”
    vqllc3.jpg

    eitedl.jpg

    156s7y0.jpg

    2zojh39.jpg

    “Every generation has its own evil. But our evil is a different kind of evil — our systems are evil.” - Rev. Nicholas Richards
  • 7figz7figz Still don’t nothing move but the money Posts: 15,294 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited October 2017
    5th Letter wrote: »
    So let me get this straight we should push aside someone calling black people (black men specifically) super predators because of their political alliance? We should ignore someone who created a bill that has destroyed the black community (that Bernie also cosigned) simply because they are democrats? We should ignore the fact that they collected all that money for Haiti relief and you had Haitians themselves who have complained about not seeing any money or stuff done for them? We should ignore illegal emails and servers created? People that didn't vote knew that both of them were shit candidates who had their own individual faults.

    Some of the shit you citing as facts hasn't even been proven to be factual.

    Let's go one by one, otherwise you lookin irrational lumping all this shit together and ignoring the comparatively worse MF in office right now.

    1. "Super-predators" vs "Terrorists" and no remorse for his call to reinstate the death penalty for innocent for the central park 5, plus making it harder to sue the cops, plus eliminating reviews against civil rights violations by cops by the justice department, plus pardoning Arpaio. The bitch Hillary atleast tried to walk back that super-predator shit when during the campaign. This MF doubling down and making it worse. So drop the "super-predator" shit. Your new shit to be worried about is "terrorist". Get out the past.
    2. Ignore someone who created a racist bill that destroyed the Black community. Debatable but don't even have to go that far because that Bill Clinton, not Hillary Clinton.
    3. "Because they are democrats". No, genius - because there was a worse republican that would win if the democrats didn't.
    4. Collected money for Haiti that some Haitians claimed not to get. You mean like how Puerto Rico is fucked up right now and claiming Trump ain't doing enough, and how he went there and blamed there for their budget and called the mayor "nasty" and dumb shit ? And how MFs in Texas were saying they weren't getting the FEMA money ? But yet the Clinton foundation still received top ratings supposedly. Wait, how about the article saying that Trump's son used some of the money from his charity / foundation to do some non-related shit ?
    5. Emails. FOH with shit already Nothing came of the emails and nothing came of the investigation. The worst you can say is it was against some law but the act alone wasn't proven to have caused any direct harm to a single American. If anything, weirdos who just the mere discussion of the a private email server, used the shit against Hilary herself without even having any evidence. Compare this to the actual business activities Trump has with Russia and China. Note shady now-dead Russians who were related to Trump's visits. Note Russian business tenants in Trump's buildings that were being investigated by the FBI.

    Nobody said "ignore" shit. But don't be stuck on inaction, or unable to see which one was worse then want to come out here now after seeing Trump doing worse shit and acting like you made the best decision.

    You could draw up all the "maybe Hillary would've did just as bad" bullshit you want but it's all hypothetical and based on the same shit that's being proven was part of the Trump+Russian campaign propaganda.

    Like I said, MFs ain't worth the conversation. Y'all look especially pathetic when you try to dismiss it as some "Love Hillary" or "Feelings" bullshit when MFs hittin you with facts. Not one MF I ever seen on here even said they even liked the bitch, they just simply stated they knew what would be worse and damn sure is looking worse than atleast the last democrat's admin, might even prove to be worse than Bill Clinton's admin.
    ShuffingtonHuey_CatribecalledgabiR0mpwhite715
  • 7figz7figz Still don’t nothing move but the money Posts: 15,294 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Facts = feelings... and you a mod ? They must be passing those shits out like MAGA hats.

    You gotta come better than that.

    Hold your L Trump enabler.... and keep going on about Hillary, that'll prove you knew what you were talmbout. We still waitin to see you and Tareeq's gamble about not-voting pay off.

    tenor.gif
    Huey_CMD_PROPER white715
  • 7figz7figz Still don’t nothing move but the money Posts: 15,294 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited October 2017
    kzzl wrote: »
    Its foolish to believe this wouldnt have happened even if hilary did win, you wishful thinking niggas. The attacks on blacks ramped up during a democrats run in the white house, a black president specifically. Stop ignoring that when the lesser evil has shown it simply prefers to stab you in the back. Looks to fall in line with "super predators" even, some sneaky, open ended shit that bitch could of easily done as well. Thats how white supremacist have always operated.

