Pizzagate, this ? is crazy
Options
Comments
-
janklow 's answers only seem real when you didnt read all the convos's smh lol I been the one providing a bunch of videos explaining and showing all types of evidences that you should at least take time to evaluate for yourself! YOU are the one always just shutting down the whole concept as if it was fake nomatter what.I'm not saying that you have to believe everything but at least be able to admit that ? is possible and needs a better look because it is discusting and even some actors ( corey haim or cory feldman ;two young famous actors from the 80's who were in alot of movies together) said that ? was big in Hollywood ,so its not impossible at all that that that ? could be going on when you look at all the evidence so far .
? I even showed you videos where you see joe Bidden groping girls at the white house live in front of the ? camera and you didnt respond to that! hahah its cool tho ,do you but you see through, bra(h) (double entendre ) hahaha -
you've shown a bunch of videos supporting the PIZZAGATE claims?Ether44mag wrote: »janklow 's answers only seem real when you didnt read all the convos's smh lol I been the one providing a bunch of videos explaining and showing all types of evidences that you should at least take time to evaluate for yourself-
okay, i'm going to say this again, because you're being willfully dense.Ether44mag wrote: »I'm not saying that you have to believe everything but at least be able to admit that ? is possible and needs a better look because it is discusting and even some actors ( corey haim or cory feldman ;two young famous actors from the 80's who were in alot of movies together) said that ? was big in Hollywood ,so its not impossible at all that that that ? could be going on when you look at all the evidence so far .
saying pedophiles are real != all the Pizzagate claims are real
saying Corey Haim got molested != all or any of the Pizzagate claims are real
seriously, you're telling me that i should take anything you claim involving a ? seriously because at some time, somewhere, a real ? molested someone. what does that have to do with supporting the Pizzagate story?
and if THIS is the quality of your argument, then why am i supposed to take your gibberish seriously?
what the ? does this have to do with Pizzagate?Ether44mag wrote: »? I even showed you videos where you see joe Bidden groping girls at the white house live in front of the ? camera and you didnt respond to that!
-
? you mean : "what the ? does this have to do with Pizzagate? " ????? why you keep shuting the ? down if you have no idea what its about ???
-
again, tell me what Joe Biden groping someone has to do with supporting your Pizzagate claims.Ether44mag wrote: »? you mean : "what the ? does this have to do with Pizzagate? " ????? why you keep shuting the ? down if you have no idea what its about ???
it's not my responsibility to argue Pizzagate isn't real. it's your responsibility to argue that it IS. and bringing up things that don't support that claim, well, don't support that claim.
-
again, tell me what Joe Biden groping someone has to do with supporting your Pizzagate claims.Ether44mag wrote: »? you mean : "what the ? does this have to do with Pizzagate? " ????? why you keep shuting the ? down if you have no idea what its about ???
it's not my responsibility to argue Pizzagate isn't real. it's your responsibility to argue that it IS. and bringing up things that don't support that claim, well, don't support that claim.
simple ,watch the videos I put in the post! damn you a funny guy ,pizzagate is about pedophiles that are linked to people in the white house ,the clintons barack and joe biden ,joe bidden posted his friendship bracelet he made for him and barack and he has a slice of pizza on the bracelet ,for all the other info and evidence watch the gottdamn videos -
if it's so simple, why can't you simply express all the proof contained in these videos?Ether44mag wrote: »simple ,watch the videos I put in the post! -
if it's so simple, why can't you simply express all the proof contained in these videos?Ether44mag wrote: »simple ,watch the videos I put in the post!
what ?? dont go full ? please you are starting to sound mad incoherent now ,first you say its ? , then you say its overcomplicated ,then you ask what Joe biden got to do with it ,and then you asking me to write down everything that is mentionned in the video ? hahah why ? just watch it ,if you dont care about the thing then get the ? out the thread ! you cannot give your opinion and say its ? if you did not watch the video I put in the thread...why the ? would I write everything down when you can just watch it ?
stop arguing with me ,you will only keep exposing yourself -
note: slinging insults doesn't actually lend any support to your argument.Ether44mag wrote: »what ?? dont go full ? -
you DO realize that something that can "? " and "overcomplicated" at the same time, right? so about someone sounding incoherent...Ether44mag wrote: »please you are starting to sound mad incoherent now ,first you say its ? , then you say its overcomplicated-
weird how you can't just simply say what he has to do with it even now.Ether44mag wrote: »then you ask what Joe biden got to do with it
no, i'll repeat myself: "if it's so simple, why can't you simply express all the proof contained in these videos?"Ether44mag wrote: »-and then you asking me to write down everything that is mentionned in the video ?
