So you're telling me that Vincent Jackson isnt one of the TOP 100 NFL players??!
Options
Comments
-
ok, i can dig that. so lets just look at his top two seasons. he averaged somewhere around 65 catches for roughly 1150 yards and 8 tds.
with that said, it still doesn't put him above
and if we are isolating season then i'd go ahead and put Brandon Marshall ahead of Vjax; MIles Austin too
this isn't a diss on Jackson, he's one of the better WR's in the game, but he's not close to being in any top 5 discussion
Id take Vincent over all but 4 WRs u just mentioned.. give Vincent Jackson an full season and you'll be switchin your opinion the usual CS style -
joeyfkncrakk wrote: »Wtf,, what about his ypa and yac tops in the league.. he doesn't get force fed like them other guys but his production is huge everytime he touches the ball
You right he's a vertical threat. SD throws the ball down field that's part the reason he does not have alot of catches -
bow to royalty wrote: »Dude hasn't proven himself to be a top 10, and maybe not even top 15 receiver. How many WR you wanna put on the top 100 list?
Nah I wouldnt put him in my top 10 or 15. But like I said I haven't seen the list, and im not a fan of Jackson but hell I thought he might have made the top 100. I dont even know how many WR are on the list. -
smh some ya'll dont get the point of this list....it's just for 2011....meaning what they did last season reflects on how they're ranked
-
vageneral08 wrote: »smh some ya'll dont get the point of this list....it's just for 2011....meaning what they did last season reflects on how they're ranked
It's really not tho if you look at the list -
ok, i can dig that. so lets just look at his top two seasons. he averaged somewhere around 65 catches for roughly 1150 yards and 8 tds.
with that said, it still doesn't put him above
and if we are isolating season then i'd go ahead and put Brandon Marshall ahead of Vjax; MIles Austin too
this isn't a diss on Jackson, he's one of the better WR's in the game, but he's not close to being in any top 5 discussion
You got White, C Johnson, Welker, Jennings, Wayne, Fitz, Boldin, Austin, Marshall, Desean Jackson
Could add Holmes, possibly Sidney Rice, Hines Ward, Colston, possibly Dwyane Bowe, Andre Johnson -
En-Fuego22 wrote: »It's really not tho if you look at the list
yes it is....that's why it's called top 100 players of 2011....not of all time.....not everybody is gonna make the list even if they had a decent season -
joeyfkncrakk wrote: »Wtf,, what about his ypa and yac tops in the league.. he doesn't get force fed like them other guys but his production is huge everytime he touches the ball
Kinda like the best Jackson- desean -
vageneral08 wrote: »yes it is....that's why it's called top 100 players of 2011....not of all time.....not everybody is gonna make the list even if they had a decent season
Dude some of those player are there for career also. if you go by the top player of that year you most likely go with stats -
En-Fuego22 wrote: »Dude some of those player are there for career also. if you go by the top player of that year you most likely go with stats
Last year and career both played part. Remember the players voted, so they prolly interpreted how they wanted to, and voted that way. -
He is not the best guy on his team and never the more dominate threat but last year they were talking about him like Amare from the NBA. I watched him grow into his position. He is a beast but I just see him as another David Boston
-
bow to royalty wrote: »You got White, C Johnson, Welker, Jennings, Wayne, Fitz, Boldin, Austin, Marshall, Desean Jackson
Could add Holmes, possibly Sidney Rice, Hines Ward, Colston, possibly Dwyane Bowe, Andre Johnson
His Caliber is right there with Boldin and if his team sucked the way KC does passing he could be as good as Bowe, Colston, or Edwards. He and Kenny Britt are On that Cusp of Goodness -
His Caliber is right there with Boldin and if his team sucked the way KC does passing he could be as good as Bowe, Colston, or Edwards. He and Kenny Britt are On that Cusp of Goodness
what?
..... -
En-Fuego22 wrote: »Dude some of those player are there for career also. if you go by the top player of that year you most likely go with stats
mainly last year.....they do reflect on their career but they always do that....why you think eli got lefted out? -
vageneral08 wrote: »mainly last year.....they do reflect on their career but they always do that....why you think eli got lefted out?
Its really not a last year list... combo of both, generally whoever the players thought were better.. Reason why McNabb even made the list and aother questionable players... U TELLIN ME MCCOY WASN'T A TOP 100 last year either?? -
How high Devin Hester made it.. I think Darren Sproles should've made it.. id take him over Hester foh
-
joeyfkncrakk wrote: »Its really not a last year list... combo of both, generally whoever the players thought were better.. Reason why McNabb even made the list and aother questionable players... U TELLIN ME MCCOY WASN'T A TOP 100 last year either??
yeah but it's thousands of players not all the decent players are gonna make the cut regardless especially to the ones who really stepped it up....McCoy could've gone either way -
joeyfkncrakk wrote: »How high Devin Hester made it.. I think Darren Sproles should've made it.. id take him over Hester foh
you cant look at it that way....you're comparing a running back to a wide receiver.....sproles doesnt have the numbers to back it up even though he hasnt started much -
joeyfkncrakk wrote: »How high Devin Hester made it.. I think Darren Sproles should've made it.. id take him over Hester foh
I don't think Hester should have made the list either, but I guess it's cuz he's the best returner the NFL's ever seen. But Sproles should NOT be on the list. His best season consisted of 840 yards (receiving and rushing combined) and 7 TD's. That's with 6 seasons under his belt. -
I thought ithis was supposed to be the top 100 players of the 2011 SEASON, and not overall?
-
I thought ithis was supposed to be the top 100 players of the 2011 SEASON, and not overall?
exactly....why you think some rookies made the list?