Semi spinoff: 1994 New York Knicks vs the 2002 Oakland Raiders
Options
5th Letter
Members, Moderators, Writer Posts: 37,068 Regulator
Both these teams lost on memorable plays the 93 Knicks lost game 5 when Charles Smith was blocked several times by Pippen and Horace Grant, and the Raiders losing to the Patriots in 2001 via the tuck rule, however the following season both teams made it to their respective championship round only to lose, so which team has more room to complain the Knicks or the Raiders?
Comments
-
The knicks because they was better than that rockets team amd should have beat them
-
more room to complain? raiders. that tuck rule would hurt my soul if i was a raiders fan
the knicks had a 3-2 advantage going back to ny for 2 games and couldnt close the deal. -
F*ck the Raiders.
That is all. -
the knicks was good for years. but jordan was there. then jordan left and they got over the ? . they didnt take care of business.
the next year, well. let me think back to 95. i dont remember the knicks. i remember shaq and nick anderson and dennis scott. -
The real point is that none of their respective fans can complain about ? like the tuck rule and the Charles Smith game when both teams made their respective championship games in their respective following years. The Knicks failed against a Rockets team they should have beaten, and the Raiders just got outplayed.
-
i Never heard of the Tuck rule until that woodson play....
when they said tuck rule i was like wtf is that??
