mustang or camaro?

Options
TimroD
TimroD Confirm Email Posts: 1,685 ✭✭
edited April 2011 in Let Me Ride
who you got?
or name some other dope american cars and drop pics if you want
· Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
«1

Comments

  • swag_of_krypton
    swag_of_krypton Members Posts: 935 ✭
    edited November 2010
    Options
    Camaro FTW
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • wilberdmillz
    wilberdmillz Members Posts: 2,159 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited November 2010
    Options
    The new 4v 5.0 ? all over the new Camaro........easy choice.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Got Em Shook
    Got Em Shook Members Posts: 2,919 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited November 2010
    Options
    mustang hands down lol
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Chickenkiller
    Chickenkiller Members Posts: 1
    edited December 2010
    Options
    I have to say you can beat the ? out of a mustang w/out working on it too much but camaros are usually a lot faster....they tend to break a little more.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Haun Solo
    Haun Solo Members Posts: 189
    edited December 2010
    Options
    swag_of_krypton wrote: »
    Camaro FTW

    This Hands down!!! A stock Camero in HP kills a stock Mustang.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • wilberdmillz
    wilberdmillz Members Posts: 2,159 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited December 2010
    Options
    Haun Solo wrote: »
    This Hands down!!! A stock Camero in HP kills a stock Mustang.

    FOH......you need to do some research.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • wilberdmillz
    wilberdmillz Members Posts: 2,159 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited December 2010
    Options
    ? it I'll do it for you. Manual Camaro = 426, Manual Mustang = 412. Auto Camaro = 400, Auto Mustang = 412. The Mustang is faster, so where's this killing you speak of stock to stock?
    Direct Comparison

    Here is the direct comparison of the 2011 Mustang and the 2010 Camaro. The Mustang ranges from $20,995 to $35,995 in price, with the Camaro cashing in at $22,680 to $33,745. The Camaro boasts more horsepower and torque, registering in at between 304 to 426 horsepower and 273 to 420 lb-ft in torque, and has the larger engine set of a 3.6L V6 to a 6.2L V8. The Mustang runs close behind in horsepower and torque, with a value of 305 to 412 hp and 280 to 390 lb-ft. The Mustangs offers up engines of a 3.7L V6 to the 5.0L V8. The Mustang reaches 0-60 mph faster than its rival does with an estimate of 4.5 to 5.5 seconds. The Camaro clocks in at 4.8 to 5.9 seconds.


    Read more at Suite101: 2011 Mustang V.S. 2010 Chevy Camaro: A Look at Both Models http://www.suite101.com/content/2011-mustang-vs-2010-chevy-camaro-a217224#ixzz19TPIeDUP
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Bcotton5
    Bcotton5 Members Posts: 51,851 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited December 2010
    Options
    Camaro by far
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • [Deleted User]
    [Deleted User] rubbed off from friction Posts: 0 ✭✭✭
    edited December 2010
    Options
    The user and all related content has been deleted.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • [Deleted User]
    [Deleted User] rubbed off from friction Posts: 0 ✭✭✭
    edited December 2010
    Options
    The user and all related content has been deleted.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • wilberdmillz
    wilberdmillz Members Posts: 2,159 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited December 2010
    Options
    I must say though, that damn challenger looks the best of the three.
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aB4vfZDYyO8
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Copper
    Copper Members Posts: 49,532 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited December 2010
    Options
    chevy everyday of the week twice on sunday.....
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • geechee slim
    geechee slim Members Posts: 2,465 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited December 2010
    Options
    Haun Solo wrote: »
    This Hands down!!! A stock Camero in HP kills a stock Mustang.
    This is true. Plus the Camaro just looks better.

    You pull to a light in the mustang, dudes are gonna wanna race.
    You pull to a light in a Camaro, ? look at you like you're in a space ship.
    You pull to a light in a Dodge Challanger? You... are... a.... ? .
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • wilberdmillz
    wilberdmillz Members Posts: 2,159 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited December 2010
    Options
    geechee slim wrote: »
    This is true. Plus the Camaro just looks better.

