The ? Movement in America is Out of Control

Options
1235»

Comments

  • Maximus Rex
    Maximus Rex Members Posts: 6,354 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Options
    Swiffness! wrote: »
    Oh and that cop didn't wanna help you cuz newsflash, YOU'RE A ? LOL,

    But the ? was a ? too. Did race play a part in this ? up incident? I don't know, maybe, maybe not, but GENDER and MISANDRY did factor into the pro-? cops not doing anything.
    zombie wrote: »
    Why can't you understand that I and many other people simply don't like homosexuality.

    Because potna, homos and they're proponents are pressing REALLY HARD to have ? like you and me shamed into accepting this fuckery. They're making it seemed like there's something wrong with you and me, when it's actually the reverse. It was like fifteen/twenty years ago when homos still had to keep that ? indoors, there wouldn't be an issue, however they want to be open with their faggotery. They want to have this ? revert back to anicent Greco-Roman times when pederasty and ? behavior was the status quo.
    because there HAS been a utterly hilarious trend of people who are REALLY ? ANGRY ABOUT ? ALL THE TIME turning out to be ? on the low. Basically: sure, hate ? , but if you're hating ? with this really really deep passion..........more than you seemingly hate anybody else...........well damn. ppl are gonna wonder why lol. Do I really gotta list all the preachers that have been caught on that? (hi douwant2go2heaven)

    See potna, you're proof positive of what I was just saying and this deflection tactic won't work here. Do you think what Jerry Sandusky did to those kids was wrong? Do you hate him and boy loving kind for what they are and what they stand for? If you do, then you must harbor this deep seeded desire to suck and ? or have kids suck and ? you. How about dope fiends. I desire drug addicts with the same intensity I desire ? , but according to you, all I'm doing is repressing is insatiable urge to mainline hairron or blow powder. Same difference. You're argument about making ? desires makes about as much sense as Klansmen secret desire to want to be and embrace black or another minority culture.
    zombie wrote: »
    lmao @ you fronting like you hate bisexual chicks just as bad tho. ? Please, we KNOW that ain't true.......like you offended when ? tongue'n each other down in pornos lol yea ok.

    That's were this ? went wrong. Back when that girl/girl female thing started ? fully embraced that movement, fallaciously believing that it would lead to menage action with them. The unintended consequences was that with the accepting of female bisexuality, that gave inroads to ? dudes, ? , and trannie freaks. I admit that I'm a hypocrite. I support and what to be involved in hot girl-Rex-girl action; however, I would GLAD trade all female bisexuality if it went if all of this ? ? would cease.
    zombie wrote: »
    If you support anything ? you deserve what happened to you, people like you who are not ? but support ? marriage are part of the problem, now you want to cry cause a ? put his ? in your face. WHAT THE ? DO PEOPLE THINK IS going TO HAPPEN when homosexuality becomes fully ingrained. BabyloN: ? , BEASTALITY ,NECROPHILIA, ? , ATHEISM and several other forms of EUROPEAN inspired CORRUPTION. ? need to be put away someplace where they can get mental help not supported in their illness.

    I hear you dude, but at the end of the day, this is America and you can't discriminate against because they're ? . The fact is the government sanctions marriage and gives benefits to married people, so how do you extend these benefits to married people?

    ? are one here calling ? normal. How can they be "normal," when by the definition of what they do is abnormal.

  • DillaDeaf
    DillaDeaf Members Posts: 4,802 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Options
    I'm still in shock somebody in this thread called "The Mack" overrated.........somebody take that dude American Ghetto Express Card away from him..................
  • zombie
    zombie Members Posts: 13,450 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited October 2012
    Options
    PK_TK_187 wrote: »
    there are no brainwashing ?
    this guy is an idiot

    ? make ? childrens books, in attempts to brainwash the kids. there is a ? on every new tv show, you can't watch tv without seeing some ? ? . there are ? plays being put on in schools you trying to tell me that's not ? brain washing.


