Lebron say's "Im going to be 1 of the top 4 thats ever played this game"
Comments
-
Shizlansky wrote: »? acting like the league ever was competitive.
Do y'all homework.
This is another thing people don't realize. It's not like a bunch of teams have won NBA titles. If you think about it The Lakers, Celtics, 76ers, Pistons, Bulls, Rockets, Spurs, Mavs and Heat are the only teams to win the NBA title since the 80's and the 76'ers and Mavs only have 1 each. It's 29 teams in the NBA and 9 have won titles since 1980. That's 34 years the NBA titles pretty much been split between 7 teams. Now we know it's been plenty superstars since the 80's, yet only 9 teams have managed to win the title. -
Cleveland had good chemistry idk about players cause even when they left for other teams they didn't match the same stats.
Wade>>>Mo Williams. -
Attention ?SancoTation wrote: »Cleveland had good chemistry idk about players cause even when they left for other teams they didn't match the same stats.
Wade>>>Mo Williams.
Mo Williams >>> Wade in THAT CLEVELAND SYSTEM. It just wasn't a championship system but winning 50+ games multiple seasons is damn good. Those Cavs were exciting back then. Mo has been a good player still , Anderson is straight but overall, yeah...they were better together with LeBron. -
Cant call it right nowericb4prez wrote: »Knives Amilli wrote: »its....JOHN B wrote: »prime_time_? wrote: »its....JOHN B wrote: »Cleveland didn't have another superstar but they had depth, they had size with Shaq who besides Dwight was putting up better numbers than any other center in the playoffs that year, Z and Varejao, they had Jamison and Mo still playing at a high level, they had good role players in Delonte, Hickson, Gibson, Moon and Parker, Cleveland had a good team im tired of people defending Bron with that excuse, like Cleveland didn't do anything to put a good team around him and wouldn't have continued to do that, no excuse to leave the franchise the way he did, it was Celtics time even if he teamed up with Wade that year they wouldn't have gotten through Boston
Dallas Mavericks 2011
1 great superstar with Dirk and a bunch of talented role players
That shows everybody you don't always need a hof caliber 2nd option to win a title
But I do think you do need one to build a dynasty
Co sign, the difference...Dirk dominated while Bron disapeared
Dirk also languished as a perceived underachiever for about 5 of his at the time 13 seasons and never got the respect he deserved (still doesn't). It took a perfect storm of the Lakers declining, him having a MVP caliber season, The Heat expending all their energy in the Boston series, and having one of the hottest shooting benches in NBA playoff history to get to that ONE ring.
That was a fluke ring if I ever saw one.
Lmao this right here is golden.
Trust me if you put that much thought into any season you would get similar results.
Exactly ? could say the same for the heat playin against a declining Boston team a young an inexperienced OKC team and D rose gettin hurt
The difference with this though is the Heat proved they could beat a healthy D. Rose led Bulls team
Yea they did the first yr when they lost in the finals but the next two they didn't have to deal with him and I felt the bulls had gotten better since the first matchup
-
Cant call it right nowShizlansky wrote: »? acting like the league ever was competitive.
Do y'all homework.
What you mean? -
Hell yea, he rightFlightKing wrote: »SancoTation wrote: »Cleveland had good chemistry idk about players cause even when they left for other teams they didn't match the same stats.
Wade>>>Mo Williams.
Mo Williams >>> Wade in THAT CLEVELAND SYSTEM. It just wasn't a championship system but winning 50+ games multiple seasons is damn good. Those Cavs were exciting back then. Mo has been a good player still , Anderson is straight but overall, yeah...they were better together with LeBron.
LMAO -
Hell yea, he rightericb4prez wrote: »Shizlansky wrote: »? acting like the league ever was competitive.
Do y'all homework.
What you mean?
He means the league has always been top heavy.
Someone posted the stats of the past 20+ champions earlier -
Cant call it right nowFlightKing wrote: »SancoTation wrote: »Cleveland had good chemistry idk about players cause even when they left for other teams they didn't match the same stats.
Wade>>>Mo Williams.
Mo Williams >>> Wade in THAT CLEVELAND SYSTEM. It just wasn't a championship system but winning 50+ games multiple seasons is damn good. Those Cavs were exciting back then. Mo has been a good player still , Anderson is straight but overall, yeah...they were better together with LeBron.
Describe to me this Cleveland system lol -
Cant call it right nowinfamous114 wrote: »FlightKing wrote: »SancoTation wrote: »Cleveland had good chemistry idk about players cause even when they left for other teams they didn't match the same stats.
Wade>>>Mo Williams.
Mo Williams >>> Wade in THAT CLEVELAND SYSTEM. It just wasn't a championship system but winning 50+ games multiple seasons is damn good. Those Cavs were exciting back then. Mo has been a good player still , Anderson is straight but overall, yeah...they were better together with LeBron.
Describe to me this Cleveland system lol
Wether you believe it or not its similar to MIA system
-
Cant call it right nowericb4prez wrote: »Shizlansky wrote: »? acting like the league ever was competitive.
Do y'all homework.
What you mean?
He means the league has always been top heavy.
Someone posted the stats of the past 20+ champions earlier
I get that its top heavy but Just because only a few franchises have rings doesn't mean the league isn't competitive -
Cant call it right nowLol and Mo Williams > D-Wade huh...think I know where that post is going.