yeah, i'll post where i want, when i want. if you're so afraid of that, support your claims or shut the ? up.Ether44mag wrote: »stop arguing with me ,you will only keep exposing yourself -
note: slinging insults doesn't actually lend any support to your argument.Ether44mag wrote: »what ?? dont go full ? -
you DO realize that something that can "? " and "overcomplicated" at the same time, right? so about someone sounding incoherent...Ether44mag wrote: »please you are starting to sound mad incoherent now ,first you say its ? , then you say its overcomplicated-
weird how you can't just simply say what he has to do with it even now.Ether44mag wrote: »then you ask what Joe biden got to do with it
no, i'll repeat myself: "if it's so simple, why can't you simply express all the proof contained in these videos?"Ether44mag wrote: »-and then you asking me to write down everything that is mentionned in the video ?
yeah, i'll post where i want, when i want. if you're so afraid of that, support your claims or shut the ? up.Ether44mag wrote: »stop arguing with me ,you will only keep exposing yourself
lol what are my claims ? you the one claiming its fake and impossible and total ? without even watching the videos lol all i'm saying is that ? is totally possible when you look at the evidence in the VIDEOS ! all I did was post the videos saying this ? here is crazy ,I never said its undeniably true, but is definitely suspect when you see all the evidence ,you are the one claiming its impossible and ?
my point was not that something cannot be overcomplicated and ? at the same time
my point was first you said its overcomplicated but you did not even know why I was referring to Joe biden ,meaning you did not watch the videos, so how can you say its overcomplicated if you did not watch the videos ?
simple ,you are a shill payed to say everybody who comes with accusations on the government ( you had the same exact attitude about the 9/11 theory) is crazy and its total ?
so ok look I get it, do you but just know I been telling you I see through you you aint fooling me brah -
feel free to explain them at any time!Ether44mag wrote: »lol what are my claims ?
"if it's so simple, why can't you simply express all the proof contained in these videos?"Ether44mag wrote: »you the one claiming its fake and impossible and total ? without even watching the videos lol all i'm saying is that ? is totally possible when you look at the evidence in the VIDEOS !
weirdly, i don't see you conceding anything about it being questionable or unproven. so are you not claiming it's "undeniably true?"Ether44mag wrote: »I never said its undeniably true, but is definitely suspect when you see all the evidence ,you are the one claiming its impossible and ?
because calling it "over-complicated" isn't contradicted by the videos. it's a description of the conspiracy theory in question. are you really this incapable of some basic logic?Ether44mag wrote: »my point was first you said its overcomplicated but you did not even know why I was referring to Joe biden ,meaning you did not watch the videos, so how can you say its overcomplicated if you did not watch the videos ?
yes, you're right. i'm paid by THE GOVERNMENT to disagree with you, the guy whose knowledge is so deep, on the AHH forums. there's nothing ridiculous about this claim at all!Ether44mag wrote: »simple ,you are a shill payed to say everybody who comes with accusations on the government ( you had the same exact attitude about the 9/11 theory) is crazy and its total ?
granted, i get that you're into embracing over-complicated conspiracy theories to make yourself feel better about life (you tell me why), but i think we both know your argument is now "i can't defend my theory, so i'll make an unprovable accusation about the person who disagrees with me!" pathetic. -
feel free to explain them at any time!Ether44mag wrote: »lol what are my claims ?
"if it's so simple, why can't you simply express all the proof contained in these videos?"Ether44mag wrote: »you the one claiming its fake and impossible and total ? without even watching the videos lol all i'm saying is that ? is totally possible when you look at the evidence in the VIDEOS !
weirdly, i don't see you conceding anything about it being questionable or unproven. so are you not claiming it's "undeniably true?"Ether44mag wrote: »I never said its undeniably true, but is definitely suspect when you see all the evidence ,you are the one claiming its impossible and ?
because calling it "over-complicated" isn't contradicted by the videos. it's a description of the conspiracy theory in question. are you really this incapable of some basic logic?Ether44mag wrote: »my point was first you said its overcomplicated but you did not even know why I was referring to Joe biden ,meaning you did not watch the videos, so how can you say its overcomplicated if you did not watch the videos ?
yes, you're right. i'm paid by THE GOVERNMENT to disagree with you, the guy whose knowledge is so deep, on the AHH forums. there's nothing ridiculous about this claim at all!Ether44mag wrote: »simple ,you are a shill payed to say everybody who comes with accusations on the government ( you had the same exact attitude about the 9/11 theory) is crazy and its total ?
granted, i get that you're into embracing over-complicated conspiracy theories to make yourself feel better about life (you tell me why), but i think we both know your argument is now "i can't defend my theory, so i'll make an unprovable accusation about the person who disagrees with me!" pathetic.
