Tariq Nasheed Is On Fox News Again 12/20/16

245

Comments

  • CapitalB
    CapitalB Members Posts: 24,556 ✭✭✭✭✭
    7figz wrote: »
    brown321 wrote: »

    He actually destroyed Tucker in this one...

    as much as one can when being constantly interrupted and talked over racist ass Faux news.

    Cool guess I'll watch this one then. Cuz I wasn't impressed with the first one

    nah.. he fell for the okie doke again. smmfh
  • semi-auto-mato
    semi-auto-mato Members Posts: 2,833 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Ok I'm going to assume there is gonna be a Rd 3. Rd 1 was debatable. It was a long thread and ? was riding for tariq. The race casino line was good. So I'm in a generous mood tonight so I will give Rd 1 to tariq by the smallest of margins.

    Rd 2 is Tucker. No debate! That ? got ugly when he started reading ? from Tariq's book. Now I know some of y'all ride for Tariq but nope not this time. Rd 2 is not debatable.

    In Rd 3 Tariq is gonna have to do some subtitles, translations, and do which room I'm in. We shall see.

  • CapitalB
    CapitalB Members Posts: 24,556 ✭✭✭✭✭
    @Black_Samson called it in the other thread..
    ever since this ? got visited by the FEDs he's been out to destroy whatever it is u ? say he so called contributed to the black community..

    ? has been acting like a bumbling idiot.
  • JDSTAYWITIT
    JDSTAYWITIT Members Posts: 12,910 ✭✭✭✭✭
    this ? need to stick to teaching these sqaures how to "MACK" our beautiful black queens ...and leave the intellectual world alone or to someone more qualified ...talking about some damn Afrocentric nonsense ... creating an economic base for black people??? and white supremacy?? ? PLEASE... i totally agree with tucker carlson .... he brings the exact type of truth that im looking for when it comes to these kinds of exchanges ... and thats why he clearly dominated this pathetic attempt at a debate ... maybe next time he drags his prosperity pimping ass on a real news network like FOX ... he'll bring some facts, logic and articulation like TUCKER just showed you how to do!
  • Swiffness!
    Swiffness! Members Posts: 10,128 ✭✭✭✭✭
    this ? need to stick to teaching these sqaures how to "MACK" our beautiful black queens ...and leave the intellectual world alone or to someone more qualified ...talking about some damn Afrocentric nonsense ... creating an economic base for black people??? and white supremacy?? ? PLEASE... i totally agree with tucker carlson .... he brings the exact type of truth that im looking for when it comes to these kinds of exchanges ... and thats why he clearly dominated this pathetic attempt at a debate ... maybe next time he drags his prosperity pimping ass on a real news network like FOX ... he'll bring some facts, logic and articulation like TUCKER just showed you how to do!

    I actually was a big fan of Tucker Carlson's MSNBC show in 2006 because he was trashing Dubya and the Iraq War every day. He'd bring Bush supporters on there and pick them apart. He can be one of the smarter conservatives on TV, has a anti-drug war libertarian streak, and has always been good at outflanking hardline types in a debate. That "white supremacy" deflection @2:46 was embarrassing.

    Tucker's website is racist clickbait trash tho. Tariq should mention that.
  • JDSTAYWITIT
    JDSTAYWITIT Members Posts: 12,910 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Swiffness! wrote: »
    this ? need to stick to teaching these sqaures how to "MACK" our beautiful black queens ...and leave the intellectual world alone or to someone more qualified ...talking about some damn Afrocentric nonsense ... creating an economic base for black people??? and white supremacy?? ? PLEASE... i totally agree with tucker carlson .... he brings the exact type of truth that im looking for when it comes to these kinds of exchanges ... and thats why he clearly dominated this pathetic attempt at a debate ... maybe next time he drags his prosperity pimping ass on a real news network like FOX ... he'll bring some facts, logic and articulation like TUCKER just showed you how to do!

