Just the simplicity of a beautiful connection. [NSFW]
Options
Comments
-
2nd chances wrote: »lol at this ?
okay..so we can see the hair on his crotch..his ? is clear as day..........but the head of the one sucking doesnt have any hair...
hmm..lets guess which sex is more likely not to have any hair on their head...
She may be a cancer patient.
-
-
Soooo
There is a high chance yall ? is actually looking at xray ? porn?
*ned flanders*
"yall ? is ? !" -
? ....
-
2nd chances wrote: »lol at this ?
okay..so we can see the hair on his crotch..his ? is clear as day..........but the head of the one sucking doesnt have any hair...
hmm..lets guess which sex is more likely not to have any hair on their head...
She may be a cancer patient.
no its not........
-
hold up man ... i was gonna reply and go thru the no hair on the "females" head arguement, but then i see another spoiler where a ? is the main focus of the pic.
threadstarter has gone past the point of retribution.
-
UPTOWN CONNEXX
9:54PM Posts: 7,868
hold up man ... i was gonna reply and go thru the no hair on the "females" head arguement, but then i see another spoiler where a ? is the main focus of the pic.
threadstarter has gone past the point of retribution.
Again. You ? need to check your sexuality.
The female hands was the center of attention in the x-ray.
Of this was a rorschach test you ? would be ? . -
UPTOWN CONNEXX
9:54PM Posts: 7,868
hold up man ... i was gonna reply and go thru the no hair on the "females" head arguement, but then i see another spoiler where a ? is the main focus of the pic.
threadstarter has gone past the point of retribution.
Again. You ? need to check your sexuality.
The female hands was the center of attention in the x-ray.
Of this was a rorschach test you ? would be ? .
Objectively speaking this is some suspect ? . Aint no other way to tell you.
SMH. -
ether-i-am makes the most corniest threads.
-
well because of this post, i objectively went to the link you posted. this action was taken to speak to the possibility that im on " no ? " overload which i see alot of posters do. so there you have it, i delved into your side of the arguement and was willing to admit if i was wrong.UPTOWN CONNEXX
9:54PM Posts: 7,868
hold up man ... i was gonna reply and go thru the no hair on the "females" head arguement, but then i see another spoiler where a ? is the main focus of the pic.
threadstarter has gone past the point of retribution.
Again. You ? need to check your sexuality.
The female hands was the center of attention in the x-ray.
Of this was a rorschach test you ? would be ? .
HOWEVER, SOME "SEX RAY" PICS SHOW STRANDS OF LONG STRAIGHT HAIR WHICH COULD ARGUEABLY BE FEMALE. THE PICS YOU POSTED WERE NOT THE PICS WITH THE LONG FEMALE HAIR. THE PICS YOU POSTED WERE OF A ? AND MAN SUCKING ANOTHER MAN. YOU EVEN HINTED AT THE FACT THAT WE WOULDNT KNOW BUT WE FOUND A LOOPHOLE IN WHAT YOU WERE TRYING TO DO.
you dont need to check YOUR sexuality, you sir .........
-
cuntlove?
-
Y'all know...Dudes can have long hair too, right?...
-
which is why i said "argueably"A1000MILES wrote: »Y'all know...Dudes can have long hair too, right?...
good point out tho
lol
-
? , you post as a "fruit stand"...Cease and desist wit that fuckery.
-
Over_? might be a ? . He sure does give them a lot of attention.
-
This whole thread is ? .
*walks out* -
Again more about the artistHe is an artist who covered men and women with small amounts of barium and took X-ray photographs of them engaging in sexual acts, which he then displayed in stained glass windows.
http://dvrcty.com/WIM-DELVOYE-exhibition -
Another x ray
-
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=092cKE56jg0