    Lets be honest, when was the last time a party had the white house more than 8 years, anyway? Theres no reason to think that pattern would of changed now. A republican was gonna get in there regardless most likely.

    The last election was horrible. I didnt vote cause thats what i do when i dont like my poll options. Id do it again, so blame all you want.

    Nobody can say what would've happened if Hillary won, but the fact is some of the shit people said would happen if Trump won is happening. And some of the shit, like war-mongering, that people said would happen if Hillary won - is actually happening with Trump winning. Trump is fuckin terrible, and MFs need to stop comparing it to how bad they imagine Hillary or another democrat would've been and deal with what is.

    My posts about not-voting isn't to individuals who chose not to vote for their own reasons, it's to MFs who encouraged and promoted it to other people as if it was some type of power-move and now talkin shit like they were some kind of oracle.

    MF you can't have it both ways - saying Trump was worse, now saying "Look at how bad Trump is".
    Shuffingtonfarris2k1
  • Max.Max. Posts: 33,009 ✭✭✭✭✭
    5th Letter wrote: »
    So let me get this straight we should push aside someone calling black people (black men specifically) super predators because of their political alliance? We should ignore someone who created a bill that has destroyed the black community (that Bernie also cosigned) simply because they are democrats? We should ignore the fact that they collected all that money for Haiti relief and you had Haitians themselves who have complained about not seeing any money or stuff done for them? We should ignore illegal emails and servers created? People that didn't vote knew that both of them were shit candidates who had their own individual faults.

    Body bag
  • 5th Letter5th Letter Black Identified Extremist Posts: 37,068 Regulator
    7figz wrote: »
    5th Letter wrote: »
    So let me get this straight we should push aside someone calling black people (black men specifically) super predators because of their political alliance? We should ignore someone who created a bill that has destroyed the black community (that Bernie also cosigned) simply because they are democrats? We should ignore the fact that they collected all that money for Haiti relief and you had Haitians themselves who have complained about not seeing any money or stuff done for them? We should ignore illegal emails and servers created? People that didn't vote knew that both of them were shit candidates who had their own individual faults.

    Some of the shit you citing as facts hasn't even been proven to be factual.

    Let's go one by one, otherwise you lookin irrational lumping all this shit together and ignoring the comparatively worse MF in office right now.

    1. "Super-predators" vs "Terrorists" and no remorse for his call to reinstate the death penalty for innocent for the central park 5, plus making it harder to sue the cops, plus eliminating reviews against civil rights violations by cops by the justice department, plus pardoning Arpaio. The bitch Hillary atleast tried to walk back that super-predator shit when during the campaign. This MF doubling down and making it worse. So drop the "super-predator" shit. Your new shit to be worried about is "terrorist". Get out the past.
    2. Ignore someone who created a racist bill that destroyed the Black community. Debatable but don't even have to go that far because that Bill Clinton, not Hillary Clinton.
    3. "Because they are democrats". No, genius - because there was a worse republican that would win if the democrats didn't.
    4. Collected money for Haiti that some Haitians claimed not to get. You mean like how Puerto Rico is fucked up right now and claiming Trump ain't doing enough, and how he went there and blamed there for their budget and called the mayor "nasty" and dumb shit ? And how MFs in Texas were saying they weren't getting the FEMA money ? But yet the Clinton foundation still received top ratings supposedly. Wait, how about the article saying that Trump's son used some of the money from his charity / foundation to do some non-related shit ?
    5. Emails. FOH with shit already Nothing came of the emails and nothing came of the investigation. The worst you can say is it was against some law but the act alone wasn't proven to have cause no direct harm to any single American. If anything, weirdos who just the mere discussion of the a private email server used the shit against Hilary herself without even having any evidence. Compare this to the actual business activities Trump has with Russia and China. Note shady now-dead Russians who were related to Trump's visits. Note Russian business tenants in Trump's buildings that were being investigated by the FBI.

    Nobody said "ignore" shit. But don't be stuck on inaction, or unable to see which one was worse then want to come out here now after seeing Trump doing worse shit and acting like you made the best decision.

    You could draw up all the "maybe Hillary would've did just as bad" bullshit you want but it's all hypothetical and based on the same shit that's being proven was part of the Trump+Russian campaign propaganda.

    Like I said, MFs ain't worth the conversation. Y'all look especially pathetic when you try to dismiss it as some "Love Hillary" or "Feelings" bullshit when MFs hittin you with facts. Not one MF I ever seen on here even said they even liked the bitch, they just simply stated they knew what would be worse and damn sure is looking worse than atleast the last democrat's admin, might even prove to be worse than Bill Clinton's admin.