-
ericb4prez wrote: »ericb4prez wrote: »Knives Amilli wrote: »its....JOHN B wrote: »prime_time_? wrote: »its....JOHN B wrote: »Cleveland didn't have another superstar but they had depth, they had size with Shaq who besides Dwight was putting up better numbers than any other center in the playoffs that year, Z and Varejao, they had Jamison and Mo still playing at a high level, they had good role players in Delonte, Hickson, Gibson, Moon and Parker, Cleveland had a good team im tired of people defending Bron with that excuse, like Cleveland didn't do anything to put a good team around him and wouldn't have continued to do that, no excuse to leave the franchise the way he did, it was Celtics time even if he teamed up with Wade that year they wouldn't have gotten through Boston
Dallas Mavericks 2011
1 great superstar with Dirk and a bunch of talented role players
That shows everybody you don't always need a hof caliber 2nd option to win a title
But I do think you do need one to build a dynasty
Co sign, the difference...Dirk dominated while Bron disapeared
Dirk also languished as a perceived underachiever for about 5 of his at the time 13 seasons and never got the respect he deserved (still doesn't). It took a perfect storm of the Lakers declining, him having a MVP caliber season, The Heat expending all their energy in the Boston series, and having one of the hottest shooting benches in NBA playoff history to get to that ONE ring.
That was a fluke ring if I ever saw one.
Lmao this right here is golden.
Trust me if you put that much thought into any season you would get similar results.
Exactly ? could say the same for the heat playin against a declining Boston team a young an inexperienced OKC team and D rose gettin hurt
The difference with this though is the Heat proved they could beat a healthy D. Rose led Bulls team
Yea they did the first yr when they lost in the finals but the next two they didn't have to deal with him and I felt the bulls had gotten better since the first matchup
The Heat did too plus by everyone's account they had actually learned to play together their 2nd year. -
Attention ?infamous114 wrote: »FlightKing wrote: »SancoTation wrote: »Cleveland had good chemistry idk about players cause even when they left for other teams they didn't match the same stats.
Wade>>>Mo Williams.
Mo Williams >>> Wade in THAT CLEVELAND SYSTEM. It just wasn't a championship system but winning 50+ games multiple seasons is damn good. Those Cavs were exciting back then. Mo has been a good player still , Anderson is straight but overall, yeah...they were better together with LeBron.
Describe to me this Cleveland system lol
Could've sworn Cleveland had big men who could rebound, pass and run the break with the guards. They did a lot of passing and movement after crossing half court and didn't really settle as much as Miami. The guards in Cleveland were all big shot makers and ate off the constant movement. When the game slowed down, so did their energy and efficiency which is why slower teams gave them problems if they got the advantage.
Also, Wade is not as good a deep shooter than Mo and that 3 ball is what made him so dangerous on that team. -
Attention ?ericb4prez wrote: »infamous114 wrote: »FlightKing wrote: »SancoTation wrote: »Cleveland had good chemistry idk about players cause even when they left for other teams they didn't match the same stats.
Wade>>>Mo Williams.
Mo Williams >>> Wade in THAT CLEVELAND SYSTEM. It just wasn't a championship system but winning 50+ games multiple seasons is damn good. Those Cavs were exciting back then. Mo has been a good player still , Anderson is straight but overall, yeah...they were better together with LeBron.
Describe to me this Cleveland system lol
Wether you believe it or not its similar to MIA system
Similar but not exactly working the same cause of the personnel. That's why I capitalized "THAT". I was meaning for that group of players. -
spacers and utiliy guys are being unappreciated never had a lack of shooting threats on those teams.. and currently legit get your own.. threats and shooters. its not simply about numbers and names.
-
yah he took that way overboard he should get banned till mo williams scores 25 in a game
-
Attention ?playmaker88 wrote: »yah he took that way overboard he should get banned till mo williams scores 25 in a game
That wasn't about Mo Williams now, it was Mo Williams then. And your post before this explained what I meant.
Stop skimming. Wade can't shoot long range. Mo was perfect for what Cleveland needed him to do then. -
Attention ?FlightKing wrote: »SancoTation wrote: »Cleveland had good chemistry idk about players cause even when they left for other teams they didn't match the same stats.
Wade>>>Mo Williams.
Mo Williams >>> Wade in THAT CLEVELAND SYSTEM.
@thatdamnjay ? like this should be a bannable offense.
I sonned you pages ago. You shouldn't be quoting me, ? . You and facts are at a crossroads. Change your name to Perpendicular, you "run and tell mommy" ass ? . If I do get banned, I'll send you a bottle of Nuvo and chocolates for you to delight over, ? ? . -
Hell yea, he rightwhats the overall point of this Cleveland cast vs Miami cast debate?
-
Hell yea, he rightalmighty breeze wrote: »whats the overall point of this Cleveland cast vs Miami cast debate?
Excellent question.
One i asked earlier in the thread and never got an answer to.
I believe it started as eric saying the cavs aren't as ? as were were making them out to be.
-
Attention ?FlightKing wrote: »FlightKing wrote: »SancoTation wrote: »Cleveland had good chemistry idk about players cause even when they left for other teams they didn't match the same stats.
Wade>>>Mo Williams.
Mo Williams >>> Wade in THAT CLEVELAND SYSTEM.
@thatdamnjay ? like this should be a bannable offense.
I sonned you pages ago. You shouldn't be quoting me, ? . You and facts are at a crossroads. Change your name to Perpendicular, you "run and tell mommy" ass ? . If I do get banned, I'll send you a bottle of Nuvo and chocolates for you to delight over, ? ? .
You just said Mo Williams at any point in his career was better than DWade. King of flights should probably take a flight and jump out of it after some ? like that.
Show me where I said that and make sure you don't cut out the "in THAT CLEVELAND SYSTEM" part.
This discussion has been closed.