Wouldn't it be nice is there really was a ? ?

1235»

Comments

  • Rock_Well
    Rock_Well Members Posts: 2,185 ✭✭✭✭✭
    lol Jaded my man im short on time these days. That other thread is a dead hustle. I thought I answered your question already anyway. The bottom line is the origin of man cannot be explained through evolite perspective. Plus more and more scientists are starting to support the ID theory. But yall can believe whatever theFACK u wanna believe like Hodge twins.
  • Rock_Well
    Rock_Well Members Posts: 2,185 ✭✭✭✭✭
    It may not be comparable in every aspect, but unless you just being stupid you can see that ? has left similar evidences like that of His existence. Not that you can detect Him on your own, bruh. That you might believe in His son and that He exist.
    ? character is righteous and comparable to none else.
  • alissowack
    alissowack Members Posts: 1,930 ✭✭✭
    edited May 2012
    ^^^ Thinking for yourself means that you test things out before you blindly believe something. If you follow something without evidence or concrete proof of whatever you're following actually being true, then you don't really know; you're just assuming with blind faith and you're not thinking for yourself.

    The act of thinking for yourself isn't always based on trying to test something. What make it possible for anyone to think...period (and I don't mean in respect to having a brain)? What liberty do we have in deciding whether or not we can or not think? You're obsessed with this evidence thing. It's almost as if to say...the evidence, when shown, will explain itself; that it is a deity in itself. The evidence is still subjected to what we perceive it to be.

    ...and I'm not a troll. I'm a short bus specialist.
  • alissowack
    alissowack Members Posts: 1,930 ✭✭✭
    edited May 2012
    alissowack wrote: »
    ^^^ Thinking for yourself means that you test things out before you blindly believe something. If you follow something without evidence or concrete proof of whatever you're following actually being true, then you don't really know; you're just assuming with blind faith and you're not thinking for yourself.

    The act of thinking for yourself isn't always based on trying to test something. What make it possible for anyone to think...period (and I don't mean in respect to having a brain)? What liberty do we have in deciding whether or not we can or not think? You're obsessed with this evidence thing. It's almost as if to say...the evidence, when shown, will explain itself; that it is a deity in itself. The evidence is still subjected to what we perceive it to be.

    ...and I'm not a troll. I'm a short bus specialist.

    Somewhere I went wrong and quoted myself. Is it possible to erase this?
  • Bodhi
    Bodhi Members Posts: 7,932 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Plus more and more scientists are starting to support the ID theory.


    link? source? something?

  • ChromaStoned
    ChromaStoned Members Posts: 938 ✭✭✭
    would it really though? maybe it would want to play ?
  • redhandedbandit
    redhandedbandit Members Posts: 2,600 ✭✭✭
    is there was really ? ?