    1. We already know what Trump is about. We know what he is. You think we are surprised by any of the racist things Trump is doing? Really? Trump doesn't need to walk back his racist comments or actions he has his base and he could give a fuck about who's offended. Hillary "walking back those super predator" comments is nothing but game. She's old enough to know what that means and how it's racist.

    2. That was a Bill Clinton bill but she cosigned it. Unless I missed it I haven't heard her denounce that bill either. And how is a bill that has caused the mass incarceration of black people especially black men debatable?

    3. No based on y'all comments it seems as if y'all are biased towards party rather than looking at the individual candidate. The only difference is that black people would continue to get shitted on but at least Trump has been an equal opportunity offender of other races.

    4. See the opening sentences of number 1. White supremacist being a white supremacist don't change the fact that the Clinton foundation fucked over Haitians and pocketed money that was supposed to help them. But I'm supposed to have faith that she would've done stuff for black people in the US?

    5. Again Trump being shady doesn't excuse Hillary doing shady things either bruh.

    I didn't vote because I didn't like none of the candidates. If someone offered me the choice between vomit and shit (which represented Hillary and Trump) I don't feel like I have to pick one. I decided to pick neither. Hopefully if a better candidate emerges in 2020 I'll gladly vote for that person.
    Fuck who's the baddest a persons status depends on salary
    That buck that bought that bottle could have struck the lotto
  • TrillfateTrillfate "i used to like the Ride more now i like the Race...i used like the Prize more now i like the Chase" Posts: 24,007 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited October 2017
    a.mann wrote: »
    I could have sworn THIS is what he wanted, when he urged black folks to let Trump win...




    This rhetoric was a mistake but at the end of the day it had very litte Impact.. he ain't responsible for trump getting elected
    z4qp8gvofqsm.gif
    a.mannShuffingtonMallyGrip.dilla
  • a.manna.mann Posts: 19,746 ✭✭✭✭✭
    5th Letter wrote: »
    So let me get this straight we should push aside someone calling black people (black men specifically) super predators because of their political alliance? We should ignore someone who created a bill that has destroyed the black community (that Bernie also cosigned) simply because they are democrats? We should ignore the fact that they collected all that money for Haiti relief and you had Haitians themselves who have complained about not seeing any money or stuff done for them? We should ignore illegal emails and servers created? People that didn't vote knew that both of them were shit candidates who had their own individual faults.

    Wouldn't want to be accused of intentionally being disingenuous and misleading

    For those that may have not heard the "super predators" comment in its full context



    playmaker88
  • 5th Letter5th Letter Black Identified Extremist Posts: 37,068 Regulator
    a.mann wrote: »
    5th Letter wrote: »
    So let me get this straight we should push aside someone calling black people (black men specifically) super predators because of their political alliance? We should ignore someone who created a bill that has destroyed the black community (that Bernie also cosigned) simply because they are democrats? We should ignore the fact that they collected all that money for Haiti relief and you had Haitians themselves who have complained about not seeing any money or stuff done for them? We should ignore illegal emails and servers created? People that didn't vote knew that both of them were shit candidates who had their own individual faults.

    Wouldn't want to be accused of intentionally being disingenuous and misleading

    For those that may have not heard the "super predators" comment in its full context



    That video definitely cleared things up...
    Fuck who's the baddest a persons status depends on salary
    That buck that bought that bottle could have struck the lotto
    Shuffingtondnyce215
  • a.manna.mann Posts: 19,746 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited October 2017
    Trillfate wrote: »


    This rhetoric was a mistake but at the end of the day it had very litte Impact.. he ain't responsible for trump getting elected

    He's not.

    But he like many others were naive and underestimated not just Trump but the team he would gather around him.
    They honestly thought Clinton would win because she was the popularly choice. So naturally they made their case against her, to go against the grain.

    But now.....they see how horrible and dangerous Trump is. But instead of just admitting that they were wrong and Hillary would NOT be THIS terrible and reckless as POTUS.

    They are trying to save face by continuing to make the case against her. By trying to say she would also be just as unqualified,careless, and incompetent had she won

    Of course no intelligent person with an ounce of integrity actually believes that bullshit.