    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nlY9Ne39L1g

    Keep it real ? like you are out here trying there best to corrupt the minds of the youth, homosexuality was labeled a mental disorder until 1974, it was only the political pressure that ? put on that forced psychologist association of america to remove it from there list of disorders. Now you sick twisted ? and your supporters are discussing taking out ? out of the dsm-5 which is basically the psychologist bible. this is clearly slow social engineering a.k.a brainwashing.
  • Maximus Rex
    Maximus Rex Members Posts: 6,354 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Options
    zombie wrote: »
    Keep it real ? like you are out here trying there best to corrupt the minds of the youth, homosexuality was labeled a mental disorder until 1974, it was only the political pressure that ? put on that forced psychologist association of america to remove it from there list of disorders. Now you sick twisted ? and your supporters are discussing taking out ? out of the dsm-5 which is basically the psychologist bible. this is clearly slow social engineering a.k.a brainwashing.

    Rex has to agree with, "The Zombie." For those think that he's over reaching and being paranoid, here's a article from the New York Times that all but co-signs what he's been saying.

    http://www.nytimes.com/2012/08/12/ma...pagewanted=all


    The night before Susan and Rob allowed their son to go to preschool in a dress, they sent an e-mail to parents of his classmates. Alex, they wrote, “has been gender-fluid for as long as we can remember, and at the moment he is equally passionate about and identified with soccer players and princesses, superheroes and ballerinas (not to mention lava and unicorns, dinosaurs and glitter rainbows).”

    They explained that Alex had recently become inconsolable about his parents’ ban on wearing dresses beyond dress-up time. After consulting their pediatrician, a psychologist and parents of other gender-nonconforming children, they concluded that “the important thing was to teach him not to be ashamed of who he feels he is.”

    When Alex was 4, he pronounced himself “a boy and a girl,” but in the two years since, he has been fairly clear that he is simply a boy who sometimes likes to dress and play in conventionally feminine ways.

    By the mid-20th century, doctors were trying “corrective therapy” to extinguish atypical gender behaviors. The goal was preventing children from becoming ? or transgender, a term for those who feel they were born in the wrong body.

    Many parents and clinicians now reject corrective therapy, making this the first generation to allow boys to openly play and dress (to varying degrees) in ways previously restricted to girls — to exist in what one psychologist called “that middle space” between traditional boyhood and traditional girlhood.


    they fear the wrong parenting decision could devastate their child’s social or emotional well-being. The fact that there is still substantial disagreement among prominent psychological professionals about whether to squelch unconventional behavior or support it makes those decisions even more wrenching.

    Many of the parents who allow their children to occupy that “middle space” were socially liberal even before they had a pink boy, quick to defend ? rights and women’s equality and to question the confines of traditional masculinity and femininity.


    But when their sons upend conventional norms, even they feel disoriented. How could my own child’s play — something ordinarily so joyous to watch — stir up such discomfort? And why does it bother me that he wants to wear a dress?

    “It’s hard to put a finger on why gender identity makes such a difference to our sense of who a person is, but it does."

    Studies estimate that 2 percent to 7 percent of boys under age 12 regularly display “cross-gender” behaviors, though very few wish to actually be a girl.

    The studies on what happens in adulthood to boys who strayed from gender norms all have methodological limitations, but they suggest that although plenty of ? men don’t start out as pink boys, 60 to 80 percent of pink boys do eventually become ? men. The rest grow up to either become heterosexual men or become women by taking hormones and maybe having surgery. Gender-nonconforming behavior of girls, however, is rarely studied, in part because departures from traditional femininity are so pervasive and accepted.

    In the 19th century, both boys and girls often wore dresses and long hair until they were 7. Colors weren’t gendered consistently. At times pink was considered a strong, and therefore masculine, color, while blue was considered delicate. Children’s clothes for both sexes included lace, ruffles, flowers and kittens.

    They took their 7-year-old son to a New York City psychologist, hoping for guidance and support. Instead, the therapist blamed them for their son’s femininity, saying Moriko was emotionally detached and her husband too absent. She advised them to confiscate the boy’s dolls and girlish clothes and to find him male friends. They followed her instructions, but their son was miserable, and they ultimately rejected the therapist’s analysis.

    I just want to be able to wrap my head around some concept. I know I have to be patient, but sometimes I feel like an emotional hostage, because as his parent, it’s my job to help him be whatever he wants to be, and I can’t do that if he doesn’t know where he’s headed.”

    Gender nonconformity is a touchy subject, and parents who celebrate it in their children can be judged harshly. When J. Crew ran an ad of its president painting her son’s toenails neon pink, with copy that read, “Lucky for me, I ended up with a boy whose favorite color is pink,”

    Ellen R. and her 10-year-old son, Nick, live in a small New Jersey suburb. Nick sometimes spends hours a day drawing gowns for his 36 Barbies and designing them for himself or his dolls, using fabric, ribbon and rubber bands.

