Hollywood Sex Abuse Scandal Thread - Harvey , Kevin, Andy etc
Comments
-
Madame_CJSkywalker wrote: »BiblicalAtheist wrote: »1 down, couple hundred to go.
"Joel Schumacher and Steven Spielberg; we're coming for you ? !"
spielberg?
with all this coming out hopefully more ppl begin to rethink the elijah wood allegations
Corey Feldman.
Stand by me takes on a whole new meaning -
The user and all related content has been deleted.
-
The user and all related content has been deleted.
-
dude is a weirdo
-
northside7 wrote: »
Yup -
fortyacres wrote: »Madame_CJSkywalker wrote: »fortyacres wrote: »Kate Beckinsale is a trash actress she needs to get the ? on with that talk about hurtin my career...
lol
no love for underworld?
no
Underworld >>>>E.T. -
@TheGOAT so you telling me you would rather watch an ugly ass alien than a sexy ass female vampire?
Ok. -
Black_Samson wrote: »illestni99ainne wrote: »Madame_CJSkywalker wrote: »BiblicalAtheist wrote: »1 down, couple hundred to go.
"Joel Schumacher and Steven Spielberg; we're coming for you ? !"
spielberg?
with all this coming out hopefully more ppl begin to rethink the elijah wood allegations
Corey Feldman.
Stand by me takes on a whole new meaning
Hes ? chicken ? hell you could leak the names without using your name and let the media do the digging.
-
Black_Samson wrote: »illestni99ainne wrote: »Madame_CJSkywalker wrote: »BiblicalAtheist wrote: »1 down, couple hundred to go.
"Joel Schumacher and Steven Spielberg; we're coming for you ? !"
spielberg?
with all this coming out hopefully more ppl begin to rethink the elijah wood allegations
Corey Feldman.
Stand by me takes on a whole new meaning
Hes ? chicken ? hell you could leak the names without using your name and let the media do the digging.
Corey Haim once said the same ? back when he was still alive. -
VulcanRaven wrote: »@TheGOAT so you telling me you would rather watch an ugly ass alien than a sexy ass female vampire?
Ok.
Ive seen the 1st 3 Underworld films and dont remember a damn thing about any of them.
They are nothing special -
Black_Samson wrote: »illestni99ainne wrote: »Madame_CJSkywalker wrote: »BiblicalAtheist wrote: »1 down, couple hundred to go.
"Joel Schumacher and Steven Spielberg; we're coming for you ? !"
spielberg?
with all this coming out hopefully more ppl begin to rethink the elijah wood allegations
Corey Feldman.
Stand by me takes on a whole new meaning
Hes ? chicken ? hell you could leak the names without using your name and let the media do the digging.
Corey Haim once said the same ? back when he was still alive.
They could send the names to tmz, national enquirer, julian assage, anonymous, etc... he could keep his name off of it
-
-
Black_Samson wrote: »illestni99ainne wrote: »Madame_CJSkywalker wrote: »BiblicalAtheist wrote: »1 down, couple hundred to go.
"Joel Schumacher and Steven Spielberg; we're coming for you ? !"
spielberg?
with all this coming out hopefully more ppl begin to rethink the elijah wood allegations
Corey Feldman.
Stand by me takes on a whole new meaning
Hes ? chicken ? hell you could leak the names without using your name and let the media do the digging.
Corey Haim once said the same ? back when he was still alive.
They could send the names to tmz, national enquirer, julian assage, anonymous, etc... he could keep his name off of it
it's easy to say that when it doesn't affect you. I can understand why he hasn't said anything, he's got his family and self to think of. He doesn't want to jeopardize that/them especially when there's no guarantee that anyone will back him up and help him fight. -
amazon probably like wtf lol but i bet every woman who got turned down for a role gonna play the sexual harassment treatment lol ? gonna get wild -
CONTRACT WITH TWC
ALLOWED FOR SEXUAL HARASSMENT
Harvey Weinstein may have been fired illegally by The Weinstein Company, a company that wrote a contract that said Weinstein could get sued over and over for sexual harassment and as long as he shelled out money, that was good enough for the Company.
