Is terrorism an effective way to advance one cause?
Comments
-
kingblaze84 wrote: »LOL those settlers wanted to terrorize the Natives so they could frighten them into leaving so they could take their land, come on now.kingblaze84 wrote: »I said in war, all sides MOST of the time use terror tactics.
said it before and will say it again: are you telling me there's NO other terminology you can use to discuss this conflict aside from "terrorism?"
also, i don't get why you keep saying "GUYS HAVE WRITTEN BOOKS" as if this is a groundbreaking concept.kingblaze84 wrote: »Not only did Natives die from contracting diseases to which they had no built up immunity, settlers provided disease infested blankets to hasten their deaths.kingblaze84 wrote: »The Indian Removal Act was a form of terrorism, forcing innocent people off their land to make way for white settlers. Those who did not comply were killed or harmed in ways that frightened Native Americans into going along with the removal act.kingblaze84 wrote: »Genocide is the worst kind of terrorism
"genocide" isn't a strong enough term that you have to go "AND ALSO, TERRORISM" right after it?
this is why debating "terrorism" in 2016 sucks. everything, in every context, is "terrorism." come on, now. -
--People worldwide seem to have very interesting ideas on who the top terrorists of the world are. We already know how the Native Americans feel. -
People have interesting ideas on Religion, economics, politics. Don't make it right neither did it make you right.
-
kingblaze84 wrote: »--People worldwide seem to have very interesting ideas on who the top terrorists of the world are. We already know how the Native Americans feel.
also, please note your argument is now "if random guys wave a sign calling someone terrorists, that means it's terrorism" and consider how... unsupported that might be.kingblaze84 wrote: »We already know how the Native Americans feel.