    In the two years since, Nick hasn’t had a single play date.

    He struggled with confusion, disappointment and alienation from his own child, who called himself a “girl-boy.” Though Anthony tried to hide it, he often cringed when he saw Jose prancing in a neighbor’s flowered dress or strutting in a friend’s wig.


    Anthony and his wife, who live in New York, found a supportive listser and began seeing a psychiatrist, who urged them to allow Jose to play with toys of his choosing. In a therapeutic compromise, he suggested letting Jose wear whatever he wanted at home, but restricting dress-wearing in public to shield him from derision.

    though he reluctantly admits that he’s still distressed when his son talks or moves flamboyantly, and he’s not sure why. ”


    No, I don’t want to be a girl,” he said, as he checked himself out in his bedroom mirror and posed, Cosmo-style. “I just want to wear girl stuff.”


    lex’s teacher, Mrs. C., jumped in, too. During circle time, she mentioned male friends who wore nail polish and earrings. Mrs. C. told them that when she was younger, she liked wearing boys’ sneakers. Did that make her a boy? Did the children think she shouldn’t have been allowed to wear them? Did they think it would have been O.K. to laugh at her? They shook their heads no. Then she told them that long ago, girls weren’t allowed to wear pants, and a couple of the children went wide-eyed.


    The article is much longer, than this, but y'all get the idea. There's a movement afoot to emasculate boys and young men of America in order to get them to accept this ? ass ? . Myself and The Zombie are giving an empathic HELL NO!!! Men need to men and boys need to be raised to be men. Enough with this acceptance of men ? other men in the ass and taking sloppy facials.
  • desertrain10
    desertrain10 Members Posts: 4,829 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Options
    dead @ the o/p....

    i dunno, blame patriarchy for the lack of ? given by the cop... she was probably like a manly man like you could handle yourself.... *shrugs*

    i'm a woman by the way

    and dead @ your homophobic rant.... move to the middle east than ?
  • PK_TK_187
    PK_TK_187 Members Posts: 2,240
    Options
    damn, i'm responsible for the spread of ? activity?
    never knew i had that much influence zombie
  • Jabu_Rule
    Jabu_Rule Members Posts: 5,993 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited October 2012
    Options
    zombie wrote: »
    PK_TK_187 wrote: »
    there are no brainwashing ?
    this guy is an idiot

    ? make ? childrens books, in attempts to brainwash the kids. there is a ? on every new tv show, you can't watch tv without seeing some ? ? . there are ? plays being put on in schools you trying to tell me that's not ? brain washing.


    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nlY9Ne39L1g

    Keep it real ? like you are out here trying there best to corrupt the minds of the youth, homosexuality was labeled a mental disorder until 1974, it was only the political pressure that ? put on that forced psychologist association of america to remove it from there list of disorders. Now you sick twisted ? and your supporters are discussing taking out ? out of the dsm-5 which is basically the psychologist bible. this is clearly slow social engineering a.k.a brainwashing.

    SMFH at that video yo. Damn man, that's crazy. I don't think indoctrination is needed to let ? have their own rights and be married and play with each others penises behind closed doors. Freedom is freedom and equal rights and all that jazz. I mean, if i see a kid ? on a ? kid, I'm gonna say something. I work with kids and it's the same as a bully picking on a little kid. But this is a discussion that kids should not be having in such detail. The only difference between ? and straight is sex and the kind of sex one has should not be a school subject. ? have never had a situation like blacks where they could not participate in society.

