whats yall thoughts on obama tip toeing around the money for black farmers?
Options
ineedpussy
Members Posts: 7,252 ✭✭✭✭✭
man it just proves he's not a so-called "african-american like us. he brought up the bill(dont hold me to it) when he was a senator but now that he president he dont say nothin about the senate not passing that ? . so why would you vote for someone like that who yall claim is the "first" black president but he cant even help our farmers out. and that includes native americans too. smh@ ? who voted for obama lookin for a change. im glad that i dont vote.
Comments
-
dumb ? . yall come right out of a boondocks episode.
-
i have two main reactions:
1. whoa! there are black farmers? wheretheydothatat
2. why help the injuns? so they can buy more jack danniels and open another casino? nah, id rather have my tax money spent on something else, like paying off the national debt and help us get out of this recession. -
its over: 2012! wrote: »What? Obama's hatred for Blacks?
Or...how he co-sign with glee, when it's time to compensate White Farmers? But, then plays rings around the rosy with compensating Black Farmers for racism that they absorbed.
...Or, were you not aware of his foul nonsense, any and every time, this Nation faces doing something to clearly and specifically benefit Blacks?
...it's no different than what he's done over the past 1.5 years, that spits on Black America then turns around to gleefully extend Aid, Relief, and a 'hand-up' to Jewish-Caucasoids, Euro-Caucasoids, Homosexuals, Hispanics, Women, Geriatrics, and the military.
my ? . you said it all close thread but keep it open at the same time. -
Obama is being a coward on this issue and he's proving what I've realized for a year now......Obama is a fraud when it comes to the average American, ESPECIALLY Blacks. He did not defend Sherrod until it became popular to do so, he's trashing Charlie Rangel despite the fact so many white congressmen for YEARS have been corrupt and still are, and the never ending war in Afghanistan shows no sign of ending in 2011. At this pace, I'm not even gonna vote for this half cracka president we have now.
-
So many of these crackas in government have a beef with Blacks and Native Americans to the extent they won't even pay up the RULING that billions should be awarded to these farmers, yet Obama is STILL raising millions of dollars for these scumbags???? Wow, shame on you Obama, shame on you.
? white people, and ? the evil warlords in the White House. Shame on Obama for raising millions of dollars for people who don't even want to pay a judge's ruling. Crackas make me sick. -
shouldn't the argument be "put all corrupt Congressmen out of office/in jail" instead of "Rangel should be ignored because there are white Congressmen who are corrupt?"kingblaze84 wrote: »- he's trashing Charlie Rangel despite the fact so many white congressmen for YEARS have been corrupt and still are- -
Obama is a us president, the same as the many b4 him, idk why ppl get caught up in his appearance, its still the same system, same government, same agenda, just in black face
-
thatdamnjay wrote: »looked it up while I was at work
the original lump sum for the Black Farmers' litigation was to be $100 million...but it was upped to $1.15 billion, at the request of...wait for it...Barack Obama.
so...yeah...
How can this be true, he hates black people... -
which ones? specifically?kingblaze84 wrote: »So many of these crackas in government have a beef with Blacks and Native Americans
the bill is waiting in the senate, it passed in the house. are you implying that the members of the house who passed the bill arent racist, but the members of the senate are?kingblaze84 wrote: »to the extent they won't even pay up the RULING that billions should be awarded to these farmers,
which politicians are the "scumbags" you refer to? specifically? also, you know obama is a politician too right? and its his job to raise money for members of his party by appearing at events for them.kingblaze84 wrote: »yet Obama is STILL raising millions of dollars for these scumbags???? Wow, shame on you Obama, shame on you.kingblaze84 wrote: »? white people, and ? the evil warlords in the White House. Shame on Obama for raising millions of dollars for people who don't even want to pay a judge's ruling. Crackas make me sick.
please provide specific details of obama raising "millions" for the people who "dont want to pay a judge's ruling". can you? or what that just rhetoric?
@ the bolded, is this all you really meant to say lol? -
thatdamnjay wrote: »looked it up while I was at work
the original lump sum for the Black Farmers' litigation was to be $100 million...but it was upped to $1.15 billion, at the request of...wait for it...Barack Obama.
so...yeah...
whoops
oh Obama didn't "support" the legislation as a Senator, he WROTE the legislation. And its Rethuglicans blocking the payout, of course.
so threadstarter is mad that.......Obama didn't give a primetime speech about the farmers? Or something? And he "trashed" Charlie Rangel by saying, quote, "He's somebody, who is at the end of his career, 82 years old, I'm sure that what he wants is to be able to end his career with dignity and my hope is that that happens."???
ya'll Obama haters ? me up
-
and here i thought we had ideals and wanted improvement in society, not just to keep on doing the same old nonsense because other people are doing it. shockingly, it seems to me like it'd be better to work to get guys prosecuted than saying "? it, let the politicians i like steal too."its over: 2012! wrote: »Yes. That should be the argument. But it's not about the argument, it's about the reality.
