The Official Fox Comicbook Cinematic Universe Thread - Coming Soon (Deadpool 2 June 2018)
Options
Comments
-
So Fox never had production rights, but Constatin Films?
-
I dont want Marvel Studios to have anything to do with X-Men and Fantastic four if they dont have %100 creative control over Fox and its not a complete reboot of the franchise. If Fox is not willing to sit back and collect a check don't even bother dealing with them. Fox needs Marvel more than they need them.
Don't get me wrong I'm of fan of Logan but as a whole the X franchise has been far from consistent. A PG 13 wolverine would be suffice if that means more quality stories,the cursing and graphic violence is a bonus I can live without.
-
Please
No more Wolverine centric movies. We've gotten 7 of them already. -
soul rattler wrote: »Please
No more Wolverine centric movies. We've gotten 7 of them already.
jackman said in a interview even if the deal happens he wont be back as wolverine but always did wanted to be in a movie with avengers but gonna be happy for whoever gets the role might this tom hardy pic look dope
-
Angeles1son85 wrote: »soul rattler wrote: »Please
No more Wolverine centric movies. We've gotten 7 of them already.
jackman said in a interview even if the deal happens he wont be back as wolverine but always did wanted to be in a movie with avengers but gonna be happy for whoever gets the role might this tom hardy pic look dope
aint this ? playing Venom tho? lol this ? is all ? up..
I guess if Josh Brolin can play Thanos AND Cable.... ? it lol -
soul rattler wrote: »Please
No more Wolverine centric movies. We've gotten 7 of them already.
I agree.... I was only referring to those who were worried about logan losing a 'R' rating,it wouldn't matter to me if it did under MCU.
Is that Tom hardy pic fanmade?..
-
Secret wars could be a thing..
? galactus (even though I'm hyped for that) were finally gonna get to see the ? Franklin Richards on screen possibly.
Wouldn't it be dope if wolverine's first appearance in the mcu is in a hulk movie? -
Is hulk ever gonna get a movie again?been a minute..
-
clairvoyance wrote: »Is hulk ever gonna get a movie again?been a minute..
Universal still owns Hulk distribution rights i believe.. so he will only probably be in MCU as a guest role like he has been....
https://www.huffingtonpost.com/brian-cronin/does-marvel-not-own-the-rights_b_9067512.html -
clairvoyance wrote: »Is hulk ever gonna get a movie again?been a minute..
Nah. Only appearing in other franchises -
Angeles1son85 wrote: »soul rattler wrote: »Please
No more Wolverine centric movies. We've gotten 7 of them already.
jackman said in a interview even if the deal happens he wont be back as wolverine but always did wanted to be in a movie with avengers but gonna be happy for whoever gets the role might this tom hardy pic look dope
Jackman confirmed he is not coming back yesterday.
give it to Emile Hirsch , good actor 32 and short
-
fortyacres wrote: »Angeles1son85 wrote: »soul rattler wrote: »Please
No more Wolverine centric movies. We've gotten 7 of them already.
jackman said in a interview even if the deal happens he wont be back as wolverine but always did wanted to be in a movie with avengers but gonna be happy for whoever gets the role might this tom hardy pic look dope
Jackman confirmed he is not coming back yesterday.
give it to Emile Hirsch , good actor 32 and short
He looks like a ? . -
metal face terrorist wrote: »fortyacres wrote: »Angeles1son85 wrote: »soul rattler wrote: »Please
No more Wolverine centric movies. We've gotten 7 of them already.
jackman said in a interview even if the deal happens he wont be back as wolverine but always did wanted to be in a movie with avengers but gonna be happy for whoever gets the role might this tom hardy pic look dope
Jackman confirmed he is not coming back yesterday.
give it to Emile Hirsch , good actor 32 and short
He looks like a ? .
okay , luckily not looking like a "? " is not a prerequisite for casting agents. -
Scott Caan is another little runt they could look at. He lacks Hirsch's range though.
-
fortyacres wrote: »Angeles1son85 wrote: »soul rattler wrote: »Please
No more Wolverine centric movies. We've gotten 7 of them already.
jackman said in a interview even if the deal happens he wont be back as wolverine but always did wanted to be in a movie with avengers but gonna be happy for whoever gets the role might this tom hardy pic look dope
Jackman confirmed he is not coming back yesterday.
give it to Emile Hirsch , good actor 32 and short
? off. -
KingFreeman wrote: »fortyacres wrote: »Angeles1son85 wrote: »soul rattler wrote: »Please
No more Wolverine centric movies. We've gotten 7 of them already.
jackman said in a interview even if the deal happens he wont be back as wolverine but always did wanted to be in a movie with avengers but gonna be happy for whoever gets the role might this tom hardy pic look dope
Jackman confirmed he is not coming back yesterday.
give it to Emile Hirsch , good actor 32 and short
? off.
give a suggestion or eat an adamantium ? ?
-
fortyacres wrote: »KingFreeman wrote: »fortyacres wrote: »Angeles1son85 wrote: »soul rattler wrote: »Please
No more Wolverine centric movies. We've gotten 7 of them already.
jackman said in a interview even if the deal happens he wont be back as wolverine but always did wanted to be in a movie with avengers but gonna be happy for whoever gets the role might this tom hardy pic look dope
Jackman confirmed he is not coming back yesterday.
give it to Emile Hirsch , good actor 32 and short
? off.
give a suggestion or eat an adamantium ? ?
It'll be another cliche like Tom Hardy.
Im sure a lot of these dudes laughed when Marvel cast Robert Downey, Jr too. -
Diet Tom Hardy
-
lazypakman wrote: »Diet Tom Hardy
That ? was Shocker in Spider Man for like 20 mins lol they did him ? -
Fox is doing so many different things with X Men. They have the traditional ? going on with Dark Phoenix and then the genre ? with Logan and New Mutants.
If Disney gives the rights back to Marvel, I could see them having to dedicate an entire movie to explain how and why mutants exist in the MCU. That's not something that you can throw a couple lines of exposition at. -
lazypakman wrote: »Diet Tom Hardy
I'm still not convinced that they're not the same guy. They've never been pictured together. -
soul rattler wrote: »Fox is doing so many different things with X Men. They have the traditional ? going on with Dark Phoenix and then the genre ? with Logan and New Mutants.
If Disney gives the rights back to Marvel, I could see them having to dedicate an entire movie to explain how and why mutants exist in the MCU. That's not something that you can throw a couple lines of exposition at.
You just won't let it go will you? Geez -
Damn deal almost done 52.4 billion waiting to be approved in a year
-
Angeles1son85 wrote: »Damn deal almost done 52.4 billion waiting to be approved in a year
But people want to think they'll see these characters in the MCU by Infinity War 2 or whatever they call that ? lmao
Told you guys. This is gonna take some serious time. They're not just gonna table everything they already have in production or post production at both studios to make the nerds happy. That ? will cost them billions in wasted revenue. -
John Campea was reading that the raw figure deal is closer to 66 billion.
We've all been talking about how this benefits Disney and Marvel, but how does this benefit Fox? That's a shitload of money for the most Republican loyal corporation on the face of thr planet.