    But pride a motherfucker

    7figz
  • a.manna.mann Posts: 19,746 ✭✭✭✭✭
    5th Letter wrote: »
    a.mann wrote: »
    5th Letter wrote: »
    So let me get this straight we should push aside someone calling black people (black men specifically) super predators because of their political alliance? We should ignore someone who created a bill that has destroyed the black community (that Bernie also cosigned) simply because they are democrats? We should ignore the fact that they collected all that money for Haiti relief and you had Haitians themselves who have complained about not seeing any money or stuff done for them? We should ignore illegal emails and servers created? People that didn't vote knew that both of them were shit candidates who had their own individual faults.

    Wouldn't want to be accused of intentionally being disingenuous and misleading

    For those that may have not heard the "super predators" comment in its full context

    That video definitely cleared things up...



    Yes, it does.....If you are being fair and honest
    Shuffingtonrip.dilla
  • 7figz7figz Still don’t nothing move but the money Posts: 15,294 ✭✭✭✭✭
    If at this point, you still believe that shit would be the same whether Trump / Hillary got elected then you might be the MF that Trump was actually the best thing to happen to - so you can learn the difference.

    Knowing both republicans and democrats can do damage but ignoring what types of damage they do is pointless - just throwing that out there.
    Huey_C
  • 5th Letter5th Letter Black Identified Extremist Posts: 37,068 Regulator
    a.mann wrote: »
    5th Letter wrote: »
    a.mann wrote: »
    5th Letter wrote: »
    So let me get this straight we should push aside someone calling black people (black men specifically) super predators because of their political alliance? We should ignore someone who created a bill that has destroyed the black community (that Bernie also cosigned) simply because they are democrats? We should ignore the fact that they collected all that money for Haiti relief and you had Haitians themselves who have complained about not seeing any money or stuff done for them? We should ignore illegal emails and servers created? People that didn't vote knew that both of them were shit candidates who had their own individual faults.

    Wouldn't want to be accused of intentionally being disingenuous and misleading

    For those that may have not heard the "super predators" comment in its full context

    That video definitely cleared things up...



    Yes, it does.....If you are being fair and honest

    If trump said those same words you wouldn't be trying to find the "context" if we're being fair and honest.
    Fuck who's the baddest a persons status depends on salary
    That buck that bought that bottle could have struck the lotto
    ghostdog56CashmoneyDuxIceBergTaylorrip.dilla
  • 7figz7figz Still don’t nothing move but the money Posts: 15,294 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited October 2017
    5th Letter wrote: »
    7figz wrote: »
    5th Letter wrote: »
    So let me get this straight... (removed for brevity)

    Some of the shit you citing as facts hasn't even been proven to be factual.

    Let's go one by one, otherwise you lookin irrational lumping all this shit together and ignoring the comparatively worse MF in office right now.

    1. "Super-predators" vs "Terrorists" ... (removed for brevity)

    1. We already know what Trump is about. We know what he is. You think we are surprised by any of the racist things Trump is doing? Really? Trump doesn't need to walk back his racist comments or actions he has his base and he could give a fuck about who's offended. Hillary "walking back those super predator" comments is nothing but game. She's old enough to know what that means and how it's racist.

    2. That was a Bill Clinton bill but she cosigned it. Unless I missed it I haven't heard her denounce that bill either. And how is a bill that has caused the mass incarceration of black people especially black men debatable?

    3. No based on y'all comments it seems as if y'all are biased towards party rather than looking at the individual candidate. The only difference is that black people would continue to get shitted on but at least Trump has been an equal opportunity offender of other races.

    4. See the opening sentences of number 1. White supremacist being a white supremacist don't change the fact that the Clinton foundation fucked over Haitians and pocketed money that was supposed to help them. But I'm supposed to have faith that she would've done stuff for black people in the US?

    5. Again Trump being shady doesn't excuse Hillary doing shady things either bruh.

    I didn't vote because I didn't like none of the candidates. If someone offered me the choice between vomit and shit (which represented Hillary and Trump) I don't feel like I have to pick one. I decided to pick neither. Hopefully if a better candidate emerges in 2020 I'll gladly vote for that person.

    I'm not caring if anybody is "surprised" or not. MFs act like Trump is some kind of open-book and is so easily read and that's why he's better. Nope, he's just as shady but unable to disguise it very well. That MF got more shady shit going on behind the scenes, with himself, his family, and his associates - that he damn sure ain't talking about. MFs really need to stop acting like they know everything about him because he says some extremely dumb / ignorant shit.