TMZ is privy to Weinstein's 2015 employment contract, which says if he gets sued for sexual harassment or any other "misconduct" that results in a settlement or judgment against TWC, all Weinstein has to do is pay what the company's out, along with a fine, and he's in the clear.
According to the contract, if Weinstein "treated someone improperly in violation of the company's Code of Conduct," he must reimburse TWC for settlements or judgments. Additionally, "You [Weinstein] will pay the company liquidated damages of $250,000 for the first such instance, $500,000 for the second such instance, $750,000 for the third such instance, and $1,000,000 for each additional instance."
The contract says as long as Weinstein pays, it constitutes a "cure" for the misconduct and no further action can be taken. Translation -- Weinstein could be sued over and over and as long as he wrote a check, he keeps his job.
The contract has specific language as to when the Board of Directors can fire Weinstein -- if he's indicted or convicted of a crime, but that doesn't apply here.
There's another provision ... he can be fired for "the perpetuation by you [Weinstein] of a material fraud against the company." The question ... where's the fraud? Lance Maerov, the board member who negotiated Weinstein's 2015 contract, said in an interview -- and we've confirmed -- the Board knew Weinstein had settled prior lawsuits brought by various women, but they "assumed" it was to cover up consensual affairs. The Board's assumption does not constitute fraud on Weinstein's part.
And here's the kicker. Even if Weinstein had committed fraud by not fully informing the Board of Directors, the contract says before he can be fired he has a right to mediation and if that doesn't work, he's entitled to arbitration. He got neither. He was summarily fired, and sources connected with Weinstein tell TMZ he was never given a specific reason.
A source connected with TWC tells TMZ, the company had a right to fire Weinstein if he didn't notify the Board of Directors of settlements. We're told there have been no settlements since the contract was signed, so it would seem this clause does not apply.
lmao damn homie had the melo no trade in his contract -
-
Black_Samson wrote: »Ja rule got a story too apparently.
Irv touched him an ashanti -
so steven seagal should be added too huh
https://www.yahoo.com/news/off-dress-men-hollywood-steven-202021745.html?.tsrc=new_fauxdal -
where is the outrage america?
-
an we didnt even talk about the kids yet....
this is still the adults -
Madame_CJSkywalker wrote: »Madame_CJSkywalker wrote: »Madame_CJSkywalker wrote: »Madame_CJSkywalker wrote: »Madame_CJSkywalker wrote: »Madame_CJSkywalker wrote: »All this outrage and its a ? happily and willfully busting it open on a cast couch right now!!
That ? ain't going to ever end. People are always going to be willing to trade sex for something that they want.
Only thing ? up about it is when these people prey on kids.
A grown person who CHOOSES to ? and suck for movie roles made a conscious decision that movie fame and money is worth more to them than their dignity.
Why the ? should I care more about their dignity than they do?
Im not trying to defend or condemn the women. And im not saying life is fair for everyone.
But you missing the point bruh. Hollywood has a culture where it is expected that women gotta ? and suck for a role. Almost all of them do it, and they understand and accept it.
That is the issue. Instead of being merit based and based on talent and skilled, all of that becomes secondary and it comes down too does she want it enough to suck this ? .
That culture shouldnt exist in any aspect of life. That culture does exist though, everywhere, even outside of hollywood, and not just gender based, its also race and religion based. Basically, if you arent a white chrisrian male, you have faced this in some form or another.
To put the blame solely on women for this completely missed the point.
Where did I put anything solely on women?
The bold is the only thing you said that is worth a damn. They understand it and accept it.
So like I said they are making the conscious decision to suck and ? . They don't have to but are willing to in order to get what they want.
A hoe suck and ? for money, they sucking and ? for movie roles and money.
I ain't crying for grown people who willing to put a price on ? they shouldn't.
You are and I have no problems with that. Just some ? I ain't going to do.
They need to live with their choices IMO. That ? ain't a forced ? situation. Its more a quid pro quo from what I'm seeing.
