Man...Malcolm X spit that real.
Options
Comments
-
waterproof wrote: »you feel better now you got that off your chest, i hope so.......lol...
I honestly don't know what you're talking about here. Kinda awkward.waterproof wrote: »what more do you want, i gave my take and i left it like that, ? if you was looking for something more then you better find it elsewhere.....
What more do I want? Bruh, I just thought that we were having a reasonable and interesting argument. That is, until you got all emotional and weird on me.waterproof wrote: »i mean emotions and ego's being hurt,
I left my emotions and ego at the doorstep a long time ago bruh. No place for all that in an impartial debate.waterproof wrote: »i hope you really dont believe the ? you tell yourself but hey whatever to pump you up to make you feel better than go ahead and beat that chest for all of us to see....
Still have no idea what you are talking about. Still very awkward.waterproof wrote: »who in the ? is you to tell somebody how long this so-called debate have to go on, you aint nobody special, i dont have to answer to you or to satisfy your wishes,
Wow man, just wow. Take it easy. No one is making you do anything you don't want to. You're reeeeeally sounding insecure right now man. All that I did was respond to your opinion with an opinion of my own. How you're translating that into me telling you what to do is beyond me.waterproof wrote: »you gave your thoughts and i gave mine and that's it,
Yes, that's what you said many times over, and I already responded to this many times over. Kind of ironic that you get your panties in a bunch because I told you that our argument wasn't over and apparently that was to be the final word, but here you are telling me that our argument is over and apparently this is supposed to be the final word.waterproof wrote: »what the ? is this the great debaters.
Nope, certainly doesn't have to be.waterproof wrote: »i think you better go pop ? to your kids or your girl homie, only ? in this thread is you and your constant ? and your ? like attitude.
More and more and more feelings. This is not even funny anymore, kind of. So I have kids? So I called you a ? ? Where are you getting all of this from? You might be the most emotional poster I have ever seen on this site, wow. You're taking this way too personal.waterproof wrote: »oh yeah, i said i will not talk about his death no more and i will celebrate his life, so i can care less what the ? you do
Lol you said this once, and then you felt it necessary to repeat it over and over and respond again and again. Seems like you care enough to really want to let me know about it. If you truly didnt care then you wouldn't even give it the time of the day.waterproof wrote: »and i didnt say anything about how people choose to give their thoughts in this thread about Malcolm X.......
I don't know, maybe. You certainly suggested that I was wasting my energy and suggested that my "thoughts" about Malcolm were suspect, and so I disagreed and simply stated why. Here's what basically happened: you made statements, I disagreed and responded to them, and then you felt salty for some strange reason, and now you're desperately in the process of trying to back out and save face with your tail between your legs.
If you're so salty and don't want to continue this argument (which has now just turned into a feelings-fest) anymore, then just simply stop. No one is forcing you to do anything bruh lol. It's a free world. Life is good. Have a drink and get some ? . It's not that serious bruh lol.
-
OH NO NOT SARCASMwaterproof wrote: »Whatever toot your horn Janklow it's alright with me, I will never ask u to not to reply to my posts, not the almighty king of the last word, the gall of me to even do such a thing...
OH NO NOT... well, either it's a shot at me or a shot at my mother, but either way, very classy?waterproof wrote: »but really if u think that then the pain u must of put ur mother through when she had to push that big head through the birth canal...
-
OK now, now that the feelings have been released.............
Zionist Logic -- Malcolm X on Zionism
Malcolm X (Omowale Malcolm X Shabazz)
Taken from The Egyptian Gazette -- Sept. 17, 1964
The Zionist armies that now occupy Palestine claim their ancient Jewish prophets predicted that in the "last days of this world" their own ? would raise them up a "messiah" who would lead them to their promised land, and they would set up their own "divine" government in this newly-gained land, this "divine" government would enable them to "rule all other nations with a rod of iron."
If the Israeli Zionists believe their present occupation of Arab Palestine is the fulfillment of predictions made by their Jewish prophets, then they also religiously believe that Israel must fulfill its "divine" mission to rule all other nations with a rod of irons, which only means a different form of iron-like rule, more firmly entrenched even, than that of the former European Colonial Powers.
These Israeli Zionists religiously believe their Jewish ? has chosen them to replace the outdated European colonialism with a new form of colonialism, so well disguised that it will enable them to deceive the African masses into submitting willingly to their "divine" authority and guidance, without the African masses being aware that they are still colonized.
CAMOUFLAGE
The Israeli Zionists are convinced they have successfully camouflaged their new kind of colonialism. Their colonialism appears to be more "benevolent," more "philanthropic," a system with which they rule simply by getting their potential victims to accept their friendly offers of economic "aid," and other tempting gifts, that they dangle in front of the newly-independent African nations, whose economies are experiencing great difficulties. During the 19th century, when the masses here in Africa were largely illiterate it was easy for European imperialists to rule them with "force and fear," but in this present era of enlightenment the African masses are awakening, and it is impossible to hold them in check now with the antiquated methods of the 19th century.
The imperialists, therefore, have been compelled to devise new methods. Since they can no longer force or frighten the masses into submission, they must devise modern methods that will enable them to manouevre the African masses into willing submission.
The modern 20th century weapon of neo-imperialism is "dollarism." The Zionists have mastered the science of dollarism: the ability to come posing as a friend and benefactor, bearing gifts and all other forms of economic aid and offers of technical assistance. Thus, the power and influence of Zionist Israel in many of the newly "independent" African nations has fast-become even more unshakeable than that of the 18th century European colonialists... and this new kind of Zionist colonialism differs only in form and method, but never in motive or objective.
