IGN Ranks Wrestlemanias 1-25
Options
Indy8503 HD
Members Posts: 554
http://tv.ign.com/articles/107/1078772p1.html
I personally think Wrestlemania 4 gets cut too much slack, poorly booked and the only good matches are the battle royal and Savage/DiBiase. I think Wrestlemania 13 is the worst and 19 is the best.
I personally think Wrestlemania 4 gets cut too much slack, poorly booked and the only good matches are the battle royal and Savage/DiBiase. I think Wrestlemania 13 is the worst and 19 is the best.
Comments
-
wrestlemania 17 is and will forever will be the best wrestlemania of all time...it was the end of a attitude era and the beginning of well *shrugs*...smh @ ign ? on dino bravo thoe
-
The austin vs rock match WM 15 was a better than the WM 17 match
-
vageneral08 wrote: »The austin vs rock match WM 15 was a better than the WM 17 match
You need to stare at your AVI for that one. -
FlightKing wrote: »You need to stare at your AVI for that one.
That Austin vs Rock match was ? horrible.... IDK what the ? you smoking. It was eaisly the worst of the 3 matches they did at WM. -
That Austin vs Rock match was ? horrible.... IDK what the ? you smoking. It was eaisly the worst of the 3 matches they did at WM.
You talking to me or him??? -
favorite ever? Tie between ? ( Benoit deserved that ? ) and the one where bret and hbk went at it for an hour.
-
i dunno why peeps loved the iron man match...that match seem like 30 mins of head locks, 20 minutes of irish whips, and 10 minutes of wrestling....the iron man match between super cena and orton was better than hart/hbk even thoe super cena won
-
FlightKing wrote: »You need to stare at your AVI for that one.
No because it was kinda predictable austin would go heel anyway at WM 17 or one of them atleast....WM 15 austin wasn't the favorite to win it was good match