Why is this not looked as a old man tricking off on a young ? ?
Old wants to ? a young ? offers money, clothes, cars, purses or movie roles.
Young ? wants money, clothes, cars, purses and to act in movies.
Old man makes offer to provide all that ? and the young ? accepts knowing what comes with it.
Why should I care?
? ain't nothing but a different form of tricking.
some of these women say they were touched, propositioned or put into an inappropriate position without their consent.... and, for good reason, fearful of being blackballed if they told
it's no different then being sexually harassed on ur job
and the women who did turn down his advances or report him were either dismissed or treated as outcasts
everyone should care because allowing these executives to get away with this only empowers/emboldens them and others within the industry who may also prey on young ppl, children who want fame and money
I don't know what reading comprehension problems some of yall have just because a person doesn't just fall in line with the outrage train of thought some of the media want people to have.
I'll repeat it again.
I don't care or have empathy for any man or woman who consciously chose to ? and suck for a movie role.
I'll repeat again.
I do have empathy and care about those people who were forced, ? or kids who have been violated.
As usual you taking ? I never said and just replying and talking to be talking.
Either address what I say or don't reply based off what you assuming I'm saying. If I didn't type it then don't attribute it to me.
lol
per usual
you made an irrelevant, dismissive commentAll this outrage and its a ? happily and willfully busting it open on a cast couch right now!!
and i like others responded accordingly
*shrugs*
No I spoke on something specific. Which is exactly what you quoted.
You like you always do speak about ? that I never commented on.
I spoke specifically about the people who make a conscious decision to ? and suck for a movie role.
You and those others chose to speak on some ? I never talked about to try and make a point regarding my comment.
That ? is dumb as ? and you continually do it. Which I always say you talking to be talking and typing just to be typing.
Like I said either address what I typed and only what I typed or don't quote my ? to bring up some ? that I never said and act like I'm saying some ? I never said.
That's sucka ? .
yes you spoke specifically about the people who make a conscious decision to ? and suck for a movie role
but that is not why ppl are outraged and bashing weinstein as ur comment suggests
if that was not ur intent ...cool... ur bad
otherwise i don't see the relevance
*shrugs*
End of discussion.
yea
ur bad bruh
its ok lol
just trying to help u out
i only do it ? i care luv
how's ur day going?
working?
May day yesterday was quite well. How about yours?
Always working. I only post on here or visit the site when I'm at work. -
Madame_CJSkywalker wrote: »Madame_CJSkywalker wrote: »Madame_CJSkywalker wrote: »Madame_CJSkywalker wrote: »Madame_CJSkywalker wrote: »Madame_CJSkywalker wrote: »All this outrage and its a ? happily and willfully busting it open on a cast couch right now!!
That ? ain't going to ever end. People are always going to be willing to trade sex for something that they want.
Only thing ? up about it is when these people prey on kids.
A grown person who CHOOSES to ? and suck for movie roles made a conscious decision that movie fame and money is worth more to them than their dignity.
Why the ? should I care more about their dignity than they do?
Im not trying to defend or condemn the women. And im not saying life is fair for everyone.
But you missing the point bruh. Hollywood has a culture where it is expected that women gotta ? and suck for a role. Almost all of them do it, and they understand and accept it.
That is the issue. Instead of being merit based and based on talent and skilled, all of that becomes secondary and it comes down too does she want it enough to suck this ? .
That culture shouldnt exist in any aspect of life. That culture does exist though, everywhere, even outside of hollywood, and not just gender based, its also race and religion based. Basically, if you arent a white chrisrian male, you have faced this in some form or another.
To put the blame solely on women for this completely missed the point.
Where did I put anything solely on women?
The bold is the only thing you said that is worth a damn. They understand it and accept it.
So like I said they are making the conscious decision to suck and ? . They don't have to but are willing to in order to get what they want.
A hoe suck and ? for money, they sucking and ? for movie roles and money.
I ain't crying for grown people who willing to put a price on ? they shouldn't.
You are and I have no problems with that. Just some ? I ain't going to do.
