The NRA Stays On That BullSh!t... NEW AD Pulls Obama's Kids Into 'Discussion'
Options
Comments
-
sorry to say it...but the president kids are more important than your kids.
if something happens to his kids it can affect his judgement and put my kids in harms way.
he is the leader of the free world...his kids should be protected.
this is just stupid. any and every world leader needs to have their family protected.
the NRA is reaching. the president is not trying to say dont have a gun...hes saying really high powered is not necessary or just please register it.
you register ya car and to vote...but you dont want to register ya gun?
the fukk? -
This new round of Gun Control Talk on the Democratic side is the same Brass ring Wood ring ? it always has been they want the underclass to accept their role and be content with what is being given to them.
It is the extremism that is killing the country because a lot of the kats calling themselves Republicans are doing their best to incite this situation in the opposite way playing the idiot race cards their base seems to eat up.
Neither side gives one legitiment ? about those average citizens who are struggling and want to be able to protect their family and rights. We all live in a different reality from these kats and have no representations with out aligning to extremists on either end of the spectrum... -
Soloman the Wise wrote: »It is the extremism that is killing the country ....
Neither side gives one legitiment ? about those average citizens who are struggling and want to be able to protect their family and rights. ...
community.allhiphop.truth.com -
sorry to say it...but the president kids are more important than your kids.
if something happens to his kids it can affect his judgement and put my kids in harms way.
he is the leader of the free world...his kids should be protected.
this is just stupid. any and every world leader needs to have their family protected.
the NRA is reaching. the president is not trying to say dont have a gun...hes saying really high powered is not necessary or just please register it.
you register ya car and to vote...but you dont want to register ya gun?
the fukk?
this entire smear campaign by the NRA and Right Wing Conservatives is only to get the attention of bigoted, uneducated white and low information black populace.
plain & simple
and the question isn't who's kids are more important than who's
but who's kids are MORE LIKELY to be targeted???
the average everyday American's or a high ranking government official?
-
i will admit this if people promoting gun control would just admit they're afraid of guns and are willing to say anything to get them banned, accurate or not.Why don't ya'll mfs just admit ya'll just love ? guns, and stop trying to pass off that ''hunting'' and ''protection'' angle. It's not like we don't have standing militias and supermarkets.
nope. and i say this not making the argument of "every pre-1930s president wins the title."This has been the most lax President on gun control period
this point i actually agree with. to a large extent, this is not giving a damn about guns, this is about scoring easy points to fire up the base.To be honest he probably would had left gun control off the table in both of his terms if that Aurora shooting in the movie theater and sandy hook elementary school shooting did not happen. -
because the person pushing the big AWB, Feinstein, has publicly claimed she would take all guns if she could. and because you have politicians on the state level simultaneously pushing the worst stuff they can.Why is everyone jumping to the conclusion that they're going to ban all guns?
i mean, yes, there's hyperbole, but explain to me why i should believe the average politician pushing hard for gun control right now DOESN'T ultimately want to take all guns.
it's all about working toward the goal. look, you say right now "assault weapons are evil because they threaten MY FREEDOM not to die, but your handgun and your hunting long gun are fine." whatever the hell this means. so now what stops you from arguing in 10 years "handguns are evil because they threaten my freedom not to die?"The ban of ALL guns will NEVER happen.
A restriction on certain guns will.
There's a difference.
the thing is, politicians pushing gun control lie about their support for the Second Amendment --don't tell me you respect it or that you're a supporter of my right to bear arms, SHOW ME WHAT YOU'VE DONE THAT DEMONSTRATES THIS-- and will not ever state an acceptable limit to gun control for some reason. remember when the Brady guys were Handgun Control, Inc? hmmm...
-
you don't remember people flipping out about Clinton's gun control efforts? seriously?YEP...IT'S BECAUSE HE'S BLACK..THEY SUDDENLY HAVE A PROBLEM WITH GUN CONTROL
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_ACV6rkJjmQ
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EF0OAvxDND0
considering that a background check is mandatory for a licensed dealer to sell a gun, this seems a LITTLE inaccurate.For the record... the same politicians (republicans, beholden to the NRA) that fought tooth and nail to have poor and old people jump through hoops (background checks) to be legally registered to vote, now are opposed to people going thru background checks to purchase guns.
-
blakfyahking wrote: »
.
"This Constitution, and the Laws of the United States which shall be made in Pursuance thereof; and all Treaties made, or which shall be made, under the Authority of the United States, shall be the supreme Law of the Land; and the Judges in every State shall be bound thereby, any Thing in the Constitution or Laws of any state to the Contrary notwithstanding."
^^^^ok what does this have to do with the Commerce clause?
you just posted something random that has nothing to do with your point
giving me a definition of the supremacy clause doesn't make sense
maybe I'm missing something?????blakfyahking wrote: »the NRA presents a legitimate point that sheep will refuse to acknowledge because of their emotional bias
most of the people preaching gun control are naturally afraid of firearms and tend to lack basic knowledge
if you believe there is a such thing as an "assault weapon", then you are one of the uninformed voters who really have no business speaking on gun control
it's fair to question why the average citizen is not able to have a degree of protection similar to politicians that work for us...............being a political figure doesn't entitle you to be treated like royalty
so wait?
the average American citizen is walking around with top secret classified information that can put National Security at risk if fallen into the wrong hands? And their immediate family can be used to attain such information???
seriously anyone that even question why certain members of government and their family are afforded a level of security more than the average citizen
obviously the point of the debate goes over your head
of course someone in an important position would need protection for their kids
but the debate addresses why is the protection only sufficient for elected leaders' kids when all kids could be afforded some degree of protection as well
it's a political talking point to use the concept of armed guards just to distract non-thinkers from thinking of a common sense solution
what's wrong with using law enforcement officers to be present at schools?
so the president can use children as a political argument, but the NRA is wrong for doing the same thing?
I applaud and at the same time laugh at your blind obedience bruh haha -
sorry to say it...but the president kids are more important than your kids.
if something happens to his kids it can affect his judgement and put my kids in harms way.
he is the leader of the free world...his kids should be protected.
this is just stupid. any and every world leader needs to have their family protected.
the NRA is reaching. the president is not trying to say dont have a gun...hes saying really high powered is not necessary or just please register it.
you register ya car and to vote...but you dont want to register ya gun?
the fukk?
explain how an AR-15 is "high-powered" but any other standard long rifle is not
-
You were the one to bring up the Supremacy Clause in the first place. So it was hardly a "random post". Like I said last night, this is getting circular. My point is already made.
-
You were the one to bring up the Supremacy Clause in the first place. So it was hardly a "random post". Like I said last night, this is getting circular. My point is already made.
what was your original point?
that is where I was lost
-
blakfyahking wrote: »sorry to say it...but the president kids are more important than your kids.
if something happens to his kids it can affect his judgement and put my kids in harms way.
he is the leader of the free world...his kids should be protected.
this is just stupid. any and every world leader needs to have their family protected.
the NRA is reaching. the president is not trying to say dont have a gun...hes saying really high powered is not necessary or just please register it.
you register ya car and to vote...but you dont want to register ya gun?
the fukk?
explain how an AR-15 is "high-powered" but any other standard long rifle is not
so your asking me how a rapid fire weapon with a huge clip is different than a single shot bolt action weapon with a few shots?
hmmm...i dont know -
So what? Obama's team just put out a series of commericals with KIDS talking about "Obama please ban guns"
? IDIOTS
