Has internet played a vital role in your belief/disblief in "? "
Options
Comments
-
what "theist" opinions has science dismissed? the only thing you can cite is some ? christian misunderstandings and mistranslations of hebraic texts. coulda swore i read something from ya boy hawkings sticking his foot in his crooked mouth in relation to a "Creative Intelligence making something out of nothing". in Hebrew this the esoteric meaning of the "name" of the Creator- yued, hay, waw, hey (YHWH- literally a compund word meaning " is was and will be" as a verb not a proper noun). more on this from a renown scientist by the name of dan winters. you should look him up.
The only thing that Hawkins corrected himself about the black hole which is what scientist do. He also attempted to make claims in his more recent book that were closer to speculation then science with M-Theory. The theory you present is a theory that anybody can postulate from simply looking at death and birth. It still doesn't prove that intelligence is necessary to create the universe. I just looked up dan winters, and he proves that he's a smart guy that likes to makes ? up. Something coming from nothing is an observation that anyone can make when looking at lie and death but it does not prove that an intelligence is necessary to create the universe.
The Hebraic text are good at making observations which all people do. But their final theory has not been proven. The historicity of the text is also in question with a certain human tribe making embellishments. You call the christian bible ? yet you offer nothing in your book either. It sounds like ? competing with ? and it's really smelly. A lot of your Hebrew writings was created to justify their massacre of other tribes in Canaan and the stealing of Egyptian gold. There was a bit of focus to create rules of law which isn't new in any civilization whether verbal or written.