They need to live with their choices IMO. That ? ain't a forced ? situation. Its more a quid pro quo from what I'm seeing.
Why is this not looked as a old man tricking off on a young ? ?
Old wants to ? a young ? offers money, clothes, cars, purses or movie roles.
Young ? wants money, clothes, cars, purses and to act in movies.
Old man makes offer to provide all that ? and the young ? accepts knowing what comes with it.
Why should I care?
? ain't nothing but a different form of tricking.
some of these women say they were touched, propositioned or put into an inappropriate position without their consent.... and, for good reason, fearful of being blackballed if they told
it's no different then being sexually harassed on ur job
and the women who did turn down his advances or report him were either dismissed or treated as outcasts
everyone should care because allowing these executives to get away with this only empowers/emboldens them and others within the industry who may also prey on young ppl, children who want fame and money
I don't know what reading comprehension problems some of yall have just because a person doesn't just fall in line with the outrage train of thought some of the media want people to have.
I'll repeat it again.
I don't care or have empathy for any man or woman who consciously chose to ? and suck for a movie role.
I'll repeat again.
I do have empathy and care about those people who were forced, ? or kids who have been violated.
As usual you taking ? I never said and just replying and talking to be talking.
Either address what I say or don't reply based off what you assuming I'm saying. If I didn't type it then don't attribute it to me.
lol
per usual
you made an irrelevant, dismissive commentAll this outrage and its a ? happily and willfully busting it open on a cast couch right now!!
and i like others responded accordingly
*shrugs*
No I spoke on something specific. Which is exactly what you quoted.
You like you always do speak about ? that I never commented on.
I spoke specifically about the people who make a conscious decision to ? and suck for a movie role.
You and those others chose to speak on some ? I never talked about to try and make a point regarding my comment.
That ? is dumb as ? and you continually do it. Which I always say you talking to be talking and typing just to be typing.
Like I said either address what I typed and only what I typed or don't quote my ? to bring up some ? that I never said and act like I'm saying some ? I never said.
That's sucka ? .
yes you spoke specifically about the people who make a conscious decision to ? and suck for a movie role
but that is not why ppl are outraged and bashing weinstein as ur comment suggests
if that was not ur intent ...cool... ur bad
otherwise i don't see the relevance
*shrugs*
End of discussion.
yea
ur bad bruh
its ok lol
just trying to help u out
i only do it ? i care luv
how's ur day going?
working?
May day yesterday was quite well. How about yours?
Always working. I only post on here or visit the site when I'm at work.
WTF?
if you ? dont get back to fighting -
2stepz_ahead wrote: »Madame_CJSkywalker wrote: »Madame_CJSkywalker wrote: »Madame_CJSkywalker wrote: »Madame_CJSkywalker wrote: »Madame_CJSkywalker wrote: »Madame_CJSkywalker wrote: »All this outrage and its a ? happily and willfully busting it open on a cast couch right now!!
That ? ain't going to ever end. People are always going to be willing to trade sex for something that they want.
Only thing ? up about it is when these people prey on kids.
A grown person who CHOOSES to ? and suck for movie roles made a conscious decision that movie fame and money is worth more to them than their dignity.
Why the ? should I care more about their dignity than they do?
Im not trying to defend or condemn the women. And im not saying life is fair for everyone.
But you missing the point bruh. Hollywood has a culture where it is expected that women gotta ? and suck for a role. Almost all of them do it, and they understand and accept it.
That is the issue. Instead of being merit based and based on talent and skilled, all of that becomes secondary and it comes down too does she want it enough to suck this ? .
That culture shouldnt exist in any aspect of life. That culture does exist though, everywhere, even outside of hollywood, and not just gender based, its also race and religion based. Basically, if you arent a white chrisrian male, you have faced this in some form or another.
To put the blame solely on women for this completely missed the point.
Where did I put anything solely on women?
The bold is the only thing you said that is worth a damn. They understand it and accept it.
So like I said they are making the conscious decision to suck and ? . They don't have to but are willing to in order to get what they want.
