Yay or Nay: Circumcision.
Options
Comments
-
Show me a consenus of doctors who agree with that i would agree. That is a myth that has been going around forever, it's never been proven factual.
honey i could care less if you agree lol. it is what it is. do ur reseach and you'll see yourself. there's a reason why most people prefer it. if you don't good for you but dont sit here saying females should be circumsized when that statement lacks any and all sense lol -
earth two superman wrote: »neither is cutting your toenails or washing your hair. does that mean I shouldnt do it either?
of course not. -
There is a huuuuuuge misconception that uncircumcised members are dirtier and more susceptible to diseases. Circumcision is an archaic and unnecessary act.
-
honey i could care less if you agree lol. it is what it is. do ur reseach and you'll see yourself. there's a reason why most people prefer it. if you don't good for you but dont sit here saying females should be circumsized when that statement lacks any and all sense lol
Most people, let me guess, you got this fact the same place where you get those other facts. I understand the aesthetic purpose of it in your eyes, but don't use that most people excuse, maybe in your ethnocentric point of view. There are alot of cultures who don't practice circrumsizion, so let's no pass it off as the norm. -
? are offended like a ? in this thread
-
blakfyahking wrote: »? are offended like a ? in this thread
yeah they are. It's a sensitive subject. -
blakfyahking wrote: »? are offended like a ? in this thread
I'm personally not offended because it doesn't affect me, i just don't like false information being passed off as fact, especially by armchair doctors. -
i'm not circumcized and i've never had any complaints
-
You gotta love how women talk about how nasty an uncut ? is when chicks bleed out of their ? , have discharge just because, yeast infection, and odor as normal occurrences. Explain to me the difference between a couch that has all of that going on and is acceptable for a man to eat & ? and a ? that is uncut & properly cleaned??? And before anyone ask me, YES I am cut!!! I'm just making a point of how ridiculous it is for women to talk about infections, appearance & ? like that when it's considered normal/ok for their ? to smell, ooooz discharge, & sometimes look like it's been disfigured by a stick of dynamite. LMBAO!!!
-
blakfyahking wrote: »? are offended like a ? in this thread
Nah. Not at all. I just prefer that old wives tales not be passed down as fact. If you've ever seen The Invention of Lying, it's kind of like that. People believe all kinds of misguided stuff that people put out there due to a lack of basic understanding of what's real. -
well glad u never had a prob with ur uncut ? . but dont be mad cuz other people prefer a circumsized ? lol.
and ummm sorry but what a ? ignorant comparison you're making. they are completely different.
like steevie said circumsisions are done on INFANTS using anasthetic for religious and/or medical purposes. uncut ? are more likely to be ? , and more likely to get cancer and STDs, infections, etc. thats why people do it, not just for aesthetic reasons.
meanwhile while female circumsisions are also known as MUTILATION and are done to girls using no anasthetic. the purpose for this is to eliminate any pleasure a woman can get from sex. females need their ? to protect their ? . men's ? serves no purpose and again has higher risks medically which is why its been commonly removed for centuries. maybe YOU should read up on it.
false, false, and not if you know how to use soap and water -
WTF!!!!!!! LMFAO! I literally LOL'd
How can you not know you're sucking an uncut ? ... them ? must be virgins or retards
There's a considerable amount of excess skin and you can definitely tell/see/feel the difference -
the prime minister wrote: »great! In that case, yeah, chicks dig a long and smooth shaft with a clean head.
Though i have met chicks who are into the pig in the blanket.
lol... ........... ... . -
You gotta love how women talk about how nasty an uncut ? is when chicks bleed out of their ? , have discharge just because, yeast infection, and odor as normal occurrences. Explain to me the difference between a couch that has all of that going on and is acceptable for a man to eat & ? and a ? that is uncut & properly cleaned??? And before anyone ask me, YES I am cut!!! I'm just making a point of how ridiculous it is for women to talk about infections, appearance & ? like that when it's considered normal/ok for their ? to smell, ooooz discharge, & sometimes look like it's been disfigured by a stick of dynamite. LMBAO!!!
Lets see how long they ignore this, these ? have a whole section to try and supress their stench, discharge, and bleeding. -
I'm personally not offended because it doesn't affect me, i just don't like false information being passed off as fact, especially by armchair doctors.
bruh what difference does it make if people believe all the rumors about being uncut
I ain't never heard a ? complaining that a chick passed him up cause he wasn't circumsized
I don't pay attention to what females claim they "prefer" anyways cause most times it's all just a front
my son getting cut tho -
Most people, let me guess, you got this fact the same place where you get those other facts. I understand the aesthetic purpose of it in your eyes, but don't use that most people excuse, maybe in your ethnocentric point of view. There are alot of cultures who don't practice circrumsizion, so let's no pass it off as the norm.
