White Girl Sexts Black Classmate And He Gets Arrested

MR.CJ
MR.CJ Members Posts: 64,689 ✭✭✭✭✭
Levar Allen is a 17-year-old standout three-sport student athlete at Parkway High School in south Bossier City, La.

An award-winning wrestler, football and basketball player, Levar is beloved at school and in the community. He's never been in trouble with the law a day in his life — until now.
Levar did what millions of kids in America are doing — he exchanged naked text messages with a 16-year-old classmate.

First, she sent Levar a nude video and then he sent her one in return. Call it gross, but a recent study found that 54% of kids under the age of 18 have done so before.

Parents may hate it, but when it's consensual, it's definitely safer than in-person intercourse.




kinglevar28n-1-web.jpg





Levar Allen's mother claims her son was discriminated against after the 17-year-old, found sexting a fellow teenager who is white, was arrested and charged with possession of child pornography.

But Levar lives in the deep South. He's black. And it appears his biggest mistake wasn't doing what the majority of American teens have done. His biggest mistake was doing so with a white girl.

Her parents called the police when they discovered what was happening. Of course, they arrested Levar and he was charged with contributing to the delinquency of a juvenile and possession of child pornography for the video he still had of her on his phone.

Yes, she's 16 and he's 17.
Yes, she sent him a video first.
Yes, this was consensual.
Yes they attend the same high school together.
Yes, this is a bogus symptom of the mass criminalization of black folk in the New Jim Crow.

When pressed on whether or not race played a role, Lt. Bill Davis, who is also white, seemed offended and told KSLA-TV, "I have nothing to say about that. It doesn't matter what your race, what your religion, what your ethnicity, don't do child pornography! Plain and simple."

Except a 16-year-old and 17-year-old in the same school consensually sending each other sexual videos of themselves isn't child pornography.

In Louisiana, the law states that anyone under the age of 17 found to be sexting any person of any age can be charged with a misdemeanor. It's not widely prosecuted. If a 17 year old, even if they are in high school together, does the very same thing, with a 16 year old, they can be charged with with child pornography. The law lacks the nuance it deserves and ultimately criminalizes common youth misbehavior between peers.

Now, this young man faces the prospect of having a criminal record and his mother is having to scrape together every single dime she can find, $4,000 already, just to defend him from these outrageous charges.





kinglevar28n-2-web.jpg





Chasity Washington maintains that a 16-year-old teenager sent her son sexually explicit videos first.

Of course race has everything to do with Levar Allen being charged with these trumped-up crimes.
Millions upon millions of teenagers are doing this very thing and he was selectively targeted among them, and made an example of, because he crossed a line that clearly irritated not only her white parents but white law enforcement officers as well.

Charges should be dropped against this young man and his mother, a single mom of three, should be reimbursed for all of the needless expenses of this charade.

Beyond that, these laws must be adjusted to have nuance for normal sexual behaviors between two consenting 16 and 17-year-old kids.




http://www.nydailynews.com/news/national/king-black-boy-sexting-white-girl-ends-child-porn-charge-article-1.2617742
«1

Comments

  • zzombie
    zzombie Members Posts: 11,280 ✭✭✭✭✭
    when i told you idiots that the age of consent should be 16 so many of you fools had a problem with it
  • powerman 5000
    powerman 5000 Members Posts: 3,084 ✭✭✭✭✭
    This should go under the "romeo and juliet exception" It would if they just smashed. Who calls the police when they find out their daughter is a ? ? I mean really... He got sent up because she sent him a picture... smh..
  • S2J
    S2J Members Posts: 28,458 ✭✭✭✭✭
    She need to set that gofundme up
  • zzombie
    zzombie Members Posts: 11,280 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Kat wrote: »
    zzombie wrote: »
    when i told you idiots that the age of consent should be 16 so many of you fools had a problem with it

    The age of consent is fine as is, however charging a minor one year older than his"victim" for some ? SHE initiated is utter ? .

    I just don't get how the parents, much less law enforcement, can rationalize taking these measures against a boy..get your fast ass daughter.

    no it's not fine as it is because if it was this young man would not be in trouble.
  • S2J
    S2J Members Posts: 28,458 ✭✭✭✭✭
    zzombie wrote: »
    Kat wrote: »
    zzombie wrote: »
    when i told you idiots that the age of consent should be 16 so many of you fools had a problem with it

    The age of consent is fine as is, however charging a minor one year older than his"victim" for some ? SHE initiated is utter ? .

    I just don't get how the parents, much less law enforcement, can rationalize taking these measures against a boy..get your fast ass daughter.

    no it's not fine as it is because if it was this young man would not be in trouble.

    That still wouldnt address,ie, a 16 year old sexting a 15 year old, which is just as common. Its not the consent age, its the proximity in age. As it stands u can be charged for ? if u mess with a chick in the same class as you, who a month ago was the same age as you, etc
  • Kat
    Kat Members Posts: 50,667 ✭✭✭✭✭
    zzombie wrote: »
    Kat wrote: »
    zzombie wrote: »
    when i told you idiots that the age of consent should be 16 so many of you fools had a problem with it

    The age of consent is fine as is, however charging a minor one year older than his"victim" for some ? SHE initiated is utter ? .

    I just don't get how the parents, much less law enforcement, can rationalize taking these measures against a boy..get your fast ass daughter.

    no it's not fine as it is because if it was this young man would not be in trouble.

    Okay so when it's a 14 yo involved maybe the age of consent should be reconsidered again at that time.