A hoe suck and ? for money, they sucking and ? for movie roles and money.
I ain't crying for grown people who willing to put a price on ? they shouldn't.
You are and I have no problems with that. Just some ? I ain't going to do.
They need to live with their choices IMO. That ? ain't a forced ? situation. Its more a quid pro quo from what I'm seeing.
Why is this not looked as a old man tricking off on a young ? ?
Old wants to ? a young ? offers money, clothes, cars, purses or movie roles.
Young ? wants money, clothes, cars, purses and to act in movies.
Old man makes offer to provide all that ? and the young ? accepts knowing what comes with it.
Why should I care?
? ain't nothing but a different form of tricking.
some of these women say they were touched, propositioned or put into an inappropriate position without their consent.... and, for good reason, fearful of being blackballed if they told
it's no different then being sexually harassed on ur job
and the women who did turn down his advances or report him were either dismissed or treated as outcasts
everyone should care because allowing these executives to get away with this only empowers/emboldens them and others within the industry who may also prey on young ppl, children who want fame and money
I don't know what reading comprehension problems some of yall have just because a person doesn't just fall in line with the outrage train of thought some of the media want people to have.
I'll repeat it again.
I don't care or have empathy for any man or woman who consciously chose to ? and suck for a movie role.
I'll repeat again.
I do have empathy and care about those people who were forced, ? or kids who have been violated.
As usual you taking ? I never said and just replying and talking to be talking.
Either address what I say or don't reply based off what you assuming I'm saying. If I didn't type it then don't attribute it to me.
lol
per usual
you made an irrelevant, dismissive commentAll this outrage and its a ? happily and willfully busting it open on a cast couch right now!!
and i like others responded accordingly
*shrugs*
No I spoke on something specific. Which is exactly what you quoted.
You like you always do speak about ? that I never commented on.
I spoke specifically about the people who make a conscious decision to ? and suck for a movie role.
You and those others chose to speak on some ? I never talked about to try and make a point regarding my comment.
That ? is dumb as ? and you continually do it. Which I always say you talking to be talking and typing just to be typing.
Like I said either address what I typed and only what I typed or don't quote my ? to bring up some ? that I never said and act like I'm saying some ? I never said.
That's sucka ? .
yes you spoke specifically about the people who make a conscious decision to ? and suck for a movie role
but that is not why ppl are outraged and bashing weinstein as ur comment suggests
if that was not ur intent ...cool... ur bad
otherwise i don't see the relevance
*shrugs*
End of discussion.
yea
ur bad bruh
its ok lol
just trying to help u out
i only do it ? i care luv
how's ur day going?
working?
May day yesterday was quite well. How about yours?
Always working. I only post on here or visit the site when I'm at work.
WTF?
if you ? dont get back to fighting
LLS, you know all we need is a new topic and we right back at it. -
SMH. All this will just blow over by month's end. The media demanded Bill Cosby be arrested, put on trial and get taken off the streets. They demonized and manipulated the allegations to the point where black people actually bought into it. Once again a case where they needed our support but they would never support us. Old Harv is never going to be arrested and fingerprinted. Nobody is trying to end his freedom. He can freely walk the streets, travel abroad, do anything he wants. Meanwhile Bill Cosby is on arraignment and facing a second trial for some charges without a shred of proof.
-
babelipsss wrote: »SMH. All this will just blow over by month's end. The media demanded Bill Cosby be arrested, put on trial and get taken off the streets. They demonized and manipulated the allegations to the point where black people actually bought into it. Once again a case where they needed our support but they would never support us. Old Harv is never going to be arrested and fingerprinted. Nobody is trying to end his freedom. He can freely walk the streets, travel abroad, do anything he wants. Meanwhile Bill Cosby is on arraignment and facing a second trial for some charges without a shred of proof.
exactly...no one speaking on this.
this dude ? went across generations and multiple people knew about it.....they have taped proof.
but he still walking around
![[Deleted User]](https://w1.vanillicon.com/v2/15efd8efe08bb34aae25f1808aaf5018.svg)
