Now that THAT SELL OUT iz Back in the White House
Options
rapluva
Members Posts: 232 ✭
Say good bye to Our Rights to Bear Armz: http://www.shtfplan.com/headline-news/turn-them-over-feinstein-moves-to-ban-all-assault-rifles-high-capacity-magazines-and-pistol-grips_11072012
Comments
-
Let's hope gun rights are not infringed upon, and in all honesty, I doubt that law will go anywhere. A nation that outlaws high powered weapons is acting for a tyrannical govt, word to China and Iran. I wouldn't worry about this bruh, although I'm not exactly thrilled Obama is prez either (voted for Gary Johnson)
-
ultimately, the big issue here is that you're not getting an AWB through the House, no matter how much of a ? Feinstein is about the issue. and frankly, to pass something, i don't think you can reasonable go as draconian as the "projected AWB" mentioned in this article.
-
gun rights are overrated
-
soulbrother wrote: »gun rights are overrated
-
Who on this board would lose their house, job, wife, and kids if gun rights were taking away?
-
soulbrother wrote: »Who on this board would lose their house, job, wife, and kids if gun rights were taking away?
-
were there another 30 Democratic congressional wins I didn't hear about? Feinstein smokin dat ? if she thinks this has a chance in hell of passing the House.you're not getting an AWB through the House
this
-
Swiffness! wrote: »this
-
I'm just curious: What exactly do regular citizens, who aren't in law enforcement or the military, need with high powered weapons?
-
Ya'll dont need high powered rifles and ? . Only miltary and TI do
-
manofmorehouse wrote: »I'm just curious: What exactly do regular citizens, who aren't in law enforcement or the military, need with high powered weapons?
If the government has more firepower than the citizenry then the government rules the people...its nto a govt for the people and by the people which fools espouse all the time.
-
-
The user and all related content has been deleted.
-
The user and all related content has been deleted.
-
The ? you talkin bout cracka. It still the same for hood ? I can still get strapped easily. Crackas is mad they cant go to they cracka shop to get a strap now and they cant go to the hood cuz they walking licks. My prezzy is black and I still stay strapped and less crackas be strapped. Aint nuthin but a W right thurr.
-
The user and all related content has been deleted.
-
manofmorehouse wrote: »I'm just curious: What exactly do regular citizens, who aren't in law enforcement or the military, need with high powered weapons?Black_Samson wrote: »and really its just a reup of what is already banned with the inclusion of the AR...
-
manofmorehouse wrote: »I'm just curious: What exactly do regular citizens, who aren't in law enforcement or the military, need with high powered weapons?
-
Triple B's wrote: »Ya'll dont need high powered rifles and ? . Only miltary and TI do
This is EXACTLY what the NWOer's want us to believe, we (that includez YOU) have every right to have fully automatic guns. -
manofmorehouse wrote: »I'm just curious: What exactly do regular citizens, who aren't in law enforcement or the military, need with high powered weapons?
If the government has more firepower than the citizenry then the government rules the people...its nto a govt for the people and by the people which fools espouse all the time.
lol by that logic, we won't truly be free until I have the right to own Predator drones & nukes n ?
-
It's Our right to defend your self with what ever type of gun you want, and there's nothing wrong with it, but the Zionist controlled Gov--we (that includez YOU) have every right to have fully automatic guns.Swiffness! wrote: »lol by that logic, we won't truly be free until I have the right to own Predator drones & nukes n ?
-
Triple B's wrote: »Ya'll dont need high powered rifles and ? . Only miltary and TI do
That's the same ? all oppressive nations say...... -
kingblaze84 wrote: »Let's hope gun rights are not infringed upon, and in all honesty, I doubt that law will go anywhere. A nation that outlaws high powered weapons is acting for a tyrannical govt, word to China and Iran. I wouldn't worry about this bruh, although I'm not exactly thrilled Obama is prez either (voted for Gary Johnson)
How so? It's 2012, I've never heard of any incident were a regular citizen used an assault rifle to protect the state but there sure is a ? load of citizens using them against the state. If the average citizen should be allowed to own a weapon made for fighting in wars we might as well get rid of the police and national guard. -
-but there sure is a ? load of citizens using them against the state.-a weapon made for fighting in wars-
but hell, you're responding to a guy who's telling you that gun rights help protect individual rights by saying "gun rights aren't helping protect the government from people." -
IDK about banning firearms, but there probably should be a review on the restrictions. Too many incidents these days where idiots get their hands on guns and shoot the place up for no good reason. Not sure how you can prevent or screen for that, though.