    Sure it sucked hiding their flaming ? ways, but what choice did blacks have? How is celebrating ? history month in school a thing? Celebrating black history month was necessary to educate children to the fact that people of that skin tone have been successful in the face of Slavery and Jim Crow. Skin tone is the first thing you see and a ? white person would be accepted in a white community far quicker then a ? black person. I wish people would stop trying to make these issues the same. I can understand the general Civil Rights attributes, but the issues are still very different when dealing with sexuality vs skin tone and place of origin (or that of your ancestors).
  • DMTxTHC
    DMTxTHC Members Posts: 14,218 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Options
    Lol @ the emotions in this thread. I cosign a lot of what Zombie said though. Not hating ? while expressing disdain for ? activity doesn't make you ? . I don't think I ever heard no ? like that, now that I think about it.
  • janklow
    janklow Members, Moderators Posts: 8,613 Regulator
    Options
    Swiffness! wrote: »
    Oh and that cop didn't wanna help you cuz newsflash, YOU'RE A ? LOL, you should be thankful that pig didn't think yo cell phone was a pistol, sheeeeiiit where's Darc when you need em.
    in fairness, he has defended the rights of racist white people to attack and oppress minorities.
    Swiffness! wrote: »
    because there HAS been a utterly hilarious trend of people who are REALLY ? ANGRY ABOUT ? ALL THE TIME turning out to be ? on the low. Basically: sure, hate ? , but if you're hating ? with this really really deep passion..........more than you seemingly hate anybody else...........well damn. ppl are gonna wonder why lol. Do I really gotta list all the preachers that have been caught on that? (hi douwant2go2heaven)
    see, okay, you've said this better than i did. AND I HOPE WE'RE ALL PAYING ATTENTION.
    zombie wrote: »
    ? OfF ALREADY-
    but remember, everyone, he totally doesn't care about this thread anymore and he's not emotional at all! HOW DARE YOU SAY OTHERWISE
    zombie wrote: »
    I have changed my mind ABOUT YOU, you are ? .
    oh no, some repressed homosexual on the internet called me ? !
    zombie wrote: »
    THis spirited attack you have set upon on me, because of my feeling on homosexuals and their communities attempted brainwashing of normal people is proof thaT You are ? .
    personally, i don't like bigotry. another difference between you and i is that i am actually NOT okay with the KKK, whereas you seem content to cosign them.
    zombie wrote: »
    I can back up my claims that ? are trying to brainwash people WITH facts.
    it's funny how people always say this kind of thing, but then forget to, you know, back up their claims with facts.
    zombie wrote: »
    i AM NOT a ? typist sometime i forget to turn the ? caps lock off sometimes i capitalize on purpose so the ? what.
    well, first you claimed the capitalization was accidental and did not reflect your emotions. but now you say you're doing it on purpose? huh. keep denying those emotions!
  • zombie
    zombie Members Posts: 13,450 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited October 2012
    Options
    janklow wrote: »
    Swiffness! wrote: »
    Oh and that cop didn't wanna help you cuz newsflash, YOU'RE A ? LOL, you should be thankful that pig didn't think yo cell phone was a pistol, sheeeeiiit where's Darc when you need em.
    in fairness, he has defended the rights of racist white people to attack and oppress minorities.
    Swiffness! wrote: »
    because there HAS been a utterly hilarious trend of people who are REALLY ? ANGRY ABOUT ? ALL THE TIME turning out to be ? on the low. Basically: sure, hate ? , but if you're hating ? with this really really deep passion..........more than you seemingly hate anybody else...........well damn. ppl are gonna wonder why lol. Do I really gotta list all the preachers that have been caught on that? (hi douwant2go2heaven)
    see, okay, you've said this better than i did. AND I HOPE WE'RE ALL PAYING ATTENTION.
    zombie wrote: »
    ? OfF ALREADY-
    but remember, everyone, he totally doesn't care about this thread anymore and he's not emotional at all! HOW DARE YOU SAY OTHERWISE
    zombie wrote: »
    I have changed my mind ABOUT YOU, you are ? .
    oh no, some repressed homosexual on the internet called me ? !
    zombie wrote: »
    THis spirited attack you have set upon on me, because of my feeling on homosexuals and their communities attempted brainwashing of normal people is proof thaT You are ? .
    personally, i don't like bigotry. another difference between you and i is that i am actually NOT okay with the KKK, whereas you seem content to cosign them.
    zombie wrote: »
    I can back up my claims that ? are trying to brainwash people WITH facts.
    it's funny how people always say this kind of thing, but then forget to, you know, back up their claims with facts.
    zombie wrote: »
    i AM NOT a ? typist sometime i forget to turn the ? caps lock off sometimes i capitalize on purpose so the ? what.
    well, first you claimed the capitalization was accidental and did not reflect your emotions. but now you say you're doing it on purpose? huh. keep denying those emotions!