    18 is fine for an across the board age of consent, however we're dealing with two minors in this case and it was clearly consensual participation. It's clear racist emotions clouded the logical adult minds here.
  • LPast
    LPast Members Posts: 4,546 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Interesting times were facing. Seems like parenting is going to get more difficult.
  • Maximus Rex
    Maximus Rex Members Posts: 6,354 ✭✭✭✭✭
    I have to add this to my "Ain't White Privilege a Muthafucka," thread.
    Kat wrote: »
    I just don't get how the parents, much less law enforcement, can rationalize taking these measures against a boy..get your fast ass daughter.

    Simple Katie, we live under a system systemic white supremacy. Racist white supremacists have been doing this ? to black people since the Bacon Rebellion. With that being said, white supremacist has never missed an opportunity to give black males criminal records.

    Again, we see the feckless nature of our so-called "black leadership." Where the hue and cry that this thot be arrested also? There needs to be marches, boycotts, and hints at the threat of violence behind this fuckery.


  • Valentinez A. Kaiser
    Valentinez A. Kaiser Members Posts: 9,028 ✭✭✭✭✭
    If he's being charged then why isn't the girl too?
  • zzombie
    zzombie Members Posts: 11,280 ✭✭✭✭✭
    S2J wrote: »
    zzombie wrote: »
    Kat wrote: »
    zzombie wrote: »
    when i told you idiots that the age of consent should be 16 so many of you fools had a problem with it

    The age of consent is fine as is, however charging a minor one year older than his"victim" for some ? SHE initiated is utter ? .

    I just don't get how the parents, much less law enforcement, can rationalize taking these measures against a boy..get your fast ass daughter.

    no it's not fine as it is because if it was this young man would not be in trouble.

    That still wouldnt address,ie, a 16 year old sexting a 15 year old, which is just as common. Its not the consent age, its the proximity in age. As it stands u can be charged for ? if u mess with a chick in the same class as you, who a month ago was the same age as you, etc

    the age of consent would be 16 but 16 nor 15 year olds would be considered adults nor would they be able to be charged with any adult crime. So a 16 year old ? a 15 years old girl would not be a crime, a 40 year old ? a 16 year old would also not be a crime because she could consent.

    they can charge this boy with child pornography because he is not legally seen as a minor, once you commit a crime the law sees you as an adult and what i am saying is that this is wrong. If you were a minor before you commit a crime you should not be seen as an adult after the crime is committed.
  • zzombie
    zzombie Members Posts: 11,280 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Kat wrote: »
    zzombie wrote: »
    Kat wrote: »
    zzombie wrote: »
    when i told you idiots that the age of consent should be 16 so many of you fools had a problem with it

    The age of consent is fine as is, however charging a minor one year older than his"victim" for some ? SHE initiated is utter ? .

    I just don't get how the parents, much less law enforcement, can rationalize taking these measures against a boy..get your fast ass daughter.

    no it's not fine as it is because if it was this young man would not be in trouble.

    Okay so when it's a 14 yo involved maybe the age of consent should be reconsidered again at that time.

    18 is fine for an across the board age of consent, however we're dealing with two minors in this case and it was clearly consensual participation. It's clear racist emotions clouded the logical adult minds here.

    No the age of will just be set at 16 and that's it and the law no longer sees you are a minor once you do certain crimes.
  • jono
    jono Members Posts: 30,280 ✭✭✭✭✭
    He technically had child porn so...

    There needs to be some sort of amendment on the age but at the same time if he did actually distribute it (by putting it online or sending it to his friends) then the law would be legit.

  • ChillaDaGawd
    ChillaDaGawd Members Posts: 12,021 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Betta leave these stank ass beckys alone
  • gns
    gns Members Posts: 21,285 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Kat wrote: »
    zzombie wrote: »
    when i told you idiots that the age of consent should be 16 so many of you fools had a problem with it

    The age of consent is fine as is, however charging a minor one year older than his"victim" for some ? SHE initiated is utter ? .

    I just don't get how the parents, much less law enforcement, can rationalize taking these measures against a boy..get your fast ass daughter.

    Youd have to put black in front of 'boy' in your last sentence then it should make sense to u.

    Saw people discussing this earlier. Shawty definitely needs a gofundme and some media attention, this is ?
  • GodNThaBuild'n
    GodNThaBuild'n Members Posts: 8,217 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Damn I was just having this discussion at court. These white ? will be the end of tha black man.
  • JokerzWyld
    JokerzWyld Members Posts: 5,483 ✭✭✭✭✭
    It's racism and sexism. Why didn't they arrest her for ADMITTINGLY sending the nudes?
  • GodNThaBuild'n
    GodNThaBuild'n Members Posts: 8,217 ✭✭✭✭✭
    The ? is wrong with ? in first place. Ain't no way in hell I'd send a pic of my ? . ? gotta see in person
  • Chi Snow
    Chi Snow Guests, Members, Writer, Content Producer Posts: 28,111 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Smash on the moms
  • iron man1
    iron man1 Members Posts: 29,989 ✭✭✭✭✭
    If he's being charged then why isn't the girl too?

    Her skin tone isn't a darker shade
  • GodNThaBuild'n
    GodNThaBuild'n Members Posts: 8,217 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Cain wrote: »
    If he was 21 and up adult male I could see the charge but dude is a child himself smh at that charge following him the rest of his life. Oddly enough in the South age of consent in most states is 16yrs old. Hopefully this get thrown out and off the young man's record.

    More then likely he'll have a white judge, with a white jury of his "peers".
  • The Lonious Monk
    The Lonious Monk Members Posts: 26,258 ✭✭✭✭✭
    twizza 77 wrote: »
    She should be arrested by that same logic. But she's the victim. ?

    Well if the article is to believed, she's not guilty of the same thing. Since she's 16, she's only guilty of a misdemeanor. It would be interesting to know if she was even charged with that much.