Gentleman Would You Ever Try Out Being A Male ? /? ? (I Know It Sounds Crazy)
Options
Comments
-
YouthGorilla wrote: »YouthGorilla wrote: »YouthGorilla wrote: »
I bet you get absolutely no ? at all. Plus what does being a mixed lightskin have to do with being escorted by a ? ? Come on Pico you need to learn how to comprehend.1800skypager wrote: »
I'm a mixed lightskin, y'all ? will ? for ? that resembles me so I'll always have ? access.
You know you dont eeeen believe dat fam
Trust me if you got ? like you say you have you wouldn't be hating. Also, it's like you thirsty all the time no harm.
Look, either you gonna let me ? or you gonna keep it pushin b.
So, you sayin you a hoe? We know you ain't ? . You eithered yourself when you called yourself cheap.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JxsfEio0L8Y
You in a thread bout ? . So is you ? or not?
Sure i'll ? . This gotta be playin in da background doe.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PFjYNJiOXtA -
Yo I love that song
-
-
After watching 3 Seasons of HBOs "Hung", I'm good.
-
Honestly? No.
Too much ? floating around out here and too many crazy people. Not a good combination to get in the middle of. -
Pico arguing with a ? about ? .
That's a new one -
The user and all related content has been deleted.
-
not this again! wrote: »Honestly? No.
Too much ? floating around out here and too many crazy people. Not a good combination to get in the middle of.
LOLBlack_Samson wrote: »Its not about the sex.
Its about the companionship.
Yeah.......that's what they all say -
The user and all related content has been deleted.
-
Black_Samson wrote: »YouthGorilla wrote: »not this again! wrote: »Honestly? No.
Too much ? floating around out here and too many crazy people. Not a good combination to get in the middle of.
LOLBlack_Samson wrote: »Its not about the sex.
Its about the companionship.
Yeah.......that's what they all say
Any ? can get some ? .
But can they get a worth while companion that will sit and be their arm candy or company for a couple hours?
The ? aint at all about sex. They take you to parties and ? that youll never see otherwise and just listen to them talk.
Alright, that much is true though. -
lol damn tough crowd
-
To be real bruh, u said u were. ? in the other thread.
You should stick to something u actually know about because u make it painfully obvious with every post related to sex. -
no because all your clients are going to be old or fat or some deuce bigalow side show freaks "that's a huge ? !"
-
Too many of these ? on here are flabby, sick and ugly.
so you would pay to spend a night with a forrest whitaker lookalike such as myself. -
-
The senario you're suggesting doesn't exist ? . 99.9936% of women can get ? anytime of anyday with very little effort, I aint trying to meet the ? that has to pay for it.
Them money making Cali ? be doing that. They be sugar mommas. -
Sounds like a bad idea
one could only imagine the kind of revolting women that need to pay for sex -
Black_Samson wrote: »YouthGorilla wrote: »not this again! wrote: »Honestly? No.
Too much ? floating around out here and too many crazy people. Not a good combination to get in the middle of.
LOLBlack_Samson wrote: »Its not about the sex.
Its about the companionship.
Yeah.......that's what they all say
Any ? can get some ? .
But can they get a worth while companion that will sit and be their arm candy or company for a couple hours?
The ? aint at all about sex. They take you to parties and ? that youll never see otherwise and just listen to them talk.
Therapists make more than hookers
If she wanna yack my ear off it's extra -
The user and all related content has been deleted.
-
(tpkfa)Lamilton wrote: »no because all your clients are going to be old or fat or some deuce bigalow side show freaks "that's a huge ? !"
Yeah, but that ? could create a personal preference not wanting to have fat women. The guidelines could go: In shape, decent hygiene, women up to 53. That's how I would do my rules if I was a ? .. -
The user and all related content has been deleted.
-
Black_Samson wrote: »YouthGorilla wrote: »(tpkfa)Lamilton wrote: »no because all your clients are going to be old or fat or some deuce bigalow side show freaks "that's a huge ? !"
Yeah, but that ? could create a personal preference not wanting to have fat women. The guidelines could go: In shape, decent hygiene, women up to 53. That's how I would do my rules if I was a ? ..
you ? looking at it wrong.
You aint slangin ? .
You slangin charm, charisma and good conversation.
You arent the ones with the money so you wont be the ones making the demands.
You go where you are told.
Escorts make their own demands though. -
Nothing wrong with male escorting as long as you service women only. My time in the industry (escorting/dancing) put me in college. No regrets
-
If I would do it then it would be in shape women only or the one's who look decent.ReppinTime wrote: »Nothing wrong with male escorting as long as you service women only. My time in the industry (escorting/dancing) put me in college. No regrets
-
The user and all related content has been deleted.
![[Deleted User]](https://w1.vanillicon.com/v2/15efd8efe08bb34aae25f1808aaf5018.svg)