    You know what, you really are a ? ? , i never cosigned the kkk i only respect their right too hate because i hate white people just as much as they hate me. Yes i respect hate it's an emotion too many of us are too ? to show. I went over that with you already i am not doinG it again. I dropped the 2 videos that proves the brainwashing, somebody else dropped the ny times article. yes some times the capitalization is on purpose sometimes it's not. when it's intentional it's not done to show emotions, i capitalize things i want the reader to pay attention to. we went over this already.

    I now think you a ? or have two fathers or maybe 2 mothers or maybe your sister has a wife OR YOUR BROTHER A HUSBAND, which would help me understand in my mind your defense of homosexuals, i also think you are white. would you please identify your race? If you are white it would give me a greater understanding, this ? ? is part or your culture. Could you please stop slicing up other peoples post and not putting it together. You know i am jamaican not american we don't have scandals where the people who ? bash turn out to be ? that seems to be mostly an american thing. The ? in jamaica try their best to hide they don't make noise for or against homosexuality.
  • zombie
    zombie Members Posts: 13,450 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Options
    PK_TK_187 wrote: »
    damn, i'm responsible for the spread of ? activity?
    never knew i had that much influence zombie

    nO is an island ,everyman has influence. By you being a proud ? you influence other ? to be proud and it just spreads exponentially eventually become a self sustaining problem for normal people. You ? start getting real comfortable, 20 YEARS ago you think some ? would have dared to pull is ? out in public? hell no.
  • janklow
    janklow Members, Moderators Posts: 8,613 Regulator
    Options
    zombie wrote: »
    You know what, you really are a ? ? -
    wait, so my sexuality is now defined by the fact that i disagreed with you and hurt your feelings on the internet? this is not exactly based on anything less than you getting EMOTIONAL.
    zombie wrote: »
    -i never cosigned the kkk i only respect their right too hate because i hate white people just as much as they hate me. Yes i respect hate it's an emotion too many of us are too ? to show.
    well, when someone says "I have no problem with the kkk hating black people" (this would be you), i think we should reflect on the part where you're saying you take no issue with a group that's advocated lynching black people and all the related stuff. i know what you did was accidentally put yourself in a position where you HAVE to say you're cool with the KKK because you want to undermine your anti-homosexual bigotry. but i guess that means you should probably just own the part where you think the KKK is cool with you.
    zombie wrote: »
    I went over that with you already i am not doinG it again.
    ha, yeah, you will. you said you were bored and done with the thread... but that was a lie. you've said you don't care... but that was a lie. so what'll happen is you'll read this post, the emotions will flair, and you'll immediately go over it again. hooray for consistency!
    zombie wrote: »
    yes some times the capitalization is on purpose sometimes it's not. when it's intentional it's not done to show emotions, i capitalize things i want the reader to pay attention to. we went over this already.
    yeah, see, the thing is, i'm just pointing out that you lied about it being an accident and that you're now pretending there's no emotional component again because you're still disputing that stuff.
    zombie wrote: »
    I now think you a ? or have two fathers or maybe 2 mothers or maybe your sister has a wife OR YOUR BROTHER A HUSBAND-
    oh no, not the same insult again!
    zombie wrote: »
    You know i am jamaican not american we don't have scandals where the people who ? bash turn out to be ? that seems to be mostly an american thing.
    i didn't say there were massive secret homosexual scandals in Jamaica. i said you were a repressed homosexual because of how you're behaving in this thread.
  • zombie
    zombie Members Posts: 13,450 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited October 2012
    Options
    janklow wrote: »
    zombie wrote: »
    You know what, you really are a ? ? -
    wait, so my sexuality is now defined by the fact that i disagreed with you and hurt your feelings on the internet? this is not exactly based on anything less than you getting EMOTIONAL.
    zombie wrote: »
    -i never cosigned the kkk i only respect their right too hate because i hate white people just as much as they hate me. Yes i respect hate it's an emotion too many of us are too ? to show.
    well, when someone says "I have no problem with the kkk hating black people" (this would be you), i think we should reflect on the part where you're saying you take no issue with a group that's advocated lynching black people and all the related stuff. i know what you did was accidentally put yourself in a position where you HAVE to say you're cool with the KKK because you want to undermine your anti-homosexual bigotry. but i guess that means you should probably just own the part where you think the KKK is cool with you.
    zombie wrote: »
    I went over that with you already i am not doinG it again.
    ha, yeah, you will. you said you were bored and done with the thread... but that was a lie. you've said you don't care... but that was a lie. so what'll happen is you'll read this post, the emotions will flair, and you'll immediately go over it again. hooray for consistency!
    zombie wrote: »
    yes some times the capitalization is on purpose sometimes it's not. when it's intentional it's not done to show emotions, i capitalize things i want the reader to pay attention to. we went over this already.
    yeah, see, the thing is, i'm just pointing out that you lied about it being an accident and that you're now pretending there's no emotional component again because you're still disputing that stuff.
    zombie wrote: »
    I now think you a ? or have two fathers or maybe 2 mothers or maybe your sister has a wife OR YOUR BROTHER A HUSBAND-
    oh no, not the same insult again!
    zombie wrote: »
    You know i am jamaican not american we don't have scandals where the people who ? bash turn out to be ? that seems to be mostly an american thing.
    i didn't say there were massive secret homosexual scandals in Jamaica. i said you were a repressed homosexual because of how you're behaving in this thread.

