Who was the better pf, Barkley or Malone?

D.D.S. · April 2011

A couple of the ol heads at the y were havin a debate bout this yesterday, who do y'all think is the better pf?

GettinLo · April 2011

Malone had better numbers and was built like the prototype PF back in the day (6'9, 250)... buuuuuuut Charles was my dude... 6'4 and scored almost as well as Malone did and was a better rebounder... So I'll take Barkley..... Plus he wasnt an uncle tom

Mr.Burns · April 2011

I say Malone. I'm not big on stats but from the outside looking in Malone was the better athlete physically. I think Barkley had better knowledge of the game tho.

#1 pick · April 2011

Malone is the perfect PnR PF while Barkley is more talented and is more of a tweener.

So ILL · April 2011

Charles, because he was 5 inches shorter than Malone and used to ball. Plus he kept it way more real......that mid-range shot from Malone was a beast though....

gns · April 2011

i gotta go with charles cause he whooped shaqs ass, malone couldn't do that

the ghost · April 2011

Mr.Burns wrote: »

I say Malone. I'm not big on stats but from the outside looking in Malone was the better athlete physically. I think Barkley had better knowledge of the game tho.

Pretty much, plus Malone racked up alot of points playing with a ''i don't give a ? about scoring'' pg his whole career.

http://community.allhiphop.com/showthread.php?85769

usmarin3 · April 2011

Barkley is better to me, he could handle the ball, shoot threes and bang on the inside, all at being 6'4''.

UPTOWN · April 2011

smh at people screaming about the mailmans points when he had the best true pg ever his whole career LOL

if u cant score with stockton running point u should be shot dead at the scorers table

UPTOWN · April 2011

usmarin3 wrote: »

Barkley is better to me, he could handle the ball, shoot threes and bang on the inside, all at being 6'4''.

and his interviews are hotter ..... holla!!

DaFifthElement · April 2011

wtf I thought Barkley was 6'6...

chi-town91 · April 2011

barkley. cuz he aint punk out against shaq

PanchoYoSancho · April 2011

DaFifthElement wrote: »

wtf I thought Barkley was 6'6...

He's listed as, but Charles has said himself he's 6'4.

G Mack · April 2011

DaFifthElement wrote: »

wtf I thought Barkley was 6'6...

i thought so too.........he's probably a inch or something shorter since he has gotten older

Sep-00 · April 2011

i say barkley because he a better all around game. he could grab the rebound then lead a fast break, hit a three, and rebound against the taller pfs and centers.