lol bro ....watch the videos man lol or else forget about it ,you can say whatever you want but saying it ? without takin time to watch the evidence is just plain stupid...and then your rebuttal is asking me why dont I write down all the evidence that is in the videos ?? hahaha you funny as hell bro
that would be like sayin a movie is wack but you never watched it and then asking me why dont I write down all the good parts or the movie lol WATCH THE VIDEOS BEFORE SAYING ITS ? !!
its ? simple lol
someone who really thought it was ? ,after all this back and forth ,woulda checked the video and woulda came back with some opinions based on the evidence.the fact that you take time to answer every week without watching the videos is a clear sign of being biased and knowing that NOTHING would make you admit that its at least very fishy -
Some wild ass ? son. Sick ass people running this world and the ? need to stop
-
ALL THE EVIDENCE IN ONE PLACE:
https://dcpizzagate.wordpress.com -
"LOL bro," i don't need to watch the videos to be familiar with the claims about Pizzagate. and i'm going to AGAIN note that your entire argument is "uh... i can't actually support my claims... watch these videos though."Ether44mag wrote: »lol bro ....watch the videos man lol or else forget about it
fun fact: the issue can be covered and discussed without your videos. you won't actually support your claims, though.Ether44mag wrote: »someone who really thought it was ? ,after all this back and forth ,woulda checked the video and woulda came back with some opinions based on the evidence.
also: "if it's so simple, why can't you simply express all the proof contained in these videos?"
oh, and again: "if it's so simple, why can't you simply express all the proof contained in these videos?"
-
"LOL bro," i don't need to watch the videos to be familiar with the claims about Pizzagate. and i'm going to AGAIN note that your entire argument is "uh... i can't actually support my claims... watch these videos though."Ether44mag wrote: »lol bro ....watch the videos man lol or else forget about it
fun fact: the issue can be covered and discussed without your videos. you won't actually support your claims, though.Ether44mag wrote: »someone who really thought it was ? ,after all this back and forth ,woulda checked the video and woulda came back with some opinions based on the evidence.
also: "if it's so simple, why can't you simply express all the proof contained in these videos?"
oh, and again: "if it's so simple, why can't you simply express all the proof contained in these videos?"
why are you acting like its funny that I tell you to watch the videos instead of wanting me to write it all down for you ?
and why are you so focused on me instead of the story ? talkin about my claims ? what claims did I make ? what are you talkin about ? stop all that smoke and mirrors ? man ,if you are familiar with the evidence and think its ridiculous then lets have a cool convo about it and tell me what evidence you think is fabricated or taken out of context and we will each give our opinions
but if you are totally sure 100% that its totally false and crazy then no sense continuing to argue
@janklow -
it's funny that you think it's simple to support your claims, and yet you won't do anything but say "watch a video." at best, you're lying about it being simple.Ether44mag wrote: »why are you acting like its funny that I tell you to watch the videos instead of wanting me to write it all down for you ?
i'm not, i'm focused on you supporting your argument. which you're refusing to do for some reason.Ether44mag wrote: »and why are you so focused on me instead of the story ?
the person on some "smoke and mirrors" ? is the guy who, when asked to support his argument, says "why is this about me?" are you too dense to understand what a question asking you to support your claims is asking?Ether44mag wrote: »talkin about my claims ? what claims did I make ? what are you talkin about ? stop all that smoke and mirrors ? man-
been trying to get to you drop some evidence that's not stated as "watch this video." still waiting.Ether44mag wrote: »-if you are familiar with the evidence and think its ridiculous then lets have a cool convo about it
man, i have been asking for an argument and all i get is watch the videos. so if that's all you want to say, you could have dropped it at any time, and yet you won't. so apply your words to yourself.Ether44mag wrote: »but if you are totally sure 100% that its totally false and crazy then no sense continuing to argue -
it's funny that you think it's simple to support your claims, and yet you won't do anything but say "watch a video." at best, you're lying about it being simple.Ether44mag wrote: »why are you acting like its funny that I tell you to watch the videos instead of wanting me to write it all down for you ?
i'm not, i'm focused on you supporting your argument. which you're refusing to do for some reason.Ether44mag wrote: »and why are you so focused on me instead of the story ?