    I actually was a big fan of Tucker Carlson's MSNBC show in 2006 because he was trashing Dubya and the Iraq War every day. He'd bring Bush supporters on there and pick them apart. He can be one of the smarter conservatives on TV, has a anti-drug war libertarian streak, and has always been good at outflanking hardline types in a debate. That "white supremacy" deflection @2:46 was embarrassing.

    Tucker's website is racist clickbait trash tho. Tariq should mention that.

    Oh i hear you ... ive been a fan of all off tuckers work since the CROSSFIRE days .... it was pretty obvious that this "MACK" should be more worried about the next players ball and leave the intellectual conversations to people more qualified like these fox news host....white supremacy this white supremacy that ... blah blah blah aint nobody tryna hear that ? .. people like TUCKER know that ? is a myth... you see how he just owned his black ass??
  • (ob)Scene
    (ob)Scene Members Posts: 4,729 ✭✭✭✭✭
    If we're being straight up and judging this as a debate then you're borderline ? if you think Tucker won that.

    Let's examine the quote.

    Trump has appointed people to his cabinet from the alt-right--**COMMA: what is the alt-right?**--a white supremacists sect that literally throws up ? salutes.

    That there is a factual statement. With a basic understanding of punctuation and sentence structure you can establish that no where in the tweet does he even begin to insinuate that Bannon himself was throwing up ? salutes.

    Then to deflect w/ the macking stuff is basically throwing in a white towel on the topic at hand in an effort to save face.
  • 7figz
    7figz Members Posts: 15,294 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited December 2016
    (ob)Scene wrote: »
    If we're being straight up and judging this as a debate then you're borderline ? if you think Tucker won that.

    Let's examine the quote.

    Trump has appointed people to his cabinet from the alt-right--**COMMA: what is the alt-right?**--a white supremacists sect that literally throws up ? salutes.

    That there is a factual statement. With a basic understanding of punctuation and sentence structure you can establish that no where in the tweet does he even begin to insinuate that Bannon himself was throwing up ? salutes.

    Then to deflect w/ the macking stuff is basically throwing in a white towel on the topic at hand in an effort to save face.

    Exactly how I see it. Also if Tareeq is saying his book is satirical, then it's even further foolishness to bring it into the discussion.
  • kzzl
    kzzl Members Posts: 7,548 ✭✭✭✭✭
    (ob)Scene wrote: »
    If we're being straight up and judging this as a debate then you're borderline ? if you think Tucker won that.

    Let's examine the quote.

    Trump has appointed people to his cabinet from the alt-right--**COMMA: what is the alt-right?**--a white supremacists sect that literally throws up ? salutes.

    That there is a factual statement. With a basic understanding of punctuation and sentence structure you can establish that no where in the tweet does he even begin to insinuate that Bannon himself was throwing up ? salutes.

    Then to deflect w/ the macking stuff is basically throwing in a white towel on the topic at hand in an effort to save face.

    These people want to feel some type of way, they don't care about that.
  • Max.
    Max. Members Posts: 33,009 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Taqueef was shook when he brought up the book


    Lmaooo
  • leftcoastkev
    leftcoastkev Members Posts: 6,232 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited December 2016
    Be objective here....

    From beginning to end Tucker made Tariq....
    1. Backtrack on about the Tweet
    2. Deflect about the Tweet at length
    3. Backtrack on his book and even worst declare that his book and "the game" in it to be learned was tongue and cheek and comedy (albeit many non-squares already knew his "game" was comedy).
    4. Based on #3, he himself just publicly undercut the legitimacy his own platform and all of "the game" he advises on.
    5. In my opinion, based on all of the above Tucker pulled his "player" card.

    The only point Tariq made was on the Ben Carson question.

    Here's the thing..there is NO upside to go on Fox News trying to ? "win"..the only point is self promotion....It's not even about logic...it's about framing and perception. You can try to logically decipher ? and look for the fact of being right or wrong...but if you're made to look wrong you lose legitimacy in the eyes of the public.