    The kkk can advocate for what ever the hell they want too like i tried to tell you many posts ago hate and acting on hate are not the same thing. Let them be free to hate what ever race they want too their hate does not bother me or affect me. Hate alone i have no problem with, I respect hate. the kkk's hate is cool with me because i hate them also. why is that hard to understand ? these statements are not accidental.

    This is a discussion forum people often get pulled back inTO threads they get bored with.

    The whole repressed homosexual thing is a tactic of mental warfare that the homosexual community has made up to destroy any opposition to their brainwashing program. I and others in this thread have already shot holes through your stupid " you say bad things about ? so therefore you must be ? logic". My disgust for homosexuality is not based on emotions, my growing disgust for you on the other hand just may be, you are starting to ? annoy me. I did not lie about my capitalizations sometimes it's an accident sometimes it's not, i simply added on more information to my explaintion to why the capitalization in my posts are sometimes all over the place. That fact alone does not make what i told you at first a lie. i'll tell you how i am behaving, i am behaving like most jamaican males and you are behaving like most homosexual white males. why have you not stated your race yet ?
  • Lord Ether
    Lord Ether Members Posts: 736 ✭✭✭✭
    Options
  • nujerz84
    nujerz84 Members Posts: 15,418 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Options
    Its disgusting the ? I see on the train going into NYC and in Newark at times.. these young homos flooding the train..
  • janklow
    janklow Members, Moderators Posts: 8,613 Regulator
    Options
    zombie wrote: »
    Let them be free to hate what ever race they want too their hate does not bother me or affect me. Hate alone i have no problem with, I respect hate. the kkk's hate is cool with me because i hate them also. why is that hard to understand ? these statements are not accidental.
    is it that hard to understand that i'm pointing out a difference in our positions? you're cool with the KKK, i think they're a bunch of lame bigots. the fact that you HAVE to cosign the KKK in order to justify hating on homosexuals is just the hilarious part.
    zombie wrote: »
    This is a discussion forum people often get pulled back inTO threads they get bored with.
    yeah, i think i know how the "internet forum" thing works. but you MIGHT want to reconsider declaring you're storming off because of EMOTIONS if you're just going to return and post again. speaking of which:

    zombie: "I went over that with you already i am not doinG it again."
    janklow: "so what'll happen is you'll read this post, the emotions will flair, and you'll immediately go over it again."
    zombie: "did not lie about my capitalizations sometimes it's an accident sometimes it's not, i simply added on more information to my explaintion to why the capitalization in my posts are sometimes all over the place."

    so i guess i called that 100% correctly. add that on to the list of "? you're lying about for no real reason."
    zombie wrote: »
    I and others in this thread have already shot holes through your stupid " you say bad things about ? so therefore you must be ? logic".
    see, it's not the "saying bad things about ? " part, it's that you have to go into a furious rant at the thought of them. so what's the reason for all this rage, especially considering that you claim there's no emotion involved here?
    zombie wrote: »
    My disgust for homosexuality is not based on emotions
    ahahaha
    zombie wrote: »
    That fact alone does not make what i told you at first a lie.
    "I do not Write in capital letters to show emotions i write in capitals to show the reader what i want him to pay attention to" followed by "I sometimes capitalize all crazy when i post some because i forget to turn off the caps lock" tells me that if it was both --and remember, this was you pretending the capital letters had nothing to do with your EMOTIONS-- you could have just said that from the beginning because, hey, who cares?
  • zombie
    zombie Members Posts: 13,450 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Options
    janklow wrote: »
    zombie wrote: »
    Let them be free to hate what ever race they want too their hate does not bother me or affect me. Hate alone i have no problem with, I respect hate. the kkk's hate is cool with me because i hate them also. why is that hard to understand ? these statements are not accidental.
    is it that hard to understand that i'm pointing out a difference in our positions? you're cool with the KKK, i think they're a bunch of lame bigots. the fact that you HAVE to cosign the KKK in order to justify hating on homosexuals is just the hilarious part.
    zombie wrote: »
    This is a discussion forum people often get pulled back inTO threads they get bored with.
    yeah, i think i know how the "internet forum" thing works. but you MIGHT want to reconsider declaring you're storming off because of EMOTIONS if you're just going to return and post again. speaking of which:

    zombie: "I went over that with you already i am not doinG it again."
    janklow: "so what'll happen is you'll read this post, the emotions will flair, and you'll immediately go over it again."
    zombie: "did not lie about my capitalizations sometimes it's an accident sometimes it's not, i simply added on more information to my explaintion to why the capitalization in my posts are sometimes all over the place."

    so i guess i called that 100% correctly. add that on to the list of "? you're lying about for no real reason."
    zombie wrote: »
    I and others in this thread have already shot holes through your stupid " you say bad things about ? so therefore you must be ? logic".
    see, it's not the "saying bad things about ? " part, it's that you have to go into a furious rant at the thought of them. so what's the reason for all this rage, especially considering that you claim there's no emotion involved here?
    zombie wrote: »
    My disgust for homosexuality is not based on emotions
    ahahaha
    zombie wrote: »
    That fact alone does not make what i told you at first a lie.
    "I do not Write in capital letters to show emotions i write in capitals to show the reader what i want him to pay attention to" followed by "I sometimes capitalize all crazy when i post some because i forget to turn off the caps lock" tells me that if it was both --and remember, this was you pretending the capital letters had nothing to do with your EMOTIONS-- you could have just said that from the beginning because, hey, who cares?

    You are such a ? . I did not cosign the kkk but I do respect their hate and that has nothing to do with ? . I told you before I do not rant you are interpreting what I write as rage when it is only the normal opinion of my nations male populace. Maybe if I was not jamaican the point you are trying to make would make sense. What seems like rage to you is normal behavior and speech to me, it's nothing out of the ordinary to say the things I have said about ? .

    Now please ? off and stop trolling the ? thread with your distractions. ? are out of control and they are brainwashing the population that is my mainpoint. Don't worry about my emotions my capitalizations or lack there of. These things are unimportant. It is impossible to really grasp if someone is being emotional or not over the internet.

    Now let me say again whiteboy battyboy ? off
  • peterpiffin
    peterpiffin Members Posts: 285 ✭✭
    Options
    Little JJ wrote: »
    PK_TK_187 wrote: »
    this idiot said blame lil wayne
    He has influence.


    apparently he has influence on your olive colored contacts wearing ? .

  • janklow
    janklow Members, Moderators Posts: 8,613 Regulator
    Options
    zombie wrote: »
    You are such a ? .
    well, now that you've used this insult again, it's lost all meaning.
    zombie wrote: »
    I did not cosign the kkk but I do respect their hate and that has nothing to do with ? .
    so you don't cosign the KKK... but you DO respect the hate of a bunch of rednecks who spent decades running around castrating and murdering black men? not really sure what the difference there is, other than that you want to embrace the KKK without looking like you're doing so.
    zombie wrote: »
    I told you before I do not rant-
    note that you say this in the same post you're ranting away with "You are such a ? ... Now let me say again whiteboy battyboy ? off." pathetic.
    zombie wrote: »
    Maybe if I was not jamaican the point you are trying to make would make sense.
    so the argument is "i'm not a ranting bigot, i'm just Jamaican?" i am assuming you've failed to consider the possibility that a Jamaican can rant and rage about a topic?
    zombie wrote: »
    Now please ? off and stop trolling the ? thread with your distractions.
    i thought you were bored with the thread, done with the thread, etc, etc?
    zombie wrote: »
    It is impossible to really grasp if someone is being emotional or not over the internet.
    nope: you're being emotional and it is obvious. if you weren't, there wouldn't be the need for you being SO UPSET.