the person on some "smoke and mirrors" ? is the guy who, when asked to support his argument, says "why is this about me?" are you too dense to understand what a question asking you to support your claims is asking?Ether44mag wrote: »talkin about my claims ? what claims did I make ? what are you talkin about ? stop all that smoke and mirrors ? man-
been trying to get to you drop some evidence that's not stated as "watch this video." still waiting.Ether44mag wrote: »-if you are familiar with the evidence and think its ridiculous then lets have a cool convo about it
man, i have been asking for an argument and all i get is watch the videos. so if that's all you want to say, you could have dropped it at any time, and yet you won't. so apply your words to yourself.Ether44mag wrote: »but if you are totally sure 100% that its totally false and crazy then no sense continuing to argue
lol those are the weakest arguments I ever heard in my life smh you basicaly said nothing except that you dont want to watch the videos ,says alot... @janklow -
exactly, another simple request to make a supportable argument is blown off by you. thanks for proving my point.Ether44mag wrote: »
it's funny that you think it's simple to support your claims, and yet you won't do anything but say "watch a video." at best, you're lying about it being simple.Ether44mag wrote: »why are you acting like its funny that I tell you to watch the videos instead of wanting me to write it all down for you ?
i'm not, i'm focused on you supporting your argument. which you're refusing to do for some reason.Ether44mag wrote: »and why are you so focused on me instead of the story ?
the person on some "smoke and mirrors" ? is the guy who, when asked to support his argument, says "why is this about me?" are you too dense to understand what a question asking you to support your claims is asking?Ether44mag wrote: »talkin about my claims ? what claims did I make ? what are you talkin about ? stop all that smoke and mirrors ? man-
been trying to get to you drop some evidence that's not stated as "watch this video." still waiting.Ether44mag wrote: »-if you are familiar with the evidence and think its ridiculous then lets have a cool convo about it
man, i have been asking for an argument and all i get is watch the videos. so if that's all you want to say, you could have dropped it at any time, and yet you won't. so apply your words to yourself.Ether44mag wrote: »but if you are totally sure 100% that its totally false and crazy then no sense continuing to argue
lol those are the weakest arguments I ever heard in my life smh you basicaly said nothing except that you dont want to watch the videos ,says alot... @janklow
you're making the claim, except you won't actually make it or support it. 50% of your argument is "watch a video that i cannot explain the contents of" and the other 50% is calling people shills. don't really think i owe you any more courtesy at this point. put up or shut the ? up.
-
exactly, another simple request to make a supportable argument is blown off by you. thanks for proving my point.Ether44mag wrote: »
it's funny that you think it's simple to support your claims, and yet you won't do anything but say "watch a video." at best, you're lying about it being simple.Ether44mag wrote: »why are you acting like its funny that I tell you to watch the videos instead of wanting me to write it all down for you ?
i'm not, i'm focused on you supporting your argument. which you're refusing to do for some reason.Ether44mag wrote: »and why are you so focused on me instead of the story ?
the person on some "smoke and mirrors" ? is the guy who, when asked to support his argument, says "why is this about me?" are you too dense to understand what a question asking you to support your claims is asking?Ether44mag wrote: »talkin about my claims ? what claims did I make ? what are you talkin about ? stop all that smoke and mirrors ? man-
been trying to get to you drop some evidence that's not stated as "watch this video." still waiting.Ether44mag wrote: »-if you are familiar with the evidence and think its ridiculous then lets have a cool convo about it
man, i have been asking for an argument and all i get is watch the videos. so if that's all you want to say, you could have dropped it at any time, and yet you won't. so apply your words to yourself.Ether44mag wrote: »but if you are totally sure 100% that its totally false and crazy then no sense continuing to argue
lol those are the weakest arguments I ever heard in my life smh you basicaly said nothing except that you dont want to watch the videos ,says alot... @janklow
you're making the claim, except you won't actually make it or support it. 50% of your argument is "watch a video that i cannot explain the contents of" and the other 50% is calling people shills. don't really think i owe you any more courtesy at this point. put up or shut the ? up.
you make absolutely no sense, give it up bro ...shish all that talking to say absolutely NOTHING ! this aint no debate its a story that people need to take a look at and you are here arguing with me about why you dont want to watch the video ,its totally ? ! you put alot of ? effort into something you dont believe is true but yet know nothing about...how does that work ? lol,
you say its fake but yet you know nothing about it ? hahaha
stop answering ,you will just make yourself look like a fool ,this ? is ridiculous if you are not a shill you are totally ? your logic makes zero sense -
Man that Biden video is creepy af. I wouldnt put it past any of those people in power to be doing that ? . And from the evidence is looks probable but i wouldnt say definite.
-
says the guy who can't even be bothered to defend his claims.Ether44mag wrote: »stop answering ,you will just make yourself look like a fool ,this ? is ridiculous if you are not a shill you are totally ? your logic makes zero sense
if you don't actually want to post, you will be treated accordingly starting now
This discussion has been closed.