    At this point Tariq is being made to look like he's throwing stones from a glass house. The more he appears on these shows the more it usurps any legitimacy he has with people. There's no way Tariq can spin this ? (although he WILL try but ppl will see right through it).


    On a side note....I wonder if Fox News will ever trot out that goofy ass ? Tommy to go against Tariq on a panel. ? would be tragically hilarious.

  • 5th Letter
    5th Letter Members, Moderators, Writer Posts: 37,068 Regulator
    (ob)Scene wrote: »
    If we're being straight up and judging this as a debate then you're borderline ? if you think Tucker won that.

    Let's examine the quote.

    Trump has appointed people to his cabinet from the alt-right--**COMMA: what is the alt-right?**--a white supremacists sect that literally throws up ? salutes.

    That there is a factual statement. With a basic understanding of punctuation and sentence structure you can establish that no where in the tweet does he even begin to insinuate that Bannon himself was throwing up ? salutes.

    Then to deflect w/ the macking stuff is basically throwing in a white towel on the topic at hand in an effort to save face.

    Once he brought up the quotes from the book it was ova, checkmate Tucker!!! anytime someone is having a debate involving Tariq just bring up one of his books and that will always win you the argument.
  • 1800skypager
    1800skypager Members Posts: 671 ✭✭✭✭
    Never was a fan of Tariq but this is the last straw. Tariq has to be getting some kind of financial compensation by the very same white people he says he is against, or he is a ? . I wouldn't be surprised at the former and hope he is a ? , but I don't think a ? should be the "representative" of our people.

    LOL @ him calling his books satire. He was right about one thing in that interview, his "game" is comical, lol.
  • leftcoastkev
    leftcoastkev Members Posts: 6,232 ✭✭✭✭✭
    ugh.. @leftcoastkev couldnt even get thru 30seconds of that. :joy: :joy:


    It's a wild world fam. I ran across this. I'm aware.

    Figured I'd toss it out there for the hell of it. Maybe I should start rhyming when I'm talking too, lol.

    yeh and i know that weird ass ? im ashamed to say. lol
    he wasnt always like this..

    its a Chicago thing i guess..
    sad ? his moms passed (rest her soul) and he aint been the same since..


    I dunno. Losing ya mom is a tough pill to stomach. I hope I'm the same person after that inevitably happens in my life.

    Watched a few of his vids since. Drops gems here and there. From the outside looking in...ain't too bad.

    He killing me with the "spectacular vernacular" tho....and 3 piece suits at the kitchen table. I'mma give him the benefit of the doubt and chalk it up to being presentation for the broads.

  • fortyacres
    fortyacres Members, Moderators Posts: 4,480 Regulator
    He just dont know when to quit.
  • playmaker88
    playmaker88 Members Posts: 67,905 ✭✭✭✭✭
    fortyacres wrote: »
    He just dont know when to quit.

    ? were replaced as the target of the subject of the mack.. but he loooooooooooves me

    and ? talk that ? about jesse and al sharpton.. let em have it though..
  • xxCivicxx
    xxCivicxx Members Posts: 6,927 ✭✭✭✭✭
    jetlifebih wrote: »
    He's a podcast host..not a political scientist......doesn't take away hidden colors and his contributions....

    It's misinformation all throughout hidden colors...

    ? was all about getting negroes to get in they emotions...wether that was to make ? feel good or to make them angry.


    Can you please post up what was misinformation and then correct it? Thanks

    It seems like a lot of you enjoy speaking in vague generalities
  • xxCivicxx
    xxCivicxx Members Posts: 6,927 ✭✭✭✭✭
    jetlifebih wrote: »
    jetlifebih wrote: »
    He's a podcast host..not a political scientist......doesn't take away hidden colors and his contributions....

    It's misinformation all throughout hidden colors...

    ? was all about getting negroes to get in they emotions...wether that was to make ? feel good or to make them angry.