I never said it was the norm because it's definitely not. Way more people are uncircumsized in the world than circumsized. But in most developed countries and in America (which is what I was referring to since thats where we are... I'm in no way ethnocentric) it's quite common and usually preferred.
Why the hell are you so mad? lmao damn i never knew ? got so sensitive about their ? .
listen i aint gonna argue with u lls... all i was saying is do not make urself look like an idiot by comparing this to mutilating someone's ? . more power to u & ur ? .
@ killa yes its unnecessary but the ? itself is also unncessary. if circumsisions were completely pointless and archaic like you are saying then it wouldn't be the most common operation in the country.
Also there wouldn't be grown ass men with uncut ? willing to take risks to get an adult circumsion. I've never heard a circumsized guy say damn I wish I was never circumsized lol. -
"? say get her some shoes...and I replied all you gettin is a big ? thats circumcised."
-
AK, the comparison to female circumcision IS a valid one.
Female circumcision takes place predominately in Asia and Africa, and it's usually for religious, cultural, or other "non-therapeutic reasons". The main issue that people have with it is that it doesn't allow for the women/girls to consent to it (which nobody would, really). And I'm talking about Type I female circumcision btw....which is the most comparable to it's male counterpart.
I'm not saying it's right, but neither is male circumcision. It's just more common place. -
yay..............
-
blakfyahking wrote: »? are offended like a ? in this thread
yep definitely lol i had no idea ? with uncut ? were so defensive about it. most guys i know that are uncut hate it and wish they were cut and most chicks i know prefer circumsized ? . but then again im just an armchair doctor what do i know. -
I never said it was the norm because it's definitely not. Way more people are uncircumsized in the world than circumsized. But in most developed countries and in America (which is what I was referring to since thats where we are... I'm in no way ethnocentric) it's quite common and usually preferred.
Why the hell are you so mad? lmao damn i never knew ? got so sensitive about their ? .
listen i aint gonna argue with u lls... all i was saying is do not make urself look like an idiot by comparing this to mutilating someone's ? . more power to u & ur ? .
@ killa yes its unnecessary but the ? itself is also unncessary. if circumsisions were completely pointless and archaic like you are saying then it wouldn't be the most common operation in the country.
Also there wouldn't be grown ass men with uncut ? willing to take risks to get an adult circumsion. I've never heard a circumsized guy say damn I wish I was never circumsized lol.
And I have never heard of a guy who was uncircumcized who later chose to get himself cut. I know a dude who has scarring from a botched operation and that's more common than you'd want it to be. Not at all COMMON, but not as rare as one would hope. -
I never said it was the norm because it's definitely not. Way more people are uncircumsized in the world than circumsized. But in most developed countries and in America (which is what I was referring to since thats where we are... I'm in no way ethnocentric) it's quite common and usually preferred.
Why the hell are you so mad? lmao damn i never knew ? got so sensitive about their ? .
listen i aint gonna argue with u lls... all i was saying is do not make urself look like an idiot by comparing this to mutilating someone's ? . more power to u & ur ? .
@ killa yes its unnecessary but the ? itself is also unncessary. if circumsisions were completely pointless and archaic like you are saying then it wouldn't be the most common operation in the country.
Also there wouldn't be grown ass men with uncut ? willing to take risks to get an adult circumsion. I've never heard a circumsized guy say damn I wish I was never circumsized lol.
No you weren't, don't evade the fact you were spreading false info about stds and hygene. I love how you forgot that part! -
Tha Killer wrote: »AK, the comparison to female circumcision IS a valid one.
Female circumcision takes place predominately in Asia and Africa, and it's usually for religious, cultural, or other "non-therapeutic reasons". The main issue that people have with it is that it doesn't allow for the women/girls to consent to it (which nobody would, really). And I'm talking about Type I female circumcision btw....which is the most comparable to it's male counterpart.
I'm not saying it's right, but neither is male circumcision. It's just more common place. -
Most people, let me guess, you got this fact the same place where you get those other facts. I understand the aesthetic purpose of it in your eyes, but don't use that most people excuse, maybe in your ethnocentric point of view. There are alot of cultures who don't practice circrumsizion, so let's no pass it off as the norm.
-
Tha Killer wrote: »And I have never heard of a guy who was uncircumcized who later chose to get himself cut. I know a dude who has scarring from a botched operation and that's more common than you'd want it to be. Not at all COMMON, but not as rare as one would hope.No you weren't, don't evade the fact you were spreading false info about stds and hygene. I love how you forgot that part!