OTTB SPECIAL NEWS REPORT: Feds ? Down on Illegally Streamed Sporting Events

Options
m. inferno
m. inferno Members Posts: 1,768 ✭✭✭
edited August 2011 in Off The Turn Buckle
For anyone that views PPV's on illegal stream sites,you may want to view an article at http://www.pcworld.com/article/238732/feds_? _down_on_illegally_streamed_sporting_events.html



A 19-year-old New York man was arrested yesterday by agents of the U.S. Immigration and Customs Engorcement's (ICE) Homeland Security Investigations (HIS) directorate for allegedly streaming live sporting events over the Internet illegally.

Mohamded Ali, of Hollis, N.Y., was arrested at his home and charged with one count of criminal infringement of a copyright. Ali is the operator of two streaming sites, hq-streams.com and hq-streams.net. Both sites were among 10 seized by ICE in February for illegally streaming live sporting telecasts and pay-per-view events over the Net.

According to ICE, Ali made more than $6000 in profits from online merchants who paid subscription fees to view copyrighted material.

In a criminal complaint filed against Ali, the government contends that for almost a year (February 2010 to January 2011), Ali used his Internet domains to infringe on copyrighted material from World Wrestling Entertainment, Ultimate Fighting Championship and boxing events for the purposes of commercial advantage and private financial gain.

Subscribers to the services offered by Ali's domains paid fees from $6 to $25 to access links that allowed them to download copyrighted material to their computers or watch such material as streaming video.

Linking sites, like Ali's, provide links to other websites where pirated sporting and pay-per-view events are hosted. Linking sites are popular because they allow users to quickly browse content and locate illegal streams that would otherwise be more difficult to find.



"Today's arrest sends a clear message to website operators who mistakenly believe it's worth the risk to take copyrighted programming and portray it as their own," ICE Director John Morton said in a statement.

Since June of last year, ICE has been vigorously shutting down Internet domains suspected of infringing on the rights of copyright holders under an initiative it calls "Operation In Our Sites." After a domain is seized, visitors to it see a splash screen informing them of the seizure by the federal government.

The program has been a controversial one because some civil libertarians see it as a violation of First Amendment rights. "This misguided intellectual property enforcement effort is causing serious collateral damage to free speech rights," asserts Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF) Intellectual Property Director Corynne McSherry. "These domain seizures should cease unless and until the government can fix the First Amendment flaws inherent in the program."

Opponents of the program argue that its targets are not receiving due process of law. "Valid claims of copyright infringement can be pursued in a manner that allows the accused parties to defend themselves," maintains EFF Senior Staff Attorney Matt Zimmerman. "The unilateral seizure of domain names without a court ruling—which obstructs access to all of a website's content—is improper and should be strongly opposed by free speech advocates everywhere."

However, at least one federal judge hasn't bought the EFF's reasoning. In a case decided earlier this month involving two domains seized by ICE, Judge Paul Crotty ruled that the First Amendment isn't violated by such seizures.



The Feds are watching you!

Comments

  • Already Home_17
    Already Home_17 Members Posts: 14,572 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited August 2011
    Options
    tough break for that ?
  • Mally_G
    Mally_G Members Posts: 2,927 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited August 2011
    Options
    his mistake was profiting from streaming the events.

    he was made an example of because he was charging folks.

    if he just kept it str8 streaming without a catch, he would have been fine.

    Oh, and believe, everything we do (text messages, phone calls, forums, etc) is being recorded by the feds. I forgot what it's called, but Dr. Umar Johnson talked about it in one of his lectures.
  • dalyricalbandit
    dalyricalbandit Members, Moderators Posts: 67,918 Regulator
    edited August 2011
    Options
  • northwest443
    northwest443 Members Posts: 589
    edited August 2011
    Options
    Too bad..........
  • VIBE
    VIBE Members Posts: 54,384 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited August 2011
    Options
    Mally_G wrote: »
    his mistake was profiting from streaming the events.

    he was made an example of because he was charging folks.

    if he just kept it str8 streaming without a catch, he would have been fine.

    Oh, and believe, everything we do (text messages, phone calls, forums, etc) is being recorded by the feds. I forgot what it's called, but Dr. Umar Johnson talked about it in one of his lectures.

    Yup, so to them reading, ? you...
  • deeroc22
    deeroc22 Members Posts: 4,548 ✭✭✭
    edited August 2011
    Options
    VIBE86 wrote: »
    Yup, so to them reading, ? you...

    **Pulls glock from waste... starts bucking off at the feds**
  • Valentinez A. Kaiser
    Valentinez A. Kaiser Members Posts: 9,028 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited August 2011
    Options
    So where am I gonna watch the mayweather/ortiz fight now???
  • Mally_G
    Mally_G Members Posts: 2,927 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited August 2011
    Options
    it's funny how people can get away with doing dirt as long as they don't profit from it. Once the feds detect someone/anyone profiting from something that they feel they can make money from or should be the only one making from whatever it is, they'll come hounding you.

    And if they catch you, then they'll pile up all sorts of infractions on you, basically destroying your life with fines, penalties, and jail time. And it could be for something as simple as streaming a video, or downloading a song. Something someone as small as the average Joe won't even dent the industry, but yet, they make an example out of them, as if they were a mob boss.

    This dude made only 6-stacks overall on some streaming ? , something WWE, UFC, boxing, etc, won't even notice in their buy rates, and they treat him like Gotti.

    The feds ain't got nothing else to do, but nip at the common folk to show their muscle.

    That's why it's hard to do big dirt on the internet, because everything is monitored, traced, and recorded. A smart kat would proxy everything he does online, to buy himself some time, and avoid issues with the feds.
  • real ness
    real ness Members Posts: 263
    edited August 2011
    Options
    I remember seeing this ? back in Feb. But the site never charged anybody though.

    http://www.atdhe.net/
  • sobek
    sobek Members Posts: 5,611 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited August 2011
    Options
    real ness wrote: »
    I remember seeing this ? back in Feb. But the site never charged anybody though.

    http://www.atdhe.net/

    Yeah I remember that. They were probably were using ads and gettin cash that way. That's probably they got taken down.

    I used to go to those other sites too mention that that article. ? is stupid as hell what the feds are doin. Right now the likelihood of someone being taken down for a streaming site might be higher then being taken down for running a ? house. And I'm sure that guys name being "Mohamded Ali" and being from NY ain't helpin his case right now either.
    What's next? People gettin prosecuted for just vistin these sites? SMH