Reasonable Doubt is not a classic.
Options
Comments
-
DreadlockRasta wrote: »Classic is relative to the listener imo
THIS ^^^ -
Even Nas had RD in his Complex top 25 fav joints of all time. RD is nice, no skips for me.
-
Cant believe the first post got 18 cosigns
-
Even Nas had RD in his Complex top 25 fav joints of all time. RD is nice, no skips for me.
-
Cant believe the first post got 18 cosigns
Whats not to believe? the ? right about everything he said especially the Jay z crusade ? . -
reason full of idiots
-
smh @ this shock thread ?
-
Problem is ? don't know what a classic is.
That's why you have ? on the internet thinking cuz THEY don't like an album it ain't classic or vice versa.
An album being classic has nothing to do with you liking or disliking it. The whole album can be banging from top to bottom it still doesn't mean it's classic.
Now, i do disagree about Reasonable Doubt not being a classic. I get why you'd say that, but it still is due to it's impact, even though it came years later. -
it's a revisionist classic, but it's still a classic.
-
? got no love death row had it locked it's borin bru hard knock did it fa Jay
-
? On Me
These ? 's tried to ? on me
I was left for dead
They tried to wipe me outta' they history
Crown -
nobody outside of new york has ever said that album was a classic
-
^I'm in NH. It's a classic.
-
nobody outside of new york has ever said that album was a classic
Same thing with Illmatic -
I know more ? that still listen to RD than Illmatic.
-
you are definitely abusing drugs for posting this thread. do you even have functioning ears? smh just swallow all the pills bruh. you dnt deserve this world anymore.
-
Album is lack luster, stop trying to create some make believe impact to push it off as a classic
-
nobody outside of new york has ever said that album was a classic
I'm from Florida, its classic. -
Yo, like I previously stated, not too long after its those that knew about this ? was calling it classic.....? went gold months after it was released....Like honestly, nobody outside of NY think that this album is classic? Sounds good, lol
-
I'm not gonna debate with people who doesn't think its a classic, but ANYTHING that was released in 1996 and it is still debated and listened to in 2013 is classic worthy. As much as some cats don't want to hear it, the album has stood the test of time......17 years to be exact.
-
Co-sign opening post!
-
lol, what impact? Yall warriors be trippinSnuffDaddy wrote: »Problem is ? don't know what a classic is.
That's why you have ? on the internet thinking cuz THEY don't like an album it ain't classic or vice versa.
An album being classic has nothing to do with you liking or disliking it. The whole album can be banging from top to bottom it still doesn't mean it's classic.
Now, i do disagree about Reasonable Doubt not being a classic. I get why you'd say that, but it still is due to it's impact, even though it came years later.
-
-
-
Classic in my opinion. But on a relate note, I'll say the same about Illmatic. NOT a classic to me. It's probably the only album I've ever heard that is lyrically flawless. But beyond that, doesn't hold up over time to me.