    Looks are opinion based so I wont argue that, but this more horse power thing is crazy to me. What does it really mean to have a little more horsepower(+14) and still not perform better than the car with a little less horsepower(-14). I know I'd take the better performing car regardless of HP rating. Now if you all buying based on looks cool, but throw that horsepower ? out the window cause its not the only thing that decides performance.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • [Deleted User]
    [Deleted User] rubbed off from friction Posts: 0 ✭✭✭
    edited December 2010
    Options
    The user and all related content has been deleted.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • paulm
    paulm Members Posts: 4
    edited January 2011
    Options
    I got Camaro Z28, One of the my most favourite car.
    Outstanding performance and great engine, Pretty cool looking and most popular muscles car.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • geechee slim
    geechee slim Members Posts: 2,465 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited January 2011
    Options
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=r-uTjaQ6E7g

    If you want a two-seater, I'd suggest the most rare.... The Challenger, and then the Camaro. Better looking and more desirable than the Mustang.

    The Challenger has the same chassis as a charger, so it's built and heavy like a four-seater. More room. It has the most athletic look.

    The Camaro, well it disapeared after 2002, and then magically came back with new body. 426 HP. You can stay in 1st and 2nd gear and still go fast.

    Mustang= Most bought pony car ever. So that means, everyone's got one. Mostly older white guys overcompensating. Time to be different and stand out.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • wilberdmillz
    wilberdmillz Members Posts: 2,159 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited January 2011
    Options
    geechee slim wrote: »
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=r-uTjaQ6E7g

    If you want a two-seater, I'd suggest the most rare.... The Challenger, and then the Camaro. Better looking and more desirable than the Mustang.

    The Challenger has the same chassis as a charger, so it's built and heavy like a four-seater. More room. It has the most athletic look.

    The Camaro, well it disapeared after 2002, and then magically came back with new body. 426 HP. You can stay in 1st and 2nd gear and still go fast.

    Mustang= Most bought pony car ever. So that means, everyone's got one. Mostly older white guys overcompensating. Time to be different and stand out.

    Whats up with that old ass video? The new Mustang has a 5.0 in it and is faster than all its competition.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • geechee slim
    geechee slim Members Posts: 2,465 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited January 2011
    Options
    wilberdmillz wrote: »
    Whats up with that old ass video? The new Mustang has a 5.0 in it and is faster than all its competition.
    Well, lemme put it in terms you can better understand.

    Mustang = Air Force 1nes. Very common, very commercial.

    Camaro = Jordans. Better looking, more desirable.

    Challanger= Timberlands. The most expensive of the bunch.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • wilberdmillz
    wilberdmillz Members Posts: 2,159 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited January 2011
    Options
    geechee slim wrote: »
    Well, lemme put it in terms you can better understand.

    Mustang = Air Force 1nes. Very common, very commercial.

    Camaro = Jordans. Better looking, more desirable.

    Challanger= Timberlands. The most expensive of the bunch.

    LOL, I can some what agree with that. Except I think of the three the Camaro looks the worst but I also think its a good looking car, does that make sense?

    I do see just as many new Camaros as I do new Mustangs. They're both very popular which I think is a good thing. It means the Muscle car wars are on.

    That Challenger analogy is spot on though lmao!!
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • [Deleted User]
    [Deleted User] rubbed off from friction Posts: 0 ✭✭✭
    edited January 2011
    Options
    The user and all related content has been deleted.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • geechee slim
    geechee slim Members Posts: 2,465 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited January 2011
    Options
    ^^^^^
    Uh...... No
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • JazznJazz
    JazznJazz Members Posts: 152 ✭
    edited January 2011
    Options
    ford-shelby-gt500kr-mustang-top-down-look.jpg
    Mustang FTW!
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • love yal
    love yal Members Posts: 1,327
    edited February 2011
    Options
    The Camaro is good car but I think the Mustang has stronger engine.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • alvarez_313
    alvarez_313 Members Posts: 1,322 ✭✭✭✭
    edited February 2011
    Options
    The new 5.0 mustang is quicker and has really decent suspension and brakes so it's beating both the Camaro and the Challenger in those performance aspects. As far as looks, well that's subjective.. The weight difference more than offsets the camaro's slight hp advantage.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter

Categories