    Where exactly did you find the misinformation and what is the correct information regarding that error?

    https://youtu.be/SsavmtsD6Oc

    13781667_898797593559852_285264397939149106_n.jpg




    I'm gonna watch this, but this post doesn't answer my question at all

    What specifically in HC is incorrect? The vid you posted doesn't seem to be a refutation of HC
  • xxCivicxx
    xxCivicxx Members Posts: 6,927 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Ok I'm going to assume there is gonna be a Rd 3. Rd 1 was debatable. It was a long thread and ? was riding for tariq. The race casino line was good. So I'm in a generous mood tonight so I will give Rd 1 to tariq by the smallest of margins.

    Rd 2 is Tucker. No debate! That ? got ugly when he started reading ? from Tariq's book. Now I know some of y'all ride for Tariq but nope not this time. Rd 2 is not debatable.

    In Rd 3 Tariq is gonna have to do some subtitles, translations, and do which room I'm in. We shall see.

    I don't understand what his books from over a decade ago have to do with his statements on trump

    Y'all pulled the same ? in the last thread and it baffled me
  • CapitalB
    CapitalB Members Posts: 24,556 ✭✭✭✭✭
    ugh.. @leftcoastkev couldnt even get thru 30seconds of that. :joy: :joy:


    It's a wild world fam. I ran across this. I'm aware.

    Figured I'd toss it out there for the hell of it. Maybe I should start rhyming when I'm talking too, lol.

    yeh and i know that weird ass ? im ashamed to say. lol
    he wasnt always like this..

    its a Chicago thing i guess..
    sad ? his moms passed (rest her soul) and he aint been the same since..


    I dunno. Losing ya mom is a tough pill to stomach. I hope I'm the same person after that inevitably happens in my life.

    Watched a few of his vids since. Drops gems here and there. From the outside looking in...ain't too bad.

    He killing me with the "spectacular vernacular" tho....and 3 piece suits at the kitchen table. I'mma give him the benefit of the doubt and chalk it up to being presentation for the broads.

    lol yeh..
    the spectacular vernacular masterpiece mouthpiece whatever the ? he be sayin he been sayin.. for a minute..

    and the suits he been doin for years..always the same 3..now that he got a lil money i think its up to 6 now wit better quality. hahaha

    he's actually a smart cat.. but we fell out after his moms passing.. ? changed and went into character mode.. he dont know if he wants to be a preacher or a ? amd makin the ? look bad in the process..

    almost like this Tariq ? ...
  • xxCivicxx
    xxCivicxx Members Posts: 6,927 ✭✭✭✭✭
    xxCivicxx wrote: »
    jetlifebih wrote: »
    jetlifebih wrote: »
    He's a podcast host..not a political scientist......doesn't take away hidden colors and his contributions....

    It's misinformation all throughout hidden colors...

    ? was all about getting negroes to get in they emotions...wether that was to make ? feel good or to make them angry.


    Where exactly did you find the misinformation and what is the correct information regarding that error?

    https://youtu.be/SsavmtsD6Oc

    13781667_898797593559852_285264397939149106_n.jpg




    I'm gonna watch this, but this post doesn't answer my question at all

    What specifically in HC is incorrect? The vid you posted doesn't seem to be a refutation of HC

    https://youtu.be/e5R6PzZ5lSw

    Ok I'll check this out
  • Will Munny
    Will Munny Members Posts: 30,199 ✭✭✭✭✭
    They did a better job having civil conversation than the first go around.
  • Elzo69Renaissance
    Elzo69Renaissance Members Posts: 50,708 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Tariq takes an L on this one....? is becoming hard to watch ....but low key is this ? becoming a contributor to Carlson s show?
  • Elzo69Renaissance
    Elzo69Renaissance Members Posts: 50,708 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Cain wrote: »
    Man ? this ? . I keep telling you nignogs he's a sham but but but but he made Hidden Colors he know what he talking about. KYS

    U have now been marked for assassination lmao