no, he went to jail because he pled guilty to obstruction of justice charges, not perjury. he was charged with both of them originally. again, if you don't think Kwame isn't a criminal, why defend him? why not argue for ALL criminal politicians to be prosecuted?its over: 2012! wrote: »For instance a Detroit Mayor just became the first Detroit-area politician in the city's History, to be charged with perjury over lying in a civil-case...especially considering he lied about cheating on his wife, I repeat, that nigg went to prison for lying about cheating on his wife. -
Swiffness! wrote: »whoops
oh Obama didn't "support" the legislation as a Senator, he WROTE the legislation. And its Rethuglicans blocking the payout, of course.
so threadstarter is mad that.......Obama didn't give a primetime speech about the farmers? Or something? And he "trashed" Charlie Rangel by saying, quote, "He's somebody, who is at the end of his career, 82 years old, I'm sure that what he wants is to be able to end his career with dignity and my hope is that that happens."???
ya'll Obama haters ? me up
I've done the research and you're right......I take back everything I said about Obama in this thread.
My apologies to the Obama fans out there. I salute Obama for actually wanting the farmers to get even MORE money, and I despise Republikkkans even more now for blocking the payments.
I'm man enough to admit when I'm wrong, although I still think Obama was too harsh on Charlie Rangel. -
BethlehemBill wrote: »which ones? specifically?
the bill is waiting in the senate, it passed in the house. are you implying that the members of the house who passed the bill arent racist, but the members of the senate are?
which politicians are the "scumbags" you refer to? specifically? also, you know obama is a politician too right? and its his job to raise money for members of his party by appearing at events for them.
please provide specific details of obama raising "millions" for the people who "dont want to pay a judge's ruling". can you? or what that just rhetoric?
@ the bolded, is this all you really meant to say lol?
I was wrong for what I said.....Obama wants the farmers to get the money, while RepubliKKKans are holding up the bill in the Senate.
I take back what I said. -
kingblaze84 wrote: »I've done the research and you're right......I take back everything I said about Obama in this thread.
My apologies to the Obama fans out there. I salute Obama for actually wanting the farmers to get even MORE money, and I despise Republikkkans even more now for blocking the payments.
I'm man enough to admit when I'm wrong, although I still think Obama was too harsh on Charlie Rangel.
"He's somebody, who is at the end of his career, 82 years old, I'm sure that what he wants is to be able to end his career with dignity and my hope is that that happens."???
How is that being harsh on Charlie???? -
"He's somebody, who is at the end of his career, 82 years old, I'm sure that what he wants is to be able to end his career with dignity and my hope is that that happens."???
How is that being harsh on Charlie????
Why single out Charlie when there are plenty of white politicians out there just as corrupt, if not more corrupt, than Charlie is? He is suggesting in that line that Charlie should retire, and soon.
Charlie helped Obama get elected, and now Obama is backstabbing him.....why hasn't Obama been as forceful singling out those politicians who are holding up the funds awarded to the Black and Native American farmers?
Why hasn't he mentioned them by name.....? -
Obama was asked a question and he answered it. I don't recall him being asked questions about anyone else beside Charlie..kingblaze84 wrote: »Why single out Charlie when there are plenty of white politicians out there just as corrupt, if not more corrupt, than Charlie is? He is suggesting in that line that Charlie should retire, and soon.
Charlie helped Obama get elected, and now Obama is backstabbing him.....why hasn't Obama been as forceful singling out those politicians who are holding up the funds awarded to the Black and Native American farmers?
Why hasn't he mentioned them by name.....?
He's 82 years old,, I'm sure he will retire soon...
And Charlie was for Hillary before he was for Obama... -
kingblaze84 wrote: »I was wrong for what I said.....Obama wants the farmers to get the money, while RepubliKKKans are holding up the bill in the Senate.
I take back what I said.
bravo! you got it this time -
Obama was asked a question and he answered it. I don't recall him being asked questions about anyone else beside Charlie..
He's 82 years old,, I'm sure he will retire soon...
And Charlie was for Hillary before he was for Obama...
and as for this about calling out the corrupt politicians, they only do it when they can get political points for it. dems hardly ever call out corrupt dems, the same way republicans don't have much to say when a republican is caught on some illegal activities. here, rangel's offenses were particularly awful, so bad in the media that even dems couldnt defend him. it happens every once in a while, and obama would get slammed if he stood up for rangel here. he wont condemn every corrupt white politician, he doesnt have time to do that. but if one becomes a big enough ordeal in the media, then he'll have to weigh in on it. thats what happened with rangel. believe that if a high ranking republican politician is caught doing something illegal, obama will condemn him. -
i have no idea what "i tried that already" is even supposed to mean. but sure, it's probably best to give up and not address issues, right?its over: 2012! wrote: »I tried that already. But the result was the same, featuring Black politicians get punished, where Whites ones do NOT get punished.
you're not exposing ? , you're simply being hypocritical. between the two of us, you're not the one saying all the politicians in question should be prosecuted.