At the close of the 19th century when European imperialists wisely foresaw that the awakening masses of Africa would not submit to their old method of ruling through force and fears, these ever-scheming imperialists had to create a "new weapon," and to find a "new base" for that weapon.
DOLLARISM
The number one weapon of 20th century imperialism is zionist dollarism, and one of the main bases for this weapon is Zionist Israel. The ever-scheming European imperialists wisely placed Israel where she could geographically divide the Arab world, infiltrate and sow the seed of dissension among African leaders and also divide the Africans against the Asians.
Zionist Israel's occupation of Arab Palestine has forced the Arab world to waste billions of precious dollars on armaments, making it impossible for these newly independent Arab nations to concentrate on strengthening the economies of their countries and elevate the living standard of their people.
And the continued low standard of living in the Arab world has been skillfully used by the Zionist propagandists to make it appear to the Africans that the Arab leaders are not intellectually or technically qualified to lift the living standard of their people ... thus, indirectly "enducing" Africans to turn away from the Arabs and towards the Israelis for teachers and technical assistance.
"They ? the bird's wing, and then condemn it for not flying as fast as they."
The imperialists always make themselves look good, but it is only because they are competing against economically crippled newly independent countries whose economies are actually crippled by the Zionist-capitalist conspiracy. They can't stand against fair competition, thus they dread Gamal Abdul Nasser's call for African-Arab Unity under Socialism.
MESSIAH?
If the "religious" claim of the Zionists is true that they were to be led to the promised land by their messiah, and Israel's present occupation of Arab Palestine is the fulfillment of that prophesy: where is their messiah whom their prophets said would get the credit for leading them there? It was Ralph Bunche who "negotiated" the Zionists into possession of Occupied Palestine! Is Ralph Bunche the messiah of Zionism? If Ralph Bunche is not their messiah, and their messsiah has not yet come, then what are they doing in Palestine ahead of their messiah?
Did the Zionists have the legal or moral right to invade Arab Palestine, uproot its Arab citizens from their homes and seize all Arab property for themselves just based on the "religious" claim that their forefathers lived there thousands of years ago? Only a thousand years ago the Moors lived in Spain. Would this give the Moors of today the legal and moral right to invade the Iberian Peninsula, drive out its Spanish citizens, and then set up a new Moroccan nation ... where Spain used to be, as the European zionists have done to our Arab brothers and sisters in Palestine?...
In short the Zionist argument to justify Israel's present occupation of Arab Palestine has no intelligent or legal basis in history ... not even in their own religion. Where is their Messiah?
-
waterproof wrote: »you feel better now you got that off your chest, i hope so.......lol...
I honestly don't know what you're talking about here. Kinda awkward.waterproof wrote: »what more do you want, i gave my take and i left it like that, ? if you was looking for something more then you better find it elsewhere.....
What more do I want? Bruh, I just thought that we were having a reasonable and interesting argument. That is, until you got all emotional and weird on me.waterproof wrote: »i mean emotions and ego's being hurt,
I left my emotions and ego at the doorstep a long time ago bruh. No place for all that in an impartial debate.waterproof wrote: »i hope you really dont believe the ? you tell yourself but hey whatever to pump you up to make you feel better than go ahead and beat that chest for all of us to see....
Still have no idea what you are talking about. Still very awkward.waterproof wrote: »who in the ? is you to tell somebody how long this so-called debate have to go on, you aint nobody special, i dont have to answer to you or to satisfy your wishes,
Wow man, just wow. Take it easy. No one is making you do anything you don't want to. You're reeeeeally sounding insecure right now man. All that I did was respond to your opinion with an opinion of my own. How you're translating that into me telling you what to do is beyond me.waterproof wrote: »you gave your thoughts and i gave mine and that's it,
Yes, that's what you said many times over, and I already responded to this many times over. Kind of ironic that you get your panties in a bunch because I told you that our argument wasn't over and apparently that was to be the final word, but here you are telling me that our argument is over and apparently this is supposed to be the final word.waterproof wrote: »what the ? is this the great debaters.
Nope, certainly doesn't have to be.waterproof wrote: »i think you better go pop ? to your kids or your girl homie, only ? in this thread is you and your constant ? and your ? like attitude.
More and more and more feelings. This is not even funny anymore, kind of. So I have kids? So I called you a ? ? Where are you getting all of this from? You might be the most emotional poster I have ever seen on this site, wow. You're taking this way too personal.waterproof wrote: »oh yeah, i said i will not talk about his death no more and i will celebrate his life, so i can care less what the ? you do
Lol you said this once, and then you felt it necessary to repeat it over and over and respond again and again. Seems like you care enough to really want to let me know about it. If you truly didnt care then you wouldn't even give it the time of the day.waterproof wrote: »and i didnt say anything about how people choose to give their thoughts in this thread about Malcolm X.......
I don't know, maybe. You certainly suggested that I was wasting my energy and suggested that my "thoughts" about Malcolm were suspect, and so I disagreed and simply stated why. Here's what basically happened: you made statements, I disagreed and responded to them, and then you felt salty for some strange reason, and now you're desperately in the process of trying to back out and save face with your tail between your legs.
If you're so salty and don't want to continue this argument (which has now just turned into a feelings-fest) anymore, then just simply stop. No one is forcing you to do anything bruh lol. It's a free world. Life is good. Have a drink and get some ? . It's not that serious bruh lol.
-
oh, wait, you wanted FEELINGS? done and donewaterproof wrote: »OK now, now that the feelings have been released.............
This discussion has been closed.