    1.

    If we "know what he is", why don't we have his tax returns showing his foreign business holdings ?

    Why does he deny that the people he hires are white supremacists ?

    Why does he still deny American terrorism ?

    Why did he front with the HBCU meetings and then not do shit ?

    This MF ain't as "obvious" as you MFs would like to believe. So y'all need to stop using that "devil we know" shit. And just because you know certain shit about a MF doesn't mean he can't be worse.

    2.

    Trump is passing bills that may be worse than what Bill Clinton did and Hillary co-signed. What's debatable is whether or not you want to hold Hillary responsible for it, and pretend that she would be on the same shit in 2017, in another environment. Now she would be actual "president". Now social media is popular. Now cops killing people are on front-page. Now we have more activism, like BLM, against police brutality, and now the dems (and Hillary) was actually trying (possibly pretending) go cater to that type of shit during campaign while Trump was saying he "supports law enforcement". Yeah, you knew what you were getting with Trump - a MF who supported cops who kill Black people and shrug his shoulder. That vs the wife of a MF who passed a bill and a wife who defended and now acts like she doesn't. Debatable all day.

    3.

    How the fuck is any of my comments biased toward a party ? Just quote it (in 1 post) and we'll discuss that. The most I mention "parties" is when MFs act like Blacks are 100% loyal to dems... or act like the republicans have been doing good things for Black people... and I'm not talking about no civil war parties shit, I'm talking about the current day dems and repubs.

    4.

    Trump is fucking over natural disaster victims RIGHT NOW according to them. I compare that to what some Haitians may / may not have said about the Clinton foundation shit - or was that even proven ? Post evidence. Until then, I'd be inclined to believe that was just part Trump's campaign. And why the fuck would you compare that to white supremacy ?

    5.

    Who the fuck is trying "excuse Hillary doing shady things" ? I think it's obvious Trump is shaping up to be worse. And that's the point. Nobody was saying either of them were 'godly' or some shit, but MFs seemed unable to get past who was going to make shit worse during their term.

    And it's weak as fuck to try to throw some "you love Hillary" or "you love the democrats" shit up when people talk about why Trump was the worse choice. But like I said, if you (generally speaking) still don't believe Trump was the worse choice - then maybe you're the person that Trump was the best thing for - so you could discern the difference.
  • a.manna.mann Posts: 19,746 ✭✭✭✭✭
    7figz wrote: »
    If at this point, you still believe that shit would be the same whether Trump / Hillary got elected then you might be the MF that Trump was actually the best thing to happen to - so you can learn the difference.

    Knowing both republicans and democrats can do damage but ignoring what types of damage they do is pointless - just throwing that out there.


    You CAN actually make a reasonable and sensible case as to how the Democrats can improve as a political party
    (Looking at the policies of Civil Rights, healthcare, justice reform, education reform, minimum wage increase, tax reform etc.etc.)

    Meanwhile on the other side of the aisle ..there is absolutely no motherfuckin' redeemable qualities of Republicans or the policies they push for

    7figzShuffingtonfarris2k1
  • 7figz7figz Still don’t nothing move but the money Posts: 15,294 ✭✭✭✭✭
    a.mann wrote: »
    I could have sworn THIS is what he wanted, when he urged black folks to let Trump win...




    Facts. And when MFs just forget about this shit and act like he droppin knowledge, I gotta step to the side and watch the whole shit.

    I started noticing some funny style shit like that about Boyce Watkins too. Dude stay criticizing the dems, and Black peoples' alleged loyalty to them but said little about Trump and the republicans especially when it mattered.

    I fuck with his so-called financial empowerment of Black people but quickly noticed nowadays that his channel is more about click-bait and right now is serving as a lot of divisiveness and coon / self-hate type thinking, especially looking at the comments. I think that MF says anything, including low-key shitting on and generalizing Black people, simply to market his product.

    Came across an old video where a dude was calling him out for it around election time...

  • radio_santanaradio_santana Posts: 275 ✭✭
    Didnt j edger hoover do the same with the black panther party as this current agency is attempting w/blm? We've come too far for regression
    Focal Point
  • BroddieBroddie just me and my bitch NYCPosts: 11,750 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Never in my life thought I'd live to see COINTELPRO 2.0

    Did I accidentally travel back in time?
    2604vgo.jpg

    R.I.P. Darwyn Cooke
    stringer bellKoltrain
Sign In or Register to comment.