Complexion For the Protection: Peyton Didnt Shake Hands After Saints SB Loss

Already Home_17 wrote: »

why are you so concerned with what others care about?

you don't care about the story but you care that others care?

you have a problem with ? simply pointing out foul behavior?

naw he got a issue cuz you dont agree with him...you shouldnt care because he doesnt..

Already Home_17 wrote: »

Shizlansky wrote: »

Already Home_17 wrote: »

why are you so concerned with what others care about?

you don't care about the story but you care that others care?

you have a problem with ? simply pointing out foul behavior?

No. You care what others think.

I've been around sports and ? that made it to the league to know they get special treatment, especially if they were stars.

Y'all talking bout some ? that happen 20 years ago. Media wasn't a big as it is now.

The Cam newton ? at Florida didn't even get that much attention. The ? at AU with Cam got more attention but faded quick.

i remember Faulk and LT talking bout the things they did in school. They wouldn't have a job on the NFL network.

Star players and rich professionals get special treatment. We all know this.

Mike Tyson admitted to knocking out old ppl and taking their things.

Greg Hardy beat his ? and played football the next year.

Y'all want ppl to get fired or ? over for every little thing.

who the ? is y'all though? don't group my thoughts on the situation with what other ? think

it ain't about him or anybody else being fired. the ? are you talking about?

why can't I point out players being in the wrong? especially when....wait for it....they're wrong?

? didn't you verbally emasculate cam last week for not falling on a loose ball in the super bowl? but somehow calling Peyton wrong for ? his trainer is going too far?

Ain't nobody said going to far.

Point is, special players get special treatment.

R.D. wrote: »

Y'all ? seem more offended that some people don't care and don't think it's a big deal at this point

You can't condemn a man for some ? he did as a child...writing articles and discussing it now is corny...they should have been on it when it happened

what's supposed to come out of this?

this whole thing resurfaced due to a lawsuit filed against the university of Tennessee alleging they violated title 9 regulations, ignored sexual assaults conducted by student athletes, etc.

mannings name was cited in the lawsuit.

the incident with peyton and his trainer has been news. it's been talked about on this forum and in mannings book 13 years ago. it wasn't a HUGE story 20 years ago, but if it has taken place today things might've been different. this is news to some, not all. I just found out last year

also, 20 year olds are children now?

On Saturday, we released a 74-page court documentfiled by Dr. Jamie Naughright's lawyers detailing the complex case of how the life and career of the fomer Director of Health & Wellness for Men's Athletics at the University of Tennessee, were ruined by Peyton Manning, Archie Manning and the university.

In the wake of this release, countless pundits and platforms have repeatedly made one key error - they have erroneously reported that the document we released was "one-sided" or was just "one woman's thoughts" on the case. This is not only an egregious misrepresentation of what we released, it causes me to sincerely question the motives of anyone who says such a thing.

KING: PEYTON'S SQUEAKY-CLEAN IMAGE BUILT ON STACK OF LIES

What follows will be a summary of the essential facts of the case included in the court document from Polk County, Fla., we released on Saturday and from other statements which have been released on the case. The Polk County court document, again, is posted in full below.

1. When Peyton and Archie Manning spoke about Dr. Jamie Naughright in their book, "The Mannings," they violated an agreement that was in place with the University of Tennessee not to speak about her or the incidents involving her at the university.

Since what we released on Saturday did include my own narrative summary and thoughts of the document, today I'd like for us to simply drill down to the facts.

2. Dr. Jamie Naughright sued Peyton Manning, Archie Manning, their ghostwriter, and the publisher of the book, Harper-Collins, for defaming her character - which she said cost her a brand new job that she had landed at Florida Southern.

3. Peyton Manning filed a motion to have her lawsuit thrown out.

Now, this next fact is perhaps the most important in the entire case that has been released thus far to debunk the notion that what we're dealing with here is one opinion from one writer or one side from one victim.

4. Polk County Circuit Judge Harvey A. Kornstein not only denied the motion from the Manning family but blasted Peyton Manning, his father, and the others, ruling a jury could find there was "clear and convincing evidence" the Mannings lied. In his statement, he said:

"Even if the plaintiff is a public figure, the evidence of record contains sufficient evidence to satisfy the court that a genuine issue of material fact exists that would allow a jury to find, by clear and convincing evidence, the existence of actual malice of the part of the defendants."

"Specifically, there is evidence of record, substantial enough to suggest that the defendants knew that the passages in question were false, or acted in reckless disregard of their falsity. There is evidence of record to suggest that there were obvious reasons to doubt the veracity of Peyton Manning's account of the incident in question. The court further finds that there is sufficient evidence to permit the conclusion that the defendants entertained serious doubts as to the truth of the passages in this case."

Judge Harvey Kornstein did not arrive at his conclusion that "clear and convincing" evidence of malice existed because one woman said it did, but because there was substantial evidence to prove such a thing.

PEYTON MANNING INCIDENT CITED IN NEW LAWSUIT

Now, let's explore that evidence.

In their book, and later under oath, the Manning family recalled a "favor" that Peyton Manning did for Dr. Jamie Naughright. This "favor" is an essential story because it was the only time that Manning could actually recall Dr. Jamie Naughright being "? ." Manning described in his book and under oath a time when he and four other athletes traveled to a conference in Virginia together. At that conference, he stated that Dr. Naughright asked him to give the four younger students a ride somewhere. According to Manning, when she asked him, she called the students "motherf

---

s."

Peyton was able to have an amazing career and pretty much go out on top with a super bowl ring. People are mad because that happened, but you have guys who can't even catch a break. Jameis Winston made headlines for yelling ? her right in the ? but Peyton laying his nuts on a chicks head gets buried. Personally I think it's too late for this ? because Peyton can pretty much dissapear now but it's whatever.

He deserves all the fire he is getting.

But he did it to himself.

For committing the act.
For lying and vigorously lying about the act.
Trying to undermine her credibility by lyin about her charater and implying she was ? ? .
By rehashing the ? in a book.. When it was settled and he assaulted her character.

Manning got carried to both his rings